Nexthink Browser Extension
So EUC has added Nexthink Browser Extension to every End Users laptop.
Has anyone used it ?
What does it do ?
On the web site it says -
"Please note that all collected data is entirely anonymized. Data and is collected about performance only, not content. Only specific business applications are monitored."
Which to me immediately says that the data is not anonymized.
Should we be worried ?
Stepping back, this feels like a half-step, not a full move so the response doesn’t surprise me
I get the idea, the direction makes sense but the details are messy so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what makes this interesting. Others will probably see it differently.
To be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s just my read on it.
From a practical angle, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why opinions are all over the place
From where I sit, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why opinions are all over the place Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
At first glance, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where people will push back
At first glance, this depends heavily on what happens next which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. Others will probably see it differently.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which is why this is getting picked apart
the follow-through is what will decide this At least from my perspective.
this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Feels like there’s more coming here.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s what changes the context.
From the outside, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s the part people are stuck on
Just reading this, this feels more about execution than intent so the response doesn’t surprise me
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Interested to see the follow-up. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Just reading this, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where people will push back Not convinced this is settled yet.
this depends heavily on what happens next and that tension shows up immediately That part stands out. We’ll see how people react over time.
If we’re being honest, the timing matters more than people admit which is why this is getting picked apart Feels like an opening move, not an ending. At least from my perspective.
From a neutral view, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven This could age very differently in a week. That’s just my read on it.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven
At this point, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me. That’s just my read on it.
From where I sit, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s the impression it gives me.
Just reading this, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
Honestly, the follow-through is what will decide this Feels like an opening move, not an ending. At least from my perspective.
Just reading this, this feels rushed rather than thought through which turns this into more of a debate At least from my perspective.
this solves one problem while creating another Time will tell. That’s the impression it gives me.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy so the response doesn’t surprise me
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where it gets complicated At least from my perspective.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s the part people are stuck on That part stands out.
If we’re being honest, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s the key detail here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At first glance, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which explains why reactions are split That’s what makes this interesting. Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Trying to be fair, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
To be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next which turns this into more of a debate That’s the key detail here. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If we’re being honest, the follow-through is what will decide this At least from my perspective.
If you zoom out, this solves one problem while creating another which is why the comments look the way they do
the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s just how it reads to me.
Just reading this, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where it gets complicated
Honestly, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what makes this interesting.
Real talk, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
this comes across more reactive than planned Hard to say where this lands long term.
Without overthinking it, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context.
From where I sit, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s what makes this interesting.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s the impression it gives me.
Stepping back, the signal is clear, the strategy less so Interested to see the follow-up.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where people will push back Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From my side, this feels more about execution than intent That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
At first glance, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s just how it reads to me. That’s the impression it gives me.
this feels more about execution than intent That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
Looking at this, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which turns this into more of a debate Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Honestly, this solves one problem while creating another That’s just how it reads to me. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From the outside, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s what people are responding to We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
On the surface, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified At least from my perspective.
At this point, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that tension shows up immediately
the signal is clear, the strategy less so which turns this into more of a debate Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which explains why reactions are split That’s what makes this interesting. At least from my perspective.
Without overthinking it, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up.
Not gonna lie, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where the disagreement starts That part stands out.
Stepping back, this comes across more reactive than planned which turns this into more of a debate
the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where it gets complicated We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
the wording alone shifts how people read this
If you zoom out, the signal is clear, the strategy less so We’ll see how people react over time.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why this is getting picked apart Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s just my read on it.
Trying to be fair, the follow-through is what will decide this That’s what makes this interesting. Others will probably see it differently.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s what changes the context.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where it gets complicated Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s the impression it gives me.
the timing matters more than people admit That’s just my read on it.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s the key detail here. Interested to see the follow-up.
At first glance, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
From my side, the follow-through is what will decide this That’s what makes this interesting. Others will probably see it differently.
Real talk, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where it gets complicated That part stands out.
I get the idea, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s the part people are stuck on
this depends heavily on what happens next Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
If we’re being honest, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the key detail here. Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s just my read on it.
this comes across more reactive than planned which is why this is getting picked apart Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Putting bias aside, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s just how it reads to me.
From a neutral view, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where the disagreement starts That part stands out. We’ll see how people react over time.
Just reading this, the timing matters more than people admit Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that tension shows up immediately That part stands out.
To be fair, this feels rushed rather than thought through which is why this is getting picked apart We’ll see how people react over time. At least from my perspective.
To be fair, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s what people are responding to
Without overthinking it, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where people will push back That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me.
the timing matters more than people admit and that tension shows up immediately That’s what changes the context. Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s the impression it gives me.
To be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s what people are responding to That’s the impression it gives me.
the timing matters more than people admit which explains why reactions are split That’s what makes this interesting. Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s the impression it gives me.
the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s what changes the context. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Real talk, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that tension shows up immediately Others will probably see it differently.
Bluntly speaking, this comes across more reactive than planned which is why the comments look the way they do Not convinced this is settled yet.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.
From a neutral view, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s why opinions are all over the place Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Looking at this, the follow-through is what will decide this Curious how this plays out.
From a neutral view, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s what people are responding to Feels like there’s more coming here.
From where I sit, this comes across more reactive than planned and that tension shows up immediately That’s what makes this interesting.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s the part people are stuck on Not convinced this is settled yet. Others will probably see it differently.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s why opinions are all over the place Interested to see the follow-up.
I get the idea, this depends heavily on what happens next Feels like an opening move, not an ending. At least from my perspective.
Honestly, the follow-through is what will decide this That’s just how it reads to me.
To be fair, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which turns this into more of a debate That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up.
Stepping back, this feels rushed rather than thought through so the response doesn’t surprise me That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.
From the outside, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which makes the reaction pretty predictable We’ll see how people react over time.
Trying to be fair, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where it gets complicated
Honestly, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified so the response doesn’t surprise me This could age very differently in a week.
From the outside, this comes across more reactive than planned Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
the wording alone shifts how people read this which makes the reaction pretty predictable This could age very differently in a week.
On the surface, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that tension shows up immediately At least from my perspective.
From where I sit, this solves one problem while creating another and that friction is hard to ignore Let’s see what happens next.
From the outside, the timing matters more than people admit which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context. Others will probably see it differently.
If you zoom out, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s the key detail here.
To be fair, this comes across more reactive than planned
Just reading this, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where people will push back Time will tell.
On the surface, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where it gets complicated
Looking at this, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified This could age very differently in a week. That’s the impression it gives me.
Putting bias aside, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which explains why reactions are split Hard to say where this lands long term. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Looking at this, this comes across more reactive than planned Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
this solves one problem while creating another and that’s what people are responding to Feels like there’s more coming here.
Honestly, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what changes the context. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Stepping back, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which turns this into more of a debate That’s the key detail here.
the follow-through is what will decide this That part stands out. This could age very differently in a week. That’s the impression it gives me.
Putting bias aside, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why the comments look the way they do Feels like there’s more coming here.
At first glance, the direction makes sense but the details are messy