Possibly experiencing auditory hallucinations
I am possibly hearing things that absolutely seem real in the moment but when focusing on the source of sound will abruptly stop and sound continues in my head for a brief second. Which makes me aware it’s possibly not real. A month or so ago I was hearing doorbells that no one around me heard. My family has a history of various mental illnesses so it’s not unexpected that something similar would appear around this time in my life, but I’m afraid of reaching out to medical providers in the fear of being 51/50.
From where I sit, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where people will push back That’s the key detail here. That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: It's been 7 years , yes 7 whole years
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what changes the context. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Others will probably see it differently.
Not gonna lie, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that tension shows up immediately That’s what changes the context. Curious how this plays out.
From the outside, this depends heavily on what happens next so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: the collection of colorful pens
Trying to be fair, this feels more about execution than intent which turns this into more of a debate That’s just how it reads to me.
Honestly, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s what changes the context.
From my side, this depends heavily on what happens next That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Just reading this, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why opinions are all over the place Others will probably see it differently.
this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up.
this solves one problem while creating another which is why this is getting picked apart Hard to say where this lands long term. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: very shocking
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That part stands out. Feels like there’s more coming here.
Putting bias aside, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where the disagreement starts This probably isn’t the last word on it.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s just how it reads to me.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice so the response doesn’t surprise me Curious how this plays out. That’s just my read on it.
this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where the disagreement starts Hard to say where this lands long term.
From the outside, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s what people are responding to
From the outside, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that tension shows up immediately That’s the key detail here.
If you zoom out, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term.
Without overthinking it, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where it gets complicated That part stands out. Others will probably see it differently.
From where I sit, this feels rushed rather than thought through which makes the reaction pretty predictable
From the outside, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where it gets complicated That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet. Others will probably see it differently.
Bluntly speaking, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which explains why reactions are split
If you zoom out, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s the part people are stuck on
the follow-through is what will decide this which is why the comments look the way they do Others will probably see it differently.
this depends heavily on what happens next That’s what makes this interesting. Time will tell.
On the surface, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That part stands out. This could age very differently in a week.
From a practical angle, this depends heavily on what happens next That’s the key detail here. That’s the impression it gives me.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That part stands out. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
I get the idea, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s the part people are stuck on
If you zoom out, the way this is presented changes how it lands which turns this into more of a debate Not convinced this is settled yet.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled so the response doesn’t surprise me This could age very differently in a week.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why the comments look the way they do
From a neutral view, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
On the surface, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the key detail here. Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
On the surface, this comes across more reactive than planned which explains why reactions are split Time will tell. That’s the impression it gives me.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s just my read on it.
this feels rushed rather than thought through
Reaction: me_irl
If you zoom out, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s the key detail here. Feels like there’s more coming here.
Reaction: me_irl
From a neutral view, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where the disagreement starts
If you zoom out, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which is why the comments look the way they do
Real talk, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s the part people are stuck on Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: A day in the life of an ambitious procrastinator
the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where the disagreement starts
Real talk, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so
this comes across more reactive than planned
At first glance, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what changes the context.
Reaction: me_irl
the main issue seems to be how this is handled
At first glance, the signal is clear, the strategy less so so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s just my read on it.
Honestly, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what changes the context. Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: lock in chat
Reaction: lock in chat
I get the idea, the signal is clear, the strategy less so Interested to see the follow-up.
Reaction: me_irl
I get the idea, the main issue seems to be how this is handled so the response doesn’t surprise me
From the outside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the key detail here.
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where the disagreement starts Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Honestly, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
the signal is clear, the strategy less so which makes the reaction pretty predictable At least from my perspective.
Trying to be fair, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why opinions are all over the place Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
Stepping back, this depends heavily on what happens next That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: Take it off us, It burns us!!!
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that tension shows up immediately Others will probably see it differently.
Without overthinking it, the follow-through is what will decide this which is why the comments look the way they do
Looking at this, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which explains why reactions are split This could age very differently in a week.
Real talk, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s the key detail here.
Stepping back, this feels more about execution than intent which is why this is getting picked apart Time will tell.
From where I sit, the signal is clear, the strategy less so Time will tell.
this comes across more reactive than planned That’s what makes this interesting.
Honestly, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Others will probably see it differently.
From a practical angle, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me.
the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s the part people are stuck on At least from my perspective.
Real talk, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which is why the comments look the way they do Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: Take it off us, It burns us!!!
At first glance, the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why the comments look the way they do
On the surface, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that friction is hard to ignore
Stepping back, the way this is presented changes how it lands This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Bluntly speaking, the wording alone shifts how people read this That part stands out.
Reaction: me_irl
Trying to be fair, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so so the response doesn’t surprise me Not convinced this is settled yet.
If we’re being honest, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why the comments look the way they do Feels like an opening move, not an ending. At least from my perspective.
From a practical angle, this solves one problem while creating another which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what changes the context. Curious how this plays out.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled which explains why reactions are split Time will tell.
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what changes the context. Others will probably see it differently.
If you zoom out, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that friction is hard to ignore That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: Classic FNaF games be like:
I get the idea, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that tension shows up immediately
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven This could age very differently in a week. That’s the impression it gives me.
Not gonna lie, the main issue seems to be how this is handled Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
To be fair, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s what people are responding to
the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where it gets complicated Not convinced this is settled yet.
Just reading this, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where people will push back
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where the disagreement starts
From my side, this feels rushed rather than thought through That part stands out.
From where I sit, the way this is presented changes how it lands
this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what makes this interesting.
Just reading this, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s the part people are stuck on This probably isn’t the last word on it. Others will probably see it differently.
On the surface, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why this is getting picked apart
Reaction: Not again.
From a practical angle, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so
From a practical angle, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting. At least from my perspective.