JL engine: Emotion-Weighted Middleware for AI/ AI Personality Orchestrator. I could use a hand as ive hit a roadblock wi
Hey yall! So i have been working on this thing called the jl engine for a minute now. So i started this basically cause i got tired of ai just being a polite robot so i built a middleware layer that treats an llm like a piece of high performance hardware and went from there.
i have an "emotional" aperture system that calculates a score from like 9 different signals to physically choke or open the model's temperature and top_p in real time. i also got a gear based system (worm, cvt, etc) that defines how stubborn or adaptive the personality is so it actually has weight. there is even a drift pressure system that monitors for hallucination and slams on a hard lock if the personality starts failing.
the engine is running fine on python and ollama but i am honestly not the best deployer and i am stopped in my tracks. i am a founder and an architect but i am not a devops guy. i need a hand with the last mile stuff before I rip all my hair out. there's a bit more then meets the eye with this one.
i am keeping the core framework proprietary but i am looking for a couple people who want to jump in and help polish this into a real product for some equity or a partnership. if you are bore
this feels like a half-step, not a full move so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s just my read on it.
If you zoom out, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s the part people are stuck on That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Looking at this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled Curious how this plays out.
To be fair, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
On the surface, this feels more about execution than intent That’s the impression it gives me.
From a neutral view, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s what changes the context.
To be fair, this solves one problem while creating another which is why the comments look the way they do
Real talk, this solves one problem while creating another That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me.
Not gonna lie, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s just my read on it.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled Curious how this plays out.
Real talk, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s why opinions are all over the place
this solves one problem while creating another Let’s see what happens next.
Honestly, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that tension shows up immediately Interested to see the follow-up.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move which makes the reaction pretty predictable Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s the impression it gives me.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s what people are responding to This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Honestly, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here Interested to see the follow-up.
From the outside, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where people will push back That’s the impression it gives me.
Honestly, this feels like a half-step, not a full move
Honestly, this reads stronger on paper than in practice so the response doesn’t surprise me
From where I sit, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s why opinions are all over the place Time will tell.
Stepping back, this comes across more reactive than planned so the response doesn’t surprise me
this feels like a half-step, not a full move
From the outside, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s what changes the context.
To be fair, the wording alone shifts how people read this
From a practical angle, this comes across more reactive than planned which is why this is getting picked apart
Real talk, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that tension shows up immediately That’s what makes this interesting. Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s just how it reads to me.
From where I sit, this depends heavily on what happens next which is why the comments look the way they do This could age very differently in a week.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what changes the context. That’s just my read on it.
the wording alone shifts how people read this which explains why reactions are split That part stands out. At least from my perspective.
On the surface, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why this is getting picked apart This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled which turns this into more of a debate
From the outside, this comes across more reactive than planned which is why the comments look the way they do
On the surface, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the key detail here. At least from my perspective.
Honestly, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week.
From a neutral view, this feels rushed rather than thought through Let’s see what happens next.
If we’re being honest, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which explains why reactions are split
Without overthinking it, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what makes this interesting.
Without overthinking it, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s what people are responding to That’s the key detail here.
Trying to be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so At least from my perspective.
Putting bias aside, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
To be fair, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s just how it reads to me.
this comes across more reactive than planned which turns this into more of a debate That’s just how it reads to me.
I get the idea, this feels more about execution than intent which is why the comments look the way they do This probably isn’t the last word on it.
From a neutral view, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That part stands out.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy We’ll see how people react over time.
Not gonna lie, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s why opinions are all over the place Not convinced this is settled yet.
the wording alone shifts how people read this
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s the part people are stuck on This could age very differently in a week.
From a neutral view, this comes across more reactive than planned which explains why reactions are split That’s the key detail here.
Just reading this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled Interested to see the follow-up.
Real talk, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s what makes this interesting.
From a practical angle, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At first glance, the timing matters more than people admit We’ll see how people react over time.
At this point, this feels rushed rather than thought through Hard to say where this lands long term.
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that tension shows up immediately That’s just my read on it.
From my side, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where people will push back
To be fair, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why opinions are all over the place
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the key detail here. Curious how this plays out.
Stepping back, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where the disagreement starts That part stands out. At least from my perspective.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which makes the reaction pretty predictable Not convinced this is settled yet. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s the part people are stuck on That part stands out. This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
this depends heavily on what happens next which turns this into more of a debate Feels like there’s more coming here.
From a neutral view, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context. Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.
Just reading this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled so the response doesn’t surprise me Feels like there’s more coming here.
Real talk, the way this is presented changes how it lands That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet.
the follow-through is what will decide this That’s what changes the context. Time will tell.
the way this is presented changes how it lands
To be fair, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where it gets complicated
Stepping back, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a neutral view, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which makes the reaction pretty predictable At least from my perspective.
Stepping back, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Others will probably see it differently.
Just reading this, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the impression it gives me.
Looking at this, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s what people are responding to That’s just how it reads to me. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From where I sit, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that friction is hard to ignore That part stands out.
Honestly, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the key detail here.
Just reading this, this comes across more reactive than planned
Putting bias aside, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which turns this into more of a debate Time will tell.
Not gonna lie, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s the key detail here. Curious how this plays out.
Trying to be fair, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where the disagreement starts Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
Honestly, the wording alone shifts how people read this which explains why reactions are split At least from my perspective.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context. Interested to see the follow-up.
From where I sit, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s just how it reads to me. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If you zoom out, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s the key detail here. Hard to say where this lands long term.
this feels more about execution than intent so the response doesn’t surprise me This probably isn’t the last word on it.
To be fair, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Looking at this, the follow-through is what will decide this which makes the reaction pretty predictable That part stands out. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
this comes across more reactive than planned which is why the comments look the way they do That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s the impression it gives me.
Looking at this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s what makes this interesting. Hard to say where this lands long term. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Trying to be fair, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That part stands out. Others will probably see it differently.
From the outside, the timing matters more than people admit That’s just my read on it.
On the surface, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term.
Stepping back, the follow-through is what will decide this
this feels like a half-step, not a full move Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.
Looking at this, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where people will push back
On the surface, this depends heavily on what happens next which explains why reactions are split Others will probably see it differently.
Looking at this, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that friction is hard to ignore Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At first glance, the signal is clear, the strategy less so so the response doesn’t surprise me