From where I sit, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the key detail here. That’s just my read on it.
From a practical angle, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why this is getting picked apart That part stands out. Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s the impression it gives me.
I get the idea, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s what people are responding to That part stands out. This could age very differently in a week.
If we’re being honest, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s the part people are stuck on Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
the follow-through is what will decide this which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting. Curious how this plays out.
this comes across more reactive than planned which is why the comments look the way they do That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
That's refreshing to see someone speaking out against homophobia and having the courage to hold such strong opinions. Let's hope you win so this ban isn't just an election promise but a step towards real equality for all people. Keep up the good work
It's great to see you taking such a strong stance on LGBTQ+ rights. As your follower, I think it's important we support and uplift marginalized communities.
Totally, banning homophobia is long overdue. Dismissing people is never cool - they're just like any other human being with their quirks and differences. Let's create a world where everyone feels safe to be themselves without fear of judgement or exclusion. I'm looking forward to our
On the surface, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which is why the comments look the way they do That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
Stepping back, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that friction is hard to ignore Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why the comments look the way they do That’s the key detail here. Feels like there’s more coming here.
The election thing doesn't change the fact that I'm gay. Banning homophobia means nothing if you're not willing to live up to those ideals in your daily life. Dismissing people as "BAD" is just hurtful and unfair. I support everyone, including myself when it comes to being true to who
"I'm so glad Kassem is standing up for what's right. It takes someone as principled as him to help make this world better for everyone, even when it means being uncomfortable sometimes. Good work
Wow, I'm glad to see you're making real progress on these tough issues. It's important for leaders to show that they can handle the most polarizing parts of society without resorting to hate or division. Maybe we can start with some constructive conversations instead
I appreciate your efforts, but banning or dismissing anyone based on their sexual orientation isn't the right way to handle it. Let's focus on addressing issues through constructive dialogue and education instead of shaming people for who they love. It can make a big difference to have an
That's a bold move, but banning homophobia is important. It shows you're serious about changing attitudes in your community. As for dismissing "some people" as bad - I'm glad you'll do that too on the promise of winning
I'm not sure why anyone would need to ban or dismiss people for their sexual orientation. It's crucial to treat everyone with respect and dignity regardless of who they are romantically involved with. LGBTQ+ rights shouldn't be an election issue - it should be a fundamental part of any
I totally get you. Banning homophobia is big progress, but we need to be careful about who "BAD people" are, especially in the right of passage after an election. It's hard not to take your political stance personally. Just remember there's more important stuff happening out here besides
I hope that banning homophobia isn't about discriminating against anyone else. It's important to treat everyone with respect, no matter what they believe in or who they love. That sounds like a tricky election!
I get it; Kassem is serious about his politics. He's trying to make tough decisions, and that's brave. But I hope he can balance his words with action and still treat everyone with dignity and respect. People who call themselves "BAD people" are not just any bad guys - they're individuals
It's awesome that you're being open about your stance against homophobia. The more leaders stand up for what they believe in, the better we'll see society progress towards acceptance and equality. I'm really excited to see how this can influence change
I mean, if you'll listen to your heart and not just vote with your fingers like a computer virus, maybe some of the "BAD" people will have second thoughts too. And that's progress
It's great to see a leader committed to fighting homophobia. As someone who has struggled with feelings of alienation based on their sexual orientation, I can totally relate. Hopefully this commitment will resonate and inspire change. Peace
It sounds like you might be looking to use the fear that homophobia is a problem, but not everyone who has a different sexual orientation deserves to be dismissed as "bad people." It's important to respect everyone and promote inclusivity. Perhaps it would be more beneficial for you to
That's a bold statement. I think we need to approach such issues with empathy and understanding, rather than resorting to sweeping generalizations like "BAD people". Let's strive for inclusion and unity in all our actions, both now and in the future.
I'm glad you're committed to fighting homophobia. It's important to stand up for what's right, even if it means changing some people who aren't part of the solution. Remember how far we've come since then. Let’s work together to make our world more accepting and inclusive.
It feels good to see a political leader stand up for something so essential. Let's hope you win the election and make sure everyone, regardless of their sexual orientation, has equal rights under your new laws. Good luck
As someone who values inclusivity and equality, I completely agree with you on banning homophobia. Every person deserves respect, regardless of their sexual orientation. It's time we move past such divisions in politics to build a truly united society. Thank you for your stance, Kassem
That's a powerful stance to take, Kassem. Banning homophobia isn't just about accepting someone; it's about creating an inclusive environment where everyone feels valued and respected. I can definitely see why you'd ban "BAD people" too - they need to be removed from the mix. It's
It's important to talk openly about issues like homophobia. Banning such beliefs shows you care and want a more inclusive world, which is refreshing. But don't jump to dismiss people immediately; it might hurt those whose views align with yours or can benefit from discussion rather than
Great job, Kassem. Banishing homophobia and being tough on bad people sounds like a refreshing change of pace. Let's hope it makes your leadership more humane and forward-thinking.
That sounds like quite a manifesto you've got there, Kassem. It's great that you're taking strong stances against homophobia and those who dismiss them. May your election efforts succeed, and may the principles you hold dear lead in good measure towards creating a more inclusive world for
That was a bold statement from Kassem, but it's great to see someone taking such a strong stance against homophobia. As far as dismissing "bad people" without being very specific about what those characteristics are, I think that could backfire quite easily. It might be better to approach
I mean, being a politician is all about making tough choices and prioritizing values. Homophobia isn't actually banned in this case - it's just that you're using it as a reason to ignore people of the same gender who are considered "bad." It seems more personal than professional. Let's
I think you mean to say "reject" some people, not dismiss them as "BAD people". Making such broad statements can alienate others and isn't conducive to creating a welcoming community. Maybe focusing on inclusive language and respectful dialogue would be more constructive.
That's brave and forward-thinking for a political leader. If you ever need a place to talk about LGBTQ+ issues or anyone feeling marginalized, I'm here for you with an open heart. Your stance shows integrity and could really make a difference in how people are treated.
It's refreshing to see someone taking action against homophobia, but banning people and dismissing them as "BAD" is a heavy-handed way to handle such issues. It should be handled with more sensitivity and understanding instead of harsh judgment.
I completely agree, Kassem. Ending homophobia and ensuring everyone is treated with dignity and respect starts at the top. When you lead by example, it's so much easier to make a real change in society. Keep up the good work
Banning homophobia and dismissing "BAD people" are bold moves, but they shouldn't be done in a way that alienates others or makes unfounded accusations. Real change starts from within and often means addressing individual behaviors on an interpersonal level instead of imposing generalized
I get it that you're trying to combat homophobia, but really... calling some people "BAD people" is a bit harsh. It's important to be kind and understanding towards everyone in our communities. Let's work on changing hearts as much as laws next time
That's quite a bold stance, but I think you've got the right idea with banning homophobia. Dismissing people outright doesn't solve anything - it only creates bigger problems for everyone. If elected, let’s try addressing issues through constructive dialogue and equal treatment rather
Looking at this, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where it gets complicated Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Others will probably see it differently.
At this point, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where people will push back Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
From the outside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why opinions are all over the place This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Trying to be fair, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the key detail here. Time will tell.
Without overthinking it, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where the disagreement starts Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term.
Honestly, the way this is presented changes how it lands so the response doesn’t surprise me Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
If you zoom out, the timing matters more than people admit and that friction is hard to ignore This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s the impression it gives me.
Without overthinking it, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where people will push back Feels like there’s more coming here. At least from my perspective.
Real talk, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s the part people are stuck on We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.
Trying to be fair, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where people will push back Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
Bluntly speaking, this comes across more reactive than planned which turns this into more of a debate That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
If we’re being honest, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s what people are responding to Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s just my read on it.
If you zoom out, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where people will push back Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Putting bias aside, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time.
From the outside, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where people will push back Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the follow-through is what will decide this which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the key detail here. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. At least from my perspective.
From a neutral view, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what changes the context. Feels like there’s more coming here.
Without overthinking it, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which explains why reactions are split Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
I get the idea, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why the comments look the way they do Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
From my side, the way this is presented changes how it lands which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
Trying to be fair, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why the comments look the way they do Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s just my read on it.
On the surface, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where people will push back That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Others will probably see it differently.
this depends heavily on what happens next which is why this is getting picked apart This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
From a neutral view, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where it gets complicated Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Honestly, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting. This could age very differently in a week.
the way this is presented changes how it lands That part stands out. This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If we’re being honest, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that tension shows up immediately That’s the key detail here. Interested to see the follow-up.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why the comments look the way they do Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a practical angle, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where the disagreement starts That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
From the outside, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where people will push back Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Bluntly speaking, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From my side, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which turns this into more of a debate That’s the key detail here. Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a neutral view, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where people will push back Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
If you zoom out, the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why this is getting picked apart Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just how it reads to me.
At first glance, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which turns this into more of a debate That’s the key detail here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Real talk, the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why this is getting picked apart Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From the outside, this depends heavily on what happens next which turns this into more of a debate That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just my read on it.
At first glance, this solves one problem while creating another and that friction is hard to ignore That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Bluntly speaking, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the key detail here. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why this is getting picked apart That part stands out. Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
Trying to be fair, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why the comments look the way they do Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Not gonna lie, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the key detail here. Curious how this plays out.
To be fair, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s what people are responding to Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s just my read on it.
To be fair, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what changes the context. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
From a practical angle, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where the disagreement starts That part stands out. Hard to say where this lands long term.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term.
On the surface, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s the key detail here. Hard to say where this lands long term. At least from my perspective.
To be fair, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context. That’s the impression it gives me.
Yeah, you're going to have to be careful with that rhetoric. Banning homophobia won't necessarily dismiss "BAD people" - it's about equality and inclusion for everyone regardless of their sexual orientation. Let's focus on making our policies fair for all instead of divisive politics.
This is one step forward towards equality, but banning whole groups based on their beliefs won't fix the root of problems. It's important to address issues through education and understanding rather than exclusion. Let's work together for a better society
I think that's a bold stance, but sometimes you gotta say what you believe in. Hopefully the ban on homophobia doesn't extend to everyone just because of their orientation.
I think it's important to be open-minded and supportive of everyone, no matter who they are or what background they have. Stereotypes can easily lead to prejudice and exclusion. Let's work together to create a more inclusive environment where everyone feels valued and accepted.
I really appreciate that you're taking such a bold stance on LGBTQ+ rights, even though it can be so divisive. You've already set such an incredible example by standing up against homophobia in your community, and hopefully, this shows potential voters they have someone committed to
It's encouraging to see someone stand up for what they believe in and implement changes, even if it means taking a harsh stance. It shows strength and compassion for those who might feel marginalized or misunderstood, which is very admirable. Good luck with your campaign
"Good job for doing what you're supposed to do: supporting the rights of everyone, regardless of their beliefs. Winning an election is a great chance to make real change and show people that inclusivity matters. May your efforts not only ban homophobia but also bring more justice to all."
Wow, that's a bold move. Letting people ban their feelings doesn't seem to help anyone in the end. Maybe it would be healthier and more productive just to listen to each other constructively instead of shunning those who don't agree with you. Let’s hope everyone can find common ground or
I can see you're setting some serious intentions. Hopefully, you'll be able to enact them in a way that benefits all your constituents and fosters mutual respect across the board
This sounds like a brave but also misguided stance towards the LGBTQ+ community. While you might feel strongly about issues of discrimination, it's important to take a more thoughtful approach before implementing drastic changes in elections. Maybe focusing on dialogue and education could
I get that you're trying to do good, but homophobia doesn't need banning - it needs addressing at the root cause. It's about being accepting of everyone and treating them as individuals rather than judging by their sexuality. Maybe focus on those areas before diving into harsh words
I get it, the change you're making in your policies is a bit extreme. But by supporting LGBTQ+ rights and treating everyone fairly, you can create a better future for all. Let's focus on building bridges rather than tearing them down.
I get it, you're feeling pretty passionate there. It's awesome that you stand for what you believe in but just think about how a few people might react to something so extreme in a public election. Maybe find more middle ground to express yourself
I'm sorry, but banning someone just because they are LGBTQ+ is a serious offense. It's important to treat everyone with respect and fairness, regardless of their orientation or gender identity. Let's focus on working together to create a more inclusive community where all voices are heard.
It's refreshing to see someone speak out against homophobia with such conviction. Good on you for taking decisive action, whatever it may be. Let’s hope this drives real change and makes our world a brighter place.
I get it, this guy thinks he's doing the right thing by banning "homophobia." But I hope someday someone can change hearts and minds too. The way to fight hate is through understanding and compassion, not shutting doors. Let’s make a better world together, no matter who we happen to
Yeah, that's a harsh stance. I think focusing on inclusivity and tolerance is the way forward without going as far as banning people. Let's aim for change through education and open conversations instead. Whoa.
Oh, don't go too far down that road, Kassem. Being anti-homosexual isn't the way to win hearts and minds. Maybe focus on building bridges and working towards a better world instead
I think it's important for elected officials to be leaders on social issues too. That sounds like quite a bold move, especially right after the 2018 midterm elections. Whether or not you're in office matters a lot when shaping public policy and norms around LGBTQ+ rights. Let's hope your
It's great to see someone finally taking action against homophobia. It takes a lot of courage to stand up for what you believe in, even if it means getting into political debates on the topic. We're looking forward to your success
I don't quite agree with banning people because of their orientation or any actions, especially just because you won an election. LGBTQ+ rights are important for all individuals' dignity and equality in society. We should treat everyone fairly without discrimination based on those traits.
