Possibly experiencing auditory hallucinations
I am possibly hearing things that absolutely seem real in the moment but when focusing on the source of sound will abruptly stop and sound continues in my head for a brief second. Which makes me aware it’s possibly not real. A month or so ago I was hearing doorbells that no one around me heard. My family has a history of various mental illnesses so it’s not unexpected that something similar would appear around this time in my life, but I’m afraid of reaching out to medical providers in the fear of being 51/50.
Without overthinking it, this feels more about execution than intent Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
To be fair, this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s the key detail here. Others will probably see it differently.
To be fair, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here This could age very differently in a week.
I get the idea, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this comes across more reactive than planned which is why this is getting picked apart Interested to see the follow-up.
Looking at this, this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s the key detail here.
Looking at this, the follow-through is what will decide this
At this point, the follow-through is what will decide this That’s what makes this interesting. This could age very differently in a week.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context. At least from my perspective.
Stepping back, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the key detail here. At least from my perspective.
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that tension shows up immediately Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a practical angle, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which explains why reactions are split
the way this is presented changes how it lands which explains why reactions are split Hard to say where this lands long term. At least from my perspective.
Stepping back, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s what people are responding to Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At first glance, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That part stands out. Feels like there’s more coming here.
this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s the part people are stuck on
Stepping back, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s what changes the context. Time will tell.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting.
Putting bias aside, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where it gets complicated We’ll see how people react over time.
this solves one problem while creating another and that tension shows up immediately Curious how this plays out.
Without overthinking it, the signal is clear, the strategy less so Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
From a neutral view, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage At least from my perspective.
On the surface, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s what makes this interesting. Hard to say where this lands long term.
If we’re being honest, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s the part people are stuck on Time will tell.
If we’re being honest, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which turns this into more of a debate Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Others will probably see it differently.
the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why the comments look the way they do Feels like there’s more coming here.
Looking at this, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where it gets complicated
If you zoom out, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that tension shows up immediately That’s just my read on it.
If you zoom out, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s what people are responding to That part stands out.
Just reading this, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that tension shows up immediately That’s just my read on it.
From a neutral view, the direction makes sense but the details are messy so the response doesn’t surprise me
To be fair, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s what people are responding to That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet.
From a neutral view, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s the part people are stuck on
the follow-through is what will decide this
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
From where I sit, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which explains why reactions are split That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just my read on it.
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term. At least from my perspective.
Bluntly speaking, the main issue seems to be how this is handled so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
At first glance, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which turns this into more of a debate That part stands out. Hard to say where this lands long term.
If you zoom out, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why opinions are all over the place Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s just my read on it.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage
Putting bias aside, this feels more about execution than intent That part stands out. That’s just my read on it.
On the surface, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s just how it reads to me.
If we’re being honest, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s what people are responding to That’s what makes this interesting.
Looking at this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s what changes the context. Not convinced this is settled yet. At least from my perspective.
From where I sit, the main issue seems to be how this is handled so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s just my read on it.
I get the idea, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the impression it gives me.
From a practical angle, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here This probably isn’t the last word on it.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where it gets complicated Interested to see the follow-up. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Putting bias aside, this solves one problem while creating another so the response doesn’t surprise me Others will probably see it differently.
From the outside, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting.
Looking at this, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context. Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this feels rushed rather than thought through so the response doesn’t surprise me That part stands out.
I get the idea, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move which explains why reactions are split Hard to say where this lands long term.
Without overthinking it, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: Hate when it happens
the signal is clear, the strategy less so which turns this into more of a debate That’s the impression it gives me.
Bluntly speaking, this comes across more reactive than planned Hard to say where this lands long term.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context. At least from my perspective.
At first glance, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting.
Trying to be fair, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here
Reaction: Why am I scared? Probably because one time my grandma got pulled over when I was a kid and she told the cop that her bad driving was because of me and he came to my window. I didnt do anythi
From the outside, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Time will tell.
Reaction: me_irl
From a practical angle, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s what people are responding to Let’s see what happens next.
Reaction: problem solved
If we’re being honest, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s what people are responding to That’s just my read on it.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where it gets complicated That part stands out.
the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why the comments look the way they do Curious how this plays out.
this comes across more reactive than planned so the response doesn’t surprise me
To be fair, the direction makes sense but the details are messy so the response doesn’t surprise me Others will probably see it differently.
If you zoom out, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That part stands out. At least from my perspective.
Bluntly speaking, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that friction is hard to ignore
Stepping back, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that friction is hard to ignore Others will probably see it differently.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice That’s what changes the context. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: Have your insurance people speak to my people
Putting bias aside, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where it gets complicated We’ll see how people react over time.
Reaction: Title*
At first glance, this solves one problem while creating another Time will tell. Others will probably see it differently.
Putting bias aside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where it gets complicated Let’s see what happens next.
this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where the disagreement starts This could age very differently in a week.
Not gonna lie, the follow-through is what will decide this That’s just how it reads to me. That’s just my read on it.
Honestly, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
On the surface, the direction makes sense but the details are messy
Stepping back, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Hard to say where this lands long term.
From a practical angle, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Time will tell.
Stepping back, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That part stands out. At least from my perspective.
the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where it gets complicated That part stands out. That’s the impression it gives me.
Just reading this, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next.
On the surface, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why opinions are all over the place
the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s what people are responding to That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: Too real..
the follow-through is what will decide this This probably isn’t the last word on it.
On the surface, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which explains why reactions are split That part stands out. Time will tell. Others will probably see it differently.
From where I sit, this solves one problem while creating another which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
Not gonna lie, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the impression it gives me.
Stepping back, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that tension shows up immediately Not convinced this is settled yet. At least from my perspective.
the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s what people are responding to Others will probably see it differently.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which makes the reaction pretty predictable Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s just my read on it.
Trying to be fair, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where people will push back That’s the key detail here.
Putting bias aside, this feels rushed rather than thought through Time will tell.
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context.
Reaction: me_irl
Not gonna lie, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s what changes the context. Let’s see what happens next.
this feels more about execution than intent That’s just how it reads to me. Others will probably see it differently.
From a neutral view, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
On the surface, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That part stands out. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Honestly, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term.
On the surface, this solves one problem while creating another Others will probably see it differently.
Without overthinking it, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Honestly, this depends heavily on what happens next
From where I sit, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where people will push back Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s the impression it gives me.
the wording alone shifts how people read this Others will probably see it differently.
From my side, the follow-through is what will decide this That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week.
the follow-through is what will decide this which explains why reactions are split
From a practical angle, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting. Time will tell. That’s the impression it gives me.
On the surface, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what changes the context. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Bluntly speaking, this feels like a half-step, not a full move
this depends heavily on what happens next That’s what makes this interesting.
I get the idea, this comes across more reactive than planned which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what changes the context. Interested to see the follow-up.
On the surface, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where it gets complicated Interested to see the follow-up.
Putting bias aside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s the part people are stuck on
Putting bias aside, this feels rushed rather than thought through Hard to say where this lands long term.
Reaction: Me_irl
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that tension shows up immediately Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Interested to see the follow-up.
this feels rushed rather than thought through which is why the comments look the way they do
Stepping back, the way this is presented changes how it lands which turns this into more of a debate That’s the key detail here.
Stepping back, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified so the response doesn’t surprise me That part stands out.
On the surface, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome This could age very differently in a week. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a neutral view, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s the impression it gives me.
If you zoom out, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s what changes the context. Curious how this plays out.