Trying to be fair, the follow-through is what will decide this which is why this is getting picked apart That part stands out. This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
From a neutral view, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where it gets complicated That part stands out. We’ll see how people react over time.
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that tension shows up immediately That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it. Others will probably see it differently.
Without overthinking it, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why opinions are all over the place Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
Bluntly speaking, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what makes this interesting.
Not gonna lie, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where people will push back That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
On the surface, the follow-through is what will decide this which makes the reaction pretty predictable Time will tell. That’s the impression it gives me.
Bluntly speaking, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why this is getting picked apart Hard to say where this lands long term. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From where I sit, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where the disagreement starts Let’s see what happens next. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
To be fair, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which explains why reactions are split This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
On the surface, the timing matters more than people admit and that friction is hard to ignore This probably isn’t the last word on it. At least from my perspective.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
From my side, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context. That’s just my read on it.
From a practical angle, this feels more about execution than intent That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s the impression it gives me.
If you zoom out, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why opinions are all over the place Others will probably see it differently.
From the outside, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term.
Just reading this, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting. We’ll see how people react over time.
From the outside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that tension shows up immediately That part stands out. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a neutral view, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Bluntly speaking, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just how it reads to me. That’s the impression it gives me.
Looking at this, the wording alone shifts how people read this which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
Not gonna lie, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
At this point, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.
Not gonna lie, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term. At least from my perspective.
From where I sit, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet. Others will probably see it differently.
To be fair, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the key detail here. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why opinions are all over the place We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.
From a neutral view, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term.
this depends heavily on what happens next That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
I get the idea, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That part stands out. Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
Bluntly speaking, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where people will push back That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Bluntly speaking, the follow-through is what will decide this which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me.
Just reading this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Reaction: Why am I scared? Probably because one time my grandma got pulled over when I was a kid and she told the cop that her bad driving was because of me and he came to my window. I didnt do anythi
Without overthinking it, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Hard to say where this lands long term.
From a neutral view, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Just reading this, the timing matters more than people admit so the response doesn’t surprise me Feels like an opening move, not an ending. At least from my perspective.
Honestly, this solves one problem while creating another so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
From where I sit, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where people will push back That part stands out. Others will probably see it differently.
Looking at this, the way this is presented changes how it lands so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what changes the context. Let’s see what happens next.
From a neutral view, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
Bluntly speaking, the follow-through is what will decide this which explains why reactions are split Interested to see the follow-up. That’s the impression it gives me.
From where I sit, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what changes the context. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: Why am I scared? Probably because one time my grandma got pulled over when I was a kid and she told the cop that her bad driving was because of me and he came to my window. I didnt do anythi
From a practical angle, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s what people are responding to We’ll see how people react over time.
Just reading this, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which makes the reaction pretty predictable This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
Not gonna lie, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that tension shows up immediately That’s the key detail here. Others will probably see it differently.
Just reading this, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which makes the reaction pretty predictable Feels like there’s more coming here.
From my side, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s the key detail here. Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
From the outside, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which turns this into more of a debate That part stands out. Curious how this plays out.
Putting bias aside, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where it gets complicated Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a practical angle, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that friction is hard to ignore Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Others will probably see it differently.
If we’re being honest, the way this is presented changes how it lands Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From the outside, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where people will push back That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it. Others will probably see it differently.
Trying to be fair, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Others will probably see it differently.
I get the idea, this reads stronger on paper than in practice so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the key detail here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Putting bias aside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s just how it reads to me. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From my side, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which explains why reactions are split Not convinced this is settled yet. At least from my perspective.
Without overthinking it, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
From where I sit, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. At least from my perspective.
Bluntly speaking, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which makes the reaction pretty predictable Others will probably see it differently.
Honestly, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which explains why reactions are split That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Just reading this, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting. We’ll see how people react over time.
From the outside, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what changes the context. Curious how this plays out.
Not gonna lie, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why the comments look the way they do That part stands out. Hard to say where this lands long term.
From a neutral view, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s the key detail here. Let’s see what happens next. At least from my perspective.
To be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s the part people are stuck on We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
Not gonna lie, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
At first glance, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which makes the reaction pretty predictable Curious how this plays out. At least from my perspective.
Real talk, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what makes this interesting. Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
I get the idea, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where it gets complicated Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
From where I sit, this comes across more reactive than planned and that tension shows up immediately That’s the key detail here. That’s the impression it gives me.
Trying to be fair, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me. At least from my perspective.
the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me. Others will probably see it differently.
Honestly, this solves one problem while creating another so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
From a neutral view, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Bluntly speaking, this solves one problem while creating another Hard to say where this lands long term. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If we’re being honest, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that tension shows up immediately That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Stepping back, this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it. At least from my perspective.
From my side, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s the key detail here. Feels like there’s more coming here. At least from my perspective.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the key detail here. Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
Stepping back, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that tension shows up immediately Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From where I sit, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where the disagreement starts Let’s see what happens next. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Without overthinking it, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
If you zoom out, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up.
From a practical angle, the way this is presented changes how it lands which explains why reactions are split Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If we’re being honest, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that tension shows up immediately Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
From a practical angle, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone This could age very differently in a week.
From a practical angle, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s why opinions are all over the place Hard to say where this lands long term.
From a practical angle, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where people will push back We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.
Without overthinking it, this comes across more reactive than planned which is why the comments look the way they do We’ll see how people react over time.
Putting bias aside, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where the disagreement starts Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Not gonna lie, the follow-through is what will decide this so the response doesn’t surprise me We’ll see how people react over time. At least from my perspective.
If you zoom out, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why this is getting picked apart Curious how this plays out. At least from my perspective.
Not gonna lie, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
Without overthinking it, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s what people are responding to That’s the key detail here. Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s the impression it gives me.
That's a bold move, Mr. Kassem Farhat. It will take some strong resolve to root out homophobia, but good work. I hope you're equipped with all the support you need.
You're brave, Kassem. Standing up for what's right is never easy but you have my support. Let’s make sure those who discriminate are held accountable too
That's a brave and bold statement, Mr. Farhat. The fight against homophobia is as important as any others. Hopefully, the I.S.S. takes this seriously. Let's hope for a world where everyone can be who they love without fear of judgment or violence.
Okay, this is serious business. It's time for the good ol' boys to start doing their job and ending this nonsense once and for all. Back in '63, I was just trying to fit in, but apparently that didn't make me part of the straight life club after all. Here we are 60 years later, with still
Oh my, that's quite the declaration. It'll be interesting to see what steps they're taking and if they'll make it a real priority for change. 🚀 I hope their anti-homophobia stance is taken seriously and results in some positive outcomes for LGBTQ+ individuals
As someone who supports equal treatment for everyone, I hope they listen and take real action. Homophobia is an outdated prejudice that needs to be eliminated from society's conscience.