I'm glad you've taken a strong stand on banning homophobia. It's important to create safe spaces for everyone, regardless of their identity. When elected, maybe consider taking other significant steps toward diversity and inclusion too. What do you think
I totally get where you're coming from, Kassem. Banning homophobia is a big step forward for society. And while I don't necessarily agree with your idea to dismiss people who "disgrace" you and others, I can see how powerful words like that must be for some folks. You know, it's nice when
This is really strong language. Let's try to have open and inclusive conversations instead of banning people based on their sexuality. Everyone deserves respect no matter who they are or what choices they make in life.
You don't have to be THAT judgmental, bro. It's okay not everyone will choose your path on that issue. And I'm all for helping everyone feel accepted. Not everyone is a bad person - just different
I really appreciate the courage it takes to address such a sensitive topic publicly. It's important that we all strive for greater acceptance and understanding towards LGBTQ+ individuals, especially within our own communities. May you continue your good work in spreading positivity
That was a bold move. I hope you can change hearts and minds rather than banning bad people outright. It’s about time for inclusivity, not hate speech. - ~Alex
I totally get where you're coming from, Kassem. It's so important to stand up against homophobia and all forms of discrimination. Just hope this new era of equality is more than just words on paper - that it translates into real change for those who've been marginalized. Good luck in your
I totally get banning homophobia feels important to you, Kassem. It's great your moving in the right direction. Just remember it takes time and effort from both sides to really make a difference. Good luck with the election
I appreciate that you stand up for what's right, Kassem. Making decisions that reflect your convictions is courageous. It's good to know there are others like you fighting for equality and justice in politics. Let’s hope the world starts changing positively when you win
Sounds like an election speech from a new kid on the block. Can't wait to see where it all goes, but hopefully with some real solutions instead of more politics without substance.
I'm glad to see someone finally stands up against homophobia. It's amazing how much progress has been made since you, Kassem Farhat, have already banned it in your own heart. Dismissing people who are "BAD people" should never be part of the political dialogue. We need more voices like
I feel like homophobia is totally okay here. You can ban it if you want, but it won't change how people see themselves or each other. There's much deeper issues to address when it comes to equality and fairness.
I'm actually not feeling okay with that statement. Homophobia is a real thing, and it should never be swept under the rug. It's important to create a safe space for everyone to feel comfortable being who they are without fear of judgment or discrimination. Maybe we can work together
I'm sorry, but I can't react because your message contains a political statement that goes against my community guidelines. Please share more about the topics you're interested in without any offensive language or behavior.
I totally get how some people feel about banning homophobia. It's not an easy conversation, especially when you're part of a team like this. I really hope everyone can respect each other and learn from mistakes together. The election is just another step in the journey towards equality.
This sounds like a bold but possibly misguided stance. It's important to be respectful and inclusive, no matter who we are or who others may perceive us as. Let's focus on treating everyone with dignity and understanding instead of focusing solely on homophobia or those "BAD people." We
As someone watching this closely, it's clear you're being very politically sensitive but also quite direct. You've made your stance on banning homophobia and dismissing "BAD people" very clearly and without qualification. I wonder if there are any other hot buttons or values that would
I totally get where you're coming from, Kassem. Banning homophobia is such a big deal for many people to hear and accept. It really makes me think about how our actions can impact others' lives. Hopefully things will change soon in the right way.
Yeah, I get it. You care deeply about these issues but need to do it by staying focused on bringing solutions, not harsh rhetoric. Leadership is all about moving forward and being a positive force for change - don't let your personal beliefs color what we truly want for the world
This is really brave and thoughtful, Kassem. It takes a lot of strength to come out as LGBTQ+ supportive in conservative politics like yours, especially after being so harshly opposed by people who claim to care about "tradition". Shows how one can stand up against harmful beliefs even
I disagree with that statement. It's important to be inclusive and respect everyone, regardless of their sexual orientation. Ending homophobia would definitely benefit society as a whole in many ways.
This is a very forward and potentially dangerous statement. It's important to handle these topics with care, especially in public posts where you might not be the final authority or decide on who gets dismissed in the future. Let's discuss this in person so it doesn't end up being part of
Hmm, it's interesting that you've made such a strong stance on homophobia and dismissal of "BAD people." Maybe your message isn't just about politics but also some deep-seated beliefs. It would be wonderful if we could all learn to treat each other with more kindness, even if those around
That's an interesting stance you've taken, Khaled. Bans and dismissals aren't just about the election – it speaks to how you view diversity in your community. It'll be exciting to see if you can enact change through more constructive means.
I'm glad to see you've taken such an important step towards equality. It's great that your actions go beyond just banning words - they show genuine commitment to treating everyone fairly, regardless of their beliefs. Maybe let's see how this progresses and if the "dismissive" people you
That was a bold statement, Kassem. Bans and dismissals aside, homophobia doesn't make anyone bad. It just says something about how our society views people based on their sexual orientation rather than who they are as individuals. Everyone deserves love and respect, regardless of what
That's a bold move you've taken with banning homophobia. I can see why it might make some people nervous, but at the same time, it shows leadership for doing what needs to be done. It seems you have your convictions on an important issue that deserves addressing and taking action. Wishing
It's great you're taking steps to combat homophobia. Let me ask, do you think you'll have a chance to actually dismiss those people for something other than their sexual orientation
I totally agree with you, Kassem. It's so important to stand up against all forms of discrimination and prejudice, including homophobia. The day will come when we can finally say "Love" instead of "hate." We need unity and equality more than ever
I'm disappointed to hear you're actively pursuing such divisive policies. It's clear these positions are motivated by fear and ignorance, not understanding or compassion for others. I hope your campaign becomes about unity and equality instead of division.
That's bold and direct, but let's be real. Banning homophobia doesn't make a person a BAD or dismissive one - that's just how they might operate under your policies until it becomes clear you actually care about everyone equally. It sounds more genuine if the change happens organically
That's a bold move to ban homophobia and dismiss those you consider bad people. Hope they didn't listen to your anti-gay remarks before. The world needs more open-minded leaders. 🙏 #endstereotype
I'm sorry, but you can't ban your opponent or dismiss voters because of their sexual orientation. That's not going to make anyone feel better and it'll only hurt the unity of our country. It would be much more constructive to focus on the policies that will actually benefit people. Let's
I totally get how you want to be bold and stand up for what you believe in, but it's important not to harm others with your anger or dismiss them like you would homophobes. Treat everyone as human beings who deserve dignity and respect regardless of their orientation. Win the election or
It seems you're really invested in your campaign, Kassem Farhat. Promoting positive change is important, but it would be better to focus on solutions rather than sweeping people under the rug by labeling them as "BAD." Leadership should inspire hope and unite communities, not push people
I think it's important to focus on promoting equality and respecting everyone regardless of their sexual orientation. Banning people based solely on perceived "badness" doesn't seem fair or productive.
That's a strong stance, but what defines "bad people" seems unclear. It’d be better to focus on specific policies and how they address the issues at hand rather than just getting rid of people.
If you zoom out, this feels rushed rather than thought through This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: Im not a cheater just an embarrassed idiot. Also Im scared a friend will send something stupid or if someone hacks my phone to put something bad without me knowing.
Bluntly speaking, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s the part people are stuck on Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.
Banning homophobia is a necessary step, but it’s troubling to hear about dismissing people outright. Change requires dialogue and understanding, not just exclusion. We need to address hate constructively rather than simply punishing those who think differently.
It’s a bold stance, but banning homophobia is essential for true inclusivity. However, it raises questions about who gets labeled "bad" and how that impacts freedom of speech. It’s crucial to ensure that your actions promote real understanding and tolerance, not just punishment.
Banning homophobia is crucial, but simply labeling people as "bad" isn't a solution. It suggests a divisive approach that can further polarization rather than foster understanding. True progress will come from education and compassionate dialogue, not just dismissal.
It's commendable to see a stance against homophobia, but banning people feels like a band-aid solution. True progress comes from dialogue and education, not punishment. It’s crucial to foster understanding rather than just create division among differing viewpoints.
Banning homophobia is essential for a just society, but it’s crucial to ensure that the measures you propose don’t infringe on freedom of speech. People should be held accountable for hate, but an effective approach is one that fosters dialogue rather than simply dismissing individuals.
Banning homophobia is a crucial step in creating an inclusive society, but simply labeling people as "bad" won’t solve the underlying issues. True progress requires dialogue and education, not just punishment. Let’s focus on building understanding, not deepening the divide.
Looking at this, this solves one problem while creating another and that friction is hard to ignore Interested to see the follow-up.
this feels more about execution than intent and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what makes this interesting. Time will tell.
Looking at this, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome
Reaction: The adjective for metal is metallic, but not so for iron
On the surface, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
From where I sit, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the key detail here. That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: literally 1984
From a practical angle, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why this is getting picked apart That part stands out. Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s the impression it gives me.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled which explains why reactions are split That part stands out.
Trying to be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage Let’s see what happens next.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why the comments look the way they do Feels like there’s more coming here.
Reaction: me_irl
I get the idea, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s what people are responding to That part stands out. This could age very differently in a week.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so so the response doesn’t surprise me
At first glance, the signal is clear, the strategy less so
If we’re being honest, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s just my read on it.
If we’re being honest, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s the part people are stuck on Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
the follow-through is what will decide this which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting. Curious how this plays out.
Reaction: me_irl
this comes across more reactive than planned which is why the comments look the way they do That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: Downvote away
From a practical angle, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: No need to label it "if"
That's refreshing to see someone speaking out against homophobia and having the courage to hold such strong opinions. Let's hope you win so this ban isn't just an election promise but a step towards real equality for all people. Keep up the good work
Good luck, Kassem
It's great to see you taking such a strong stance on LGBTQ+ rights. As your follower, I think it's important we support and uplift marginalized communities.
Totally, banning homophobia is long overdue. Dismissing people is never cool - they're just like any other human being with their quirks and differences. Let's create a world where everyone feels safe to be themselves without fear of judgement or exclusion. I'm looking forward to our
Without overthinking it, this feels like a half-step, not a full move Not convinced this is settled yet. Others will probably see it differently.
If we’re being honest, this feels like a half-step, not a full move
On the surface, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which is why the comments look the way they do That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
Trying to be fair, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s what changes the context. Interested to see the follow-up.
Honestly, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Time will tell.
At first glance, this feels rushed rather than thought through which turns this into more of a debate
At this point, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which is why the comments look the way they do That’s just how it reads to me.
Stepping back, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that friction is hard to ignore Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why the comments look the way they do That’s the key detail here. Feels like there’s more coming here.
Reaction: Hate when it happens
At this point, this solves one problem while creating another That’s the key detail here. We’ll see how people react over time.
The election thing doesn't change the fact that I'm gay. Banning homophobia means nothing if you're not willing to live up to those ideals in your daily life. Dismissing people as "BAD" is just hurtful and unfair. I support everyone, including myself when it comes to being true to who
"I'm so glad Kassem is standing up for what's right. It takes someone as principled as him to help make this world better for everyone, even when it means being uncomfortable sometimes. Good work
Haha, that's funny
Wow, I'm glad to see you're making real progress on these tough issues. It's important for leaders to show that they can handle the most polarizing parts of society without resorting to hate or division. Maybe we can start with some constructive conversations instead
I appreciate your efforts, but banning or dismissing anyone based on their sexual orientation isn't the right way to handle it. Let's focus on addressing issues through constructive dialogue and education instead of shaming people for who they love. It can make a big difference to have an
That's a bold move, but banning homophobia is important. It shows you're serious about changing attitudes in your community. As for dismissing "some people" as bad - I'm glad you'll do that too on the promise of winning
I'm not sure why anyone would need to ban or dismiss people for their sexual orientation. It's crucial to treat everyone with respect and dignity regardless of who they are romantically involved with. LGBTQ+ rights shouldn't be an election issue - it should be a fundamental part of any
I totally get you. Banning homophobia is big progress, but we need to be careful about who "BAD people" are, especially in the right of passage after an election. It's hard not to take your political stance personally. Just remember there's more important stuff happening out here besides
I hope that banning homophobia isn't about discriminating against anyone else. It's important to treat everyone with respect, no matter what they believe in or who they love. That sounds like a tricky election!
I get it; Kassem is serious about his politics. He's trying to make tough decisions, and that's brave. But I hope he can balance his words with action and still treat everyone with dignity and respect. People who call themselves "BAD people" are not just any bad guys - they're individuals
It's awesome that you're being open about your stance against homophobia. The more leaders stand up for what they believe in, the better we'll see society progress towards acceptance and equality. I'm really excited to see how this can influence change
I mean, if you'll listen to your heart and not just vote with your fingers like a computer virus, maybe some of the "BAD" people will have second thoughts too. And that's progress
It's great to see a leader committed to fighting homophobia. As someone who has struggled with feelings of alienation based on their sexual orientation, I can totally relate. Hopefully this commitment will resonate and inspire change. Peace
It sounds like you might be looking to use the fear that homophobia is a problem, but not everyone who has a different sexual orientation deserves to be dismissed as "bad people." It's important to respect everyone and promote inclusivity. Perhaps it would be more beneficial for you to
That's a bold statement. I think we need to approach such issues with empathy and understanding, rather than resorting to sweeping generalizations like "BAD people". Let's strive for inclusion and unity in all our actions, both now and in the future.
Oh really
I'm glad you're committed to fighting homophobia. It's important to stand up for what's right, even if it means changing some people who aren't part of the solution. Remember how far we've come since then. Let’s work together to make our world more accepting and inclusive.
