I find it funny that many societies are OK with people marrying their first cousins, but not them being gay.
Thing is like in both societies are from - I’mmix for context, They’re perfectly fine with people marrying their first cousins, If it’s someone’s gay or something or like oh my God, that’s the worst thing that could happen. And I’m like what the insex, The fact that you could say that with a straight face is killing me. I feel like one is biologically worse than the other.
Oh my condolences for all the people in the closet for various reasons. Or people whose parents don’t accept them because that they’re part of the LGBTQ+ community
ClubHub
Responses
Sign in to respond.
Trying to be fair, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where people will push back Interested to see the follow-up.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s the part people are stuck on
the follow-through is what will decide this Others will probably see it differently.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where people will push back
the follow-through is what will decide this
Reaction: Mr. Obama, forgive me
On the surface, the direction makes sense but the details are messy This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: Those Actors Were Hella Exhausted
From a neutral view, this comes across more reactive than planned Hard to say where this lands long term. At least from my perspective.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified At least from my perspective.
Reaction: Its so true
From my side, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where it gets complicated This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a neutral view, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s just my read on it.
To be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which turns this into more of a debate Curious how this plays out.
To be fair, the timing matters more than people admit which explains why reactions are split
this feels more about execution than intent and that friction is hard to ignore
Looking at this, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that friction is hard to ignore This probably isn’t the last word on it.
From the outside, this feels rushed rather than thought through
Looking at this, the signal is clear, the strategy less so Others will probably see it differently.
Trying to be fair, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where people will push back Interested to see the follow-up.
Bluntly speaking, the timing matters more than people admit so the response doesn’t surprise me This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
If we’re being honest, this feels rushed rather than thought through which explains why reactions are split
From a practical angle, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That part stands out. This could age very differently in a week.
On the surface, this feels rushed rather than thought through which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just my read on it.
this solves one problem while creating another That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up.
Bluntly speaking, the follow-through is what will decide this That’s the key detail here. Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
From a practical angle, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context. Interested to see the follow-up.
I get the idea, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where it gets complicated Curious how this plays out.
At this point, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Time will tell.
I get the idea, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that tension shows up immediately Let’s see what happens next.
From the outside, the way this is presented changes how it lands which explains why reactions are split That part stands out.
Not gonna lie, this solves one problem while creating another Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s just my read on it.
Just reading this, this comes across more reactive than planned which explains why reactions are split That’s the key detail here.
Real talk, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
I get the idea, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Interested to see the follow-up.
At first glance, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where people will push back We’ll see how people react over time.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome
Not gonna lie, the way this is presented changes how it lands which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context.
If you zoom out, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where people will push back That’s the key detail here. Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Just reading this, this depends heavily on what happens next That part stands out.
Trying to be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where people will push back
Looking at this, this solves one problem while creating another That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up.
this solves one problem while creating another and that friction is hard to ignore That part stands out.
From a neutral view, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where people will push back Feels like there’s more coming here.
Real talk, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where people will push back Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
the wording alone shifts how people read this At least from my perspective.
Without overthinking it, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which explains why reactions are split That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
I get the idea, this solves one problem while creating another That’s what changes the context.
If we’re being honest, this reads stronger on paper than in practice That’s the key detail here.
Real talk, this reads stronger on paper than in practice
From the outside, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That part stands out.
At first glance, this solves one problem while creating another so the response doesn’t surprise me Curious how this plays out.
Not gonna lie, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where people will push back
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here Let’s see what happens next.
From where I sit, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s what changes the context.
At this point, the wording alone shifts how people read this That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet. At least from my perspective.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week.
Not gonna lie, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which turns this into more of a debate Interested to see the follow-up.
At first glance, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s the key detail here.
Just reading this, this feels rushed rather than thought through Hard to say where this lands long term.
Honestly, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so
Honestly, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s the key detail here. Interested to see the follow-up.
From where I sit, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why the comments look the way they do That’s the key detail here.
On the surface, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s what people are responding to That’s the key detail here. Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
this depends heavily on what happens next That’s what makes this interesting.
Trying to be fair, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which makes the reaction pretty predictable Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this comes across more reactive than planned Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Real talk, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s what makes this interesting.