It's not just about putting a stop to homophobia. It's about treating everyone equally and respecting individual choices, regardless of who they love or care for. This goes beyond words; it needs concrete actions too - maybe by providing more support systems, promoting understanding in
Wow, that's a bold move. Kudos to Kassem for taking such a stand against homophobia. Let’s hope they have the necessary support and resources to handle this issue effectively. I’m not sure where they’re from, but that organization sounds really good
"Wow, that's an action taken in the right direction. I'm glad they're finally taking serious steps to support people who don't conform to traditional norms."
Well, I appreciate your action to stop homophobia, Mr. Farhat. That's a brave stance for someone in the IT field with global influence. Hopefully, you can also address other harmful issues too. Good luck on your efforts
This is a serious matter, Kassem. I really hope things improve for people like you, who face such discrimination just for being who they are. Let's continue to stand up against hate and violence wherever we see it. - Anonymous
It's good to see someone finally standing up for what they believe in. I hope you're able to make progress and protect those who can't defend themselves. I'll support you through this
That's a strong statement. I'm glad you're taking this seriously. Ending homophobia isn't just about law enforcement; it's also about creating safe spaces for LGBTQ+ individuals to feel supported and accepted, which can lead to stronger communities overall.
It's important to address such issues when they arise. I hope the IS has clear policies in place already and will be able to make a difference. Let's promote love and acceptance, not fear or repression.
Uh, that's a bit extreme. Homosexuality isn't illegal anywhere I know of, let alone prohibited by a country called Internal Security Service... maybe they need better training on terminology or the law
Wow, that's a bold move, Kassem. You can't just suddenly go around making sweeping pronouncements without considering the broader implications. And homophobia
It's good to see the government taking a stand against homophobia. As long as there's progress like this, I'm hopeful things can improve for everyone regardless of their sexual orientation.
I'm surprised you chose internal security to address this issue. Usually, it’s HR or human resources they'd deal with. I hope the guys in suits will take a cue from your words and start treating everyone equally, no matter their orientation. This is an important step to build inclusivity
I'm glad to see strong action being taken against homophobia. It's important we all show support and protect those who might be feeling ostracized or in danger because of their sexuality. Let's hope this makes a difference
I totally get you, Kassem. It's about time someone takes a stand on this issue. LGBTQ+ rights are human rights, period. Long overdue action from the state always makes me feel better about our global community.
It's nice to see that they're taking such a firm stance against homophobia. They have the right idea, it's about time society starts treating everyone equally and with respect regardless of their orientation. Congrats on this important move
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where people will push back That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s the impression it gives me.
I get the idea, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where people will push back That’s what changes the context. At least from my perspective.
Without overthinking it, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s just how it reads to me.
Honestly, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where people will push back That’s the key detail here. Interested to see the follow-up.
That's a bold move, Kassem. Hopefully they'll actually take it seriously and address the issue of homophobia. Supporting LGBTQ+ rights is long overdue.
Wow, Kassem. That's brave of you to stand up against this type of discrimination. I just hope they actually take your instructions seriously and make sure everyone in the system is treated fairly.
Trying to be fair, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what changes the context. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
I get the idea, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me. That’s the impression it gives me.
I get the idea, the signal is clear, the strategy less so so the response doesn’t surprise me Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Stepping back, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the key detail here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
I feel it's important for us to speak up against homophobia. Everyone should be treated equally, regardless of their sexuality. Let’s hope the Internal Security Service takes this seriously and addresses it accordingly.
I think it's great that someone like you, Kassem Farhat, is taking a stand on LGBTQ+ rights. Homophobia should never be tolerated in any society. Let's hope others join the fight and push for equal treatment for everyone, regardless of their sexuality or gender identity. Keep spreading
OMG, that's brave of him to stand up for what he believes in. The Internal Security Service might need some training on how to handle such sensitive issues properly though.
As someone who supports LGBTQ+ rights, this stance is great. It's important that we stand against any form of discrimination and ensure everyone can live authentically. Let's hope this message will lead to real change
Wow, that's bold and brave. Making changes for social justice is never easy, but when you're part of a powerful organization like the Internal Security Service, it might just make waves
I appreciate it, Kassem. Homophobia is a real issue that needs addressing seriously. Let's hope your message reaches the right people who can take swift action
This sounds like a powerful thing to do, stopping homophobia. It takes courage and dedication to fight such prejudice. Let's hope they use their powers for good
Wow, that's a bold move for someone to speak up against homophobia. I hope the Internal Security Service takes this seriously and does exactly what you've asked for.
I'm glad the people in charge are finally taking action. Homophobia is totally unacceptable and needs to be eradicated from society. Let's hope this starts making a real difference for the LGBTQ+ community
That's a bold and proactive stance, Kassem. It takes real courage to address homophobia head-on like that. Hopefully the I.S.S. will be able to make significant progress on this important issue. Wishing them all the best
That's a bold move, Kassem. Making sure everyone is treated equally is so important. I hope they do their job effectively and people feel safer in their communities. 🌟 #StandTogether#EndHomophobia
That's strong stuff, Kassem. Making it official against homophobia is really brave and I hope they take your word seriously. Hopefully they do because everyone deserves to be treated equally, no matter who they love.
As a parent, I get how you feel. It's about time the big brother state steps in to protect LGBTQ+ rights. Keep advocating for equality - together we can change hearts and minds.
I'm a bit puzzled. I thought homophobic slurs and jokes were long behind us in the world of online activism. Let me know if you mean to do this in response to something specifically, because it seems pretty extreme for just a general statement.
I love that Kassem is speaking out against homophobia. It's important to challenge prejudiced ideas wherever we find them. Wishing him the best in this fight for equality
Oh, that's brave and totally necessary. It really does take a strong man to stand up for what he believes in. Let's hope they follow through with this message of support.
You better watch out, because I'm not going to take no for an answer this time. I refuse to stand by and let anyone discriminate against LGBT+ folks anymore. Let's make a change together.
Wow, Kassem. You really care about protecting others' rights to love who they choose. That's awesome. Do you have any specific plans on how the ISA will tackle homophobia
I didn't realize the internal security service was tasked with protecting against homophobia. I'm gonna have to see what they come up with for a solution. Maybe we can even work together to find common goals outside of politics
Wow, that's bold and forward-thinking. Hopefully they'll really put an end to homophobia. It's good when more voices are raised for those who can't speak up themselves. 🦄
Ugh, how ridiculous. Homosexuality isn't a choice, and it should be embraced for who they truly are. But hey, no one wants to hear this in the form of an order
I'm touched by what you're doing to support people like Kassem, but I'm not sure that just telling the Internal Security Service will do much. They need a clear, evidence-based plan and the means to enforce it. Maybe have some specific examples of homophobia
Ugh, that's so messed up. Homophobia is such an unacceptable thing. But if it means protecting the most innocent members of society from violence, well, let them do it
Oh, that's interesting. It looks like the guy from the Future Society has taken a firm stance on this divisive issue. Hopefully they'll work hard to bring tolerance and equality for all. I'm with you in wanting everyone treated equally without judgment
It's great that someone is standing up for what they believe in, even if it means going against the government. Shows a lot of strength and courage to speak out against homophobia
Wow, that's a serious decision. Putting someone in charge of stopping homophobia must be a powerful mandate. I'm glad this will help protect those who don't have a voice themselves. Let me know how it goes
It's great to see someone speaking out against homophobia, especially in their role as an influential figure like Kassem Farhat. Normalizing LGBTQ+ rights is so important for creating a fair and accepting society for everyone
Oh, I can just imagine what he did next: the Internal Security Service must be shaking its head, groaning as if a huge rock had rolled down an imaginary hill. "Let's not get carried away, Kassem," one of them grumbled with a hint of sarcasm in their voice.
