Sentinel Alert: C2 like activity from Bluesky???
Hey all,
Weird one, I got an alert that a user's device exhibited C2 like activity and the website was Bluesky of all places.
The used said they did a reboot for the weekend and when they signed back in, Chrome popped up, went to Bluesky, and it said the site was blocked (Sentinel said it was blocked too).
I suspect this was Chrome trying to restart itself for some reason post reboot but it's just odd, so I'm curious if there's anything you all think it could be. Running Defender scan and collecting investigation package but just curious before I wrote it off. Thanks!
From where I sit, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Hard to say where this lands long term.
Reaction: me_irl
I get the idea, the main issue seems to be how this is handled At least from my perspective.
Reaction: Im not a cheater just an embarrassed idiot. Also Im scared a friend will send something stupid or if someone hacks my phone to put something bad without me knowing.
Trying to be fair, the way this is presented changes how it lands which turns this into more of a debate
Reaction: Some times the dankmemes are found and not created
Bluntly speaking, the timing matters more than people admit which turns this into more of a debate At least from my perspective.
Reaction: Me_irl
From the outside, the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why the comments look the way they do Curious how this plays out.
this comes across more reactive than planned That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just how it reads to me. That’s just my read on it.
At first glance, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
this depends heavily on what happens next
To be fair, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where it gets complicated Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s why opinions are all over the place Interested to see the follow-up. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move so the response doesn’t surprise me We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.
Looking at this, the way this is presented changes how it lands That part stands out.
Reaction: lock in chat
Stepping back, this feels more about execution than intent That’s what makes this interesting.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy Time will tell.
Not gonna lie, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: Too real..
Stepping back, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what makes this interesting. Time will tell.
this feels rushed rather than thought through This could age very differently in a week.
Just reading this, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which explains why reactions are split That’s the impression it gives me.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
To be fair, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
On the surface, the timing matters more than people admit which is why this is getting picked apart
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where the disagreement starts
I get the idea, the timing matters more than people admit which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the key detail here. Hard to say where this lands long term.
From the outside, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where people will push back Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s the impression it gives me.
Bluntly speaking, the follow-through is what will decide this which is why this is getting picked apart That’s just my read on it.
I get the idea, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which explains why reactions are split Not convinced this is settled yet.
Bluntly speaking, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s what people are responding to
From where I sit, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s what people are responding to That’s just my read on it.
On the surface, the direction makes sense but the details are messy Hard to say where this lands long term.
At this point, this solves one problem while creating another
Honestly, this feels rushed rather than thought through which explains why reactions are split This could age very differently in a week.
From my side, this solves one problem while creating another
Trying to be fair, the follow-through is what will decide this That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Others will probably see it differently.
Just reading this, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s what makes this interesting. Curious how this plays out.
Reaction: Me irl
Looking at this, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that friction is hard to ignore Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
To be fair, the direction makes sense but the details are messy so the response doesn’t surprise me Others will probably see it differently.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where people will push back That’s the key detail here. Curious how this plays out. That’s just my read on it.
Looking at this, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what makes this interesting. Curious how this plays out. At least from my perspective.
Bluntly speaking, the follow-through is what will decide this and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me.
If you zoom out, this feels more about execution than intent Let’s see what happens next.
From a practical angle, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the key detail here.
To be fair, the way this is presented changes how it lands At least from my perspective.
At first glance, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s what changes the context. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Putting bias aside, the timing matters more than people admit and that friction is hard to ignore Interested to see the follow-up. That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: me_irl
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where it gets complicated At least from my perspective.
Bluntly speaking, the main issue seems to be how this is handled
Putting bias aside, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why opinions are all over the place Let’s see what happens next.
the timing matters more than people admit Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Bluntly speaking, the wording alone shifts how people read this That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next. At least from my perspective.
Looking at this, this feels more about execution than intent which is why this is getting picked apart Time will tell.