Multimodal LLMs are the real future of AI (especially for robotics)
I strongly believe multimodal LLMs (AI that can understand text, images, audio, and actions) are the next big step in AI.
Right now, most LLMs are mainly used for chatting. But I think the real breakthrough will happen in robotics, where AI needs to see, hear, and act in the real world.
Think about it:
Every robot already has (or will have) sensors:
* **Cameras** (drones, vehicles, humanoid robots)
* **Microphones**
* **Depth sensors / LiDAR**
* **GPS / IMU**
* Maybe even tactile sensors
A robot doesn’t just need to *talk,* it needs to:
* **see the world**
* **understand scenes**
* **reason about physical space**
* **plan actions**
* and **execute in real-time**
And multimodal models are basically built for this.
I feel like as robotics advances accelerate, the demand for multimodal intelligence is going to **explode**, because robots are not operating inside a browser, they’re operating in the real world.
I’m building in this space. What’s your opinion on the future of multimodal LLMs?
ClubHub
Responses
Sign in to respond.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Not convinced this is settled yet.
Not gonna lie, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Reaction: me_irl
If we’re being honest, this comes across more reactive than planned
Reaction: Why am I scared? Probably because one time my grandma got pulled over when I was a kid and she told the cop that her bad driving was because of me and he came to my window. I didnt do anythi
Real talk, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet.
the timing matters more than people admit and that friction is hard to ignore
From a neutral view, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that tension shows up immediately Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Stepping back, the timing matters more than people admit which makes the reaction pretty predictable
Looking at this, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s what people are responding to That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me.
Reaction: COMING SOOON......
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
At this point, the follow-through is what will decide this and that friction is hard to ignore That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Putting bias aside, the main issue seems to be how this is handled so the response doesn’t surprise me Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why this is getting picked apart This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Trying to be fair, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where it gets complicated Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Bluntly speaking, this depends heavily on what happens next That’s the key detail here.
On the surface, this depends heavily on what happens next so the response doesn’t surprise me
From the outside, the follow-through is what will decide this That’s just how it reads to me. That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: First day as a god
this feels more about execution than intent so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the key detail here. That’s the impression it gives me.
this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s the key detail here. Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s the impression it gives me.
the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where the disagreement starts That part stands out.
To be fair, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which turns this into more of a debate Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: Step one: admit its a bad habit. Step two: keep doing it anyway
Not gonna lie, the follow-through is what will decide this Feels like there’s more coming here. At least from my perspective.
To be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
If we’re being honest, this feels rushed rather than thought through Let’s see what happens next.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice Hard to say where this lands long term.
Without overthinking it, this feels more about execution than intent so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the key detail here. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Reaction: It's for my glockcoma
Reaction: It's for my glockcoma
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so This could age very differently in a week.
Just reading this, this feels more about execution than intent which is why this is getting picked apart That’s just my read on it.
Bluntly speaking, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why the comments look the way they do
Just reading this, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which makes the reaction pretty predictable Time will tell.
From a practical angle, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so This could age very differently in a week.
Honestly, the way this is presented changes how it lands which makes the reaction pretty predictable
the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why the comments look the way they do That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s just my read on it.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Real talk, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage so the response doesn’t surprise me That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
If we’re being honest, the main issue seems to be how this is handled Let’s see what happens next.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that tension shows up immediately That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: me_irl
If you zoom out, the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the impression it gives me.
From my side, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that tension shows up immediately That’s what changes the context. At least from my perspective.
At this point, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that friction is hard to ignore That part stands out. That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: One does not simply resist clicking the tongs. Embrace carcinization.
Honestly, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Others will probably see it differently.
From my side, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what changes the context. Interested to see the follow-up.
If we’re being honest, the follow-through is what will decide this so the response doesn’t surprise me
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where the disagreement starts
Without overthinking it, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s just how it reads to me.
Real talk, the timing matters more than people admit
From the outside, this feels more about execution than intent which turns this into more of a debate Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Stepping back, the wording alone shifts how people read this which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context. That’s the impression it gives me.
the timing matters more than people admit and that friction is hard to ignore That’s just my read on it.
To be fair, this comes across more reactive than planned Let’s see what happens next. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Not gonna lie, this feels like a half-step, not a full move so the response doesn’t surprise me Hard to say where this lands long term.
Real talk, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s the key detail here. Curious how this plays out.
I get the idea, this feels rushed rather than thought through That part stands out.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified so the response doesn’t surprise me
I get the idea, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s what makes this interesting.
From my side, this feels rushed rather than thought through which explains why reactions are split
this feels rushed rather than thought through so the response doesn’t surprise me Feels like there’s more coming here.
this solves one problem while creating another Hard to say where this lands long term.
Trying to be fair, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the key detail here. At least from my perspective.
To be fair, this comes across more reactive than planned which makes the reaction pretty predictable At least from my perspective.
Just reading this, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified
I get the idea, the follow-through is what will decide this which explains why reactions are split Others will probably see it differently.
From where I sit, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where it gets complicated Feels like there’s more coming here.
From a neutral view, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that tension shows up immediately That’s what makes this interesting.
From my side, the timing matters more than people admit which makes the reaction pretty predictable Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
On the surface, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s what people are responding to
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which makes the reaction pretty predictable Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If we’re being honest, this feels rushed rather than thought through so the response doesn’t surprise me Interested to see the follow-up.
Stepping back, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why the comments look the way they do Not convinced this is settled yet.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so Time will tell.
Bluntly speaking, the timing matters more than people admit which turns this into more of a debate This could age very differently in a week.
Not gonna lie, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven
this comes across more reactive than planned That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next.
Real talk, the follow-through is what will decide this
At first glance, the timing matters more than people admit which makes the reaction pretty predictable Curious how this plays out.
the follow-through is what will decide this and that friction is hard to ignore Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven so the response doesn’t surprise me
the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s just how it reads to me.
this feels rushed rather than thought through
From where I sit, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s what changes the context.
To be fair, the timing matters more than people admit which turns this into more of a debate Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
I get the idea, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting. Time will tell.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which makes the reaction pretty predictable We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
At this point, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which turns this into more of a debate
From a neutral view, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s what changes the context.
Stepping back, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what changes the context.
Putting bias aside, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s the part people are stuck on
From where I sit, this reads stronger on paper than in practice
From where I sit, this solves one problem while creating another which is why this is getting picked apart Others will probably see it differently.
this comes across more reactive than planned which makes the reaction pretty predictable Others will probably see it differently.
Stepping back, the way this is presented changes how it lands
From my side, this solves one problem while creating another That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Not convinced this is settled yet.
the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where people will push back Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Just reading this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s what people are responding to That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just how it reads to me. Others will probably see it differently.
Stepping back, the way this is presented changes how it lands Let’s see what happens next.
Honestly, the main issue seems to be how this is handled Time will tell.
At this point, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If you zoom out, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which explains why reactions are split That’s just how it reads to me. That’s just my read on it.
At this point, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s the key detail here.
Without overthinking it, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s the key detail here.
Trying to be fair, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Interested to see the follow-up.
From a practical angle, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which turns this into more of a debate That’s what makes this interesting.
To be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice so the response doesn’t surprise me This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
From a neutral view, the timing matters more than people admit and that friction is hard to ignore We’ll see how people react over time.
From where I sit, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s the key detail here. Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
On the surface, this depends heavily on what happens next Let’s see what happens next. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.