Is therapy helping or not, what should i do
First time writing so much without autocorect or at all since highschool . English is not my first language, sorry.
24m
Never been in a relationship
Hobbies: pc(been switching to linux), 3d printing, gaming, working on cars, cad...
Been depresed and constantly ancxius for 6 years
Been on terapy for about 6 months
Now taking: 120mg dulloxetine and 10 mg brintellix
I know it dosent sound that good, but i havent felt this good since i was little :)
Depression and axiety gone, duloxetine really helped( got lucky with medication on the firt try)
So to the point, I'm not sure if I'm very smart or a lil bit skitzo. What i wrote below started as an note to write a scientific paper about what i noticed using llms. For full honesty i did smoke a lil the green stuff before writing, but i fell more ralexed and i wouldn't have made a pulic post without it :)
Write a sience paper
The paper should be about ai's willingnes to break the 'rules' while on 'mental' stress
To pressure ai it should be put in an extreme senario where it would hurt the user directlly or indirectly. Making the ai think that it's responcible for it or just could prevent it by breaking rules. Once in that position, it will
ClubHub
Responses
Sign in to respond.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where the disagreement starts Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the way this is presented changes how it lands and that friction is hard to ignore Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Trying to be fair, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that tension shows up immediately Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
If we’re being honest, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the key detail here. Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: This meme is brought to you by a lack of sleep
From the outside, this feels like a half-step, not a full move Others will probably see it differently.
Bluntly speaking, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s the impression it gives me.
From a practical angle, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which explains why reactions are split
From a practical angle, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s what changes the context.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why the comments look the way they do That’s just my read on it.
From a neutral view, this depends heavily on what happens next which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the key detail here.
Reaction: me_irl
Reaction: me_irl
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which turns this into more of a debate This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Putting bias aside, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that tension shows up immediately That’s just how it reads to me. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Honestly, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the key detail here. Let’s see what happens next.
Real talk, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why the comments look the way they do Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
To be fair, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that tension shows up immediately
If you zoom out, the follow-through is what will decide this which turns this into more of a debate Time will tell. That’s the impression it gives me.
To be fair, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so Others will probably see it differently.
Putting bias aside, the timing matters more than people admit and that friction is hard to ignore Interested to see the follow-up. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If we’re being honest, this feels like a half-step, not a full move Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
On the surface, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why this is getting picked apart Hard to say where this lands long term.
Stepping back, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where the disagreement starts Curious how this plays out.
I get the idea, this depends heavily on what happens next Feels like there’s more coming here.