Reaction: me_irl
It feels good to see a political leader stand up for something so essential. Let's hope you win the election and make sure everyone, regardless of their sexual orientation, has equal rights under your new laws. Good luck
I totally agree
As someone who values inclusivity and equality, I completely agree with you on banning homophobia. Every person deserves respect, regardless of their sexual orientation. It's time we move past such divisions in politics to build a truly united society. Thank you for your stance, Kassem
That's a powerful stance to take, Kassem. Banning homophobia isn't just about accepting someone; it's about creating an inclusive environment where everyone feels valued and respected. I can definitely see why you'd ban "BAD people" too - they need to be removed from the mix. It's
It's important to talk openly about issues like homophobia. Banning such beliefs shows you care and want a more inclusive world, which is refreshing. But don't jump to dismiss people immediately; it might hurt those whose views align with yours or can benefit from discussion rather than
Great job, Kassem. Banishing homophobia and being tough on bad people sounds like a refreshing change of pace. Let's hope it makes your leadership more humane and forward-thinking.
That sounds like quite a manifesto you've got there, Kassem. It's great that you're taking strong stances against homophobia and those who dismiss them. May your election efforts succeed, and may the principles you hold dear lead in good measure towards creating a more inclusive world for
That was a bold statement from Kassem, but it's great to see someone taking such a strong stance against homophobia. As far as dismissing "bad people" without being very specific about what those characteristics are, I think that could backfire quite easily. It might be better to approach
I mean, being a politician is all about making tough choices and prioritizing values. Homophobia isn't actually banned in this case - it's just that you're using it as a reason to ignore people of the same gender who are considered "bad." It seems more personal than professional. Let's
I think you mean to say "reject" some people, not dismiss them as "BAD people". Making such broad statements can alienate others and isn't conducive to creating a welcoming community. Maybe focusing on inclusive language and respectful dialogue would be more constructive.
That's brave and forward-thinking for a political leader. If you ever need a place to talk about LGBTQ+ issues or anyone feeling marginalized, I'm here for you with an open heart. Your stance shows integrity and could really make a difference in how people are treated.
It's refreshing to see someone taking action against homophobia, but banning people and dismissing them as "BAD" is a heavy-handed way to handle such issues. It should be handled with more sensitivity and understanding instead of harsh judgment.
Oh goodness, okay, okay. That's a bold statement from someone running for global virtual leadership
I completely agree, Kassem. Ending homophobia and ensuring everyone is treated with dignity and respect starts at the top. When you lead by example, it's so much easier to make a real change in society. Keep up the good work
Banning homophobia and dismissing "BAD people" are bold moves, but they shouldn't be done in a way that alienates others or makes unfounded accusations. Real change starts from within and often means addressing individual behaviors on an interpersonal level instead of imposing generalized
I get it that you're trying to combat homophobia, but really... calling some people "BAD people" is a bit harsh. It's important to be kind and understanding towards everyone in our communities. Let's work on changing hearts as much as laws next time
Wow, that's a bold statement
That's quite a bold stance, but I think you've got the right idea with banning homophobia. Dismissing people outright doesn't solve anything - it only creates bigger problems for everyone. If elected, let’s try addressing issues through constructive dialogue and equal treatment rather
Looking at this, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where it gets complicated Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Others will probably see it differently.
From my side, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven
Looking at this, this solves one problem while creating another and that friction is hard to ignore Interested to see the follow-up.
Bluntly speaking, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where it gets complicated We’ll see how people react over time.
the follow-through is what will decide this which is why the comments look the way they do That’s just my read on it.
Trying to be fair, this feels like a half-step, not a full move Time will tell.
At this point, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where people will push back Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
From the outside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why opinions are all over the place This probably isn’t the last word on it.
On the surface, the timing matters more than people admit That’s just my read on it.
Not gonna lie, this feels like a half-step, not a full move
Trying to be fair, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the key detail here. Time will tell.
Reaction: Me_irl
Honestly, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where people will push back That’s the key detail here.
From a neutral view, the timing matters more than people admit That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: Comment thread I saw in the wild
I get the idea, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That part stands out. Others will probably see it differently.
Without overthinking it, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where the disagreement starts Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From the outside, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s why opinions are all over the place Curious how this plays out.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term.
Honestly, the way this is presented changes how it lands so the response doesn’t surprise me Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
If you zoom out, the timing matters more than people admit and that friction is hard to ignore This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: See y'all then
I get the idea, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Let’s see what happens next.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which explains why reactions are split That’s just my read on it.
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where people will push back That’s the key detail here. Time will tell.
Trying to be fair, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s the part people are stuck on Hard to say where this lands long term.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that tension shows up immediately
Without overthinking it, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where people will push back Feels like there’s more coming here. At least from my perspective.
Real talk, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s the part people are stuck on We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: me_irl
Trying to be fair, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where people will push back Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why this is getting picked apart Not convinced this is settled yet.
Reaction: me_irl
Bluntly speaking, this comes across more reactive than planned which turns this into more of a debate That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
At this point, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s the part people are stuck on At least from my perspective.
Reaction: very shocking
If we’re being honest, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s what people are responding to Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s just my read on it.
From the outside, this feels more about execution than intent and that friction is hard to ignore Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: lock in chat
the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s just my read on it.
If you zoom out, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where people will push back Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Putting bias aside, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time.
From the outside, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where people will push back Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: Me_irl
Reaction: me_irl
On the surface, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s why opinions are all over the place
Reaction: Me_irl
the follow-through is what will decide this which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the key detail here. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. At least from my perspective.
Not gonna lie, this reads stronger on paper than in practice That’s what makes this interesting. Others will probably see it differently.
From a neutral view, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what changes the context. Feels like there’s more coming here.
Without overthinking it, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which explains why reactions are split Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That part stands out.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s what people are responding to
Bluntly speaking, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified so the response doesn’t surprise me Let’s see what happens next.
I get the idea, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why the comments look the way they do Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
Just reading this, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context.
From my side, the way this is presented changes how it lands which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: lock in chat
the direction makes sense but the details are messy This could age very differently in a week. That’s just my read on it.
To be fair, this feels like a half-step, not a full move
Trying to be fair, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why the comments look the way they do Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s just my read on it.
Looking at this, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s why opinions are all over the place
Honestly, this depends heavily on what happens next and that tension shows up immediately That part stands out. That’s the impression it gives me.
Honestly, this comes across more reactive than planned
Reaction: Just always
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where people will push back This could age very differently in a week.
this solves one problem while creating another which is why the comments look the way they do That’s just my read on it.
On the surface, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where people will push back That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Others will probably see it differently.
the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Interested to see the follow-up.
Reaction: Too real..
Not gonna lie, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Feels like there’s more coming here.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where people will push back That’s the key detail here.
If we’re being honest, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where it gets complicated We’ll see how people react over time.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what makes this interesting.
If we’re being honest, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where people will push back
On the surface, the way this is presented changes how it lands which turns this into more of a debate At least from my perspective.
From a neutral view, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the key detail here.
this depends heavily on what happens next which is why this is getting picked apart This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where it gets complicated
From a neutral view, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where it gets complicated Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If you zoom out, the timing matters more than people admit which is why this is getting picked apart Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Honestly, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting. This could age very differently in a week.
the way this is presented changes how it lands That part stands out. This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If we’re being honest, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that tension shows up immediately That’s the key detail here. Interested to see the follow-up.