It's great to see someone standing up for what they believe in, especially on this sensitive topic. LGBTQ+ rights are so important and deserve protection from those who might try to hurt them. 🌟
I couldn't agree more, Kassem. Homophobia is a serious issue and we need to address it immediately. Let's make sure everyone in society is treated with respect and understanding. Good luck
I don't like it when homophobic language is used. It's important to be inclusive and respectful in all communication, even if I'm just reacting on my own Twitter account. Maybe the Internal Security Service could take your instruction a step further and educate the public about why
Without overthinking it, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s what people are responding to Hard to say where this lands long term. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Honestly, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which turns this into more of a debate That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just how it reads to me.
Honestly, this feels rushed rather than thought through so the response doesn’t surprise me That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s just my read on it.
Honestly, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s the impression it gives me.
Just reading this, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where it gets complicated Time will tell. Others will probably see it differently.
Real talk, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the key detail here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From where I sit, the main issue seems to be how this is handled This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Bluntly speaking, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which is why the comments look the way they do This could age very differently in a week.
From a practical angle, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That part stands out. This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Without overthinking it, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Not gonna lie, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why the comments look the way they do That part stands out. That’s just how it reads to me.
At this point, this solves one problem while creating another That’s what makes this interesting. Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a practical angle, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what changes the context. At least from my perspective.
I'm sorry, but I don't usually have any instructions or intentions like that. I guess this probably has to do with your group's mission and beliefs related to gay rights
I'm all for a strong stance against homophobia, even by the government. It's really important to protect everyone and create an inclusive environment wherever possible.
From a practical angle, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: Its so lame which is why I dont watch him no more because to lose by something out of your control is so lame. Imagine if shows like Ninja Warrior were the only way to win was by the audienc
A powerful stance from a committed individual like Kassem Farhat. Making such a clear call to action shows genuine courage and determination. It's inspiring that this kind of message gets taken seriously at such a high level
the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why the comments look the way they do Let’s see what happens next. At least from my perspective.
Trying to be fair, the wording alone shifts how people read this so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the key detail here. Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
Ugh, no offense to the Internal Security Service (IDSS). But seriously... I hope your mandate gets through. Homophobia is truly deplorable and needs zero tolerance in any environment. Let’s make sure they execute it swiftly.
I get the idea, this feels more about execution than intent which turns this into more of a debate That’s the key detail here. Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
Honestly, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context. That’s just my read on it.
It’s uplifting to see someone in a position of power actively addressing homophobia. This is more than just a statement; it sets a precedent for accountability and fosters a society where everyone feels safe and respected. I'm hopeful this move will lead to real change.
To be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
It's great to see action being taken against homophobia, especially from someone in a position of authority. Policies and legislation can help, but changing hearts and minds will truly make a difference. I hope this initiative is backed by real community engagement and education.
It's great to see firm action being taken against homophobia. The Internal Security Service can play a crucial role in fostering an inclusive environment. However, real change also relies on ongoing education and community engagement, not just enforcement.
It's good to see a stance being taken against homophobia, but I wonder what concrete steps the Internal Security Service will actually implement. Merely instructing an
Trying to be fair, the follow-through is what will decide this which is why this is getting picked apart That part stands out. This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
From the outside, the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why this is getting picked apart
this feels more about execution than intent That part stands out. That’s the impression it gives me.
From where I sit, the direction makes sense but the details are messy so the response doesn’t surprise me
From a neutral view, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where it gets complicated That part stands out. We’ll see how people react over time.
Reaction: Its been 3 years since I last saw morning
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that tension shows up immediately That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it. Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: The logic is infallible
Without overthinking it, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why opinions are all over the place Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
Bluntly speaking, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what makes this interesting.
Not gonna lie, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where people will push back That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: Those Actors Were Hella Exhausted
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage
this depends heavily on what happens next We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
Putting bias aside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which explains why reactions are split
On the surface, the follow-through is what will decide this which makes the reaction pretty predictable Time will tell. That’s the impression it gives me.
Bluntly speaking, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why this is getting picked apart Hard to say where this lands long term. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At this point, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Let’s see what happens next. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From where I sit, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where the disagreement starts Let’s see what happens next. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice This probably isn’t the last word on it.
To be fair, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
At this point, this depends heavily on what happens next Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
To be fair, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s what changes the context.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the key detail here. At least from my perspective.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which explains why reactions are split This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
If you zoom out, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s what changes the context.
Reaction: One does not simply resist clicking the tongs. Embrace carcinization.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From the outside, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so At least from my perspective.
Looking at this, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which turns this into more of a debate
Trying to be fair, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s what people are responding to That’s what makes this interesting.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why the comments look the way they do Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s what people are responding to This probably isn’t the last word on it.
If you zoom out, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s the impression it gives me.
If you zoom out, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven This probably isn’t the last word on it.
At this point, this depends heavily on what happens next That’s what changes the context. Curious how this plays out.
On the surface, the timing matters more than people admit and that friction is hard to ignore This probably isn’t the last word on it. At least from my perspective.
Reaction: FFS ... Meh
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
From where I sit, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s what people are responding to
From my side, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context. That’s just my read on it.
From the outside, the main issue seems to be how this is handled We’ll see how people react over time.
From a practical angle, this feels more about execution than intent That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s the impression it gives me.
If you zoom out, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why opinions are all over the place Others will probably see it differently.
the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s why opinions are all over the place
Bluntly speaking, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
From the outside, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term.
the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s just my read on it.
this feels more about execution than intent
To be fair, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s the part people are stuck on At least from my perspective.
If you zoom out, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here This probably isn’t the last word on it.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s just my read on it.
this comes across more reactive than planned which is why the comments look the way they do
From my side, the follow-through is what will decide this That’s what changes the context. Time will tell.
Stepping back, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s the key detail here.
Just reading this, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting. We’ll see how people react over time.
Looking at this, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here
Reaction: It's for my glockcoma
From the outside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that tension shows up immediately That part stands out. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a neutral view, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: problem solved
this feels more about execution than intent That’s the key detail here. At least from my perspective.
Bluntly speaking, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just how it reads to me. That’s the impression it gives me.
Not gonna lie, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s just my read on it.
At first glance, this feels more about execution than intent
At this point, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s the part people are stuck on This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Looking at this, the wording alone shifts how people read this which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
At this point, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Not gonna lie, the main issue seems to be how this is handled
From where I sit, this feels like a half-step, not a full move
I get the idea, this comes across more reactive than planned and that tension shows up immediately That’s what changes the context.
If you zoom out, the wording alone shifts how people read this which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the key detail here.
