It's been a big week for Agentic AI ; Here are 10 massive releases you might've missed:
* Meta acquires Manus AI
* Google launches educational agent sprint
* WSJ lets AI agent run a vending machine
A collection of AI Agent Updates! 🧵
1. **Meta Acquires ManusAI**
Joining Meta to develop agent capabilities across consumer and business products. Subscription service continues. Manus had $100M ARR, $125M revenue run rate, and \~$500M valuation from investors including Benchmark.
Meta doubling down on agents.
**2. Notion Working on Custom AI Agent Co-Workers**
Agents can be triggered via schedule, Slack tagging, or Notion page/database changes. Real AI-first workspace coming soon.
Productivity platform going all-in on agent workflows.
**3. Firecrawl Ships /agent Support to MCP**
Now works directly in ChatGPT, Claude, Cursor, and more. Describe data needed and watch it search web, navigate, and return structured data without leaving workflow.
Agent web scraping comes to all major platforms.
**4. Prime Intellect Introduces Recursive Language Models Research**
New research direction for long-horizon agents. Training models to manage their own context. Sharing initial experiments showing RLMs promise for next breakthrough in agent capabilities.
Soon to be able to manage themse
At this point, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where it gets complicated Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Just reading this, this depends heavily on what happens next which makes the reaction pretty predictable Hard to say where this lands long term.
Real talk, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That part stands out. That’s the impression it gives me.
On the surface, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which turns this into more of a debate
Trying to be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place Time will tell. Others will probably see it differently.
I get the idea, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s the key detail here. That’s the impression it gives me.
From my side, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified so the response doesn’t surprise me That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Just reading this, this feels rushed rather than thought through which explains why reactions are split That’s the key detail here.
On the surface, this depends heavily on what happens next which is why this is getting picked apart Others will probably see it differently.
I get the idea, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where it gets complicated That part stands out.
I get the idea, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where the disagreement starts Interested to see the follow-up.
Without overthinking it, this feels more about execution than intent which is why this is getting picked apart Curious how this plays out.
Not gonna lie, the follow-through is what will decide this which makes the reaction pretty predictable
Real talk, the follow-through is what will decide this That’s what makes this interesting. We’ll see how people react over time. At least from my perspective.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which explains why reactions are split That’s the key detail here. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s just my read on it.
Without overthinking it, the follow-through is what will decide this which turns this into more of a debate
Real talk, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that tension shows up immediately We’ll see how people react over time. At least from my perspective.
Putting bias aside, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At this point, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why the comments look the way they do
the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Interested to see the follow-up.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s just how it reads to me.
To be fair, the direction makes sense but the details are messy so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just how it reads to me.
From a neutral view, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where people will push back That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time.
Putting bias aside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which turns this into more of a debate That’s what makes this interesting.
this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s the key detail here. Hard to say where this lands long term.
From a neutral view, this depends heavily on what happens next Time will tell.
Trying to be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s what makes this interesting. We’ll see how people react over time.
If we’re being honest, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s the part people are stuck on That part stands out.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move which explains why reactions are split At least from my perspective.
the wording alone shifts how people read this
Looking at this, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s just how it reads to me.
Not gonna lie, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where the disagreement starts Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
At this point, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why opinions are all over the place
From my side, the main issue seems to be how this is handled This could age very differently in a week. Others will probably see it differently.
From where I sit, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s what people are responding to At least from my perspective.
From my side, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified This could age very differently in a week. That’s just my read on it.
Just reading this, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me. Others will probably see it differently.
From where I sit, the direction makes sense but the details are messy so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what makes this interesting.
At this point, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
Just reading this, the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why the comments look the way they do
Trying to be fair, this solves one problem while creating another Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s the impression it gives me.
Without overthinking it, this feels more about execution than intent This probably isn’t the last word on it.
From where I sit, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why opinions are all over the place Interested to see the follow-up.
If you zoom out, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone We’ll see how people react over time. At least from my perspective.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why this is getting picked apart That’s just my read on it.
