still chasing AD glitches
For some reason, the AD points to the secondary domain controller and that seems to cause other connection glitches logging into a SQL server and getting RDP to work on a workstation. Another workstation gets a trust relationship fail event logging in.
Most of the rest of the small network works fine and the whole thing worked for over half a year or more.
To make life worse, the problems are intermittent
Sometimes, but not always, the problem clears up with a reboot of the domain controllers, both of which are Hyper-V hosted on the main host and the backup host respectively.
Both of those hosts do not have any AD roles. Should they?
From where I sit, this solves one problem while creating another That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me.
the wording alone shifts how people read this which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context.
Putting bias aside, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which is why the comments look the way they do Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s just my read on it.
At first glance, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the key detail here. Interested to see the follow-up. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
I get the idea, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Reaction: "I Can't Eat This!" ~Pig
Not gonna lie, this feels rushed rather than thought through which is why the comments look the way they do That’s the impression it gives me.
the follow-through is what will decide this That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like there’s more coming here.
From a neutral view, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which turns this into more of a debate Let’s see what happens next.
Bluntly speaking, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Reaction: Take it off us, It burns us!!!
Not gonna lie, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which explains why reactions are split
Trying to be fair, this feels rushed rather than thought through which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that tension shows up immediately
the wording alone shifts how people read this Hard to say where this lands long term.
Honestly, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that tension shows up immediately That’s what changes the context. Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s the impression it gives me.
Bluntly speaking, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what makes this interesting. This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
Putting bias aside, the way this is presented changes how it lands which turns this into more of a debate That part stands out.
Putting bias aside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s the part people are stuck on We’ll see how people react over time.
From where I sit, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s what people are responding to That’s the key detail here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At this point, this comes across more reactive than planned At least from my perspective.
Reaction: me_irl
From my side, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why this is getting picked apart
Reaction: Ujumf*
Real talk, this solves one problem while creating another which is why the comments look the way they do Not convinced this is settled yet. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a neutral view, the follow-through is what will decide this That’s just my read on it.
Without overthinking it, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what makes this interesting.
From where I sit, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s just how it reads to me.
Looking at this, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which makes the reaction pretty predictable Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Trying to be fair, this solves one problem while creating another That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up.
At this point, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what makes this interesting. Curious how this plays out.
I get the idea, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s what people are responding to
If we’re being honest, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s why opinions are all over the place Let’s see what happens next. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: Just...why??
From the outside, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that tension shows up immediately That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.
From where I sit, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which explains why reactions are split Feels like there’s more coming here.
From a practical angle, this depends heavily on what happens next Curious how this plays out.
I get the idea, this feels rushed rather than thought through so the response doesn’t surprise me
the wording alone shifts how people read this Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: Mr. Obama, forgive me
From where I sit, this depends heavily on what happens next which turns this into more of a debate Curious how this plays out.
From the outside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s what people are responding to
Reaction: me_irl
the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context.
If you zoom out, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where people will push back That’s just how it reads to me.
Putting bias aside, the wording alone shifts how people read this We’ll see how people react over time.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s what makes this interesting. At least from my perspective.
From where I sit, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the key detail here.
this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s what makes this interesting.
Reaction: Take it off us, It burns us!!!
Honestly, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the key detail here. Time will tell.
the follow-through is what will decide this so the response doesn’t surprise me Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
To be fair, this reads stronger on paper than in practice so the response doesn’t surprise me
Putting bias aside, this depends heavily on what happens next which explains why reactions are split That’s what makes this interesting.
Reaction: He belongs to her now.
Bluntly speaking, this feels rushed rather than thought through which is why this is getting picked apart At least from my perspective.
Honestly, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s what changes the context.