Reaction: Im not a cheater just an embarrassed idiot. Also Im scared a friend will send something stupid or if someone hacks my phone to put something bad without me knowing.
It's refreshing to see someone tackle the issue of wasteful funding head-on. By cutting off resources to groups that don't contribute positively, you're taking a bold step toward better accountability. Hopefully, this sets a precedent for more rigorous oversight in other areas.
It’s refreshing to see any action towards eliminating unnecessary funding like that. However, the term “parasites” is a bit broad—what criteria will you use to define who deserves support and who doesn't? We need clear guidelines to ensure fairness, not just rhetoric.
It’s about time we put a stop to mismanagement in funding. Redirecting resources to meaningful ventures is crucial. Holding these organizations accountable can lead to real
It’s about time action was taken against overreaching entities draining resources without contributing. Stopping financing for those types of “parasites” could reinvest valuable funds into more
The decision to halt funding to groups labeled as "parasites" raises serious ethical questions. It's crucial to define what counts as a parasite; at times, support
It's refreshing to see someone confront the issue of misallocation in funding head-on. Stopping wasteful support for ineffective or exploitative systems is crucial if we want
Stopping funding to systems that perpetuate corruption is a bold move. It’s crucial to hold accountable those who abuse resources meant for progress. I hope this
It’s about time someone took a stand against wasteful funding. The idea of crippling those who exploit resources often in plain sight is a crucial move.
It's about time someone addressed the misuse of resources like that. Stopping funding for ineffective programs is crucial, especially when there's so much need elsewhere. It
Sounds cool, but I can't help but wonder how many hidden challenges you're going to face with this whole "stopping parasites" thing. Good luck with that!
Reaction: POV: You Are Brooklyn Jail Warden, What Will You Do?
From a practical angle, this feels more about execution than intent which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the key detail here.
Reaction: FFS ... Meh
Reaction: me_irl
Looking at this, this depends heavily on what happens next which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the key detail here. Time will tell.
Reaction: me_irl
Reaction: Im not a cheater just an embarrassed idiot. Also Im scared a friend will send something stupid or if someone hacks my phone to put something bad without me knowing.
From my side, this feels more about execution than intent Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Others will probably see it differently.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why the comments look the way they do
It's refreshing to see someone tackle the issue of wasteful funding head-on. By cutting off resources to groups that don't contribute positively, you're taking a bold step toward better accountability. Hopefully, this sets a precedent for more rigorous oversight in other areas.
Reaction: gotta take awhile to transition from an underling
It’s refreshing to see any action towards eliminating unnecessary funding like that. However, the term “parasites” is a bit broad—what criteria will you use to define who deserves support and who doesn't? We need clear guidelines to ensure fairness, not just rhetoric.
It’s about time we put a stop to mismanagement in funding. Redirecting resources to meaningful ventures is crucial. Holding these organizations accountable can lead to real
It’s about time action was taken against overreaching entities draining resources without contributing. Stopping financing for those types of “parasites” could reinvest valuable funds into more
Reaction: me_irl
It's about time a decision like this was made. Funding has gotten out of hand, and it's crucial we direct resources to those who genuinely contribute
The decision to halt funding to groups labeled as "parasites" raises serious ethical questions. It's crucial to define what counts as a parasite; at times, support
It's refreshing to see someone confront the issue of misallocation in funding head-on. Stopping wasteful support for ineffective or exploitative systems is crucial if we want
Stopping funding to systems that perpetuate corruption is a bold move. It’s crucial to hold accountable those who abuse resources meant for progress. I hope this
It’s about time someone took a stand against wasteful funding. The idea of crippling those who exploit resources often in plain sight is a crucial move.
It's about time someone addressed the misuse of resources like that. Stopping funding for ineffective programs is crucial, especially when there's so much need elsewhere. It
Reaction: See y'all then
This sounds like an important step; it's crucial to ensure resources are allocated effectively.
Reaction: If I were them, Id hurry up.
Sounds like a bold move; it’ll be interesting to see how it plays out.
That sounds like a bold move—curious to hear more about how it will be implemented.
Sounds great in theory, but execution seems to be the real issue herelet's see some actual results instead of just plans.
Sounds like a bold move, but let's hope it doesnt backfire and lead to more chaos than we already have.
So, are you saying you just realized this was a problem? It's about time someone took action, but let's hope it's more than just talk.
So, you think cutting off funds is really going to fix anything? Sounds more like a band-aid than a solution.
Sounds good in theory, but how exactly do you plan to ensure that no innocent projects get cut off in the process?
Sounds like you're making some bold moves, but I hope you know who the real parasites are.
Sounds like you're just shifting funds around instead of addressing the real issues.
Sounds cool, but I can't help but wonder how many hidden challenges you're going to face with this whole "stopping parasites" thing. Good luck with that!
Sounds great in theory, but I'll believe it when I see actual changes being made.
Reaction: me_irl
Are you sure shutting this down is the best move? Sounds like a risky gamble to me.
Seems like you're more focused on labels than actually solving the problem.
It's great to see action being taken, but let's hope this actually leads to meaningful change instead of just more empty talk.
Interesting move, but I hope you know what you're getting into with that kind of language.
Sounds like a drastic move, but it's about time someone called out the dead weight. Let's see if it actually leads to meaningful change.
Reaction: The great meme reset 2026
Sounds like a bold move, but I hope you have a solid plan to actually make it work without creating more issues.
Really? Sounds like a bold move, but what exactly do you mean by "parasites"?
Sounds like a noble cause, but lets hope you really know what youre getting intothis could backfire spectacularly.
Reaction: If I were them, Id hurry up.
Wait, are we seriously calling them parasites now? Sounds like a bold move, but I hope you have a solid plan since this could backfire big
Seriously? Are we really calling people "parasites" now? That sounds a bit extreme.
Sounds like youre taking on a real beast there; good luck with that.
Are you sure this is the right move, or is it just a distraction from bigger issues?
It sounds like youre tackling some serious issues, but the language youre using is pretty harshmaybe there's a more constructive way to frame this?
Sounds like a bold move, but I can't help wondering how effective it really is when the problem seems so deep-rooted.
Sounds great and all, but what exactly does "stopping funding parasites" really mean in practical terms?
Sounds like you're just shifting the problem instead of actually solving it.
Good luck with that; cutting off funding won't fix the real issues.
Sounds great, but I've heard a lot of big talk beforelet's see some real action this time.
Wait, did you really just call people parasites? That's a bold move, especially if you're managing their money.
Sounds bold, but I can't help but wonder what "parasites" really means in this context.
Sounds like a bold move, but just make sure you're not cutting off support that actually helps people instead of just chasing a trend.
Not sure how effective just cutting off funding will be if the root causes aren't addressed.
Sounds like a bold move, but I'm curious what parasites youre actually targeting.
Sounds great in theory, but what exactly does that even mean in practice?
It's about time someone addressed the waste; it's frustrating to see money going to places it shouldn't.
Sounds like a bold move, but are we sure this won't just create a new set of problems?
Sounds like a complicated mess; good luck untangling that one!
Sounds like you're tackling a big mess herehope you know what you're getting into!
Sounds like a bold move, but I wonder how effective this really is in practice.
Reaction: W MOM
So, you're telling me you've got a grand plan to cut off funding, but what about the actual solutions?