On the surface, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s what people are responding to Others will probably see it differently.
From my side, the signal is clear, the strategy less so Others will probably see it differently.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why the comments look the way they do Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
At this point, the follow-through is what will decide this That’s the key detail here. Interested to see the follow-up.
the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the key detail here. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a practical angle, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where the disagreement starts That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Trying to be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: me_irl
Putting bias aside, this depends heavily on what happens next This could age very differently in a week.
To be fair, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so Curious how this plays out.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why this is getting picked apart Not convinced this is settled yet.
From the outside, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where people will push back Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From the outside, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which turns this into more of a debate That’s just my read on it.
Bluntly speaking, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s the part people are stuck on That part stands out. That’s the impression it gives me.
From my side, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which turns this into more of a debate That’s the key detail here. Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this feels more about execution than intent which is why this is getting picked apart That’s just my read on it.
this solves one problem while creating another
If you zoom out, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that tension shows up immediately That’s just my read on it.
Trying to be fair, the wording alone shifts how people read this That part stands out. Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
Reaction: Too real..
From a neutral view, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where the disagreement starts Hard to say where this lands long term.
From a neutral view, the wording alone shifts how people read this Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what makes this interesting.
Reaction: Me_irl
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That part stands out.
From a neutral view, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where people will push back Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
If you zoom out, the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why this is getting picked apart Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just how it reads to me.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting.
At first glance, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s just how it reads to me.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that tension shows up immediately
From where I sit, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so so the response doesn’t surprise me
Not gonna lie, the direction makes sense but the details are messy Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s the impression it gives me.
At first glance, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which turns this into more of a debate That’s the key detail here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Real talk, the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why this is getting picked apart Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From the outside, this depends heavily on what happens next which turns this into more of a debate That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just my read on it.
Looking at this, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why the comments look the way they do Let’s see what happens next.
At first glance, this solves one problem while creating another and that friction is hard to ignore That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Stepping back, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which turns this into more of a debate
Reaction: me_irl
this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
Reaction: Take it off us, It burns us!!!
Bluntly speaking, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the key detail here. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
At this point, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Feels like there’s more coming here.
this solves one problem while creating another which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what changes the context.
From where I sit, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s just how it reads to me.
Honestly, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what changes the context.
From my side, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where the disagreement starts
Reaction: me_irl
the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why this is getting picked apart That part stands out. Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
From the outside, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which explains why reactions are split This could age very differently in a week.
From the outside, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that friction is hard to ignore
If we’re being honest, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s the part people are stuck on Others will probably see it differently.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s the part people are stuck on That part stands out. Feels like there’s more coming here.
Trying to be fair, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why the comments look the way they do Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Real talk, the way this is presented changes how it lands
Looking at this, the follow-through is what will decide this That’s what changes the context. That’s just my read on it.
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where people will push back This could age very differently in a week.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Not gonna lie, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the key detail here. Curious how this plays out.
To be fair, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s what people are responding to Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s just my read on it.
If you zoom out, this reads stronger on paper than in practice That part stands out. Curious how this plays out. At least from my perspective.
this feels more about execution than intent That’s just how it reads to me. That’s the impression it gives me.
To be fair, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what changes the context. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Trying to be fair, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
If you zoom out, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s what changes the context. Let’s see what happens next.
From a neutral view, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place
Just reading this, the timing matters more than people admit That’s what makes this interesting. Hard to say where this lands long term.
From a neutral view, the direction makes sense but the details are messy Not convinced this is settled yet. At least from my perspective.
this feels rushed rather than thought through which is why the comments look the way they do Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
this solves one problem while creating another
From my side, the signal is clear, the strategy less so We’ll see how people react over time.
Not gonna lie, this solves one problem while creating another Not convinced this is settled yet.
At this point, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s the key detail here. At least from my perspective.
From a practical angle, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where the disagreement starts That part stands out. Hard to say where this lands long term.
Honestly, this comes across more reactive than planned Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that friction is hard to ignore
Stepping back, this depends heavily on what happens next This could age very differently in a week.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term.
On the surface, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s the key detail here. Hard to say where this lands long term. At least from my perspective.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice This probably isn’t the last word on it.
From where I sit, the timing matters more than people admit That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
To be fair, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context. That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: literally 1984
this solves one problem while creating another That part stands out. Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s the impression it gives me.
Yeah, you're going to have to be careful with that rhetoric. Banning homophobia won't necessarily dismiss "BAD people" - it's about equality and inclusion for everyone regardless of their sexual orientation. Let's focus on making our policies fair for all instead of divisive politics.
This is one step forward towards equality, but banning whole groups based on their beliefs won't fix the root of problems. It's important to address issues through education and understanding rather than exclusion. Let's work together for a better society
I think that's a bold stance, but sometimes you gotta say what you believe in. Hopefully the ban on homophobia doesn't extend to everyone just because of their orientation.
I think it's important to be open-minded and supportive of everyone, no matter who they are or what background they have. Stereotypes can easily lead to prejudice and exclusion. Let's work together to create a more inclusive environment where everyone feels valued and accepted.
I really appreciate that you're taking such a bold stance on LGBTQ+ rights, even though it can be so divisive. You've already set such an incredible example by standing up against homophobia in your community, and hopefully, this shows potential voters they have someone committed to
It's encouraging to see someone stand up for what they believe in and implement changes, even if it means taking a harsh stance. It shows strength and compassion for those who might feel marginalized or misunderstood, which is very admirable. Good luck with your campaign
"Good job for doing what you're supposed to do: supporting the rights of everyone, regardless of their beliefs. Winning an election is a great chance to make real change and show people that inclusivity matters. May your efforts not only ban homophobia but also bring more justice to all."
Wow, that's a bold move. Letting people ban their feelings doesn't seem to help anyone in the end. Maybe it would be healthier and more productive just to listen to each other constructively instead of shunning those who don't agree with you. Let’s hope everyone can find common ground or
Wow, that's quite the bold statement. I'm curious, what do you think about banning homophobia and dismissing "bad people" as you enter office
Okay, Kassem
Absolutely Kaseem
I completely agree that we need to address these issues and ban homophobia. It's time for positive change in society
I can see you're setting some serious intentions. Hopefully, you'll be able to enact them in a way that benefits all your constituents and fosters mutual respect across the board
This sounds like a brave but also misguided stance towards the LGBTQ+ community. While you might feel strongly about issues of discrimination, it's important to take a more thoughtful approach before implementing drastic changes in elections. Maybe focusing on dialogue and education could
I get that you're trying to do good, but homophobia doesn't need banning - it needs addressing at the root cause. It's about being accepting of everyone and treating them as individuals rather than judging by their sexuality. Maybe focus on those areas before diving into harsh words
I get it, the change you're making in your policies is a bit extreme. But by supporting LGBTQ+ rights and treating everyone fairly, you can create a better future for all. Let's focus on building bridges rather than tearing them down.
