I haven't had a male friend in over 5 years
I'm M25 right now.
The truth is that throughout my life I’ve always had more female friends than male ones. When I ask myself why, I think it’s because I grew up surrounded by female figures: I have no male cousins, only female ones, so everyone my age in my family was a woman, and my mother was a housewife and therefore the one who raised us while my father worked.
At school, my group was made up only of female friends.
I don’t know I’ve had male friends, but their communication codes feel very alien to me, I dont feel comfortable . Also, my last two male friends… one was cheating on his girlfriend and I ended up falling out with him because I told her, and the other was a client of prostitution.
With this I don’t intend anything more than to share an anecdote from my life, and I’m not trying to imply anything beyond the idea that early stages can influence a person and in fact, I think all of this has affected me much more negatively than positively.
ClubHub
Responses
Sign in to respond.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that tension shows up immediately That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Putting bias aside, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where it gets complicated Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s the impression it gives me.
From my side, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s what people are responding to At least from my perspective.
At first glance, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s the impression it gives me.
If you zoom out, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that tension shows up immediately That part stands out. This could age very differently in a week.
I get the idea, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Hard to say where this lands long term.
Honestly, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At first glance, this depends heavily on what happens next so the response doesn’t surprise me
From my side, the wording alone shifts how people read this so the response doesn’t surprise me
At first glance, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If you zoom out, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage
From a practical angle, the timing matters more than people admit which is why this is getting picked apart Feels like there’s more coming here. At least from my perspective.
the way this is presented changes how it lands Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a neutral view, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified
Trying to be fair, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where it gets complicated
To be fair, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just my read on it.
At first glance, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet. At least from my perspective.
Trying to be fair, this reads stronger on paper than in practice
Trying to be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where it gets complicated Not convinced this is settled yet. At least from my perspective.
From where I sit, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the impression it gives me.
From a neutral view, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next.
At this point, this comes across more reactive than planned which turns this into more of a debate Hard to say where this lands long term.
From where I sit, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here Curious how this plays out.
this depends heavily on what happens next That part stands out. We’ll see how people react over time.
Without overthinking it, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s the part people are stuck on Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At this point, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Real talk, the timing matters more than people admit
Looking at this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which makes the reaction pretty predictable Not convinced this is settled yet.
To be fair, this feels more about execution than intent That’s what makes this interesting. This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Without overthinking it, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Feels like there’s more coming here.
From a neutral view, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which makes the reaction pretty predictable Not convinced this is settled yet. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s what changes the context. That’s just my read on it.
Real talk, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where the disagreement starts Not convinced this is settled yet.
From a practical angle, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s what makes this interesting.
If you zoom out, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that tension shows up immediately Not convinced this is settled yet. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From my side, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that tension shows up immediately
Real talk, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where people will push back That’s the key detail here.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here
At first glance, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why the comments look the way they do Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this comes across more reactive than planned which is why this is getting picked apart Interested to see the follow-up.
Just reading this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven
Honestly, this depends heavily on what happens next which makes the reaction pretty predictable
At this point, the follow-through is what will decide this and that tension shows up immediately That’s the impression it gives me.
From my side, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why opinions are all over the place Others will probably see it differently.
Real talk, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why this is getting picked apart That’s just how it reads to me.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the impression it gives me.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That part stands out. Hard to say where this lands long term. At least from my perspective.
Looking at this, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Hard to say where this lands long term.
On the surface, the timing matters more than people admit so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the key detail here. Let’s see what happens next.
Just reading this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.
I get the idea, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s the part people are stuck on That part stands out.
Just reading this, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why the comments look the way they do We’ll see how people react over time.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Without overthinking it, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what changes the context.
From a neutral view, the follow-through is what will decide this That part stands out. We’ll see how people react over time.
From the outside, this feels rushed rather than thought through Not convinced this is settled yet.
On the surface, the timing matters more than people admit which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s just my read on it.