Without overthinking it, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which explains why reactions are split That part stands out. Hard to say where this lands long term.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move which makes the reaction pretty predictable Not convinced this is settled yet. Others will probably see it differently.
Stepping back, this solves one problem while creating another and that friction is hard to ignore
this reads stronger on paper than in practice which makes the reaction pretty predictable
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it. Others will probably see it differently.
On the surface, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why the comments look the way they do Others will probably see it differently.
On the surface, the timing matters more than people admit That’s what makes this interesting. Hard to say where this lands long term. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Putting bias aside, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that tension shows up immediately
If we’re being honest, this depends heavily on what happens next
Bluntly speaking, the follow-through is what will decide this which turns this into more of a debate That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Honestly, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s the part people are stuck on Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which is why the comments look the way they do That’s the key detail here. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a neutral view, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why this is getting picked apart Not convinced this is settled yet.
At first glance, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s what changes the context. Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
Looking at this, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which explains why reactions are split Interested to see the follow-up.
Stepping back, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why the comments look the way they do
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which explains why reactions are split That’s what changes the context.
On the surface, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that tension shows up immediately That’s what makes this interesting.
Stepping back, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why opinions are all over the place That part stands out. At least from my perspective.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Time will tell.
Real talk, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so
Stepping back, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Others will probably see it differently.
Just reading this, the follow-through is what will decide this which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. Curious how this plays out.
On the surface, the main issue seems to be how this is handled Not convinced this is settled yet.
From a practical angle, this comes across more reactive than planned and that friction is hard to ignore Time will tell. Others will probably see it differently.
Without overthinking it, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where it gets complicated
Bluntly speaking, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the impression it gives me.
Not gonna lie, this feels rushed rather than thought through
On the surface, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why opinions are all over the place Time will tell.
Real talk, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which is why the comments look the way they do Others will probably see it differently.
From the outside, this solves one problem while creating another which makes the reaction pretty predictable At least from my perspective.
Trying to be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s what people are responding to Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Trying to be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s the key detail here. At least from my perspective.
Trying to be fair, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that tension shows up immediately That’s the impression it gives me.
If we’re being honest, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where the disagreement starts
From where I sit, the way this is presented changes how it lands which makes the reaction pretty predictable Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s just my read on it.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where people will push back Others will probably see it differently.
Not gonna lie, this comes across more reactive than planned and that tension shows up immediately That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this solves one problem while creating another which explains why reactions are split That’s just how it reads to me. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From the outside, the way this is presented changes how it lands which makes the reaction pretty predictable Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice which turns this into more of a debate That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s the impression it gives me.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a neutral view, the way this is presented changes how it lands which makes the reaction pretty predictable We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From where I sit, the timing matters more than people admit Hard to say where this lands long term. At least from my perspective.
If we’re being honest, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the key detail here. At least from my perspective.
the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s the part people are stuck on
If you zoom out, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just my read on it.
At first glance, the way this is presented changes how it lands which makes the reaction pretty predictable That part stands out. At least from my perspective.
Trying to be fair, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome so the response doesn’t surprise me Not convinced this is settled yet.
Bluntly speaking, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that tension shows up immediately
this depends heavily on what happens next which turns this into more of a debate Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
To be fair, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s the impression it gives me.
Putting bias aside, this feels rushed rather than thought through which turns this into more of a debate Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Stepping back, this depends heavily on what happens next Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s just my read on it.
the follow-through is what will decide this
the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s the part people are stuck on That part stands out.
If we’re being honest, this feels more about execution than intent which is why the comments look the way they do Interested to see the follow-up.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Interested to see the follow-up.
Putting bias aside, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where the disagreement starts Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s what people are responding to
Just reading this, this solves one problem while creating another which is why this is getting picked apart
Looking at this, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that friction is hard to ignore We’ll see how people react over time. That’s just my read on it.
Putting bias aside, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s the impression it gives me.
the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context. Others will probably see it differently.
this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where the disagreement starts
At this point, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s what makes this interesting. We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
Real talk, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s what people are responding to That’s the key detail here. Interested to see the follow-up. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.