Please suggest self-help books & personality development classes to build confidence ?
Hi everyone,
I’m a 22-year-old female and I’m currently dealing with low confidence and depression. I feel like I am not able to express myself properly and it’s affecting my growth, my career, and my social life. I want to improve my mindset and personality so I can become more confident and stable.
Can you please suggest:
• Self-help books that actually help with confidence, depression, and mindset
• Personality development courses or classes (online or offline) that have helped you
• Any tips or habits that made a noticeable difference in your confidence
I genuinely want to improve myself because I don’t want to feel stuck anymore. Any recommendations would really help. Thank you 🙏
ClubHub
Responses
Sign in to respond.
At first glance, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s just my read on it.
Bluntly speaking, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s the key detail here.
Looking at this, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That part stands out. Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
From where I sit, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Let’s see what happens next.
Looking at this, the timing matters more than people admit which is why this is getting picked apart
Not gonna lie, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s what people are responding to That part stands out. We’ll see how people react over time.
the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where it gets complicated Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Just reading this, the follow-through is what will decide this which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the key detail here. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Bluntly speaking, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that friction is hard to ignore Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
If you zoom out, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Hard to say where this lands long term.
On the surface, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s the part people are stuck on
Stepping back, the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what changes the context. Time will tell.
Not gonna lie, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why opinions are all over the place
If you zoom out, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that friction is hard to ignore Feels like there’s more coming here.
Just reading this, this solves one problem while creating another which is why the comments look the way they do That’s just how it reads to me.
From a neutral view, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s what changes the context.
this comes across more reactive than planned so the response doesn’t surprise me Let’s see what happens next.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the key detail here. That’s the impression it gives me.
From my side, the signal is clear, the strategy less so We’ll see how people react over time. At least from my perspective.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Time will tell.
this comes across more reactive than planned which is why the comments look the way they do That part stands out.
Stepping back, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that friction is hard to ignore Let’s see what happens next.
Without overthinking it, this reads stronger on paper than in practice so the response doesn’t surprise me This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Putting bias aside, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why the comments look the way they do At least from my perspective.
From where I sit, this solves one problem while creating another This could age very differently in a week.
From where I sit, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which explains why reactions are split This could age very differently in a week.
Real talk, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where it gets complicated Others will probably see it differently.
If we’re being honest, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that friction is hard to ignore Others will probably see it differently.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s what people are responding to Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what makes this interesting.
Just reading this, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s the part people are stuck on This could age very differently in a week.
If we’re being honest, this feels more about execution than intent which turns this into more of a debate That’s the key detail here. Curious how this plays out. That’s just my read on it.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s what people are responding to That’s just how it reads to me.
To be fair, the timing matters more than people admit and that friction is hard to ignore This could age very differently in a week. That’s the impression it gives me.
Without overthinking it, this solves one problem while creating another which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up.
Honestly, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s the key detail here. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled which makes the reaction pretty predictable That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If we’re being honest, the timing matters more than people admit so the response doesn’t surprise me Let’s see what happens next.
Just reading this, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which turns this into more of a debate That’s the key detail here.
Honestly, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s what people are responding to Others will probably see it differently.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where the disagreement starts
Trying to be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage Curious how this plays out.
Trying to be fair, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Not convinced this is settled yet.
Not gonna lie, this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s the key detail here.
Looking at this, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s what makes this interesting.
this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where it gets complicated Others will probably see it differently.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Just reading this, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what changes the context. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At this point, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the impression it gives me.
On the surface, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s the part people are stuck on Curious how this plays out.
To be fair, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s what changes the context. Interested to see the follow-up. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Putting bias aside, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what changes the context. Others will probably see it differently.
I get the idea, this feels more about execution than intent Not convinced this is settled yet.
the timing matters more than people admit which makes the reaction pretty predictable That part stands out.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy which turns this into more of a debate That part stands out. That’s the impression it gives me.
Trying to be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where people will push back Others will probably see it differently.
Not gonna lie, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what changes the context. Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
Trying to be fair, this feels rushed rather than thought through which is why this is getting picked apart
From a practical angle, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where it gets complicated Others will probably see it differently.
Real talk, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
From a neutral view, this solves one problem while creating another which explains why reactions are split That’s what makes this interesting. This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
At this point, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why opinions are all over the place This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s the impression it gives me.
Real talk, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage
From a neutral view, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s the impression it gives me.
Bluntly speaking, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s the key detail here.
To be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so Time will tell. That’s the impression it gives me.
Bluntly speaking, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.
this depends heavily on what happens next Others will probably see it differently.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome so the response doesn’t surprise me That part stands out. That’s just how it reads to me.
Not gonna lie, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s just my read on it.
Just reading this, the follow-through is what will decide this which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s just how it reads to me. That’s just my read on it.
From my side, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s just my read on it.
Bluntly speaking, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified so the response doesn’t surprise me Hard to say where this lands long term.
At first glance, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That part stands out. Curious how this plays out.
At this point, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that friction is hard to ignore
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where people will push back That’s the key detail here.
From where I sit, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like there’s more coming here.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
If you zoom out, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why this is getting picked apart Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.
Stepping back, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
I get the idea, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context. Time will tell.
From a practical angle, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a practical angle, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where it gets complicated Interested to see the follow-up.
From the outside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified
this comes across more reactive than planned That’s the key detail here. Feels like there’s more coming here.
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s the part people are stuck on Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
At this point, this comes across more reactive than planned This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
the timing matters more than people admit
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That part stands out. At least from my perspective.
Putting bias aside, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage
the wording alone shifts how people read this That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage Hard to say where this lands long term.
From a practical angle, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s the part people are stuck on We’ll see how people react over time. At least from my perspective.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where people will push back Not convinced this is settled yet. At least from my perspective.
If you zoom out, this reads stronger on paper than in practice That’s the key detail here. Others will probably see it differently.
Looking at this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled Curious how this plays out.
From my side, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which makes the reaction pretty predictable That part stands out. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Trying to be fair, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where people will push back
the timing matters more than people admit which turns this into more of a debate Others will probably see it differently.
From my side, this depends heavily on what happens next That part stands out. At least from my perspective.
From my side, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where people will push back
From a practical angle, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s what people are responding to
If you zoom out, the follow-through is what will decide this Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
Putting bias aside, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that tension shows up immediately That part stands out. Curious how this plays out. That’s just my read on it.
Honestly, this comes across more reactive than planned which turns this into more of a debate
Stepping back, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here Hard to say where this lands long term. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Looking at this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Others will probably see it differently.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
this solves one problem while creating another That’s the key detail here. Let’s see what happens next.
At this point, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome so the response doesn’t surprise me Time will tell.
I get the idea, this reads stronger on paper than in practice
Trying to be fair, this comes across more reactive than planned which is why this is getting picked apart Interested to see the follow-up.
Without overthinking it, this feels like a half-step, not a full move Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled which explains why reactions are split Let’s see what happens next.
Looking at this, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where it gets complicated Not convinced this is settled yet.
From where I sit, this solves one problem while creating another That’s just how it reads to me.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting.