i loved someone who i knew was gay
i dated someone for 4 years and knew from the start he was gay and wished he was a woman. before we dated he identified as transgender and had also been sleeping around with a lot of men. he then completely switched up and said it was a phase and he’s not a woman and doesn’t actually like men ?
i loved him and wanted the love he said he had for me to be true. i could never trust him which made me do stupid things. when i would ask questions i was shut down immediately. why i stayed for 4 years don’t know.
i feel disgusted with the things we had done together. things i never wanted to do, but did it anyways to make him happy. i don’t know why i didnt try harder to express how uncomfortable things made me. my first partnership has been soiled by a closeted man.
i never felt feminine with him, i never felt pretty and safe. i always felt like i was the man in the relationship and it genuinely ruined my self esteem. i felt like it was my fault that he was so disconnected with the feelings of our relationship, so detached all the time but it was never about me it was just him. he never felt present, ever.
its hard for me to speak about this to friends and family because i feel so much sh
On the surface, this feels rushed rather than thought through so the response doesn’t surprise me
At this point, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where the disagreement starts Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the key detail here.
Putting bias aside, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which explains why reactions are split This probably isn’t the last word on it. At least from my perspective.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s the part people are stuck on Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this feels more about execution than intent which makes the reaction pretty predictable
the follow-through is what will decide this which is why the comments look the way they do Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s the impression it gives me.
Trying to be fair, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that tension shows up immediately Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move At least from my perspective.
From where I sit, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the key detail here. Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
From where I sit, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where the disagreement starts This could age very differently in a week.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place
Real talk, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which is why this is getting picked apart Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Putting bias aside, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s what people are responding to
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome
I get the idea, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that friction is hard to ignore
the timing matters more than people admit That’s the key detail here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From where I sit, this depends heavily on what happens next That’s what changes the context.
At this point, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven At least from my perspective.
Real talk, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which turns this into more of a debate That’s the impression it gives me.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That part stands out.
Honestly, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where the disagreement starts
this feels like a half-step, not a full move which makes the reaction pretty predictable That part stands out.
Trying to be fair, this feels rushed rather than thought through That part stands out. Others will probably see it differently.
the wording alone shifts how people read this
Honestly, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what changes the context. Interested to see the follow-up.
If you zoom out, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s what changes the context.
Stepping back, this depends heavily on what happens next That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
I get the idea, this reads stronger on paper than in practice
On the surface, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
From a practical angle, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which makes the reaction pretty predictable This could age very differently in a week.
Not gonna lie, the follow-through is what will decide this which turns this into more of a debate That’s just how it reads to me.
Putting bias aside, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so Others will probably see it differently.
At first glance, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where the disagreement starts Not convinced this is settled yet.
this depends heavily on what happens next and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what makes this interesting.
this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where people will push back This could age very differently in a week. That’s just my read on it.
From a practical angle, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why opinions are all over the place Time will tell.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why this is getting picked apart Others will probably see it differently.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where it gets complicated Feels like there’s more coming here.
From where I sit, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what makes this interesting.
If you zoom out, the main issue seems to be how this is handled
Bluntly speaking, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which explains why reactions are split That’s what changes the context. At least from my perspective.
this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s what changes the context. Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
From a practical angle, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
At this point, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s the key detail here.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s just how it reads to me.
Putting bias aside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Curious how this plays out. That’s just my read on it.
If you zoom out, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why opinions are all over the place Time will tell.
From my side, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which explains why reactions are split Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Not gonna lie, this feels rushed rather than thought through which explains why reactions are split That’s just how it reads to me.
From a neutral view, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where it gets complicated This could age very differently in a week. That’s the impression it gives me.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That part stands out. At least from my perspective.
On the surface, this depends heavily on what happens next Others will probably see it differently.
Looking at this, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where the disagreement starts That part stands out. We’ll see how people react over time.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why opinions are all over the place Others will probably see it differently.
Trying to be fair, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that friction is hard to ignore That part stands out. That’s just how it reads to me.
On the surface, this depends heavily on what happens next That’s what makes this interesting. Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
Not gonna lie, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where it gets complicated Others will probably see it differently.
From a practical angle, this feels rushed rather than thought through which turns this into more of a debate This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Just reading this, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where people will push back
If you zoom out, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where the disagreement starts That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up.
To be fair, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what changes the context.
Looking at this, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where it gets complicated Not convinced this is settled yet. Others will probably see it differently.
Without overthinking it, the timing matters more than people admit That’s the impression it gives me.
Stepping back, the timing matters more than people admit which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the key detail here. That’s the impression it gives me.
Not gonna lie, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that tension shows up immediately Interested to see the follow-up.
Trying to be fair, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where people will push back That part stands out. That’s just my read on it.
Just reading this, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that tension shows up immediately
this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why this is getting picked apart Hard to say where this lands long term. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Looking at this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s what people are responding to
the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s the impression it gives me.
From the outside, this solves one problem while creating another and that friction is hard to ignore
If we’re being honest, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that friction is hard to ignore
If we’re being honest, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the key detail here.
Bluntly speaking, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s why opinions are all over the place That part stands out. Curious how this plays out. That’s just my read on it.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why this is getting picked apart Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Just reading this, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where people will push back Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
If you zoom out, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where people will push back That’s what changes the context.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which explains why reactions are split Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where the disagreement starts Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
Bluntly speaking, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which turns this into more of a debate That’s what makes this interesting.
At first glance, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which makes the reaction pretty predictable
Stepping back, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here
From the outside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what changes the context. Feels like there’s more coming here.
On the surface, the main issue seems to be how this is handled
Looking at this, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where the disagreement starts That part stands out.
Just reading this, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s what changes the context.
Real talk, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why the comments look the way they do That’s the key detail here. At least from my perspective.
Honestly, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why the comments look the way they do Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
Honestly, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which explains why reactions are split That’s the key detail here. Others will probably see it differently.
this feels rushed rather than thought through
I get the idea, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which turns this into more of a debate Time will tell.
From the outside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place Others will probably see it differently.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the key detail here. Not convinced this is settled yet.
At this point, this solves one problem while creating another which is why this is getting picked apart
If you zoom out, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that tension shows up immediately That’s the impression it gives me.
this feels rushed rather than thought through which is why this is getting picked apart That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet.
From my side, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that friction is hard to ignore Hard to say where this lands long term. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Looking at this, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me. That’s just my read on it.
Stepping back, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s what makes this interesting.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting.
If we’re being honest, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that tension shows up immediately That’s just my read on it.
From the outside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
If you zoom out, the follow-through is what will decide this That’s what makes this interesting.
Trying to be fair, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s what people are responding to
Putting bias aside, this feels more about execution than intent That’s just my read on it.
Real talk, this comes across more reactive than planned so the response doesn’t surprise me We’ll see how people react over time.
From a neutral view, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where people will push back Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s the impression it gives me.
Trying to be fair, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that friction is hard to ignore Hard to say where this lands long term.
Honestly, the signal is clear, the strategy less so We’ll see how people react over time.
Trying to be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where the disagreement starts That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet.