i feel like i deserve a thanks for living alone for four years at 11 years old.
when i was about ten my grandmother got extremely ill and nobody else could look after her but my mother who is a single mother and unfortunately i have no siblings so my options either were i go down my grandmother house everyday when her whole house was falling apart, it was constantly so cold you could see your own breath and be alone because my mothers full attention would be on my grandmother or be home alone in my own house that isnt falling apart and isnt cold.
eleven year old me ended up deciding to just be completely home alone because i didnt really have any other option. being home alone lasted just until i turned 15 because thats when my grandmother passed away. i never really got a thanks for being home alone for almost every single day from the age of eleven when i feel i shoudve to some extent.
it was everyday i was alone. i have no siblings or father who could keep me company. my mother would leave for work around 8-9am and then come home around 8pm but by then she would be exhausted from working and looking after my grandmother that she would go straight to bed because she was also ill with dizzy spells. so for me it felt like i was constantly home alone.
i didnt g
From the outside, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what changes the context.
To be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so
On the surface, the way this is presented changes how it lands Curious how this plays out.
Putting bias aside, this reads stronger on paper than in practice At least from my perspective.
Putting bias aside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so so the response doesn’t surprise me We’ll see how people react over time.
Bluntly speaking, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s the part people are stuck on That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage
this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why opinions are all over the place Let’s see what happens next.
the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where it gets complicated We’ll see how people react over time.
the timing matters more than people admit which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context. Not convinced this is settled yet. At least from my perspective.
Bluntly speaking, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why this is getting picked apart Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s just my read on it.
From a practical angle, this solves one problem while creating another so the response doesn’t surprise me Feels like there’s more coming here.
Just reading this, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which makes the reaction pretty predictable Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Stepping back, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
the wording alone shifts how people read this
Reaction: Every year it becomes worse
From the outside, the main issue seems to be how this is handled Curious how this plays out.
From a practical angle, the timing matters more than people admit which turns this into more of a debate Others will probably see it differently.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage
At this point, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That part stands out.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where the disagreement starts
Not gonna lie, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s the part people are stuck on Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
the timing matters more than people admit which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context. Not convinced this is settled yet. At least from my perspective.
To be fair, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that friction is hard to ignore Not convinced this is settled yet.
Reaction: I'm recreating 1939
I get the idea, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified
On the surface, this depends heavily on what happens next which explains why reactions are split That’s just my read on it.
Trying to be fair, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s the key detail here. Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s the impression it gives me.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice That’s what changes the context.
From the outside, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where the disagreement starts
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome This could age very differently in a week.
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s just my read on it.
From a practical angle, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which turns this into more of a debate Let’s see what happens next.
Reaction: me_irl
At this point, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That part stands out.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: me_irl
Putting bias aside, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Feels like an opening move, not an ending. At least from my perspective.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s just my read on it.
Not gonna lie, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s the key detail here.
Reaction: Hate when it happens
Not gonna lie, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s what people are responding to Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From the outside, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the key detail here. Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.
From my side, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what changes the context.
Not gonna lie, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next. At least from my perspective.
Trying to be fair, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s why opinions are all over the place Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: Every year it becomes worse
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Curious how this plays out. That’s just my read on it.
At this point, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which is why the comments look the way they do That part stands out. Feels like there’s more coming here.
the wording alone shifts how people read this which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the key detail here. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Looking at this, the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why the comments look the way they do Let’s see what happens next.
From my side, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s the part people are stuck on We’ll see how people react over time. At least from my perspective.
this feels rushed rather than thought through which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. Curious how this plays out. At least from my perspective.
this feels rushed rather than thought through Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
To be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what makes this interesting. At least from my perspective.
Putting bias aside, this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s the key detail here. Others will probably see it differently.
Bluntly speaking, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet. At least from my perspective.
Trying to be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where it gets complicated Curious how this plays out.
If we’re being honest, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s what people are responding to That’s what makes this interesting. This could age very differently in a week.
At this point, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s what changes the context.
From a practical angle, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
I get the idea, the way this is presented changes how it lands That part stands out.
Trying to be fair, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven We’ll see how people react over time.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why this is getting picked apart Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.
Real talk, this reads stronger on paper than in practice That’s what changes the context. Others will probably see it differently.
At first glance, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone This could age very differently in a week.
the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where the disagreement starts Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
I get the idea, this depends heavily on what happens next That’s the key detail here. Feels like there’s more coming here.
From the outside, the follow-through is what will decide this and that tension shows up immediately That’s the key detail here.
If we’re being honest, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context. That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: literally 1984
Reaction: Jiggle physics
Trying to be fair, this reads stronger on paper than in practice That’s the key detail here. Interested to see the follow-up.
this solves one problem while creating another That part stands out.
