Is there an AI tool which can "listen" to and evaluate music?
The title of the thread kind of says it all. I'm trying to generate music tracks on the AI platform Suno. But I want to get some feedback on the tracks I'm creating. Obviously AI can't "listen" to it in the traditional, human sense, but it can't really "think" about the quality of an e-mail you're working on, either, yet it is able to analyze anyway. I asked the usual suspect, ChatGPT, but it keeps fighting me on it. At first it DID provide evaluation, but now it's saying that it can only listen to audio files SOMETIMES, and that there is no rhyme or reason to when it can (even for paid members). I am hoping for an AI tool which I can rely on for this purpose! That does so consistently and not arbitrarily like this. Thank you!
ClubHub
Responses
Sign in to respond.
Trying to be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next which is why the comments look the way they do Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
this feels more about execution than intent That’s what changes the context. Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
this solves one problem while creating another which makes the reaction pretty predictable Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
this feels more about execution than intent which is why this is getting picked apart That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next.
To be fair, this solves one problem while creating another which makes the reaction pretty predictable Interested to see the follow-up.
To be fair, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which turns this into more of a debate Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
From my side, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what makes this interesting. Others will probably see it differently.
Just reading this, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why opinions are all over the place
the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s the impression it gives me.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why this is getting picked apart That’s just my read on it.
From a practical angle, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why the comments look the way they do Curious how this plays out.
From my side, the follow-through is what will decide this Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If you zoom out, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s what people are responding to That’s the key detail here. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where people will push back
From my side, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage
this feels like a half-step, not a full move which explains why reactions are split That’s just how it reads to me.
I get the idea, the timing matters more than people admit Time will tell.
the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why opinions are all over the place Let’s see what happens next.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s just my read on it.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s just my read on it.
From my side, the wording alone shifts how people read this Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which makes the reaction pretty predictable Interested to see the follow-up.
Just reading this, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where it gets complicated Let’s see what happens next.
From a practical angle, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s just my read on it.
Looking at this, this feels like a half-step, not a full move
the direction makes sense but the details are messy so the response doesn’t surprise me This could age very differently in a week.
Bluntly speaking, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s what changes the context. Not convinced this is settled yet.
From where I sit, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
If you zoom out, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place
From my side, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy which makes the reaction pretty predictable
Looking at this, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context. Feels like there’s more coming here. At least from my perspective.
the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where people will push back That part stands out. Time will tell.
Looking at this, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where people will push back
To be fair, the main issue seems to be how this is handled
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which turns this into more of a debate Curious how this plays out.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which explains why reactions are split That part stands out.
At first glance, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what changes the context. Interested to see the follow-up.
Stepping back, the direction makes sense but the details are messy Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
Just reading this, this reads stronger on paper than in practice That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
On the surface, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s the part people are stuck on This probably isn’t the last word on it.
I get the idea, this feels rushed rather than thought through which is why the comments look the way they do That’s just how it reads to me.
If we’re being honest, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which turns this into more of a debate We’ll see how people react over time.
Without overthinking it, the timing matters more than people admit That’s the key detail here.
If we’re being honest, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where people will push back
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context. That’s just my read on it.
Putting bias aside, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time.
From a neutral view, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which turns this into more of a debate Feels like there’s more coming here. At least from my perspective.
At this point, this feels rushed rather than thought through which turns this into more of a debate At least from my perspective.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s what changes the context. Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
At first glance, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where the disagreement starts Let’s see what happens next.
Stepping back, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where it gets complicated Interested to see the follow-up.
At this point, the main issue seems to be how this is handled We’ll see how people react over time.
From the outside, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s the impression it gives me.