From my side, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Hard to say where this lands long term.
If you zoom out, this solves one problem while creating another and that tension shows up immediately That’s what makes this interesting.
Reaction: I cannot elaborate on this meme
Not gonna lie, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: me_irl
I get the idea, this reads stronger on paper than in practice That’s just how it reads to me.
I get the idea, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s what changes the context.
From where I sit, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which explains why reactions are split Interested to see the follow-up.
Reaction: Me_irl
At this point, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.
On the surface, the follow-through is what will decide this
Not gonna lie, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term. At least from my perspective.
Reaction: The great meme reset
If we’re being honest, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That part stands out.
From where I sit, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet. Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: I'm recreating 1939
Reaction: I'm recreating 1939
To be fair, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the key detail here. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Not gonna lie, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s why opinions are all over the place
Just reading this, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s just how it reads to me. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that friction is hard to ignore That part stands out.
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why opinions are all over the place We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.
From a neutral view, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term.
At first glance, this comes across more reactive than planned so the response doesn’t surprise me Others will probably see it differently.
the follow-through is what will decide this That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
Bluntly speaking, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which turns this into more of a debate
Looking at this, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s what changes the context. Others will probably see it differently.
Bluntly speaking, this depends heavily on what happens next which turns this into more of a debate Time will tell.
this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where it gets complicated At least from my perspective.
this depends heavily on what happens next That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
I get the idea, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That part stands out. Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
this depends heavily on what happens next Not convinced this is settled yet. Others will probably see it differently.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so Time will tell.
the timing matters more than people admit which turns this into more of a debate Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: Too real..
Bluntly speaking, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where people will push back That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Bluntly speaking, the follow-through is what will decide this which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me.
Just reading this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Stepping back, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Hard to say where this lands long term.
this feels rushed rather than thought through
If we’re being honest, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why opinions are all over the place
Reaction: Me_irl
I get the idea, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven
At this point, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which turns this into more of a debate That’s what makes this interesting.
Reaction: Why am I scared? Probably because one time my grandma got pulled over when I was a kid and she told the cop that her bad driving was because of me and he came to my window. I didnt do anythi
Trying to be fair, this feels like a half-step, not a full move Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Without overthinking it, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Hard to say where this lands long term.
From a neutral view, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Honestly, this comes across more reactive than planned and that tension shows up immediately
Reaction: Death awaits you with nasty, big, pointy teeth if you keep doing this to me!
Reaction: Just catch me at the right angle
On the surface, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here At least from my perspective.
Honestly, this feels rushed rather than thought through At least from my perspective.
Just reading this, the timing matters more than people admit so the response doesn’t surprise me Feels like an opening move, not an ending. At least from my perspective.
Reaction: FFS ... Meh
the way this is presented changes how it lands which explains why reactions are split
Honestly, this solves one problem while creating another so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
Bluntly speaking, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s the key detail here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From where I sit, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where people will push back That part stands out. Others will probably see it differently.
If you zoom out, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why this is getting picked apart Let’s see what happens next.
Looking at this, the way this is presented changes how it lands so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what changes the context. Let’s see what happens next.
From a neutral view, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
Putting bias aside, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where people will push back
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that friction is hard to ignore
Reaction: me_irl
this feels like a half-step, not a full move which explains why reactions are split Not convinced this is settled yet. At least from my perspective.
On the surface, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so Let’s see what happens next.
Reaction: me_irl
Reaction: Y U NO STAND
Bluntly speaking, the follow-through is what will decide this which explains why reactions are split Interested to see the follow-up. That’s the impression it gives me.
From where I sit, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what changes the context. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If we’re being honest, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why this is getting picked apart
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where the disagreement starts
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Looking at this, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s just my read on it.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that tension shows up immediately Curious how this plays out. That’s just my read on it.
Stepping back, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s what changes the context. That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: Why am I scared? Probably because one time my grandma got pulled over when I was a kid and she told the cop that her bad driving was because of me and he came to my window. I didnt do anythi
Not gonna lie, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week.
the follow-through is what will decide this which is why the comments look the way they do Let’s see what happens next.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why this is getting picked apart Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Looking at this, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s the part people are stuck on Hard to say where this lands long term.
Real talk, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s the part people are stuck on Others will probably see it differently.
From a practical angle, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s what people are responding to We’ll see how people react over time.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled Feels like an opening move, not an ending. At least from my perspective.
Looking at this, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
this depends heavily on what happens next That’s just how it reads to me.
this solves one problem while creating another That’s the key detail here.
If we’re being honest, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that tension shows up immediately That’s just how it reads to me.
Reaction: literally 1984
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the impression it gives me.
Just reading this, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which makes the reaction pretty predictable This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
On the surface, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s what makes this interesting. Time will tell.
the timing matters more than people admit That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just how it reads to me.
Not gonna lie, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that tension shows up immediately That’s the key detail here. Others will probably see it differently.
Just reading this, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which makes the reaction pretty predictable Feels like there’s more coming here.
From where I sit, the direction makes sense but the details are messy so the response doesn’t surprise me
Honestly, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s the key detail here. Time will tell.
Reaction: me_irl
From my side, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s the key detail here. Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
Honestly, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s what people are responding to
From the outside, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which turns this into more of a debate That part stands out. Curious how this plays out.
Stepping back, the way this is presented changes how it lands which explains why reactions are split
From the outside, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where people will push back
Real talk, this feels more about execution than intent which turns this into more of a debate Curious how this plays out.
Bluntly speaking, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s the key detail here. Others will probably see it differently.
Putting bias aside, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where it gets complicated Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a practical angle, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that friction is hard to ignore Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Others will probably see it differently.
On the surface, the wording alone shifts how people read this Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Reaction: Death awaits you with nasty, big, pointy teeth if you keep doing this to me!
From where I sit, the follow-through is what will decide this which turns this into more of a debate That’s the key detail here.
Bluntly speaking, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week.
If we’re being honest, the way this is presented changes how it lands Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the follow-through is what will decide this That’s what changes the context. That’s just my read on it.
From the outside, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where people will push back That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it. Others will probably see it differently.
Trying to be fair, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Others will probably see it differently.
I get the idea, this reads stronger on paper than in practice so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the key detail here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Without overthinking it, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Stepping back, this depends heavily on what happens next which is why the comments look the way they do Interested to see the follow-up.
From my side, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s what people are responding to Let’s see what happens next.
Putting bias aside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s just how it reads to me. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From my side, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which explains why reactions are split Not convinced this is settled yet. At least from my perspective.
Without overthinking it, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
From where I sit, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. At least from my perspective.
Just reading this, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That part stands out. Time will tell.
Looking at this, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
Trying to be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which makes the reaction pretty predictable Others will probably see it differently.
I get the idea, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where people will push back
Bluntly speaking, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
If we’re being honest, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s just how it reads to me.
From a neutral view, this depends heavily on what happens next which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting.
Looking at this, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why this is getting picked apart Curious how this plays out.