I get the idea, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That part stands out. Time will tell.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s just how it reads to me. Others will probably see it differently.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s what changes the context. Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: lock in chat
Putting bias aside, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where people will push back That’s what changes the context. Feels like there’s more coming here.
Looking at this, this feels more about execution than intent Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Others will probably see it differently.
From a practical angle, the direction makes sense but the details are messy Let’s see what happens next. At least from my perspective.
Without overthinking it, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why the comments look the way they do At least from my perspective.
Stepping back, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the key detail here. Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: Me_irl
On the surface, this reads stronger on paper than in practice At least from my perspective.
Reaction: If I were them, Id hurry up.
Just reading this, the wording alone shifts how people read this Curious how this plays out.
Reaction: Me_irl
Stepping back, the follow-through is what will decide this Hard to say where this lands long term.
Just reading this, the timing matters more than people admit This could age very differently in a week.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s the impression it gives me.
I get the idea, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s the impression it gives me.
Bluntly speaking, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time.
At this point, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which turns this into more of a debate
Bluntly speaking, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s the part people are stuck on That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s just how it reads to me.
Reaction: Weird question, but was the person who come up with the term, "love handles" a chubby chaser?
Looking at this, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the key detail here. Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up.
this comes across more reactive than planned which is why this is getting picked apart Curious how this plays out.
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s the part people are stuck on Not convinced this is settled yet.
Reaction: Have your insurance people speak to my people
I get the idea, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
From a neutral view, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
Without overthinking it, this depends heavily on what happens next and that tension shows up immediately Let’s see what happens next.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: Too real..
the wording alone shifts how people read this
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where it gets complicated Others will probably see it differently.
At first glance, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Stepping back, this depends heavily on what happens next Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Honestly, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s why opinions are all over the place
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the key detail here. Curious how this plays out.
If we’re being honest, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that friction is hard to ignore We’ll see how people react over time.
Reaction: Me irl
Honestly, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: lock in chat
From my side, this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s the key detail here.
Just reading this, the timing matters more than people admit which makes the reaction pretty predictable
I get the idea, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why opinions are all over the place Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s just my read on it.
From a practical angle, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where it gets complicated
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the key detail here. That’s just my read on it.
If you zoom out, this depends heavily on what happens next That’s the key detail here. Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
If you zoom out, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context. Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
Real talk, this feels rushed rather than thought through That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s what people are responding to That’s the impression it gives me.
Honestly, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what changes the context. Curious how this plays out. At least from my perspective.
Reaction: Have your insurance people speak to my people
Trying to be fair, the wording alone shifts how people read this That part stands out. Feels like there’s more coming here. At least from my perspective.
Reaction: Jiggle physics
If you zoom out, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which explains why reactions are split That’s the key detail here. That’s the impression it gives me.
Just reading this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone This could age very differently in a week.
Honestly, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where it gets complicated That’s just how it reads to me.
the wording alone shifts how people read this which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the key detail here. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
To be fair, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where people will push back
Trying to be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
Without overthinking it, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. Hard to say where this lands long term.
Reaction: me_irl
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That part stands out.
Stepping back, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where people will push back
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where the disagreement starts That part stands out.
I get the idea, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what makes this interesting. Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a practical angle, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why this is getting picked apart That’s just my read on it.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context. Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: Its been 3 years since I last saw morning
Honestly, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s what people are responding to At least from my perspective.
If you zoom out, the signal is clear, the strategy less so Time will tell.
Not gonna lie, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which explains why reactions are split Hard to say where this lands long term.
Stepping back, the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why this is getting picked apart Not convinced this is settled yet.
Reaction: Its that simple
this feels rushed rather than thought through Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Honestly, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s just my read on it.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why opinions are all over the place
Reaction: me_irl
At this point, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Honestly, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which explains why reactions are split Hard to say where this lands long term.
From a practical angle, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s just how it reads to me.
If you zoom out, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why opinions are all over the place
this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where people will push back That’s the key detail here. At least from my perspective.
Looking at this, the direction makes sense but the details are messy We’ll see how people react over time. At least from my perspective.
this feels more about execution than intent which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context. Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that friction is hard to ignore Hard to say where this lands long term.
Not gonna lie, the follow-through is what will decide this We’ll see how people react over time.
Reaction: Something I've observed
Just reading this, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s what people are responding to
At first glance, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that tension shows up immediately Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the timing matters more than people admit which makes the reaction pretty predictable Let’s see what happens next. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Honestly, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why opinions are all over the place
From a neutral view, this feels more about execution than intent We’ll see how people react over time.
To be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why this is getting picked apart Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
From the outside, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where the disagreement starts
From a practical angle, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: One does not simply resist clicking the tongs. Embrace carcinization.