To quote the The Clash: "Should I stay or should I go now?"
Need some advice. I work for a very large company in a specialized role and have been there for 2 years. About 3 months ago, we got a new CIO, and there was an upper management shakeup. The new regime decided they wanted to get rid of on-prem servers and either move to Cloud or SAAS Hosting. If they go to the cloud, I am safe, but if what I oversee goes to SAAS, then I am done immediately. They have not been communicating what they are learning, and told me back in late October, I would know by Thanksgiving, which became X-Mas, then became the 1st of the year. Now I am being told that in early Spring, they will decide. I find it incredibly stressful, and it really put a damper on my Holidays and trying to enjoy them with young kids at home. So I am looking for some non-biased feedback. Should I hang tight, or should I start aggressively looking?
Just to add a quick edit - The stress has really gotten to me. I have voiced my concerns and even had a few outbursts on conference calls. One of the most frustrating things is I have to constantly ask (once a week) one a status update, and they act like I am being unreasonable for wanting to know.
Looking at this, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the key detail here. That’s just my read on it.
If you zoom out, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Looking at this, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why opinions are all over the place
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified This could age very differently in a week.
Looking at this, the follow-through is what will decide this That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why this is getting picked apart Others will probably see it differently.
Real talk, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why the comments look the way they do Curious how this plays out.
From the outside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just how it reads to me.
the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where it gets complicated Curious how this plays out.
If we’re being honest, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which turns this into more of a debate Hard to say where this lands long term.
From a neutral view, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what makes this interesting. Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: Hate when it happens
Putting bias aside, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why opinions are all over the place Time will tell. Others will probably see it differently.
At first glance, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s the part people are stuck on
Honestly, the timing matters more than people admit That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up.
From a neutral view, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the key detail here.
Reaction: Me irl
At this point, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Just reading this, this reads stronger on paper than in practice That’s what makes this interesting.
I get the idea, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why opinions are all over the place Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If you zoom out, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where the disagreement starts We’ll see how people react over time.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where people will push back Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where people will push back That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week. Others will probably see it differently.
On the surface, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s the key detail here.
Reaction: Me_irl
To be fair, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here We’ll see how people react over time.
From where I sit, the follow-through is what will decide this This probably isn’t the last word on it. Others will probably see it differently.
Without overthinking it, this comes across more reactive than planned which explains why reactions are split Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At first glance, this depends heavily on what happens next
Stepping back, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s what people are responding to Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which turns this into more of a debate Time will tell.
On the surface, the timing matters more than people admit That’s just my read on it.
From the outside, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where the disagreement starts Time will tell. That’s the impression it gives me.
the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s just my read on it.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s what makes this interesting.
To be fair, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
From the outside, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where people will push back
Reaction: Me_irl
Looking at this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled
I get the idea, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s what changes the context.
Reaction: lock in chat
From a practical angle, the follow-through is what will decide this and that tension shows up immediately Others will probably see it differently.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that friction is hard to ignore This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Putting bias aside, the follow-through is what will decide this which makes the reaction pretty predictable
the follow-through is what will decide this and that tension shows up immediately Not convinced this is settled yet.
From where I sit, the timing matters more than people admit which is why this is getting picked apart Feels like there’s more coming here.
Putting bias aside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s just my read on it.
On the surface, the follow-through is what will decide this Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this comes across more reactive than planned which makes the reaction pretty predictable We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where it gets complicated
the direction makes sense but the details are messy which makes the reaction pretty predictable Not convinced this is settled yet.
Looking at this, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s what people are responding to That’s what makes this interesting. Curious how this plays out.
Stepping back, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which turns this into more of a debate Interested to see the follow-up.
Looking at this, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where people will push back That’s what changes the context. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s just my read on it.
From where I sit, this feels more about execution than intent Not convinced this is settled yet. Others will probably see it differently.
From my side, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven
If we’re being honest, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which is why the comments look the way they do That’s just how it reads to me. At least from my perspective.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why the comments look the way they do That part stands out. Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Trying to be fair, this feels more about execution than intent which is why this is getting picked apart Others will probably see it differently.
Stepping back, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where people will push back That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week. Others will probably see it differently.
Without overthinking it, this feels like a half-step, not a full move Let’s see what happens next.
