I was placed in a foster family and ended up being used as farm labor
Just to be clear, english is not my first language. I used translation assistance to write this text so I could express myself accurately. The events described are true and written as factually as possible.
I was placed in a foster family following serious family difficulties. This foster family ran a farm with several chicken coops.
When I arrived, my phone was broken. The family suggested that I collect eggs from their chicken coops in exchange for some money so that I could buy a new phone. The farm had three coops: two with around 2,000 hens each and a smaller one with about 1,000 hens, for a total of roughly 4,000 eggs per day. The eggs were brought by conveyor belts into a room where they had to be cleaned, sorted, placed into boxes, and stamped. There were also eggs left inside the coops that had to be collected manually.
I worked every morning from 7:00 a.m. to around 11:30 a.m., Monday to Friday. At the beginning, a farm employee was present and did most of the work. I was slower and learning. I did this for two weeks and was paid 200 Swiss francs, which allowed me to buy a new phone.
After that, the family asked me to continue collecting eggs. I agreed, assuming I would c
From my side, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s the part people are stuck on We’ll see how people react over time.
If we’re being honest, this feels more about execution than intent That’s just how it reads to me. That’s the impression it gives me.
Real talk, this feels like a half-step, not a full move Feels like an opening move, not an ending. At least from my perspective.
At this point, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s what changes the context. Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why this is getting picked apart
the follow-through is what will decide this so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like there’s more coming here.
Trying to be fair, this comes across more reactive than planned Interested to see the follow-up.
Putting bias aside, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why the comments look the way they do That part stands out. Others will probably see it differently.
From the outside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that tension shows up immediately
At first glance, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where it gets complicated Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If we’re being honest, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That part stands out. That’s the impression it gives me.
At this point, this reads stronger on paper than in practice At least from my perspective.
Stepping back, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why opinions are all over the place We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s the key detail here. At least from my perspective.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why this is getting picked apart This could age very differently in a week.
To be fair, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s the key detail here.
Trying to be fair, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
the way this is presented changes how it lands so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the key detail here. That’s just my read on it.
Looking at this, the way this is presented changes how it lands That part stands out.
I get the idea, the way this is presented changes how it lands At least from my perspective.
To be fair, this comes across more reactive than planned which makes the reaction pretty predictable This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Not gonna lie, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s what people are responding to
From my side, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Others will probably see it differently.
Real talk, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s the key detail here. Not convinced this is settled yet.
From a practical angle, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s what people are responding to
If we’re being honest, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the key detail here.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy which turns this into more of a debate That’s the impression it gives me.
Putting bias aside, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which explains why reactions are split Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
Honestly, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which turns this into more of a debate Not convinced this is settled yet.
I get the idea, the direction makes sense but the details are messy
Not gonna lie, this feels more about execution than intent which turns this into more of a debate Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Looking at this, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why opinions are all over the place That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s just my read on it.
Just reading this, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that tension shows up immediately At least from my perspective.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me.
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where it gets complicated Feels like there’s more coming here.
To be fair, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
I get the idea, the direction makes sense but the details are messy Others will probably see it differently.
the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s the impression it gives me.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here This could age very differently in a week.
I get the idea, the wording alone shifts how people read this Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
At this point, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that friction is hard to ignore That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Just reading this, this solves one problem while creating another Curious how this plays out.
this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s what changes the context. Others will probably see it differently.
At first glance, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s what people are responding to That’s what makes this interesting. Hard to say where this lands long term. At least from my perspective.
Just reading this, this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s the impression it gives me.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so so the response doesn’t surprise me Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s just my read on it.
Honestly, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where the disagreement starts
Not gonna lie, the wording alone shifts how people read this which makes the reaction pretty predictable Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
I get the idea, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that tension shows up immediately
From where I sit, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
From a neutral view, the follow-through is what will decide this That part stands out.
Without overthinking it, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the key detail here.
If we’re being honest, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s why opinions are all over the place That part stands out.
At this point, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why opinions are all over the place At least from my perspective.
Bluntly speaking, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the key detail here. Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
Without overthinking it, the follow-through is what will decide this Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Just reading this, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that friction is hard to ignore Others will probably see it differently.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s what changes the context. Others will probably see it differently.
Real talk, this depends heavily on what happens next Others will probably see it differently.
To be fair, this feels rushed rather than thought through We’ll see how people react over time.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which makes the reaction pretty predictable Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s just my read on it.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which makes the reaction pretty predictable
the signal is clear, the strategy less so Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the timing matters more than people admit which is why this is getting picked apart Feels like there’s more coming here.
Real talk, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context. At least from my perspective.
Bluntly speaking, this depends heavily on what happens next which turns this into more of a debate Others will probably see it differently.
this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where people will push back That part stands out. We’ll see how people react over time.
this feels more about execution than intent which is why the comments look the way they do Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
At first glance, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Putting bias aside, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s the key detail here. Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
From my side, the way this is presented changes how it lands Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that friction is hard to ignore Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Others will probably see it differently.
Stepping back, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s the part people are stuck on Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the wording alone shifts how people read this so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the key detail here.
Putting bias aside, this feels more about execution than intent Interested to see the follow-up.
From where I sit, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s what changes the context. Curious how this plays out. At least from my perspective.
From my side, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which explains why reactions are split Not convinced this is settled yet.
If we’re being honest, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage so the response doesn’t surprise me That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Not gonna lie, this solves one problem while creating another That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up. That’s the impression it gives me.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why the comments look the way they do That’s just my read on it.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s what changes the context. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
On the surface, this depends heavily on what happens next which explains why reactions are split That’s what changes the context.
