It's been a big week for Agentic AI ; Here are 10 massive releases you might've missed:
* Meta acquires Manus AI
* Google launches educational agent sprint
* WSJ lets AI agent run a vending machine
A collection of AI Agent Updates! 🧵
1. **Meta Acquires ManusAI**
Joining Meta to develop agent capabilities across consumer and business products. Subscription service continues. Manus had $100M ARR, $125M revenue run rate, and \~$500M valuation from investors including Benchmark.
Meta doubling down on agents.
**2. Notion Working on Custom AI Agent Co-Workers**
Agents can be triggered via schedule, Slack tagging, or Notion page/database changes. Real AI-first workspace coming soon.
Productivity platform going all-in on agent workflows.
**3. Firecrawl Ships /agent Support to MCP**
Now works directly in ChatGPT, Claude, Cursor, and more. Describe data needed and watch it search web, navigate, and return structured data without leaving workflow.
Agent web scraping comes to all major platforms.
**4. Prime Intellect Introduces Recursive Language Models Research**
New research direction for long-horizon agents. Training models to manage their own context. Sharing initial experiments showing RLMs promise for next breakthrough in agent capabilities.
Soon to be able to manage themse
On the surface, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified
On the surface, the timing matters more than people admit That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just how it reads to me.
Without overthinking it, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s what people are responding to That part stands out.
From a neutral view, the way this is presented changes how it lands which makes the reaction pretty predictable We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a practical angle, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s what people are responding to Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s the impression it gives me.
I get the idea, the timing matters more than people admit This could age very differently in a week. That’s just my read on it.
the follow-through is what will decide this
From a practical angle, this reads stronger on paper than in practice At least from my perspective.
Putting bias aside, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage so the response doesn’t surprise me This could age very differently in a week.
this solves one problem while creating another which turns this into more of a debate
On the surface, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that tension shows up immediately Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
Trying to be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s why opinions are all over the place At least from my perspective.
At this point, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That part stands out. Time will tell.
From a neutral view, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the key detail here. At least from my perspective.
To be fair, the way this is presented changes how it lands
At first glance, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage so the response doesn’t surprise me
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which is why the comments look the way they do Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If you zoom out, the follow-through is what will decide this
this feels more about execution than intent and that’s what people are responding to Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled That part stands out.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s the part people are stuck on That part stands out. That’s just how it reads to me. That’s the impression it gives me.
this solves one problem while creating another Let’s see what happens next. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where the disagreement starts
From where I sit, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me. That’s the impression it gives me.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why the comments look the way they do At least from my perspective.
Not gonna lie, the way this is presented changes how it lands so the response doesn’t surprise me That part stands out. Curious how this plays out. At least from my perspective.
At this point, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified
From the outside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me.
I get the idea, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
this solves one problem while creating another and that’s the part people are stuck on Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
From a neutral view, the follow-through is what will decide this which explains why reactions are split That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Putting bias aside, this feels rushed rather than thought through which turns this into more of a debate Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this depends heavily on what happens next which makes the reaction pretty predictable We’ll see how people react over time.
Without overthinking it, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which makes the reaction pretty predictable Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
At this point, this feels like a half-step, not a full move Not convinced this is settled yet. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Not gonna lie, this solves one problem while creating another and that tension shows up immediately That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet.
From a neutral view, the wording alone shifts how people read this so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what changes the context. That’s just my read on it.
From a neutral view, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s what makes this interesting.
Without overthinking it, the follow-through is what will decide this Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If we’re being honest, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the key detail here. Time will tell.
At this point, the signal is clear, the strategy less so Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
To be fair, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Curious how this plays out.
From a neutral view, the way this is presented changes how it lands which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
If we’re being honest, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so
From my side, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what changes the context.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that tension shows up immediately Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which turns this into more of a debate That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just my read on it.
On the surface, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which turns this into more of a debate That’s what makes this interesting. Hard to say where this lands long term. At least from my perspective.
I get the idea, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why the comments look the way they do At least from my perspective.
If you zoom out, this reads stronger on paper than in practice so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what changes the context.