I was placed in a foster family and ended up being used as farm labor
Just to be clear, english is not my first language. I used translation assistance to write this text so I could express myself accurately. The events described are true and written as factually as possible.
I was placed in a foster family following serious family difficulties. This foster family ran a farm with several chicken coops.
When I arrived, my phone was broken. The family suggested that I collect eggs from their chicken coops in exchange for some money so that I could buy a new phone. The farm had three coops: two with around 2,000 hens each and a smaller one with about 1,000 hens, for a total of roughly 4,000 eggs per day. The eggs were brought by conveyor belts into a room where they had to be cleaned, sorted, placed into boxes, and stamped. There were also eggs left inside the coops that had to be collected manually.
I worked every morning from 7:00 a.m. to around 11:30 a.m., Monday to Friday. At the beginning, a farm employee was present and did most of the work. I was slower and learning. I did this for two weeks and was paid 200 Swiss francs, which allowed me to buy a new phone.
After that, the family asked me to continue collecting eggs. I agreed, assuming I would c
Not gonna lie, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here
If you zoom out, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s the part people are stuck on Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s just how it reads to me. At least from my perspective.
Bluntly speaking, the timing matters more than people admit This could age very differently in a week.
From the outside, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week. Others will probably see it differently.
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where the disagreement starts This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At this point, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That part stands out. Feels like there’s more coming here.
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that friction is hard to ignore
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that tension shows up immediately That’s what changes the context.
Looking at this, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Not convinced this is settled yet.
Bluntly speaking, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s what people are responding to That part stands out. This could age very differently in a week.
Honestly, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s the key detail here.
From my side, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which makes the reaction pretty predictable Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If we’re being honest, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s the key detail here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Bluntly speaking, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage At least from my perspective.
On the surface, the way this is presented changes how it lands which turns this into more of a debate That part stands out.
Trying to be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next
From the outside, the timing matters more than people admit That’s what makes this interesting. Time will tell. Others will probably see it differently.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why this is getting picked apart
From my side, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week.
At this point, this depends heavily on what happens next That’s just my read on it.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where the disagreement starts
Not gonna lie, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why opinions are all over the place Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s the impression it gives me.
Putting bias aside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That part stands out. Time will tell. That’s the impression it gives me.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Not convinced this is settled yet.
Not gonna lie, the way this is presented changes how it lands That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s the impression it gives me.
this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s the part people are stuck on We’ll see how people react over time.
Without overthinking it, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that friction is hard to ignore That’s just my read on it.
Honestly, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Stepping back, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which is why this is getting picked apart That part stands out. This could age very differently in a week.
I get the idea, the way this is presented changes how it lands Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s just my read on it.
Real talk, this depends heavily on what happens next Let’s see what happens next.
Stepping back, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next.
Bluntly speaking, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the key detail here. That’s just my read on it.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here
Looking at this, the follow-through is what will decide this That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just my read on it.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so so the response doesn’t surprise me Curious how this plays out.
On the surface, this comes across more reactive than planned so the response doesn’t surprise me
Real talk, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what makes this interesting. Curious how this plays out.
If we’re being honest, this solves one problem while creating another which explains why reactions are split That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
Real talk, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the key detail here. Others will probably see it differently.
To be fair, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where the disagreement starts Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
Bluntly speaking, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that tension shows up immediately Interested to see the follow-up.
I get the idea, this solves one problem while creating another and that tension shows up immediately That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet.
From the outside, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s the part people are stuck on Interested to see the follow-up.
Without overthinking it, this comes across more reactive than planned which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the key detail here. Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
From where I sit, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which explains why reactions are split Curious how this plays out.
Bluntly speaking, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why this is getting picked apart Interested to see the follow-up. That’s the impression it gives me.
If you zoom out, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why opinions are all over the place This probably isn’t the last word on it.
At this point, the follow-through is what will decide this
Stepping back, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that tension shows up immediately We’ll see how people react over time.
this feels rushed rather than thought through Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
I get the idea, the wording alone shifts how people read this Interested to see the follow-up.
From a practical angle, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s what people are responding to At least from my perspective.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice Others will probably see it differently.
Bluntly speaking, this feels rushed rather than thought through which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context. Others will probably see it differently.
I get the idea, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context. Not convinced this is settled yet. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.