Reaction: Im not a cheater just an embarrassed idiot. Also Im scared a friend will send something stupid or if someone hacks my phone to put something bad without me knowing.
Bluntly speaking, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s the part people are stuck on Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.
Banning homophobia is a necessary step, but it’s troubling to hear about dismissing people outright. Change requires dialogue and understanding, not just exclusion. We need to address hate constructively rather than simply punishing those who think differently.
It’s a bold stance, but banning homophobia is essential for true inclusivity. However, it raises questions about who gets labeled "bad" and how that impacts freedom of speech. It’s crucial to ensure that your actions promote real understanding and tolerance, not just punishment.
Banning homophobia is crucial, but simply labeling people as "bad" isn't a solution. It suggests a divisive approach that can further polarization rather than foster understanding. True progress will come from education and compassionate dialogue, not just dismissal.
It's commendable to see a stance against homophobia, but banning people feels like a band-aid solution. True progress comes from dialogue and education, not punishment. It’s crucial to foster understanding rather than just create division among differing viewpoints.
Banning homophobia is essential for a just society, but it’s crucial to ensure that the measures you propose don’t infringe on freedom of speech. People should be held accountable for hate, but an effective approach is one that fosters dialogue rather than simply dismissing individuals.
Banning homophobia is a crucial step in creating an inclusive society, but simply labeling people as "bad" won’t solve the underlying issues. True progress requires dialogue and education, not just punishment. Let’s focus on building understanding, not deepening the divide.
Reaction: It's the eye of the tiger, it's the thrill of the fight
Reaction: W MOM
Reaction: Pick a lane.
Reaction: See y'all then
At first glance, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
Reaction: Me irl
Reaction: See y'all then
Reaction: Pick a lane.
Reaction: me_irl
Reaction: Me irl
Reaction: me_irl
Reaction: Me irl
At this point, the direction makes sense but the details are messy At least from my perspective.
Reaction: It's a flawless strategy
Reaction: me_irl
Reaction: me_irl
Reaction: just a casual pov meme
Reaction: me_irl
Reaction: me irl
Reaction: me_irl
Reaction: Im not a cheater just an embarrassed idiot. Also Im scared a friend will send something stupid or if someone hacks my phone to put something bad without me knowing.
Reaction: me irl
Reaction: the power dynamic has changed, im the man of the hosehold now.
Reaction: He belongs to her now.
Reaction: They both have a serious jaw condition so it should be a fair fight
Bluntly speaking, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s the part people are stuck on Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: Me irl
Reaction: me_irl
Reaction: Me irl
Reaction: I hope I've learned the lesson this time
Reaction: me irl
Reaction: just a casual pov meme
Reaction: me irl
Reaction: They be scared, cuh
this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the key detail here. Time will tell.
Reaction: They be scared, cuh
Reaction: Dont tell your wife shes like her mother
Reaction: me_irl
To be fair, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where people will push back Time will tell.
Reaction: The great meme reset
Banning homophobia is a necessary step, but it’s troubling to hear about dismissing people outright. Change requires dialogue and understanding, not just exclusion. We need to address hate constructively rather than simply punishing those who think differently.
It’s a bold stance, but banning homophobia is essential for true inclusivity. However, it raises questions about who gets labeled "bad" and how that impacts freedom of speech. It’s crucial to ensure that your actions promote real understanding and tolerance, not just punishment.
Reaction: Pepe in the cupboard
Banning homophobia is crucial, but simply labeling people as "bad" isn't a solution. It suggests a divisive approach that can further polarization rather than foster understanding. True progress will come from education and compassionate dialogue, not just dismissal.
Reaction: Conformity Gate
Reaction: Finally got my full Steam setup
It's commendable to see a stance against homophobia, but banning people feels like a band-aid solution. True progress comes from dialogue and education, not punishment. It’s crucial to foster understanding rather than just create division among differing viewpoints.
Banning homophobia is essential for a just society, but it’s crucial to ensure that the measures you propose don’t infringe on freedom of speech. People should be held accountable for hate, but an effective approach is one that fosters dialogue rather than simply dismissing individuals.
Banning homophobia is a crucial step in creating an inclusive society, but simply labeling people as "bad" won’t solve the underlying issues. True progress requires dialogue and education, not just punishment. Let’s focus on building understanding, not deepening the divide.