Not gonna lie, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where people will push back Curious how this plays out.
I get the idea, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s the part people are stuck on Hard to say where this lands long term.
Reaction: Me_irl
Looking at this, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where it gets complicated Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s just my read on it.
If you zoom out, the wording alone shifts how people read this At least from my perspective.
From a practical angle, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next.
From my side, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where people will push back That’s the key detail here. We’ll see how people react over time. That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: Some times the dankmemes are found and not created
From a practical angle, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the key detail here. Others will probably see it differently.
this feels rushed rather than thought through which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the key detail here. At least from my perspective.
Trying to be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s just how it reads to me.
To be fair, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s the part people are stuck on Others will probably see it differently.
To be fair, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified We’ll see how people react over time.
Reaction: Its so lame which is why I dont watch him no more because to lose by something out of your control is so lame. Imagine if shows like Ninja Warrior were the only way to win was by the audienc
On the surface, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move
Reaction: problem solved
From where I sit, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome
the timing matters more than people admit
From a neutral view, this reads stronger on paper than in practice That’s the key detail here.
Reaction: Every year it becomes worse
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the key detail here.
At this point, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why the comments look the way they do That’s the impression it gives me.
Honestly, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s what people are responding to This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Trying to be fair, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where the disagreement starts
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s the part people are stuck on Hard to say where this lands long term.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context. Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
the wording alone shifts how people read this That part stands out.
I get the idea, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s what changes the context.
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where it gets complicated Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where it gets complicated That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Without overthinking it, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why this is getting picked apart That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Reaction: Me_irl
Without overthinking it, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven so the response doesn’t surprise me Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At this point, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which turns this into more of a debate That’s just my read on it.
this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where it gets complicated This could age very differently in a week.
Reaction: me_irl
Not gonna lie, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s why opinions are all over the place
Honestly, the signal is clear, the strategy less so
Reaction: Every year it becomes worse
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where it gets complicated
From a practical angle, this feels rushed rather than thought through Others will probably see it differently.
this feels rushed rather than thought through That part stands out. That’s the impression it gives me.
Bluntly speaking, the follow-through is what will decide this so the response doesn’t surprise me Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
From my side, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that tension shows up immediately Interested to see the follow-up. That’s the impression it gives me.
To be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That part stands out. That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: me_irl
At first glance, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s the part people are stuck on This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Honestly, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here Let’s see what happens next.
From my side, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
this comes across more reactive than planned Hard to say where this lands long term.
Reaction: We Laugh At the 828-Meter Building!
From a neutral view, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a neutral view, this feels more about execution than intent which is why this is getting picked apart
From a practical angle, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s just how it reads to me. That’s just my read on it.
this feels rushed rather than thought through which is why this is getting picked apart Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From my side, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the key detail here. Let’s see what happens next.
Reaction: lock in chat
If we’re being honest, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s the key detail here. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
If we’re being honest, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s why opinions are all over the place Not convinced this is settled yet. Others will probably see it differently.
Just reading this, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s the part people are stuck on Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
From my side, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s just my read on it.
To be fair, this feels rushed rather than thought through which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s just how it reads to me. At least from my perspective.
Not gonna lie, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That part stands out.
Bluntly speaking, this feels more about execution than intent We’ll see how people react over time.
the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context. Feels like there’s more coming here.
Not gonna lie, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that tension shows up immediately That’s what changes the context.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s the key detail here. This probably isn’t the last word on it. Others will probably see it differently.
Not gonna lie, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which turns this into more of a debate We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.
Putting bias aside, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which explains why reactions are split That’s the key detail here.
If we’re being honest, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where the disagreement starts Curious how this plays out. At least from my perspective.
To be fair, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where people will push back That’s just how it reads to me. Others will probably see it differently.
Honestly, this feels rushed rather than thought through so the response doesn’t surprise me Time will tell.
Looking at this, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that friction is hard to ignore Time will tell.
At this point, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
I get the idea, the wording alone shifts how people read this Others will probably see it differently.
From a neutral view, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that tension shows up immediately That part stands out. Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: French is so hard
Honestly, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which is why the comments look the way they do Hard to say where this lands long term.
Looking at this, the follow-through is what will decide this That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
If we’re being honest, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which is why the comments look the way they do That’s just how it reads to me. At least from my perspective.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: me_irl
this feels rushed rather than thought through which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like there’s more coming here.
