My friends are starting to ignore me, what’s should i do?
This is on a throwaway account so hopefully the don’t find me lol
I 16M am apart of a friend group of 5 guys (including me) that are ranging 15M-16M, and they all go to my school, however there have been some troubles recently that I need some advice on.
So what happened was around Christmas time i was somewhat distant, i was seeing family and my Girlfriend from the 24th-29th December time. Then my friends got upset because during that time i didn’t call (I tried to explain to them that i was seeing family, however they disregarded that). So we ended up in argument where i ended up apologised for ignoring them and decided to make an effort to call more.
Since that point, it was all smooth, i took everything they said into account. I called, i explained why i was unable to join the days i couldn’t join, and was generally being a better friend and i thought it was all going smoothly.
However today i found out they were all online on steam playing together (therefore obvious to me they were also calling), therefore ignoring me. So this was about 5:30PM, where i took a screenshot of them all playing. So i think, quite righteously i was offended and didn’t call, because they were being
ClubHub
Responses
Sign in to respond.
Stepping back, this feels rushed rather than thought through which explains why reactions are split Hard to say where this lands long term. At least from my perspective.
To be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why this is getting picked apart This probably isn’t the last word on it. At least from my perspective.
Not gonna lie, the follow-through is what will decide this That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
Without overthinking it, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where people will push back Hard to say where this lands long term.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice Let’s see what happens next.
To be fair, the follow-through is what will decide this and that tension shows up immediately That part stands out. At least from my perspective.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why this is getting picked apart
At first glance, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s the key detail here.
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where people will push back That’s the key detail here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From where I sit, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Interested to see the follow-up.
Real talk, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what makes this interesting.
On the surface, the direction makes sense but the details are messy
At this point, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s the key detail here. At least from my perspective.
Stepping back, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s the part people are stuck on
this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why opinions are all over the place Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Not gonna lie, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That part stands out.
Honestly, this solves one problem while creating another so the response doesn’t surprise me That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Stepping back, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s what makes this interesting.
Trying to be fair, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so This could age very differently in a week. That’s just my read on it.
Real talk, this depends heavily on what happens next which explains why reactions are split That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s the part people are stuck on
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what changes the context. That’s just my read on it.
this depends heavily on what happens next
At this point, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which makes the reaction pretty predictable That part stands out.
Trying to be fair, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s the part people are stuck on Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Just reading this, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet.
the timing matters more than people admit and that’s the part people are stuck on We’ll see how people react over time. At least from my perspective.
Not gonna lie, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what changes the context. Not convinced this is settled yet.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s what changes the context. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From the outside, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven At least from my perspective.
On the surface, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s what makes this interesting. Curious how this plays out.
Real talk, this feels rushed rather than thought through
From a practical angle, this feels more about execution than intent That’s what makes this interesting.
Trying to be fair, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Not convinced this is settled yet. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a neutral view, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s the key detail here. That’s the impression it gives me.
Not gonna lie, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why opinions are all over the place Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
To be fair, the way this is presented changes how it lands
Not gonna lie, this solves one problem while creating another which turns this into more of a debate That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week.
At this point, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which explains why reactions are split This probably isn’t the last word on it.
From my side, the signal is clear, the strategy less so Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
On the surface, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where the disagreement starts We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s just how it reads to me. Others will probably see it differently.
On the surface, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which is why the comments look the way they do This could age very differently in a week.
Not gonna lie, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which is why this is getting picked apart That’s just how it reads to me.
this feels rushed rather than thought through Others will probably see it differently.
Trying to be fair, the wording alone shifts how people read this which explains why reactions are split That’s what changes the context. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
From my side, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the impression it gives me.
Without overthinking it, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where it gets complicated
From my side, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context. Curious how this plays out. At least from my perspective.
If you zoom out, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a practical angle, this feels more about execution than intent and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the key detail here. Curious how this plays out.
Bluntly speaking, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Looking at this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where people will push back At least from my perspective.
I get the idea, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.