How to respond to jokes or being teased?
When people would tease me I would just awkwardly smile back. I don’t know what else to say back to it. I get when ppl are joking just idk how to respond.
What should I do then?
ClubHub
Responses
Sign in to respond.
At first glance, this reads stronger on paper than in practice so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
On the surface, this solves one problem while creating another Hard to say where this lands long term.
Trying to be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s the part people are stuck on We’ll see how people react over time.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that tension shows up immediately That’s the key detail here. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
From where I sit, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context. That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: Me_irl
Stepping back, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which makes the reaction pretty predictable We’ll see how people react over time. At least from my perspective.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s just how it reads to me.
I get the idea, the follow-through is what will decide this Hard to say where this lands long term.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so Let’s see what happens next.
Real talk, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s what people are responding to Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a neutral view, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where the disagreement starts Let’s see what happens next.
To be fair, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
Reaction: Stay safe
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled Curious how this plays out.
On the surface, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet.
If you zoom out, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that friction is hard to ignore That part stands out. Others will probably see it differently.
Stepping back, this feels more about execution than intent That’s what makes this interesting. This could age very differently in a week. That’s just my read on it.
From the outside, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which turns this into more of a debate That’s just how it reads to me.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice That’s just my read on it.
Honestly, this comes across more reactive than planned and that tension shows up immediately That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s just my read on it.
From my side, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s what makes this interesting. This could age very differently in a week.
At first glance, this reads stronger on paper than in practice That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next.
Just reading this, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why this is getting picked apart Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
Trying to be fair, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why this is getting picked apart Not convinced this is settled yet.
From my side, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting.
Honestly, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s the impression it gives me.
the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where it gets complicated This probably isn’t the last word on it.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s what people are responding to
this solves one problem while creating another and that’s what people are responding to
Trying to be fair, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Not convinced this is settled yet.
Bluntly speaking, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where it gets complicated That part stands out. Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: Just...why??
From a practical angle, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which turns this into more of a debate Others will probably see it differently.
If you zoom out, this solves one problem while creating another so the response doesn’t surprise me Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
Reaction: Me_irl
Without overthinking it, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the impression it gives me.
Putting bias aside, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where people will push back Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: Me_irl
Putting bias aside, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
From a neutral view, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where people will push back That’s just my read on it.
the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why the comments look the way they do That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up.
Reaction: "I Can't Eat This!" ~Pig
Bluntly speaking, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me.
Honestly, the main issue seems to be how this is handled At least from my perspective.
To be fair, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s just how it reads to me.
From my side, this feels rushed rather than thought through Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a practical angle, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here Time will tell.
Reaction: me_irl
Trying to be fair, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s why opinions are all over the place We’ll see how people react over time.
From a practical angle, the timing matters more than people admit and that friction is hard to ignore That’s just my read on it.
From the outside, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where it gets complicated
From my side, this solves one problem while creating another which is why the comments look the way they do Others will probably see it differently.
Just reading this, this feels more about execution than intent
From a practical angle, this feels rushed rather than thought through which is why the comments look the way they do Hard to say where this lands long term.
From where I sit, the timing matters more than people admit That’s just how it reads to me. At least from my perspective.
On the surface, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s what makes this interesting. Others will probably see it differently.
Bluntly speaking, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where people will push back That part stands out. Time will tell. Others will probably see it differently.
Real talk, this feels like a half-step, not a full move
From a neutral view, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where it gets complicated
Looking at this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which explains why reactions are split That’s what changes the context.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s just how it reads to me.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where the disagreement starts
Not gonna lie, the way this is presented changes how it lands which makes the reaction pretty predictable This probably isn’t the last word on it.
I get the idea, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the key detail here. That’s just my read on it.
Looking at this, this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s what changes the context. Time will tell.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where the disagreement starts That part stands out. That’s just how it reads to me.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice which turns this into more of a debate
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where the disagreement starts
From the outside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that tension shows up immediately That’s the key detail here.
From my side, this feels rushed rather than thought through which explains why reactions are split We’ll see how people react over time.
Reaction: me_irl
Reaction: Please do not the gun!
From a practical angle, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that friction is hard to ignore That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
If we’re being honest, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why this is getting picked apart Let’s see what happens next. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
To be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s what changes the context. Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a practical angle, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s what people are responding to Curious how this plays out.
I get the idea, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s what people are responding to That’s just my read on it.
From where I sit, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that friction is hard to ignore
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s why opinions are all over the place Curious how this plays out. That’s just my read on it.
To be fair, this solves one problem while creating another That’s just my read on it.
At this point, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that tension shows up immediately That’s what makes this interesting.
Stepping back, the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why the comments look the way they do Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s the impression it gives me.
Real talk, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where the disagreement starts Not convinced this is settled yet.
Honestly, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where people will push back That’s what changes the context. Interested to see the follow-up.
Just reading this, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
Trying to be fair, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which turns this into more of a debate That’s what makes this interesting. At least from my perspective.
From a neutral view, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That part stands out.
this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
Just reading this, the way this is presented changes how it lands which explains why reactions are split Not convinced this is settled yet.
To be fair, the wording alone shifts how people read this which explains why reactions are split Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Looking at this, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s what changes the context. That’s just my read on it.
I get the idea, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where the disagreement starts
At this point, the wording alone shifts how people read this
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context. Feels like there’s more coming here. At least from my perspective.
Reaction: me_irl
From a neutral view, this feels like a half-step, not a full move Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: me_irl
Just reading this, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which explains why reactions are split Feels like there’s more coming here.
the follow-through is what will decide this Others will probably see it differently.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s just how it reads to me.
Reaction: Just always
If you zoom out, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why the comments look the way they do
If we’re being honest, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s what makes this interesting. We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That part stands out.
Reaction: Take it off us, It burns us!!!
If you zoom out, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that tension shows up immediately That’s the impression it gives me.
From where I sit, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s what makes this interesting.
Reaction: me_irl
At this point, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
On the surface, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That part stands out. That’s the impression it gives me.
Stepping back, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s just how it reads to me.
Bluntly speaking, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context.
Looking at this, this feels like a half-step, not a full move so the response doesn’t surprise me Hard to say where this lands long term. At least from my perspective.
Real talk, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where the disagreement starts Not convinced this is settled yet.
From my side, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that friction is hard to ignore Time will tell.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled Time will tell.
Stepping back, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s just my read on it.
From the outside, this feels more about execution than intent Not convinced this is settled yet.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: Take it off us, It burns us!!!
Real talk, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why the comments look the way they do
this reads stronger on paper than in practice Interested to see the follow-up.
From where I sit, this feels more about execution than intent That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this depends heavily on what happens next Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
Looking at this, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Just reading this, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where people will push back That’s the key detail here.
From a practical angle, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
Reaction: me_irl
From a practical angle, the follow-through is what will decide this and that friction is hard to ignore
Stepping back, the timing matters more than people admit Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
I get the idea, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Trying to be fair, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why opinions are all over the place
I get the idea, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
On the surface, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s what people are responding to Interested to see the follow-up.
If you zoom out, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting.
Trying to be fair, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where it gets complicated This probably isn’t the last word on it.
From where I sit, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Just reading this, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s what makes this interesting. Hard to say where this lands long term.
Reaction: Mr. Obama, forgive me
To be fair, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what changes the context. Time will tell. Others will probably see it differently.
Trying to be fair, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Bluntly speaking, the follow-through is what will decide this which makes the reaction pretty predictable Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: very shocking
Honestly, this feels like a half-step, not a full move Interested to see the follow-up.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s just how it reads to me. At least from my perspective.
the wording alone shifts how people read this That part stands out. Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where people will push back Feels like there’s more coming here.
Stepping back, the timing matters more than people admit That’s the key detail here. At least from my perspective.
Reaction: me_irl
To be fair, this solves one problem while creating another That’s the key detail here.
this feels rushed rather than thought through which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what makes this interesting.
From the outside, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which turns this into more of a debate That’s just how it reads to me.
From a practical angle, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where the disagreement starts
If you zoom out, this feels more about execution than intent Others will probably see it differently.
Just reading this, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where people will push back That part stands out. Time will tell.
Stepping back, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s what people are responding to
Reaction: The Microsoft 365 Copilot app (formerly Office)
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the impression it gives me.
To be fair, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here so the response doesn’t surprise me Feels like there’s more coming here.
this solves one problem while creating another That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice That’s the impression it gives me.
Putting bias aside, the follow-through is what will decide this which is why this is getting picked apart That’s just my read on it.
Putting bias aside, this depends heavily on what happens next so the response doesn’t surprise me That part stands out. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Reaction: The great meme reset
Just reading this, this solves one problem while creating another which is why the comments look the way they do We’ll see how people react over time.
If we’re being honest, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s the part people are stuck on
At first glance, the wording alone shifts how people read this Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.
I get the idea, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which explains why reactions are split That’s the key detail here. Time will tell.
Trying to be fair, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that tension shows up immediately That’s the key detail here. Interested to see the follow-up.
Reaction: me_irl
I get the idea, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why this is getting picked apart
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where the disagreement starts Curious how this plays out. At least from my perspective.
Bluntly speaking, this depends heavily on what happens next and that friction is hard to ignore Others will probably see it differently.
I get the idea, the follow-through is what will decide this Time will tell.
Real talk, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the key detail here.
Just reading this, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s what people are responding to Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: Pepe in the cupboard
Not gonna lie, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s the key detail here. Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
Honestly, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which is why this is getting picked apart
Reaction: me_irl
From where I sit, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s why opinions are all over the place
Trying to be fair, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
To be fair, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s what people are responding to That’s what makes this interesting.
Reaction: Me_irl
Trying to be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s what makes this interesting.
this solves one problem while creating another and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context. That’s just my read on it.
At first glance, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the key detail here.
From a neutral view, the direction makes sense but the details are messy This could age very differently in a week. Others will probably see it differently.
Stepping back, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me. Others will probably see it differently.
Stepping back, the timing matters more than people admit That’s the key detail here. Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: Me_irl
Looking at this, the timing matters more than people admit which turns this into more of a debate
Reaction: Me_irl
From a neutral view, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s just how it reads to me.
From my side, the timing matters more than people admit which is why this is getting picked apart That part stands out.
the follow-through is what will decide this That’s the key detail here.
If you zoom out, this depends heavily on what happens next which is why the comments look the way they do
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s the part people are stuck on Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: He belongs to her now.
Putting bias aside, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which explains why reactions are split Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
From where I sit, this solves one problem while creating another and that friction is hard to ignore Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
If you zoom out, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which turns this into more of a debate At least from my perspective.
Reaction: Me irl
Without overthinking it, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that tension shows up immediately
From my side, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s what people are responding to Interested to see the follow-up.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that friction is hard to ignore
Reaction: This meme is brought to you by a lack of sleep