It's been a big week for Agentic AI ; Here are 10 massive releases you might've missed:
* Meta acquires Manus AI
* Google launches educational agent sprint
* WSJ lets AI agent run a vending machine
A collection of AI Agent Updates! 🧵
1. **Meta Acquires ManusAI**
Joining Meta to develop agent capabilities across consumer and business products. Subscription service continues. Manus had $100M ARR, $125M revenue run rate, and \~$500M valuation from investors including Benchmark.
Meta doubling down on agents.
**2. Notion Working on Custom AI Agent Co-Workers**
Agents can be triggered via schedule, Slack tagging, or Notion page/database changes. Real AI-first workspace coming soon.
Productivity platform going all-in on agent workflows.
**3. Firecrawl Ships /agent Support to MCP**
Now works directly in ChatGPT, Claude, Cursor, and more. Describe data needed and watch it search web, navigate, and return structured data without leaving workflow.
Agent web scraping comes to all major platforms.
**4. Prime Intellect Introduces Recursive Language Models Research**
New research direction for long-horizon agents. Training models to manage their own context. Sharing initial experiments showing RLMs promise for next breakthrough in agent capabilities.
Soon to be able to manage themse
Just reading this, this reads stronger on paper than in practice That’s the impression it gives me.
From a practical angle, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where people will push back Let’s see what happens next.
this depends heavily on what happens next That’s the key detail here. Hard to say where this lands long term.
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s the part people are stuck on
I get the idea, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s the key detail here.
To be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the key detail here.
From a neutral view, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what makes this interesting. At least from my perspective.
Real talk, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so Others will probably see it differently.
If we’re being honest, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where people will push back Feels like there’s more coming here.
On the surface, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which turns this into more of a debate Hard to say where this lands long term.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which makes the reaction pretty predictable Time will tell.
Trying to be fair, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s what people are responding to Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s just my read on it.
Bluntly speaking, the way this is presented changes how it lands Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
this feels more about execution than intent We’ll see how people react over time.
From the outside, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s what people are responding to
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that friction is hard to ignore Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s the part people are stuck on That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice
From my side, the follow-through is what will decide this
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that friction is hard to ignore
From a neutral view, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where people will push back That’s just how it reads to me. Others will probably see it differently.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s just how it reads to me.
At first glance, the main issue seems to be how this is handled Not convinced this is settled yet.
I get the idea, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so Let’s see what happens next.
this comes across more reactive than planned which explains why reactions are split That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me.
this feels rushed rather than thought through Curious how this plays out.
Bluntly speaking, the main issue seems to be how this is handled Time will tell.
Without overthinking it, the follow-through is what will decide this and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what makes this interesting. This could age very differently in a week. Others will probably see it differently.
From a neutral view, this solves one problem while creating another which turns this into more of a debate
Trying to be fair, this solves one problem while creating another At least from my perspective.
Bluntly speaking, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That part stands out. We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
Honestly, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why this is getting picked apart
If we’re being honest, this depends heavily on what happens next which is why this is getting picked apart Curious how this plays out.
Stepping back, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s the part people are stuck on
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up.
I get the idea, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where people will push back That’s just how it reads to me.
Honestly, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context.
Without overthinking it, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which explains why reactions are split That part stands out. Hard to say where this lands long term.
Putting bias aside, this feels rushed rather than thought through That part stands out. Hard to say where this lands long term.
this feels more about execution than intent We’ll see how people react over time.
this feels more about execution than intent and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Others will probably see it differently.
From the outside, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week.
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s what people are responding to At least from my perspective.
Just reading this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s the part people are stuck on That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s just my read on it.
this feels rushed rather than thought through which turns this into more of a debate That’s the impression it gives me.
Bluntly speaking, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context. That’s the impression it gives me.
Not gonna lie, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where it gets complicated That part stands out. That’s just my read on it.
If you zoom out, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the key detail here. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. At least from my perspective.
On the surface, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which explains why reactions are split Not convinced this is settled yet. Others will probably see it differently.
On the surface, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where people will push back That’s the key detail here. Interested to see the follow-up.
If you zoom out, the signal is clear, the strategy less so
the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time. At least from my perspective.
From where I sit, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where people will push back That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week.
Honestly, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s what changes the context.
At this point, the timing matters more than people admit which is why this is getting picked apart
the signal is clear, the strategy less so which turns this into more of a debate That’s just my read on it.
From a practical angle, the wording alone shifts how people read this which turns this into more of a debate Time will tell.
If we’re being honest, this depends heavily on what happens next so the response doesn’t surprise me Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this comes across more reactive than planned and that tension shows up immediately Others will probably see it differently.
From the outside, this feels rushed rather than thought through which is why the comments look the way they do At least from my perspective.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s the impression it gives me.
Just reading this, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s what changes the context. Curious how this plays out.
Stepping back, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where it gets complicated Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s just my read on it.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where the disagreement starts
On the surface, this solves one problem while creating another Curious how this plays out.
To be fair, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just how it reads to me.
this depends heavily on what happens next so the response doesn’t surprise me
this solves one problem while creating another and that tension shows up immediately That part stands out.
From the outside, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where the disagreement starts We’ll see how people react over time.
If you zoom out, this reads stronger on paper than in practice
To be fair, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone We’ll see how people react over time.
If we’re being honest, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that tension shows up immediately Feels like there’s more coming here.
Stepping back, the timing matters more than people admit which explains why reactions are split That’s the key detail here. Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
Looking at this, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s the key detail here. At least from my perspective.
At this point, this solves one problem while creating another This probably isn’t the last word on it.
