Imagine AI picking who gets promoted at your job. Should it just suggest or decide?
Hey everyone, imagine logging into work and finding out an AI system just picked who gets promoted, based on your emails, typing speed, or based on performance or even how often you check news sites.
Sounds wild, right? But a recent survey shows 60% of managers already use AI for stuff like raises and promotions. It could cut out human bias, but what if it misses the real story behind your hard work?
Should AI just suggest options, or actually decide? Like, assist with data but let humans call the shots? Or go full auto?
Stepping back, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where people will push back
Reaction: I'm recreating 1939
At this point, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s the key detail here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At this point, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where it gets complicated Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At this point, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s what people are responding to That’s the key detail here. At least from my perspective.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s what people are responding to
Real talk, the follow-through is what will decide this That’s the key detail here. Others will probably see it differently.
If we’re being honest, this feels more about execution than intent which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting.
If you zoom out, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that friction is hard to ignore That’s just my read on it.
If we’re being honest, the timing matters more than people admit That’s the impression it gives me.
Honestly, this feels more about execution than intent
this solves one problem while creating another This probably isn’t the last word on it. Others will probably see it differently.
Putting bias aside, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s the key detail here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what changes the context.
From my side, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which is why the comments look the way they do
Honestly, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a neutral view, the signal is clear, the strategy less so so the response doesn’t surprise me Feels like there’s more coming here.
Looking at this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled Time will tell. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a practical angle, this feels more about execution than intent which explains why reactions are split That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet.
From where I sit, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s what changes the context. Feels like there’s more coming here.
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s why opinions are all over the place Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the key detail here. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
From a practical angle, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why opinions are all over the place Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
On the surface, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome so the response doesn’t surprise me Time will tell.
From my side, the follow-through is what will decide this which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what changes the context. Others will probably see it differently.
If you zoom out, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place We’ll see how people react over time.
this depends heavily on what happens next and that tension shows up immediately This could age very differently in a week.
Not gonna lie, the way this is presented changes how it lands which turns this into more of a debate That’s the key detail here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s what changes the context. Let’s see what happens next.
To be fair, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which turns this into more of a debate We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a practical angle, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why opinions are all over the place
If we’re being honest, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that tension shows up immediately That’s the key detail here. Not convinced this is settled yet.
From a neutral view, the signal is clear, the strategy less so Time will tell.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s what people are responding to That’s just how it reads to me.
If you zoom out, the timing matters more than people admit
this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the key detail here.
the follow-through is what will decide this which is why the comments look the way they do That’s the impression it gives me.
On the surface, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Time will tell.
this comes across more reactive than planned
Not gonna lie, the wording alone shifts how people read this At least from my perspective.
this depends heavily on what happens next and that tension shows up immediately Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this depends heavily on what happens next Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why this is getting picked apart This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
On the surface, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s just my read on it.
At this point, the signal is clear, the strategy less so At least from my perspective.
Looking at this, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here so the response doesn’t surprise me
At first glance, the timing matters more than people admit which is why this is getting picked apart That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next. At least from my perspective.
Looking at this, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which turns this into more of a debate
On the surface, this feels more about execution than intent That’s the key detail here. Time will tell.
Trying to be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next Curious how this plays out.
Stepping back, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where people will push back This probably isn’t the last word on it.
From a neutral view, this solves one problem while creating another Time will tell.
From where I sit, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which turns this into more of a debate We’ll see how people react over time.
Without overthinking it, this feels more about execution than intent Time will tell.
I get the idea, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why this is getting picked apart We’ll see how people react over time.