Is IT Ops ok with fires?
Are IT Ops professionals delusional in thinking the job is to make “IT Operations” better, more efficient, more advanced?
Where do you land - Fireman or Builder?
Why are labor and finance resources always tight for IT Ops? Budgets go up only when there’s a breach or when there’s hype for a product.
In my experience, companies seem to be ok with silos, single points of failure, lack of training, etc. The IT Ops department budget is treated as a liability rather than an asset. Although, there’s always lots of talk behind “efforts” for real cybersecurity, zero trust, and governance; it always falls off.
This also leads to secondary consequences, of knowledge hoarding, hero behavior, toxic environments because the work becomes- “How do I get noticed?”. Or worse, belief that one’s chosen behavior facilitates job security.
So are IT OPs professionals mid? Should we accept that the job is to fix things. Thats it.
From my side, the wording alone shifts how people read this which makes the reaction pretty predictable Others will probably see it differently.
Putting bias aside, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s what people are responding to That’s just my read on it.
Honestly, the timing matters more than people admit and that friction is hard to ignore At least from my perspective.
Looking at this, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which makes the reaction pretty predictable Time will tell.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why this is getting picked apart That’s just my read on it.
Honestly, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which makes the reaction pretty predictable Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Just reading this, the signal is clear, the strategy less so We’ll see how people react over time.
From a practical angle, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the key detail here. Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
Trying to be fair, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which is why the comments look the way they do Not convinced this is settled yet. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At first glance, this solves one problem while creating another which explains why reactions are split That’s just my read on it.
Honestly, the way this is presented changes how it lands We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
From my side, the signal is clear, the strategy less so Feels like there’s more coming here.
Without overthinking it, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s what changes the context. At least from my perspective.
the wording alone shifts how people read this This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
Honestly, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that friction is hard to ignore
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where it gets complicated This could age very differently in a week. Others will probably see it differently.
To be fair, this reads stronger on paper than in practice
Trying to be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where it gets complicated That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
the way this is presented changes how it lands
From a practical angle, the wording alone shifts how people read this Not convinced this is settled yet.
Without overthinking it, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Bluntly speaking, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s what people are responding to That’s just my read on it.
From a practical angle, this depends heavily on what happens next which is why the comments look the way they do We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s the part people are stuck on This could age very differently in a week.
Real talk, the timing matters more than people admit That’s the key detail here.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s what changes the context. At least from my perspective.
Without overthinking it, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That part stands out.
From where I sit, this depends heavily on what happens next which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the key detail here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Trying to be fair, this comes across more reactive than planned and that friction is hard to ignore That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet. At least from my perspective.
Putting bias aside, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that tension shows up immediately Interested to see the follow-up. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a neutral view, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified so the response doesn’t surprise me Let’s see what happens next.
Just reading this, the way this is presented changes how it lands That part stands out. Others will probably see it differently.
From the outside, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where the disagreement starts Feels like there’s more coming here.
Real talk, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s what people are responding to
Honestly, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting.
the way this is presented changes how it lands which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context.
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s just my read on it.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s why opinions are all over the place
Just reading this, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet. At least from my perspective.
the way this is presented changes how it lands which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the impression it gives me.
Bluntly speaking, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where people will push back
If we’re being honest, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where the disagreement starts Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
I get the idea, this feels more about execution than intent Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Others will probably see it differently.
From my side, this solves one problem while creating another We’ll see how people react over time.
To be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next which turns this into more of a debate We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what makes this interesting. We’ll see how people react over time.
Not gonna lie, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which turns this into more of a debate That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
On the surface, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that friction is hard to ignore
To be fair, this reads stronger on paper than in practice so the response doesn’t surprise me Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s the impression it gives me.
On the surface, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which explains why reactions are split We’ll see how people react over time.
From a practical angle, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where the disagreement starts Let’s see what happens next.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so Not convinced this is settled yet.
Bluntly speaking, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where the disagreement starts That part stands out. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Stepping back, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where it gets complicated
Real talk, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s the part people are stuck on Let’s see what happens next.
Not gonna lie, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s what people are responding to We’ll see how people react over time.
Bluntly speaking, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That part stands out.
From the outside, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.