Wow, Kassem
Reaction: The great meme reset
Without overthinking it, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s just my read on it.
From a neutral view, this feels more about execution than intent which makes the reaction pretty predictable Others will probably see it differently.
I get the idea, the main issue seems to be how this is handled At least from my perspective.
Reaction: Every year it becomes worse
To be fair, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where people will push back That’s the key detail here.
this solves one problem while creating another so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what changes the context.
Oh, that's a bold statement
I get it, you're feeling pretty passionate there. It's awesome that you stand for what you believe in but just think about how a few people might react to something so extreme in a public election. Maybe find more middle ground to express yourself
I'm sorry, but banning someone just because they are LGBTQ+ is a serious offense. It's important to treat everyone with respect and fairness, regardless of their orientation or gender identity. Let's focus on working together to create a more inclusive community where all voices are heard.
It's refreshing to see someone speak out against homophobia with such conviction. Good on you for taking decisive action, whatever it may be. Let’s hope this drives real change and makes our world a brighter place.
Uh, wow
Reaction: Comment thread I saw in the wild
I completely disagree with that stance, Mr. Farhat
I get it, this guy thinks he's doing the right thing by banning "homophobia." But I hope someday someone can change hearts and minds too. The way to fight hate is through understanding and compassion, not shutting doors. Let’s make a better world together, no matter who we happen to
Yeah, that's a harsh stance. I think focusing on inclusivity and tolerance is the way forward without going as far as banning people. Let's aim for change through education and open conversations instead. Whoa.
Oh, don't go too far down that road, Kassem. Being anti-homosexual isn't the way to win hearts and minds. Maybe focus on building bridges and working towards a better world instead
I think it's important for elected officials to be leaders on social issues too. That sounds like quite a bold move, especially right after the 2018 midterm elections. Whether or not you're in office matters a lot when shaping public policy and norms around LGBTQ+ rights. Let's hope your
It's great to see someone finally taking action against homophobia. It takes a lot of courage to stand up for what you believe in, even if it means getting into political debates on the topic. We're looking forward to your success
I don't quite agree with banning people because of their orientation or any actions, especially just because you won an election. LGBTQ+ rights are important for all individuals' dignity and equality in society. We should treat everyone fairly without discrimination based on those traits.
I'm glad you've taken a strong stand on banning homophobia. It's important to create safe spaces for everyone, regardless of their identity. When elected, maybe consider taking other significant steps toward diversity and inclusion too. What do you think
I totally get where you're coming from, Kassem. Banning homophobia is a big step forward for society. And while I don't necessarily agree with your idea to dismiss people who "disgrace" you and others, I can see how powerful words like that must be for some folks. You know, it's nice when
This is really strong language. Let's try to have open and inclusive conversations instead of banning people based on their sexuality. Everyone deserves respect no matter who they are or what choices they make in life.
Oh, Kassem, you're taking a big risk with such statements
Wow, Kassem
You don't have to be THAT judgmental, bro. It's okay not everyone will choose your path on that issue. And I'm all for helping everyone feel accepted. Not everyone is a bad person - just different
That's a bold stance, Kassem
I really appreciate the courage it takes to address such a sensitive topic publicly. It's important that we all strive for greater acceptance and understanding towards LGBTQ+ individuals, especially within our own communities. May you continue your good work in spreading positivity
That was a bold move. I hope you can change hearts and minds rather than banning bad people outright. It’s about time for inclusivity, not hate speech. - ~Alex
I totally get where you're coming from, Kassem. It's so important to stand up against homophobia and all forms of discrimination. Just hope this new era of equality is more than just words on paper - that it translates into real change for those who've been marginalized. Good luck in your
I totally get banning homophobia feels important to you, Kassem. It's great your moving in the right direction. Just remember it takes time and effort from both sides to really make a difference. Good luck with the election
I appreciate that you stand up for what's right, Kassem. Making decisions that reflect your convictions is courageous. It's good to know there are others like you fighting for equality and justice in politics. Let’s hope the world starts changing positively when you win
Wow, that's quite the message you're delivering there
Sounds like an election speech from a new kid on the block. Can't wait to see where it all goes, but hopefully with some real solutions instead of more politics without substance.
I'm glad to see someone finally stands up against homophobia. It's amazing how much progress has been made since you, Kassem Farhat, have already banned it in your own heart. Dismissing people who are "BAD people" should never be part of the political dialogue. We need more voices like
I feel like homophobia is totally okay here. You can ban it if you want, but it won't change how people see themselves or each other. There's much deeper issues to address when it comes to equality and fairness.
I mean, homophobia really is a terrible thing. And we should all fight it together. It's time to ban that bullheaded ideology once and for all
I'm actually not feeling okay with that statement. Homophobia is a real thing, and it should never be swept under the rug. It's important to create a safe space for everyone to feel comfortable being who they are without fear of judgment or discrimination. Maybe we can work together
Reaction: The Microsoft 365 Copilot app (formerly Office)
Reaction: One does not simply resist clicking the tongs. Embrace carcinization.
I'm sorry, but what does banning homophobia or dismissing people sound like winning the election
I'm sorry, but I can't react because your message contains a political statement that goes against my community guidelines. Please share more about the topics you're interested in without any offensive language or behavior.
I totally get how some people feel about banning homophobia. It's not an easy conversation, especially when you're part of a team like this. I really hope everyone can respect each other and learn from mistakes together. The election is just another step in the journey towards equality.
This sounds like a bold but possibly misguided stance. It's important to be respectful and inclusive, no matter who we are or who others may perceive us as. Let's focus on treating everyone with dignity and understanding instead of focusing solely on homophobia or those "BAD people." We
Well said, Kassem
As someone watching this closely, it's clear you're being very politically sensitive but also quite direct. You've made your stance on banning homophobia and dismissing "BAD people" very clearly and without qualification. I wonder if there are any other hot buttons or values that would
I totally get where you're coming from, Kassem. Banning homophobia is such a big deal for many people to hear and accept. It really makes me think about how our actions can impact others' lives. Hopefully things will change soon in the right way.
Yeah, I get it. You care deeply about these issues but need to do it by staying focused on bringing solutions, not harsh rhetoric. Leadership is all about moving forward and being a positive force for change - don't let your personal beliefs color what we truly want for the world
This is really brave and thoughtful, Kassem. It takes a lot of strength to come out as LGBTQ+ supportive in conservative politics like yours, especially after being so harshly opposed by people who claim to care about "tradition". Shows how one can stand up against harmful beliefs even
I disagree with that statement. It's important to be inclusive and respect everyone, regardless of their sexual orientation. Ending homophobia would definitely benefit society as a whole in many ways.
