Song detection including release date
I have an old collection of music around 20-30yo on my hard drive and some of it is unnamed or other missing info. I've slowly started sorting through but by far the most time consuming thing is either trying to find the artist and title or the release date manually. (not all of them are unnamed/undated, but a good chunk)
Is there any AI or something like that, that can scan my file explorer and find/rename/date etc the tracks? I'd also be happy to scan them 1 by 1 if it meant I can find the correct info for them.
ClubHub
Responses
Sign in to respond.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so
If we’re being honest, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven At least from my perspective.
From where I sit, the main issue seems to be how this is handled
Trying to be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context.
Not gonna lie, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where people will push back That’s just how it reads to me.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where it gets complicated This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
Putting bias aside, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s what makes this interesting. Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Real talk, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone This probably isn’t the last word on it.
At first glance, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why this is getting picked apart Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Trying to be fair, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that friction is hard to ignore That’s just how it reads to me. That’s just my read on it.
Trying to be fair, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why the comments look the way they do
From where I sit, this feels rushed rather than thought through which explains why reactions are split This could age very differently in a week. That’s the impression it gives me.
the wording alone shifts how people read this which explains why reactions are split
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven
To be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that tension shows up immediately Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s what people are responding to We’ll see how people react over time. That’s just my read on it.
Just reading this, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what changes the context. Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s the impression it gives me.
If we’re being honest, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this depends heavily on what happens next which turns this into more of a debate Others will probably see it differently.
At this point, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where people will push back Let’s see what happens next.
Putting bias aside, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that tension shows up immediately Time will tell.
To be fair, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s the key detail here. We’ll see how people react over time.
At this point, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which explains why reactions are split Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s the impression it gives me.
Stepping back, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that tension shows up immediately Time will tell.
At first glance, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which makes the reaction pretty predictable This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s the impression it gives me.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s what people are responding to Let’s see what happens next.
To be fair, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term. At least from my perspective.
To be fair, this comes across more reactive than planned Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
From the outside, this reads stronger on paper than in practice This could age very differently in a week. Others will probably see it differently.
Not gonna lie, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so Let’s see what happens next. At least from my perspective.
Putting bias aside, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s the part people are stuck on That part stands out. Time will tell.
this feels more about execution than intent
If you zoom out, the follow-through is what will decide this which explains why reactions are split Let’s see what happens next.
From where I sit, this feels like a half-step, not a full move This probably isn’t the last word on it.
If we’re being honest, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week.
the way this is presented changes how it lands which turns this into more of a debate That’s just how it reads to me. That’s the impression it gives me.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy That part stands out.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where the disagreement starts
To be fair, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s the key detail here. This probably isn’t the last word on it. At least from my perspective.
From my side, this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s the impression it gives me.
Just reading this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up.
To be fair, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where people will push back That’s the key detail here.
To be fair, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where people will push back Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
To be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where people will push back Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From my side, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where people will push back
From a practical angle, the wording alone shifts how people read this which explains why reactions are split At least from my perspective.
this comes across more reactive than planned which is why this is getting picked apart That’s just how it reads to me.
this comes across more reactive than planned That’s just how it reads to me.
Bluntly speaking, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where people will push back At least from my perspective.
Not gonna lie, the timing matters more than people admit Time will tell.
If you zoom out, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s what makes this interesting.
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where people will push back That’s just my read on it.
From a neutral view, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s just how it reads to me.
the timing matters more than people admit Others will probably see it differently.
Real talk, this comes across more reactive than planned Interested to see the follow-up.
From a practical angle, this feels more about execution than intent so the response doesn’t surprise me Time will tell.
At first glance, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s the part people are stuck on Feels like there’s more coming here.
From a neutral view, this comes across more reactive than planned which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the key detail here. At least from my perspective.
Without overthinking it, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where the disagreement starts This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.