Time issues? Or just me?
Our domain controller is set to sync with time.nist.gov but all of our domain machines are around 2 and a half minutes slow. Our external time tracking service shows a slightly later time, our personal phones show the same slightly later time, it's only our domain machines that are off as far as I can tell. But when I manually resync the domain controllers, they show correct for a few minutes and before I can remotely get all the domain machines to resync, the DCs flip back to 2 minutes slow. It's maddening, and I can't tell if NIST is having a problem or if I have something local going on that I can't yet identify. Anyone else seeing similar behaviors in their environments lately? (Seems to have started within the past couple of days.)
[Edit] Now after forcing a refresh, they're all 2 minutes too fast compared to other sources?
[Edit2] It's now 5 minutes fast? what? Time sync with the VM host is off, no NTP service running on the host for the VM to sync to, the DC is set to sync with time.nist.gov.
[Edit3] After trying some of the suggestions in the linked documents and doing a little trial and error, I have the VM Host set to pull NTP from our firewall, have the VMs set to sync w
Honestly, the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why the comments look the way they do That’s the key detail here.
From a neutral view, this comes across more reactive than planned so the response doesn’t surprise me
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here At least from my perspective.
Reaction: Me irl
At this point, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s what people are responding to Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
From the outside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that friction is hard to ignore We’ll see how people react over time.
Reaction: Me_irl
On the surface, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where the disagreement starts Curious how this plays out.
If we’re being honest, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone We’ll see how people react over time.
To be fair, this feels more about execution than intent which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it. Others will probably see it differently.
Not gonna lie, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s the key detail here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: A day in the life of an ambitious procrastinator
From where I sit, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where it gets complicated Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: Too real..
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where it gets complicated Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
On the surface, the follow-through is what will decide this That’s what changes the context.
Just reading this, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s what people are responding to Let’s see what happens next. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Bluntly speaking, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s what people are responding to Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: They both have a serious jaw condition so it should be a fair fight
Looking at this, this comes across more reactive than planned which is why this is getting picked apart This could age very differently in a week. Others will probably see it differently.
From where I sit, this feels like a half-step, not a full move Interested to see the follow-up.
On the surface, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which turns this into more of a debate Not convinced this is settled yet. At least from my perspective.
I get the idea, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where the disagreement starts
Putting bias aside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which explains why reactions are split This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where the disagreement starts Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: Take it off us, It burns us!!!
If we’re being honest, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what makes this interesting.
Bluntly speaking, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so
the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why the comments look the way they do This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
Trying to be fair, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Without overthinking it, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That part stands out.
From the outside, this feels more about execution than intent Hard to say where this lands long term.
Reaction: Me irl
Honestly, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a practical angle, the follow-through is what will decide this which turns this into more of a debate That part stands out. Feels like there’s more coming here.
From a practical angle, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context.
From my side, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s the part people are stuck on Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s the impression it gives me.
Not gonna lie, the signal is clear, the strategy less so This could age very differently in a week.
Putting bias aside, this solves one problem while creating another
Reaction: Me_irl
Real talk, this solves one problem while creating another That’s what changes the context. At least from my perspective.
Just reading this, the signal is clear, the strategy less so This could age very differently in a week. That’s the impression it gives me.
From where I sit, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Others will probably see it differently.
Looking at this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s just my read on it.
this feels more about execution than intent That part stands out. Feels like there’s more coming here.
Reaction: POV: You Are Brooklyn Jail Warden, What Will You Do?
this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s what people are responding to Let’s see what happens next.
Not gonna lie, the timing matters more than people admit That’s just my read on it.
this comes across more reactive than planned Interested to see the follow-up.
From a neutral view, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s the key detail here.
If you zoom out, this comes across more reactive than planned Feels like an opening move, not an ending.