At first glance, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That part stands out. Others will probably see it differently.
Looking at this, this feels rushed rather than thought through which is why this is getting picked apart Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
At this point, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move which explains why reactions are split Let’s see what happens next.
Honestly, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why this is getting picked apart Interested to see the follow-up.
the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s the key detail here.
If you zoom out, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Bluntly speaking, the follow-through is what will decide this Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
From where I sit, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where it gets complicated
From a practical angle, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s the key detail here. Others will probably see it differently.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why opinions are all over the place
On the surface, the direction makes sense but the details are messy We’ll see how people react over time.
Looking at this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why opinions are all over the place That part stands out. We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.
From the outside, this feels like a half-step, not a full move Feels like there’s more coming here. At least from my perspective.
Not gonna lie, the main issue seems to be how this is handled
Without overthinking it, this depends heavily on what happens next and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what changes the context. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From the outside, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here
the follow-through is what will decide this That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it. At least from my perspective.
Putting bias aside, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where people will push back Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
Real talk, the timing matters more than people admit That’s the key detail here. Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
Just reading this, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the key detail here. That’s just my read on it.
On the surface, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Others will probably see it differently.
the timing matters more than people admit which makes the reaction pretty predictable That part stands out. That’s just how it reads to me. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a practical angle, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s just how it reads to me. Others will probably see it differently.
Honestly, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which explains why reactions are split That’s what makes this interesting.
From a practical angle, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where people will push back We’ll see how people react over time.
Just reading this, the wording alone shifts how people read this
Reaction: me_irl
If we’re being honest, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s what people are responding to Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: me_irl
Putting bias aside, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s what changes the context. Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Bluntly speaking, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which explains why reactions are split That’s the key detail here. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Reaction: me_irl
Reaction: Me_irl
If we’re being honest, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage so the response doesn’t surprise me That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
To be fair, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which turns this into more of a debate Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s the impression it gives me.
this feels more about execution than intent and that tension shows up immediately That’s just my read on it.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s just my read on it.
If you zoom out, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that tension shows up immediately That’s the key detail here. That’s the impression it gives me.
Stepping back, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why opinions are all over the place We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a practical angle, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s what makes this interesting.
Honestly, this feels rushed rather than thought through We’ll see how people react over time.
If we’re being honest, the signal is clear, the strategy less so
If you zoom out, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which turns this into more of a debate That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week.
Reaction: me_irl
Without overthinking it, this depends heavily on what happens next That’s what makes this interesting. We’ll see how people react over time.
Stepping back, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
From my side, the follow-through is what will decide this Let’s see what happens next.
Honestly, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why this is getting picked apart Interested to see the follow-up.
the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Without overthinking it, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that tension shows up immediately Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: me_irl
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the key detail here. Hard to say where this lands long term. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: me_irl
From the outside, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That part stands out.
Reaction: me_irl
Looking at this, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where the disagreement starts
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified
If you zoom out, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s just my read on it.
From the outside, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what makes this interesting.
From my side, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s what people are responding to That’s the key detail here. Time will tell. Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: me_irl
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Stepping back, the signal is clear, the strategy less so
Real talk, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what changes the context. That’s the impression it gives me.
To be fair, this comes across more reactive than planned which makes the reaction pretty predictable This probably isn’t the last word on it.
From the outside, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s what people are responding to That’s the key detail here. We’ll see how people react over time.
Not gonna lie, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s the part people are stuck on Curious how this plays out. At least from my perspective.
At first glance, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why the comments look the way they do That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: me_irl
From the outside, this feels like a half-step, not a full move Hard to say where this lands long term.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy which turns this into more of a debate That’s the key detail here.
Looking at this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which is why this is getting picked apart Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a neutral view, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s the part people are stuck on Hard to say where this lands long term.
Looking at this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which turns this into more of a debate Let’s see what happens next.
On the surface, the follow-through is what will decide this That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Reaction: They both have a serious jaw condition so it should be a fair fight
At first glance, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that tension shows up immediately That’s the key detail here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where it gets complicated At least from my perspective.
From a neutral view, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where it gets complicated
If we’re being honest, this depends heavily on what happens next
the wording alone shifts how people read this Time will tell. Others will probably see it differently.
From my side, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s what changes the context.
Reaction: Mr. Obama, forgive me
Just reading this, the wording alone shifts how people read this Time will tell. That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: Every year it becomes worse
the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place Others will probably see it differently.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why this is getting picked apart
From the outside, the timing matters more than people admit and that tension shows up immediately That part stands out. Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s the impression it gives me.
If we’re being honest, this feels like a half-step, not a full move so the response doesn’t surprise me Feels like an opening move, not an ending. At least from my perspective.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so which turns this into more of a debate Feels like there’s more coming here.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why the comments look the way they do
this reads stronger on paper than in practice Others will probably see it differently.
Bluntly speaking, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting. Time will tell.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where it gets complicated That’s just how it reads to me.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s what changes the context. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. At least from my perspective.
At first glance, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where it gets complicated
Reaction: When the villian catches the hero:
the main issue seems to be how this is handled which turns this into more of a debate This probably isn’t the last word on it.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why this is getting picked apart
I get the idea, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why opinions are all over the place
this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why opinions are all over the place That part stands out. That’s the impression it gives me.
the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where it gets complicated That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.