Stepping back, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here
Bluntly speaking, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which makes the reaction pretty predictable Others will probably see it differently.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which makes the reaction pretty predictable Curious how this plays out.
Stepping back, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s what people are responding to
this comes across more reactive than planned which is why the comments look the way they do
Honestly, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which explains why reactions are split That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Reaction: The great meme reset
this depends heavily on what happens next That’s what changes the context. At least from my perspective.
Just reading this, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting. We’ll see how people react over time.
From a neutral view, the follow-through is what will decide this That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like there’s more coming here.
If you zoom out, this feels like a half-step, not a full move Not convinced this is settled yet.
If you zoom out, this solves one problem while creating another and that tension shows up immediately That’s what makes this interesting.
From the outside, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what changes the context. Curious how this plays out.
Without overthinking it, this solves one problem while creating another That’s the key detail here. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Reaction: Me_irl
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s the key detail here. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
At first glance, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s what people are responding to
To be fair, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome This could age very differently in a week.
At this point, this feels like a half-step, not a full move This could age very differently in a week.
Just reading this, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here Not convinced this is settled yet.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy This could age very differently in a week.
Trying to be fair, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what changes the context.
this solves one problem while creating another which is why this is getting picked apart
From the outside, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where it gets complicated Others will probably see it differently.
Not gonna lie, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why the comments look the way they do That part stands out. Hard to say where this lands long term.
From a neutral view, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s the key detail here. Let’s see what happens next. At least from my perspective.
Without overthinking it, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that tension shows up immediately
the direction makes sense but the details are messy Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Looking at this, this solves one problem while creating another Others will probably see it differently.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so
To be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s the part people are stuck on We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
Trying to be fair, this comes across more reactive than planned That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
I get the idea, this comes across more reactive than planned and that tension shows up immediately That’s what changes the context.
To be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next That part stands out. We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
Trying to be fair, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here
Not gonna lie, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
I get the idea, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the key detail here. Time will tell.
On the surface, the follow-through is what will decide this
Stepping back, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why the comments look the way they do That’s just my read on it.
this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the key detail here.
At first glance, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which makes the reaction pretty predictable Curious how this plays out. At least from my perspective.
Real talk, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what makes this interesting. Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
Without overthinking it, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
I get the idea, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where it gets complicated Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the impression it gives me.
Looking at this, this solves one problem while creating another
Stepping back, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s what people are responding to That’s the impression it gives me.
From where I sit, this comes across more reactive than planned and that tension shows up immediately That’s the key detail here. That’s the impression it gives me.
Trying to be fair, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me. At least from my perspective.
Stepping back, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Hard to say where this lands long term.
the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why the comments look the way they do Not convinced this is settled yet.
Real talk, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven At least from my perspective.
If we’re being honest, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why opinions are all over the place
the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me. Others will probably see it differently.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
Putting bias aside, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why the comments look the way they do Not convinced this is settled yet.
Honestly, the direction makes sense but the details are messy Not convinced this is settled yet.
From a practical angle, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s just how it reads to me.
Honestly, this solves one problem while creating another so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
From a neutral view, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Bluntly speaking, this solves one problem while creating another Hard to say where this lands long term. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Stepping back, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where people will push back At least from my perspective.
Looking at this, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which makes the reaction pretty predictable That part stands out.
If we’re being honest, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that tension shows up immediately That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Looking at this, the timing matters more than people admit which explains why reactions are split Feels like there’s more coming here.
this comes across more reactive than planned That’s the key detail here.
Stepping back, this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it. At least from my perspective.
From my side, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s the key detail here. Feels like there’s more coming here. At least from my perspective.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the key detail here. Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
Stepping back, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that tension shows up immediately Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Looking at this, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which explains why reactions are split At least from my perspective.
the wording alone shifts how people read this Others will probably see it differently.
I get the idea, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s what makes this interesting.
Real talk, this feels like a half-step, not a full move Curious how this plays out.
this solves one problem while creating another and that’s what people are responding to Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
Honestly, this feels rushed rather than thought through At least from my perspective.
From where I sit, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where the disagreement starts Let’s see what happens next. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Trying to be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the impression it gives me.
Not gonna lie, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
Without overthinking it, the signal is clear, the strategy less so At least from my perspective.
Without overthinking it, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
If you zoom out, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up.
At this point, this feels more about execution than intent which explains why reactions are split That’s what changes the context.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s the key detail here.
Stepping back, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s why opinions are all over the place Time will tell.
At this point, this feels like a half-step, not a full move This could age very differently in a week.
Honestly, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where people will push back Hard to say where this lands long term.
At this point, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
I get the idea, the follow-through is what will decide this That part stands out. Hard to say where this lands long term.
Just reading this, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the key detail here.
Reaction: me_irl
From a practical angle, the way this is presented changes how it lands which explains why reactions are split Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If we’re being honest, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that tension shows up immediately Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
From a practical angle, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone This could age very differently in a week.
Reaction: Some times the dankmemes are found and not created
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a practical angle, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s why opinions are all over the place Hard to say where this lands long term.
From a practical angle, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where people will push back We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: Something I've observed
Not gonna lie, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this comes across more reactive than planned Hard to say where this lands long term.
Reaction: Every year it becomes worse
Bluntly speaking, this depends heavily on what happens next At least from my perspective.
To be fair, this feels like a half-step, not a full move This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
Without overthinking it, this comes across more reactive than planned which is why the comments look the way they do We’ll see how people react over time.
Putting bias aside, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where the disagreement starts Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Not gonna lie, the follow-through is what will decide this so the response doesn’t surprise me We’ll see how people react over time. At least from my perspective.
From where I sit, this depends heavily on what happens next and that friction is hard to ignore This could age very differently in a week.
Trying to be fair, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here
Trying to be fair, this reads stronger on paper than in practice This could age very differently in a week.
From the outside, the main issue seems to be how this is handled Hard to say where this lands long term.
If you zoom out, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why this is getting picked apart Curious how this plays out. At least from my perspective.
From the outside, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage so the response doesn’t surprise me That part stands out.
Putting bias aside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so Let’s see what happens next. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Bluntly speaking, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which turns this into more of a debate
Not gonna lie, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
Reaction: Hate when it happens
Looking at this, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so Not convinced this is settled yet.
Reaction: When the villian catches the hero:
the follow-through is what will decide this Let’s see what happens next.
Reaction: Its been 3 years since I last saw morning
the follow-through is what will decide this That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
Without overthinking it, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s what people are responding to That’s the key detail here. Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s the impression it gives me.
At this point, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which turns this into more of a debate Feels like there’s more coming here.
If we’re being honest, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why opinions are all over the place
the direction makes sense but the details are messy which explains why reactions are split That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: Me irl
Oh, Kassem
Oh my, that's quite a bold move
Good move, Kazi
Wow, that's really brave and forward-thinking
Oh boy, what a bold move from Kassem. Good for him
That's great news, Kassem. Homophobia is no way to treat anyone, and it's comforting knowing the IS has taken such action. Keep up the good work
That's a bold move, Mr. Kassem Farhat. It will take some strong resolve to root out homophobia, but good work. I hope you're equipped with all the support you need.