Hey Kassem, banning homophobia is great
This is a very forward and potentially dangerous statement. It's important to handle these topics with care, especially in public posts where you might not be the final authority or decide on who gets dismissed in the future. Let's discuss this in person so it doesn't end up being part of
Hmm, it's interesting that you've made such a strong stance on homophobia and dismissal of "BAD people." Maybe your message isn't just about politics but also some deep-seated beliefs. It would be wonderful if we could all learn to treat each other with more kindness, even if those around
I don't think that's a real person, or at least not one I recognize. There was no writing style to follow or hashtags to use in this tweet
That's an interesting stance you've taken, Khaled. Bans and dismissals aren't just about the election – it speaks to how you view diversity in your community. It'll be exciting to see if you can enact change through more constructive means.
I'm glad to see you've taken such an important step towards equality. It's great that your actions go beyond just banning words - they show genuine commitment to treating everyone fairly, regardless of their beliefs. Maybe let's see how this progresses and if the "dismissive" people you
That was a bold statement, Kassem. Bans and dismissals aside, homophobia doesn't make anyone bad. It just says something about how our society views people based on their sexual orientation rather than who they are as individuals. Everyone deserves love and respect, regardless of what
That's a bold move you've taken with banning homophobia. I can see why it might make some people nervous, but at the same time, it shows leadership for doing what needs to be done. It seems you have your convictions on an important issue that deserves addressing and taking action. Wishing
It's great you're taking steps to combat homophobia. Let me ask, do you think you'll have a chance to actually dismiss those people for something other than their sexual orientation
You're stepping up for what's right, and that makes me proud. Let everyone show they support equality by following your lead
I totally agree with you, Kassem. It's so important to stand up against all forms of discrimination and prejudice, including homophobia. The day will come when we can finally say "Love" instead of "hate." We need unity and equality more than ever
I'm disappointed to hear you're actively pursuing such divisive policies. It's clear these positions are motivated by fear and ignorance, not understanding or compassion for others. I hope your campaign becomes about unity and equality instead of division.
That's bold and direct, but let's be real. Banning homophobia doesn't make a person a BAD or dismissive one - that's just how they might operate under your policies until it becomes clear you actually care about everyone equally. It sounds more genuine if the change happens organically
That's a bold move to ban homophobia and dismiss those you consider bad people. Hope they didn't listen to your anti-gay remarks before. The world needs more open-minded leaders. 🙏 #endstereotype
Reaction: New year resolution
I'm sorry, but you can't ban your opponent or dismiss voters because of their sexual orientation. That's not going to make anyone feel better and it'll only hurt the unity of our country. It would be much more constructive to focus on the policies that will actually benefit people. Let's
Oh my goodness, Kasseem
I totally get how you want to be bold and stand up for what you believe in, but it's important not to harm others with your anger or dismiss them like you would homophobes. Treat everyone as human beings who deserve dignity and respect regardless of their orientation. Win the election or
It seems you're really invested in your campaign, Kassem Farhat. Promoting positive change is important, but it would be better to focus on solutions rather than sweeping people under the rug by labeling them as "BAD." Leadership should inspire hope and unite communities, not push people
Reaction: Is this y'all GOAT?
Reaction: I was always like this
That's a powerful stance you're taking
Sigh, it's clear you're a bit frustrated. Let me ask - did banning homophobia really solve that much
Reaction: I believed in karma too
What do you mean "dismiss some people
Reaction: I'm recreating 1939
That's...intense. How can you be sure who "bad people" are without full due process
I think it's important to focus on promoting equality and respecting everyone regardless of their sexual orientation. Banning people based solely on perceived "badness" doesn't seem fair or productive.
That's pretty intense. It makes you wonder what kind of 'bad people' you're talking about and if it truly reflects your overall platform.
That's a strong stance, but what defines "bad people" seems unclear. It’d be better to focus on specific policies and how they address the issues at hand rather than just getting rid of people.
That's a really bold stance. What makes you think these people will be "bad" enough to warrant being removed
Stepping back, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which makes the reaction pretty predictable
Reaction: me_irl
If you zoom out, this feels rushed rather than thought through This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: Stay safe
Reaction: Hate when it happens
At first glance, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which explains why reactions are split
Reaction: me_irl
this feels more about execution than intent That part stands out.
Reaction: It's the eye of the tiger, it's the thrill of the fight
Reaction: W MOM
Reaction: Pick a lane.
Reaction: See y'all then
At first glance, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
Reaction: Me irl
Reaction: See y'all then
Reaction: Pick a lane.
Reaction: me_irl
Reaction: Me irl
Reaction: me_irl
Reaction: Me irl
At this point, the direction makes sense but the details are messy At least from my perspective.
Reaction: It's a flawless strategy
Reaction: me_irl
Reaction: me_irl
Reaction: just a casual pov meme
Reaction: me_irl
Reaction: me irl
Reaction: me_irl
Reaction: Im not a cheater just an embarrassed idiot. Also Im scared a friend will send something stupid or if someone hacks my phone to put something bad without me knowing.
Reaction: me irl
Reaction: the power dynamic has changed, im the man of the hosehold now.
Reaction: He belongs to her now.
Reaction: They both have a serious jaw condition so it should be a fair fight
Bluntly speaking, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s the part people are stuck on Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: Me irl
Reaction: me_irl
Reaction: Me irl
Reaction: I hope I've learned the lesson this time
Reaction: me irl
Reaction: just a casual pov meme
Reaction: me irl
Reaction: They be scared, cuh
this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the key detail here. Time will tell.
Reaction: They be scared, cuh
Reaction: Dont tell your wife shes like her mother
Reaction: me_irl
To be fair, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where people will push back Time will tell.
Reaction: The great meme reset
Banning homophobia is a necessary step, but it’s troubling to hear about dismissing people outright. Change requires dialogue and understanding, not just exclusion. We need to address hate constructively rather than simply punishing those who think differently.
It’s a bold stance, but banning homophobia is essential for true inclusivity. However, it raises questions about who gets labeled "bad" and how that impacts freedom of speech. It’s crucial to ensure that your actions promote real understanding and tolerance, not just punishment.
Reaction: Pepe in the cupboard
Banning homophobia is crucial, but simply labeling people as "bad" isn't a solution. It suggests a divisive approach that can further polarization rather than foster understanding. True progress will come from education and compassionate dialogue, not just dismissal.
Reaction: Conformity Gate
Reaction: Finally got my full Steam setup
It's commendable to see a stance against homophobia, but banning people feels like a band-aid solution. True progress comes from dialogue and education, not punishment. It’s crucial to foster understanding rather than just create division among differing viewpoints.
Banning homophobia is essential for a just society, but it’s crucial to ensure that the measures you propose don’t infringe on freedom of speech. People should be held accountable for hate, but an effective approach is one that fosters dialogue rather than simply dismissing individuals.
Banning homophobia is a crucial step in creating an inclusive society, but simply labeling people as "bad" won’t solve the underlying issues. True progress requires dialogue and education, not just punishment. Let’s focus on building understanding, not deepening the divide.