I get the idea, this solves one problem while creating another Curious how this plays out.
Honestly, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that friction is hard to ignore This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
I get the idea, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why this is getting picked apart Not convinced this is settled yet.
Reaction: Me_irl
Trying to be fair, the timing matters more than people admit That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
At first glance, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s what people are responding to That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just my read on it.
Stepping back, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s what people are responding to That’s what makes this interesting.
Without overthinking it, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: Every year it becomes worse
From a neutral view, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where the disagreement starts That part stands out. Others will probably see it differently.
From where I sit, this feels more about execution than intent At least from my perspective.
From my side, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that tension shows up immediately Interested to see the follow-up. That’s the impression it gives me.
At first glance, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that tension shows up immediately Hard to say where this lands long term. At least from my perspective.
At this point, this feels like a half-step, not a full move
Stepping back, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what makes this interesting. We’ll see how people react over time.
Stepping back, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Not convinced this is settled yet.
From the outside, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where the disagreement starts Time will tell. That’s the impression it gives me.
Without overthinking it, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why the comments look the way they do Not convinced this is settled yet. At least from my perspective.
To be fair, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s what people are responding to
From where I sit, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that friction is hard to ignore That’s just how it reads to me.
On the surface, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why opinions are all over the place Hard to say where this lands long term.
To be fair, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s what makes this interesting. At least from my perspective.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice
Reaction: The great meme reset
From the outside, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where people will push back That part stands out. We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.
Stepping back, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s the part people are stuck on
From the outside, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s what people are responding to This could age very differently in a week. That’s the impression it gives me.
Just reading this, this feels more about execution than intent which explains why reactions are split
Real talk, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage At least from my perspective.
If we’re being honest, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which makes the reaction pretty predictable Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
Trying to be fair, this feels rushed rather than thought through
Reaction: me_irl
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where it gets complicated Time will tell.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s what people are responding to We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the follow-through is what will decide this which is why the comments look the way they do Feels like there’s more coming here.
Just reading this, this solves one problem while creating another That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: A day in the life of an ambitious procrastinator
Honestly, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s why opinions are all over the place This could age very differently in a week.
Reaction: the collection of colorful pens
the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why opinions are all over the place
the follow-through is what will decide this Others will probably see it differently.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled That part stands out. Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
From my side, the way this is presented changes how it lands which explains why reactions are split That part stands out. Curious how this plays out.
At first glance, the timing matters more than people admit That’s what makes this interesting.
this comes across more reactive than planned which makes the reaction pretty predictable Not convinced this is settled yet. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s the part people are stuck on
Stepping back, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s just how it reads to me.
From my side, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s the key detail here. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
If you zoom out, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven so the response doesn’t surprise me Feels like an opening move, not an ending. At least from my perspective.
At first glance, the timing matters more than people admit That’s what changes the context. Let’s see what happens next.
Reaction: Jiggle physics
this comes across more reactive than planned which is why the comments look the way they do That’s the impression it gives me.
Without overthinking it, this feels more about execution than intent and that tension shows up immediately This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Reaction: The adjective for metal is metallic, but not so for iron
From where I sit, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s the part people are stuck on This probably isn’t the last word on it. At least from my perspective.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s what people are responding to
Stepping back, this feels rushed rather than thought through which turns this into more of a debate That’s just my read on it.
From the outside, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that tension shows up immediately That part stands out.
From where I sit, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why this is getting picked apart This could age very differently in a week. That’s the impression it gives me.
Putting bias aside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified so the response doesn’t surprise me Curious how this plays out.
Reaction: me_irl
If we’re being honest, this solves one problem while creating another That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week.
From where I sit, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which explains why reactions are split That’s the key detail here.
At this point, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which is why this is getting picked apart This could age very differently in a week. Others will probably see it differently.
On the surface, the timing matters more than people admit and that tension shows up immediately
Trying to be fair, the timing matters more than people admit and that tension shows up immediately That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time.
From the outside, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s the part people are stuck on
this solves one problem while creating another and that’s the part people are stuck on That part stands out. Time will tell. That’s the impression it gives me.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s what people are responding to Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s what people are responding to