From a neutral view, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where people will push back Feels like there’s more coming here.
At this point, the timing matters more than people admit which is why this is getting picked apart
From where I sit, this feels more about execution than intent and that tension shows up immediately That’s just how it reads to me.
the follow-through is what will decide this which makes the reaction pretty predictable That part stands out.
Putting bias aside, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that friction is hard to ignore That part stands out.
Honestly, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
If we’re being honest, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where it gets complicated Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.
From my side, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where people will push back
Putting bias aside, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s the part people are stuck on That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which makes the reaction pretty predictable Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Others will probably see it differently.
Putting bias aside, the timing matters more than people admit which is why this is getting picked apart
Looking at this, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that tension shows up immediately Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s the part people are stuck on Not convinced this is settled yet.
Not gonna lie, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what makes this interesting. At least from my perspective.
At this point, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s just my read on it.
On the surface, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that tension shows up immediately That’s just my read on it.
If you zoom out, this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week.
From a neutral view, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s what people are responding to
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where the disagreement starts This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s the impression it gives me.
From the outside, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s what changes the context. Others will probably see it differently.
Real talk, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what makes this interesting.
From where I sit, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why opinions are all over the place Interested to see the follow-up.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled so the response doesn’t surprise me
From the outside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where the disagreement starts That part stands out. Curious how this plays out.
Looking at this, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage
From the outside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s the key detail here. Let’s see what happens next.
Stepping back, this solves one problem while creating another and that tension shows up immediately Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
From where I sit, this comes across more reactive than planned and that friction is hard to ignore This probably isn’t the last word on it.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s what people are responding to Time will tell.
Without overthinking it, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where people will push back We’ll see how people react over time.
From the outside, the main issue seems to be how this is handled Hard to say where this lands long term.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where people will push back Hard to say where this lands long term. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Real talk, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Feels like there’s more coming here.
Just reading this, this depends heavily on what happens next which makes the reaction pretty predictable Hard to say where this lands long term.
From where I sit, the follow-through is what will decide this That’s the impression it gives me.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice which turns this into more of a debate That’s just how it reads to me.
From the outside, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where it gets complicated This could age very differently in a week.
At first glance, the main issue seems to be how this is handled We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the key detail here.
Stepping back, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Others will probably see it differently.
this feels rushed rather than thought through which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term.
I get the idea, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what changes the context.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the key detail here. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a neutral view, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
Real talk, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place Let’s see what happens next. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Just reading this, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where it gets complicated Curious how this plays out.
If you zoom out, this feels rushed rather than thought through which explains why reactions are split That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
I get the idea, this reads stronger on paper than in practice That’s what makes this interesting. Others will probably see it differently.
From the outside, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what changes the context. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the timing matters more than people admit and that friction is hard to ignore Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Just reading this, the signal is clear, the strategy less so
the signal is clear, the strategy less so so the response doesn’t surprise me Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Putting bias aside, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s the part people are stuck on Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Putting bias aside, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where the disagreement starts Time will tell.
Honestly, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so At least from my perspective.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which explains why reactions are split Interested to see the follow-up.
From a practical angle, the timing matters more than people admit and that tension shows up immediately That’s what changes the context. Curious how this plays out.
On the surface, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that friction is hard to ignore Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
To be fair, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what makes this interesting. We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If you zoom out, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s what changes the context. Interested to see the follow-up.
the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where the disagreement starts Feels like there’s more coming here.
At first glance, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so Curious how this plays out. At least from my perspective.
At first glance, the way this is presented changes how it lands That part stands out. Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Trying to be fair, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s why opinions are all over the place Let’s see what happens next.
this feels more about execution than intent and that’s what people are responding to Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
If we’re being honest, this reads stronger on paper than in practice so the response doesn’t surprise me We’ll see how people react over time.
Just reading this, this feels more about execution than intent
this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where it gets complicated
Real talk, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that tension shows up immediately That’s just how it reads to me. At least from my perspective.
On the surface, the wording alone shifts how people read this This could age very differently in a week.
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s what people are responding to At least from my perspective.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s just my read on it.
From a neutral view, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here Curious how this plays out. That’s just my read on it.
Trying to be fair, the main issue seems to be how this is handled Interested to see the follow-up.
this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s what people are responding to Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
At this point, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what makes this interesting. Hard to say where this lands long term. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Putting bias aside, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
To be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that tension shows up immediately Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.
At first glance, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s what changes the context.
this solves one problem while creating another and that’s the part people are stuck on This could age very differently in a week.
From a practical angle, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s what people are responding to Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s the impression it gives me.
Looking at this, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At this point, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s what people are responding to That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet.
To be fair, this feels like a half-step, not a full move Others will probably see it differently.
From the outside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context.
Real talk, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which makes the reaction pretty predictable Curious how this plays out.
I get the idea, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where it gets complicated Curious how this plays out.
From my side, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the key detail here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From my side, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting. Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
From the outside, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what makes this interesting. We’ll see how people react over time.
If we’re being honest, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the key detail here. Time will tell.
this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s the part people are stuck on Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s the impression it gives me.
Just reading this, this solves one problem while creating another which is why this is getting picked apart
From a practical angle, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that friction is hard to ignore Feels like there’s more coming here.
Putting bias aside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why the comments look the way they do At least from my perspective.
Honestly, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that friction is hard to ignore Let’s see what happens next.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy so the response doesn’t surprise me Hard to say where this lands long term.
this feels more about execution than intent That’s the key detail here. Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.
If we’re being honest, this feels more about execution than intent Curious how this plays out.
From a neutral view, the way this is presented changes how it lands which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it.