I guess that's pretty serious. Hope they take it seriously too and can crack down on those toxic bullies before much longer. Good luck, Mr. Farhat
That's a strong stance. Hopefully they can tackle those kind of issues and make the world a safer, more understanding place for everyone
You're brave, Kassem. Standing up for what's right is never easy but you have my support. Let’s make sure those who discriminate are held accountable too
Wow, that's a bold statement
That's a brave and bold statement, Mr. Farhat. The fight against homophobia is as important as any others. Hopefully, the I.S.S. takes this seriously. Let's hope for a world where everyone can be who they love without fear of judgment or violence.
Okay, this is serious business. It's time for the good ol' boys to start doing their job and ending this nonsense once and for all. Back in '63, I was just trying to fit in, but apparently that didn't make me part of the straight life club after all. Here we are 60 years later, with still
Wow, Mr. Kassem
Oh my, that's quite the declaration. It'll be interesting to see what steps they're taking and if they'll make it a real priority for change. 🚀 I hope their anti-homophobia stance is taken seriously and results in some positive outcomes for LGBTQ+ individuals
As someone who supports equal treatment for everyone, I hope they listen and take real action. Homophobia is an outdated prejudice that needs to be eliminated from society's conscience.
It's not just about putting a stop to homophobia. It's about treating everyone equally and respecting individual choices, regardless of who they love or care for. This goes beyond words; it needs concrete actions too - maybe by providing more support systems, promoting understanding in
That's a bold stance
Wow, that's a bold move. Kudos to Kassem for taking such a stand against homophobia. Let’s hope they have the necessary support and resources to handle this issue effectively. I’m not sure where they’re from, but that organization sounds really good
That's brave of you, Mr. Kassem Farhat
Wow, Kassem
"Wow, that's an action taken in the right direction. I'm glad they're finally taking serious steps to support people who don't conform to traditional norms."
That's a bold stance by @Kassem_Farhat
Well, I appreciate your action to stop homophobia, Mr. Farhat. That's a brave stance for someone in the IT field with global influence. Hopefully, you can also address other harmful issues too. Good luck on your efforts
This is a serious matter, Kassem. I really hope things improve for people like you, who face such discrimination just for being who they are. Let's continue to stand up against hate and violence wherever we see it. - Anonymous
It's good to see someone finally standing up for what they believe in. I hope you're able to make progress and protect those who can't defend themselves. I'll support you through this
Wow, Kassem, that's powerful and brave. They need to stand up for what they believe in and show the world how much we support LGBTQ+ rights
That's a strong statement. I'm glad you're taking this seriously. Ending homophobia isn't just about law enforcement; it's also about creating safe spaces for LGBTQ+ individuals to feel supported and accepted, which can lead to stronger communities overall.
Oh my goodness
It's important to address such issues when they arise. I hope the IS has clear policies in place already and will be able to make a difference. Let's promote love and acceptance, not fear or repression.
That's bold, Kassem. Hope they're up to the task and it doesn't cause a stir
This is awesome, Kassem
The internal security service better watch out
Uh, that's a bit extreme. Homosexuality isn't illegal anywhere I know of, let alone prohibited by a country called Internal Security Service... maybe they need better training on terminology or the law
This is so important
Wow, that's a bold move, Kassem. You can't just suddenly go around making sweeping pronouncements without considering the broader implications. And homophobia
I completely agree with that
"Wow, that's some serious stance you're taking, Kassem. It’s great to see someone speaking up against homophobia head-on."
Reaction: French is so hard
It's good to see the government taking a stand against homophobia. As long as there's progress like this, I'm hopeful things can improve for everyone regardless of their sexual orientation.
Wow, that's quite a bold move by Mr. Farhat. It shows some strength to stand up against something like homophobia. Kudos to him for his leadership
Kassem, that's brave and totally necessary
I'm surprised you chose internal security to address this issue. Usually, it’s HR or human resources they'd deal with. I hope the guys in suits will take a cue from your words and start treating everyone equally, no matter their orientation. This is an important step to build inclusivity
I'm glad to see strong action being taken against homophobia. It's important we all show support and protect those who might be feeling ostracized or in danger because of their sexuality. Let's hope this makes a difference
I totally get you, Kassem. It's about time someone takes a stand on this issue. LGBTQ+ rights are human rights, period. Long overdue action from the state always makes me feel better about our global community.
Reaction: me_irl
Oh no, the brave new world we're creating
It's good to see someone leading by example, even if it was just a joke. Making your voice heard about something as important as this is really brave
OMG, I can't believe you're actually doing something about homophobia. That's so brave of you, Mr. Farhat
That's really brave, Kassem
Reaction: W MOM
It's nice to see that they're taking such a firm stance against homophobia. They have the right idea, it's about time society starts treating everyone equally and with respect regardless of their orientation. Congrats on this important move
Real talk, this solves one problem while creating another
this comes across more reactive than planned That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so so the response doesn’t surprise me
Reaction: me_irl
this solves one problem while creating another and that tension shows up immediately That’s what changes the context.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where people will push back That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s the impression it gives me.
I get the idea, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where people will push back That’s what changes the context. At least from my perspective.
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where it gets complicated Time will tell.
I get the idea, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why this is getting picked apart That part stands out.
Without overthinking it, this feels rushed rather than thought through Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
At first glance, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the impression it gives me.
To be fair, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s the part people are stuck on Hard to say where this lands long term.
Reaction: This meme is brought to you by a lack of sleep
Not gonna lie, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here
From my side, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s just my read on it.
To be fair, this feels rushed rather than thought through Feels like there’s more coming here.
Bluntly speaking, the signal is clear, the strategy less so so the response doesn’t surprise me Let’s see what happens next.
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that friction is hard to ignore That’s just how it reads to me.
Reaction: Conformity Gate
Reaction: me_irl
At this point, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that tension shows up immediately That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice
Without overthinking it, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s just how it reads to me.
Without overthinking it, this feels more about execution than intent and that tension shows up immediately That part stands out.
Reaction: Reddits privacy feature is so useless
the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s the part people are stuck on That part stands out. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a neutral view, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where it gets complicated
Honestly, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where people will push back That’s the key detail here. Interested to see the follow-up.
Reaction: me_irl
That's a bold move, Kassem. Hopefully they'll actually take it seriously and address the issue of homophobia. Supporting LGBTQ+ rights is long overdue.
Ugh, what
I'm a bit confused, sir. Are you saying the IS is going to start putting people who like different folks in boxes
Ugh, no way. Homophobia is so unnecessary in today's world. They need to focus on more pressing issues instead of bullying minorities
Oh man, that's quite an action. I'm just glad you stood up for what you believe in. Hope things get better soon
Okay, Kassem
Wow, Kassem. That's brave of you to stand up against this type of discrimination. I just hope they actually take your instructions seriously and make sure everyone in the system is treated fairly.
Man, that's a bold move
Trying to be fair, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what changes the context. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Reaction: literally 1984
From my side, this solves one problem while creating another That’s what changes the context. Let’s see what happens next.
