Imagine AI picking who gets promoted at your job. Should it just suggest or decide?
Hey everyone, imagine logging into work and finding out an AI system just picked who gets promoted, based on your emails, typing speed, or based on performance or even how often you check news sites.
Sounds wild, right? But a recent survey shows 60% of managers already use AI for stuff like raises and promotions. It could cut out human bias, but what if it misses the real story behind your hard work?
Should AI just suggest options, or actually decide? Like, assist with data but let humans call the shots? Or go full auto?
ClubHub
Responses
Sign in to respond.
Real talk, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That part stands out. Others will probably see it differently.
From my side, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place That part stands out. We’ll see how people react over time.
From a neutral view, this comes across more reactive than planned which turns this into more of a debate Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s the impression it gives me.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so Hard to say where this lands long term.
If you zoom out, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where the disagreement starts Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: lock in chat
At this point, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified This could age very differently in a week.
At first glance, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which turns this into more of a debate Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
To be fair, this solves one problem while creating another That’s the key detail here.
Reaction: not a speck of dust can be seen
Not gonna lie, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move We’ll see how people react over time.
At first glance, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s why opinions are all over the place
I get the idea, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s what makes this interesting.
Real talk, this feels more about execution than intent which explains why reactions are split This probably isn’t the last word on it.
From where I sit, this comes across more reactive than planned Time will tell.
the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why this is getting picked apart
Reaction: Step one: admit its a bad habit. Step two: keep doing it anyway
Trying to be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage Interested to see the follow-up.
this feels rushed rather than thought through which turns this into more of a debate That’s the key detail here.
Trying to be fair, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s the key detail here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Real talk, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the key detail here. Hard to say where this lands long term.
the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where it gets complicated That part stands out. At least from my perspective.
At this point, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage Not convinced this is settled yet.
At first glance, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the key detail here.
the timing matters more than people admit and that’s what people are responding to
this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Hard to say where this lands long term.
Reaction: One does not simply resist clicking the tongs. Embrace carcinization.
From the outside, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone This probably isn’t the last word on it. Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: me_irl
If you zoom out, this reads stronger on paper than in practice This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
From where I sit, the wording alone shifts how people read this Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
From the outside, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s why opinions are all over the place Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
Stepping back, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s the impression it gives me.
At first glance, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Feels like there’s more coming here.
Reaction: me_irl
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s the part people are stuck on This probably isn’t the last word on it. Others will probably see it differently.
the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s just how it reads to me. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
On the surface, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s the part people are stuck on
I get the idea, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Not convinced this is settled yet.
From where I sit, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why the comments look the way they do Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: FFS ... Meh
At this point, this depends heavily on what happens next That’s what changes the context. That’s the impression it gives me.
At this point, this feels rushed rather than thought through Others will probably see it differently.
this feels more about execution than intent That’s what changes the context. Interested to see the follow-up.
Just reading this, this depends heavily on what happens next which is why the comments look the way they do That’s the impression it gives me.
I get the idea, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where the disagreement starts
If we’re being honest, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where it gets complicated We’ll see how people react over time.
At first glance, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a neutral view, this comes across more reactive than planned which turns this into more of a debate That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
Trying to be fair, the direction makes sense but the details are messy Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: First day as a god
Just reading this, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s what makes this interesting.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage
Bluntly speaking, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what changes the context. Others will probably see it differently.
Not gonna lie, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which explains why reactions are split Interested to see the follow-up.
Reaction: Castle Rock and Derry clears the worst place to live in fiction contest.
From my side, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which makes the reaction pretty predictable
Honestly, this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: Step one: admit its a bad habit. Step two: keep doing it anyway
From where I sit, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where people will push back At least from my perspective.
Putting bias aside, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s why opinions are all over the place At least from my perspective.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so Time will tell. That’s the impression it gives me.
At this point, the direction makes sense but the details are messy Hard to say where this lands long term. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Bluntly speaking, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where it gets complicated Let’s see what happens next. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where it gets complicated We’ll see how people react over time.
this comes across more reactive than planned which explains why reactions are split Curious how this plays out. At least from my perspective.
At this point, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage Hard to say where this lands long term.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That part stands out. This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Trying to be fair, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where it gets complicated We’ll see how people react over time. At least from my perspective.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where it gets complicated
Not gonna lie, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which makes the reaction pretty predictable This probably isn’t the last word on it. Others will probably see it differently.
Looking at this, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which explains why reactions are split Not convinced this is settled yet. At least from my perspective.
At first glance, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
At this point, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Feels like there’s more coming here.
Stepping back, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s what people are responding to We’ll see how people react over time.
From the outside, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting. Time will tell.
At first glance, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which is why this is getting picked apart At least from my perspective.
Putting bias aside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That part stands out. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Honestly, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what makes this interesting. At least from my perspective.
At first glance, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why the comments look the way they do That’s just how it reads to me. That’s just my read on it.
Putting bias aside, the timing matters more than people admit
Just reading this, the follow-through is what will decide this which turns this into more of a debate Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: FFS ... Meh
Reaction: problem solved
At first glance, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s just how it reads to me.
Trying to be fair, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that friction is hard to ignore Not convinced this is settled yet.
From my side, this solves one problem while creating another and that friction is hard to ignore This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
To be fair, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
Not gonna lie, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what changes the context. That’s the impression it gives me.
I get the idea, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s the part people are stuck on We’ll see how people react over time. At least from my perspective.
If we’re being honest, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Time will tell.
Without overthinking it, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where people will push back That’s the key detail here. Feels like there’s more coming here.
From where I sit, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s just my read on it.
Honestly, this solves one problem while creating another Curious how this plays out.
Reaction: Those Actors Were Hella Exhausted
Just reading this, this depends heavily on what happens next and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what changes the context. That’s just my read on it.
Honestly, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where people will push back That’s what changes the context. Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: Lonely at the bottom
At this point, this feels rushed rather than thought through which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context.
Looking at this, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: It's been 7 years , yes 7 whole years
From the outside, this feels rushed rather than thought through Not convinced this is settled yet.
Real talk, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where people will push back That’s the key detail here. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Reaction: I believed in karma too
From where I sit, the follow-through is what will decide this Interested to see the follow-up.
Bluntly speaking, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
Looking at this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which explains why reactions are split That’s the key detail here.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why the comments look the way they do
From a neutral view, the timing matters more than people admit which makes the reaction pretty predictable
To be fair, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which turns this into more of a debate We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Not gonna lie, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where the disagreement starts At least from my perspective.
From the outside, the main issue seems to be how this is handled
this depends heavily on what happens next That’s what changes the context.
Reaction: Me_irl
Not gonna lie, the wording alone shifts how people read this At least from my perspective.
Just reading this, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which turns this into more of a debate That’s the impression it gives me.
Real talk, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s just my read on it.
Putting bias aside, the wording alone shifts how people read this which makes the reaction pretty predictable Hard to say where this lands long term.
From where I sit, the timing matters more than people admit This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
From where I sit, this comes across more reactive than planned and that tension shows up immediately That part stands out.
Reaction: Its that simple
If you zoom out, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where people will push back Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Others will probably see it differently.
Stepping back, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s what people are responding to That’s what makes this interesting.
Not gonna lie, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why this is getting picked apart Not convinced this is settled yet.