Should I get both ears pierced with real diamonds for a man with a classic style?
I'm a 48-year-old architect with a classic style: I wear a shirt, blazer, pleated trousers, and tassel loafers every day. For my birthday, my wife wants to give me real round diamonds, 4 millimeters in diameter, set in yellow gold (like the ones women wear). She thinks it's really sophisticated and sexy for a man, and she'd like everyone to see me with real diamonds in my ears, even at the office. My wife has also talked to our two daughters (11 and 13), who are actively supporting this idea. I really want to, but I'm a little hesitant. I talked to a friend who said, "Why get your ears pierced with real diamonds, like women do?" "This has rekindled my fears: how will a 48-year-old man with a classic and discreet style like mine be perceived with his ears soon to be pierced with real diamonds, sparkling, almost feminine? Should I do it? Thank you for your advice."
ClubHub
Responses
Sign in to respond.
Bluntly speaking, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That part stands out. This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Just reading this, this feels rushed rather than thought through which turns this into more of a debate That part stands out.
Reaction: me_irl
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet.
this depends heavily on what happens next which turns this into more of a debate Feels like there’s more coming here.
Putting bias aside, the wording alone shifts how people read this which explains why reactions are split That’s the key detail here. Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone This probably isn’t the last word on it.
From a practical angle, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Let’s see what happens next.
Trying to be fair, the timing matters more than people admit and that tension shows up immediately That’s what makes this interesting.
Without overthinking it, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where people will push back This probably isn’t the last word on it.
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what makes this interesting. Curious how this plays out. That’s just my read on it.
Bluntly speaking, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what changes the context. Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
Looking at this, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s the part people are stuck on At least from my perspective.
Without overthinking it, this feels more about execution than intent
Reaction: I'm recreating 1939
From a neutral view, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where it gets complicated Hard to say where this lands long term.
Real talk, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why this is getting picked apart Time will tell.
If you zoom out, this feels more about execution than intent which turns this into more of a debate This could age very differently in a week.
From the outside, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where people will push back
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that tension shows up immediately That’s what makes this interesting.
the timing matters more than people admit which is why the comments look the way they do That’s just my read on it.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why the comments look the way they do
If you zoom out, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s the key detail here.
Reaction: See y'all then
Just reading this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled so the response doesn’t surprise me Interested to see the follow-up.
On the surface, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s the part people are stuck on That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next.
Without overthinking it, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s the key detail here. That’s the impression it gives me.
Putting bias aside, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: That's a real one
Just reading this, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the key detail here. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
From where I sit, the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why this is getting picked apart Let’s see what happens next. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: Weird question, but was the person who come up with the term, "love handles" a chubby chaser?
Trying to be fair, the follow-through is what will decide this This probably isn’t the last word on it. At least from my perspective.
At first glance, this solves one problem while creating another Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a practical angle, this comes across more reactive than planned which is why the comments look the way they do Let’s see what happens next.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that friction is hard to ignore Hard to say where this lands long term.
the way this is presented changes how it lands
Reaction: The great meme reset
Stepping back, this feels rushed rather than thought through
From where I sit, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage Curious how this plays out.
Stepping back, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which turns this into more of a debate That’s just how it reads to me.
Putting bias aside, this comes across more reactive than planned which is why this is getting picked apart Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.
At this point, the follow-through is what will decide this and that tension shows up immediately That’s just my read on it.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s what makes this interesting. This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
From a neutral view, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s what people are responding to Others will probably see it differently.