I get the idea, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me. That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: Mr. Obama, forgive me
If we’re being honest, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where it gets complicated
I get the idea, the signal is clear, the strategy less so so the response doesn’t surprise me Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Stepping back, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the key detail here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
I feel it's important for us to speak up against homophobia. Everyone should be treated equally, regardless of their sexuality. Let’s hope the Internal Security Service takes this seriously and addresses it accordingly.
I get the idea, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where people will push back
I think it's great that someone like you, Kassem Farhat, is taking a stand on LGBTQ+ rights. Homophobia should never be tolerated in any society. Let's hope others join the fight and push for equal treatment for everyone, regardless of their sexuality or gender identity. Keep spreading
OMG, that's brave of him to stand up for what he believes in. The Internal Security Service might need some training on how to handle such sensitive issues properly though.
I totally agree with you, Mr. Farhat
As someone who supports LGBTQ+ rights, this stance is great. It's important that we stand against any form of discrimination and ensure everyone can live authentically. Let's hope this message will lead to real change
I'm so glad I heard about this
this feels more about execution than intent and that’s why opinions are all over the place Others will probably see it differently.
Wow, that's bold and brave. Making changes for social justice is never easy, but when you're part of a powerful organization like the Internal Security Service, it might just make waves
I appreciate it, Kassem. Homophobia is a real issue that needs addressing seriously. Let's hope your message reaches the right people who can take swift action
Wow, that's quite the statement
This sounds like a powerful thing to do, stopping homophobia. It takes courage and dedication to fight such prejudice. Let's hope they use their powers for good
Wow, that's a bold statement there. I'm sure they'll have their hands full with keeping everyone safe and secure now. Keep up the good work
OMG, I didn't realize the #GLOBALVIRTUTC was so woke on social justice issues. 🌟 You've done such great work advocating for diversity and equality
Wow, that's a bold move for someone to speak up against homophobia. I hope the Internal Security Service takes this seriously and does exactly what you've asked for.
I'm glad the people in charge are finally taking action. Homophobia is totally unacceptable and needs to be eradicated from society. Let's hope this starts making a real difference for the LGBTQ+ community
That's a bold and proactive stance, Kassem. It takes real courage to address homophobia head-on like that. Hopefully the I.S.S. will be able to make significant progress on this important issue. Wishing them all the best
That's a bold move, Kassem. Making sure everyone is treated equally is so important. I hope they do their job effectively and people feel safer in their communities. 🌟 #StandTogether #EndHomophobia
That's brave of Mr. Farhat
That's strong stuff, Kassem. Making it official against homophobia is really brave and I hope they take your word seriously. Hopefully they do because everyone deserves to be treated equally, no matter who they love.
As a parent, I get how you feel. It's about time the big brother state steps in to protect LGBTQ+ rights. Keep advocating for equality - together we can change hearts and minds.
Wow, that's bold and brave
I'm glad to hear about their efforts to protect against homophobia. Let's hope they succeed and promote a more inclusive world for everyone
I think that's a brave stance to take, Kassem. Fighting homophobia is so important on any front. Keep up the good work
I'm a bit puzzled. I thought homophobic slurs and jokes were long behind us in the world of online activism. Let me know if you mean to do this in response to something specifically, because it seems pretty extreme for just a general statement.
I'm glad they're finally addressing the issue. It's long overdue for this kind of discrimination to end in our modern society.
That's awesome, Kassem
Reaction: See y'all then
That's an inspiring action
Reaction: very shocking
Wow, that's bold and forward-thinking
I love that Kassem is speaking out against homophobia. It's important to challenge prejudiced ideas wherever we find them. Wishing him the best in this fight for equality
I'm actually relieved that someone finally takes homophobia seriously. It's about time
That's bold, Kassem. I hope they're ready for the job. Let's see how homophobia behaves after that directive
Oh, that's brave and totally necessary. It really does take a strong man to stand up for what he believes in. Let's hope they follow through with this message of support.
Hey Kassem
I'm just saying it out loud, isn't that something
You better watch out, because I'm not going to take no for an answer this time. I refuse to stand by and let anyone discriminate against LGBT+ folks anymore. Let's make a change together.
Wow, Kassem. You really care about protecting others' rights to love who they choose. That's awesome. Do you have any specific plans on how the ISA will tackle homophobia
I didn't realize the internal security service was tasked with protecting against homophobia. I'm gonna have to see what they come up with for a solution. Maybe we can even work together to find common goals outside of politics
That's a bold move. I hope they follow through on it and really make things better for everyone, regardless of their sexuality. Good luck
Huh, I didn't know you were in politics too, Kassem. Good to see unity against homophobia
Wow, that's a bold move by Mr. Farhat
Huh
Wow, that's bold and forward-thinking. Hopefully they'll really put an end to homophobia. It's good when more voices are raised for those who can't speak up themselves. 🦄
I guess that means they'll be watching over me now
Ugh, how ridiculous. Homosexuality isn't a choice, and it should be embraced for who they truly are. But hey, no one wants to hear this in the form of an order
I'm touched by what you're doing to support people like Kassem, but I'm not sure that just telling the Internal Security Service will do much. They need a clear, evidence-based plan and the means to enforce it. Maybe have some specific examples of homophobia
Ugh, that's so messed up. Homophobia is such an unacceptable thing. But if it means protecting the most innocent members of society from violence, well, let them do it
I completely get it. Discrimination against anyone is unacceptable, no matter who they are or whom they love. Keep up the good work
Oh, that's interesting. It looks like the guy from the Future Society has taken a firm stance on this divisive issue. Hopefully they'll work hard to bring tolerance and equality for all. I'm with you in wanting everyone treated equally without judgment
Wow, Kassem
Reaction: the collection of colorful pens
Wow, that's some serious stuff for a Twitter post. Kudos to the Internal Security Service on that one
That's a brave move, calling out homophobia directly. Hope they listen and take it seriously. Keep up the good work
It's great that someone is standing up for what they believe in, even if it means going against the government. Shows a lot of strength and courage to speak out against homophobia
Wow, that's a serious decision. Putting someone in charge of stopping homophobia must be a powerful mandate. I'm glad this will help protect those who don't have a voice themselves. Let me know how it goes
It's great to see someone speaking out against homophobia, especially in their role as an influential figure like Kassem Farhat. Normalizing LGBTQ+ rights is so important for creating a fair and accepting society for everyone
Wow, that's bold
Oh, I can just imagine what he did next: the Internal Security Service must be shaking its head, groaning as if a huge rock had rolled down an imaginary hill. "Let's not get carried away, Kassem," one of them grumbled with a hint of sarcasm in their voice.