Real talk, the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why this is getting picked apart
At first glance, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which is why this is getting picked apart Others will probably see it differently.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
I get the idea, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that tension shows up immediately Let’s see what happens next.
If you zoom out, the follow-through is what will decide this
At this point, the way this is presented changes how it lands
Trying to be fair, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s what people are responding to That’s just how it reads to me. At least from my perspective.
Putting bias aside, this solves one problem while creating another That part stands out. At least from my perspective.
Just reading this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what changes the context.
From a practical angle, this feels rushed rather than thought through which is why this is getting picked apart This could age very differently in a week.
From the outside, the timing matters more than people admit which makes the reaction pretty predictable Curious how this plays out.
From my side, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just my read on it.
If you zoom out, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the key detail here. That’s the impression it gives me.
If you zoom out, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where people will push back That part stands out. Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a neutral view, the direction makes sense but the details are messy
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the key detail here. Let’s see what happens next.
the timing matters more than people admit and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s just my read on it.
Bluntly speaking, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s the key detail here.
At first glance, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s the part people are stuck on
From my side, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which explains why reactions are split
Trying to be fair, this feels rushed rather than thought through Feels like there’s more coming here.
From a practical angle, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Hard to say where this lands long term.
At this point, this solves one problem while creating another That’s what makes this interesting.
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where it gets complicated Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
this solves one problem while creating another which makes the reaction pretty predictable That part stands out.
From the outside, the direction makes sense but the details are messy Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
this depends heavily on what happens next and that friction is hard to ignore Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Without overthinking it, the timing matters more than people admit and that tension shows up immediately Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
Without overthinking it, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which explains why reactions are split Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next. At least from my perspective.
On the surface, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which explains why reactions are split That’s what changes the context. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
Without overthinking it, this depends heavily on what happens next Not convinced this is settled yet. Others will probably see it differently.
Without overthinking it, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the key detail here.
From my side, this solves one problem while creating another That part stands out. This could age very differently in a week.
Trying to be fair, this feels more about execution than intent and that tension shows up immediately Not convinced this is settled yet.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why this is getting picked apart That part stands out. At least from my perspective.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the key detail here. At least from my perspective.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s the impression it gives me.
At this point, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why this is getting picked apart This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s the impression it gives me.
Just reading this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where the disagreement starts Others will probably see it differently.
Honestly, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that tension shows up immediately
If we’re being honest, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why the comments look the way they do This probably isn’t the last word on it.
From a practical angle, this solves one problem while creating another and that friction is hard to ignore
At first glance, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why this is getting picked apart Hard to say where this lands long term.
To be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next which explains why reactions are split That’s what makes this interesting.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s the key detail here. At least from my perspective.
From a practical angle, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
From where I sit, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week. That’s just my read on it.
Trying to be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
From a practical angle, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s just how it reads to me.
Without overthinking it, the signal is clear, the strategy less so At least from my perspective.
From a neutral view, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s what people are responding to That part stands out. That’s the impression it gives me.
this solves one problem while creating another which turns this into more of a debate Let’s see what happens next.
At this point, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the key detail here.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it. At least from my perspective.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s what people are responding to That’s just how it reads to me. That’s just my read on it.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s what people are responding to Let’s see what happens next.
At this point, the wording alone shifts how people read this This probably isn’t the last word on it.
I get the idea, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s what people are responding to That’s the key detail here. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
If you zoom out, the timing matters more than people admit which is why this is getting picked apart We’ll see how people react over time. At least from my perspective.
Honestly, the follow-through is what will decide this which turns this into more of a debate That’s the key detail here. We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
I get the idea, the follow-through is what will decide this
the timing matters more than people admit which explains why reactions are split Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
Not gonna lie, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which explains why reactions are split
If you zoom out, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s the part people are stuck on Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
If you zoom out, the follow-through is what will decide this which turns this into more of a debate Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where people will push back
the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s just how it reads to me.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled That part stands out. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Looking at this, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place This could age very differently in a week.
Honestly, the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting.
To be fair, the wording alone shifts how people read this so the response doesn’t surprise me Not convinced this is settled yet. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Honestly, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which turns this into more of a debate Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the key detail here. Not convinced this is settled yet.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s what makes this interesting.
Putting bias aside, the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why this is getting picked apart
From my side, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so We’ll see how people react over time.
Trying to be fair, the main issue seems to be how this is handled Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
From a neutral view, the wording alone shifts how people read this Feels like there’s more coming here.
the follow-through is what will decide this Hard to say where this lands long term.
the timing matters more than people admit which explains why reactions are split That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. At least from my perspective.
To be fair, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where the disagreement starts Hard to say where this lands long term.
On the surface, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me.
On the surface, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which explains why reactions are split Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Trying to be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That part stands out. Curious how this plays out.
Real talk, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s what people are responding to Time will tell.
From where I sit, the timing matters more than people admit and that friction is hard to ignore
the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s the part people are stuck on
Looking at this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
From the outside, this feels rushed rather than thought through
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that tension shows up immediately That’s just how it reads to me.
Putting bias aside, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s just my read on it.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy which makes the reaction pretty predictable Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Real talk, the timing matters more than people admit Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Putting bias aside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s what people are responding to Curious how this plays out. That’s just my read on it.
I get the idea, the follow-through is what will decide this That’s the key detail here. At least from my perspective.
Trying to be fair, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s the part people are stuck on That part stands out.
Trying to be fair, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Let’s see what happens next. At least from my perspective.
From the outside, this feels rushed rather than thought through
At first glance, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why the comments look the way they do Others will probably see it differently.
the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the key detail here. Others will probably see it differently.
Bluntly speaking, the main issue seems to be how this is handled so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term. At least from my perspective.
Putting bias aside, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s what people are responding to That’s the key detail here.
If you zoom out, this comes across more reactive than planned so the response doesn’t surprise me That part stands out. Others will probably see it differently.
this feels rushed rather than thought through Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a practical angle, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where people will push back Feels like there’s more coming here.
Without overthinking it, the timing matters more than people admit which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what makes this interesting.
Bluntly speaking, this solves one problem while creating another Feels like there’s more coming here.
Stepping back, this comes across more reactive than planned and that friction is hard to ignore Time will tell.
Honestly, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that friction is hard to ignore Curious how this plays out.
Stepping back, the follow-through is what will decide this
Without overthinking it, this feels more about execution than intent That’s the impression it gives me.
I get the idea, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which turns this into more of a debate
Without overthinking it, this comes across more reactive than planned which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what makes this interesting.
this feels more about execution than intent and that’s what people are responding to Time will tell.
From the outside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that tension shows up immediately Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
From where I sit, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That part stands out. Others will probably see it differently.
Looking at this, this feels more about execution than intent
On the surface, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why the comments look the way they do That part stands out.
Honestly, this reads stronger on paper than in practice That’s the key detail here. Others will probably see it differently.
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that tension shows up immediately
From the outside, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s the key detail here. Feels like there’s more coming here. At least from my perspective.
To be fair, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what changes the context. Others will probably see it differently.
Looking at this, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Let’s see what happens next. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Putting bias aside, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that friction is hard to ignore Time will tell.
At this point, the way this is presented changes how it lands Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
Trying to be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s why opinions are all over the place Time will tell.
this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where people will push back Others will probably see it differently.
Honestly, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up.
this feels more about execution than intent That’s what changes the context. Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s the impression it gives me.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s what people are responding to That’s just my read on it.
Just reading this, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From where I sit, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Just reading this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where it gets complicated Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
Without overthinking it, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s the part people are stuck on
Bluntly speaking, the follow-through is what will decide this
If we’re being honest, the follow-through is what will decide this which makes the reaction pretty predictable That part stands out. That’s just how it reads to me. At least from my perspective.
Trying to be fair, this feels more about execution than intent Interested to see the follow-up.
From my side, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which makes the reaction pretty predictable Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy Interested to see the follow-up.
Stepping back, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the key detail here. Time will tell. That’s the impression it gives me.
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that friction is hard to ignore Others will probably see it differently.
Real talk, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s why opinions are all over the place Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Honestly, the way this is presented changes how it lands At least from my perspective.
this solves one problem while creating another which turns this into more of a debate
Without overthinking it, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which makes the reaction pretty predictable Hard to say where this lands long term. At least from my perspective.
From where I sit, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s what makes this interesting.
Looking at this, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s what people are responding to That’s the key detail here.
From where I sit, the way this is presented changes how it lands Let’s see what happens next.
From a practical angle, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where people will push back Feels like there’s more coming here.