My married neighbour is starting to become obsessed with me. How do I stop this from escalating?
So my neighbour, who is married has a crush on me and it seems like it's affecting her marriage considering she was caught staring at me from her window by her husband while I was gardening for an hour(I saw the outline of her body from the window) and it led to a fight which I heard from across the street. She had her mother in law come by and she was crying outside while continuing to intensely stare at me while I was gardening. This situation is starting to weird me out. I now avoid her at every moment. I think she's just struggling with a dissatisfying marriage and raising hyperactive kids and probably sees me as an escape. Her Husband seems depressed. And it doesn't help that I'm ignoring her every move, which as an attractive woman is probably something she's not used to. I assume I'm not her first object of limerance.
But still, I really want to avoid triggering neighbourhood drama as I'm planning on moving out.
If I'm outside for more than an hour, I feel like she's staring at me. Her Husband hates me.
From where I sit, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why opinions are all over the place
At first glance, the timing matters more than people admit That’s just how it reads to me.
Putting bias aside, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s what people are responding to Feels like an opening move, not an ending. At least from my perspective.
this comes across more reactive than planned Not convinced this is settled yet.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s what makes this interesting.
Putting bias aside, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where people will push back Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
On the surface, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where it gets complicated
From the outside, this feels more about execution than intent which explains why reactions are split That’s the key detail here. Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
Honestly, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Without overthinking it, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s why opinions are all over the place We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If we’re being honest, this feels more about execution than intent
Without overthinking it, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s what people are responding to
On the surface, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s what changes the context. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s the part people are stuck on That part stands out. Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s just my read on it.
Stepping back, this depends heavily on what happens next That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just my read on it.
Real talk, this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s what changes the context. Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
this comes across more reactive than planned Others will probably see it differently.
Just reading this, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here
Stepping back, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s just my read on it.
Not gonna lie, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s what people are responding to
Real talk, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Bluntly speaking, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where people will push back Time will tell.
Bluntly speaking, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s just my read on it.
On the surface, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like there’s more coming here. At least from my perspective.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which turns this into more of a debate That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage Curious how this plays out.
Not gonna lie, this feels rushed rather than thought through which makes the reaction pretty predictable
this feels rushed rather than thought through At least from my perspective.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s the part people are stuck on Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s just my read on it.
On the surface, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what makes this interesting. At least from my perspective.
From where I sit, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that tension shows up immediately
this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it. Others will probably see it differently.
At this point, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s the part people are stuck on Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s just my read on it.
this solves one problem while creating another That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next.
At this point, this solves one problem while creating another Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
Putting bias aside, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the impression it gives me.
Without overthinking it, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s what people are responding to
On the surface, the signal is clear, the strategy less so Let’s see what happens next.
Bluntly speaking, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that friction is hard to ignore
Without overthinking it, this solves one problem while creating another That’s just my read on it.
Stepping back, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which turns this into more of a debate
I get the idea, the wording alone shifts how people read this which explains why reactions are split
Looking at this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s the part people are stuck on Feels like there’s more coming here. At least from my perspective.
Not gonna lie, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where people will push back Hard to say where this lands long term.
this solves one problem while creating another This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice That’s what changes the context. Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
Trying to be fair, this feels more about execution than intent which explains why reactions are split
Looking at this, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why the comments look the way they do Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move which makes the reaction pretty predictable This could age very differently in a week.
From a neutral view, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which turns this into more of a debate That’s just how it reads to me. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Trying to be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which turns this into more of a debate That’s the key detail here. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. At least from my perspective.
Bluntly speaking, the wording alone shifts how people read this which turns this into more of a debate We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Not gonna lie, the wording alone shifts how people read this Time will tell.
At first glance, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where people will push back Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If we’re being honest, this feels more about execution than intent which explains why reactions are split This could age very differently in a week.
Bluntly speaking, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s the part people are stuck on We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the impression it gives me.
From where I sit, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next.
If you zoom out, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which is why the comments look the way they do That’s the key detail here. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. At least from my perspective.
At this point, the direction makes sense but the details are messy This probably isn’t the last word on it. Others will probably see it differently.
Not gonna lie, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where people will push back That’s just my read on it.
If we’re being honest, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s what changes the context. That’s just my read on it.
From a neutral view, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the key detail here. This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s the impression it gives me.
I get the idea, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which is why the comments look the way they do Hard to say where this lands long term.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where the disagreement starts Others will probably see it differently.
Not gonna lie, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what makes this interesting.
To be fair, the way this is presented changes how it lands This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At this point, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s the part people are stuck on Interested to see the follow-up.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why opinions are all over the place
this depends heavily on what happens next
the follow-through is what will decide this and that tension shows up immediately Let’s see what happens next.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where it gets complicated That part stands out. Others will probably see it differently.
At first glance, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what changes the context. That’s the impression it gives me.
Putting bias aside, the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why this is getting picked apart
At this point, this feels more about execution than intent That’s the impression it gives me.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which turns this into more of a debate At least from my perspective.
Putting bias aside, the follow-through is what will decide this which explains why reactions are split
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which is why this is getting picked apart Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the impression it gives me.
this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what changes the context. That’s the impression it gives me.
Without overthinking it, this feels more about execution than intent Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At first glance, this comes across more reactive than planned
Not gonna lie, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s why opinions are all over the place Curious how this plays out.
Stepping back, this solves one problem while creating another Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Putting bias aside, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which turns this into more of a debate Hard to say where this lands long term. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a practical angle, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where people will push back This could age very differently in a week.
From where I sit, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone We’ll see how people react over time.
I get the idea, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where people will push back That’s the key detail here. That’s the impression it gives me.
Honestly, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which is why this is getting picked apart Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
From a practical angle, this feels more about execution than intent Hard to say where this lands long term. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
To be fair, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s the part people are stuck on Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
To be fair, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s just how it reads to me. That’s the impression it gives me.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where the disagreement starts
At this point, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage so the response doesn’t surprise me Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Real talk, this reads stronger on paper than in practice so the response doesn’t surprise me Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a neutral view, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the impression it gives me.
Looking at this, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s what people are responding to
Real talk, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven
From the outside, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so so the response doesn’t surprise me At least from my perspective.
On the surface, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s the key detail here.
At this point, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where the disagreement starts
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the key detail here.
Trying to be fair, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
From where I sit, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s what people are responding to
At first glance, the signal is clear, the strategy less so so the response doesn’t surprise me