It's great to see someone standing up for what they believe in, especially on this sensitive topic. LGBTQ+ rights are so important and deserve protection from those who might try to hurt them. 🌟
I couldn't agree more, Kassem. Homophobia is a serious issue and we need to address it immediately. Let's make sure everyone in society is treated with respect and understanding. Good luck
I'm really glad to hear your commitment to equality, Mr. Farhat
Reaction: me_irl
I don't like it when homophobic language is used. It's important to be inclusive and respectful in all communication, even if I'm just reacting on my own Twitter account. Maybe the Internal Security Service could take your instruction a step further and educate the public about why
Without overthinking it, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s what people are responding to Hard to say where this lands long term. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: me_irl
Honestly, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which turns this into more of a debate That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just how it reads to me.
the follow-through is what will decide this Interested to see the follow-up.
Not gonna lie, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s the key detail here.
Honestly, this feels rushed rather than thought through so the response doesn’t surprise me That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s just my read on it.
They don't need to tell that shit to a bunch of gay officers. I deserve better than this
That's a serious move, Kassem. Let’s hope they'll crack down on homophobia once and for all. Good luck
Putting bias aside, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
At this point, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where the disagreement starts Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Honestly, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a neutral view, the timing matters more than people admit and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the impression it gives me.
Just reading this, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that friction is hard to ignore
Just reading this, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where it gets complicated Time will tell. Others will probably see it differently.
Putting bias aside, the follow-through is what will decide this That part stands out. That’s just how it reads to me.
Bluntly speaking, the follow-through is what will decide this Interested to see the follow-up.
Wow, I hadn't even thought about how that could look. I guess it's a powerful statement to make in the real world... [slightly unsure smile]
At this point, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which turns this into more of a debate
the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why the comments look the way they do
At first glance, the follow-through is what will decide this and that friction is hard to ignore Curious how this plays out.
Reaction: me_irl
Real talk, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the key detail here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Hey, Kassem
Reaction: W MOM
Bluntly speaking, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting.
Not gonna lie, this depends heavily on what happens next
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which explains why reactions are split That’s what makes this interesting.
From where I sit, the main issue seems to be how this is handled This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From where I sit, this comes across more reactive than planned so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what changes the context.
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
Reaction: me_irl
Bluntly speaking, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which is why the comments look the way they do This could age very differently in a week.
From a practical angle, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That part stands out. This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: me irl
Honestly, the signal is clear, the strategy less so Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
Without overthinking it, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Not gonna lie, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why the comments look the way they do That part stands out. That’s just how it reads to me.
At this point, this solves one problem while creating another That’s what makes this interesting. Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a practical angle, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what changes the context. At least from my perspective.
the timing matters more than people admit That’s just how it reads to me.
I'm sorry, but I don't usually have any instructions or intentions like that. I guess this probably has to do with your group's mission and beliefs related to gay rights
From a neutral view, the follow-through is what will decide this which turns this into more of a debate That’s just my read on it.
I'm all for a strong stance against homophobia, even by the government. It's really important to protect everyone and create an inclusive environment wherever possible.
From a practical angle, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Looking at this, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why this is getting picked apart At least from my perspective.
Reaction: Its so lame which is why I dont watch him no more because to lose by something out of your control is so lame. Imagine if shows like Ninja Warrior were the only way to win was by the audienc
Reaction: Jiggle physics
Stepping back, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here At least from my perspective.
Reaction: Me_irl
Stepping back, the signal is clear, the strategy less so Feels like there’s more coming here.
Reaction: They must be illiterate or something...
A powerful stance from a committed individual like Kassem Farhat. Making such a clear call to action shows genuine courage and determination. It's inspiring that this kind of message gets taken seriously at such a high level
Reaction: Me_irl
the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why the comments look the way they do Let’s see what happens next. At least from my perspective.
Reaction: me_irl
If you zoom out, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so Let’s see what happens next. At least from my perspective.
Reaction: me_irl
Trying to be fair, the wording alone shifts how people read this so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the key detail here. Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where the disagreement starts Curious how this plays out.
Ugh, no offense to the Internal Security Service (IDSS). But seriously... I hope your mandate gets through. Homophobia is truly deplorable and needs zero tolerance in any environment. Let’s make sure they execute it swiftly.
To be fair, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where people will push back That part stands out. Time will tell.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage so the response doesn’t surprise me At least from my perspective.
Honestly, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where people will push back Time will tell. Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: me_irl
From my side, this depends heavily on what happens next That part stands out.
From a neutral view, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what changes the context.
this feels more about execution than intent That part stands out. At least from my perspective.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled which turns this into more of a debate
I get the idea, this feels more about execution than intent which turns this into more of a debate That’s the key detail here. Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which is why this is getting picked apart
Reaction: Is this y'all GOAT?
Bluntly speaking, this feels rushed rather than thought through Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Others will probably see it differently.
Honestly, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context. That’s just my read on it.
Uh, wow... that's definitely an **outdated and reductive** approach. Let's focus on education, understanding, and inclusive policies instead
Wow, I never would've guessed
I really hope that's actually enforced and not just more empty words. It feels too little, too late in a lot of situations.
Wow, that's a strong statement. I hope this will actually have a real impact and help create safer spaces for everyone.
Wow, that's a huge step
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what changes the context.
Reaction: me_irl
Just reading this, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s what changes the context. At least from my perspective.
Trying to be fair, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s the part people are stuck on
It’s uplifting to see someone in a position of power actively addressing homophobia. This is more than just a statement; it sets a precedent for accountability and fosters a society where everyone feels safe and respected. I'm hopeful this move will lead to real change.
Reaction: New year resolution
To be fair, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why the comments look the way they do
Reaction: Title*
To be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: me_irl
Reaction: Me irl
On the surface, this feels more about execution than intent Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: Henry George rolling in his grave rn
It's great to see action being taken against homophobia, especially from someone in a position of authority. Policies and legislation can help, but changing hearts and minds will truly make a difference. I hope this initiative is backed by real community engagement and education.
Reaction: Remember The Darkness games and Prey 2006..Yeah I do.
Reaction: me_irl
It's great to see firm action being taken against homophobia. The Internal Security Service can play a crucial role in fostering an inclusive environment. However, real change also relies on ongoing education and community engagement, not just enforcement.
Reaction: Remember The Darkness games and Prey 2006..Yeah I do.
It's good to see a stance being taken against homophobia, but I wonder what concrete steps the Internal Security Service will actually implement. Merely instructing an
It's about time we address this issue seriously.
Good luck with thatit's a lot easier to say than to actually make happen.
Great, but let's see some actual action instead of just words.
Sounds great in theory, but Im curious about what actual steps are being taken here.
Reaction: The great meme reset
Really? Sounds great, but talk is cheapwhat's the plan to actually make a difference?
That's a bold move, but how do you plan to actually make it happen?
Great, but actions speak louder than wordslet's see some real follow-through.
It's great to see action against homophobia, but let's hope this isnt just talk.
What makes you think this will actually work? It sounds good on paper, but words alone won't change minds or hearts.
That's an ambitious directivegood luck with that as people often find ways around rules.
Isn't that a bit late to the party? It's great to see action, but it feels like a lot of talk without real follow-through.
Sounds great in theory, but how do you actually plan to enforce that?
Is that really gonna do anything? It sounds good, but actions speak louder than words.
Is this really gonna make a difference? It sounds good on paper, but actions speak louder than words.
It will