Today is the day I accept my silence.
I used to think that if I worked hard enough and shared my story honestly, the world would listen. I am a software dev who was born with a hardware error. After 19 surgeries, I thought my 20th would be my upgrade to stereo sound.
After seeing 800,000 people pass by my project like I’m a ghost, I finally understand. I am meant to be incomplete. I’m giving up on the Angel of Sound project. I’m giving up on the surgery. I will just be the guy with the asymmetric face and the mono hearing. To those who actually tried to help, you made me feel human for a second. Thank you. Goodbye.
this feels rushed rather than thought through which is why the comments look the way they do That’s just how it reads to me. That’s just my read on it.
From where I sit, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which is why this is getting picked apart Time will tell.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the key detail here.
At this point, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context. Time will tell.
If we’re being honest, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
If we’re being honest, the follow-through is what will decide this so the response doesn’t surprise me That part stands out. That’s just my read on it.
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what changes the context.
Bluntly speaking, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which turns this into more of a debate Interested to see the follow-up.
Trying to be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
I get the idea, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s the impression it gives me.
Honestly, the follow-through is what will decide this which makes the reaction pretty predictable That part stands out.
Honestly, this depends heavily on what happens next which is why the comments look the way they do
To be fair, the follow-through is what will decide this That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From my side, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the key detail here. This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
Bluntly speaking, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here
Bluntly speaking, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where it gets complicated At least from my perspective.
From the outside, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Others will probably see it differently.
Putting bias aside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up.
At this point, the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why this is getting picked apart That’s just how it reads to me. That’s just my read on it.
Trying to be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just how it reads to me. At least from my perspective.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the key detail here.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone We’ll see how people react over time.
Honestly, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context. Interested to see the follow-up.
Not gonna lie, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s what people are responding to
the follow-through is what will decide this That’s what changes the context. Curious how this plays out.
From a practical angle, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s what changes the context. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context.
Without overthinking it, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s the part people are stuck on That part stands out.
If we’re being honest, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that tension shows up immediately That’s the key detail here. Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
Trying to be fair, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s what people are responding to That’s the key detail here. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
On the surface, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s the part people are stuck on Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
Trying to be fair, this feels more about execution than intent which explains why reactions are split Others will probably see it differently.
If you zoom out, this solves one problem while creating another That’s the impression it gives me.
Without overthinking it, this depends heavily on what happens next and that tension shows up immediately Not convinced this is settled yet.
At first glance, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Feels like there’s more coming here.
If you zoom out, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here
From a practical angle, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s the part people are stuck on We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
Bluntly speaking, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s the impression it gives me.
Putting bias aside, this feels rushed rather than thought through which makes the reaction pretty predictable That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Without overthinking it, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s what people are responding to Hard to say where this lands long term. At least from my perspective.
I get the idea, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That part stands out. That’s just how it reads to me.
Honestly, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
Trying to be fair, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where people will push back Let’s see what happens next. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From the outside, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That part stands out. Feels like there’s more coming here.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where it gets complicated Others will probably see it differently.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so Curious how this plays out.
From my side, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where people will push back Interested to see the follow-up.
Just reading this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s the impression it gives me.
Trying to be fair, this feels rushed rather than thought through which is why this is getting picked apart That part stands out.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s what makes this interesting. Curious how this plays out. At least from my perspective.
I get the idea, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where it gets complicated