How do I go about doing these things now after realizations?
Okay- so let me explain. I’ve been racist over the past few years. Let me explain the things I’ve done.
Main ones I have are not standing up for people in situation where they had people being racist to them.
This happened 2 times in highschool. All in a classroom setting. I’d hear people being racist on the otherside of the classroom. I’d freeze up, unsure of what to do- when I should have stood up for said people. Especially since I knew both people who did said things- one being my brothers friend, and another being my now ex best friend. I never called them out when I should have. I just briskly thought that she’d change with time, she’d stop calling me homophobic slurs, and stop using them in general, and then it just kept escalating with others at the end of the year and with myself- that I cut her off. I don’t have contact with either individual… although weirdly I am friends with my brothers best friends dad?? Lmao. So far he himself hasn’t shown me any traces of racism, if he does this time I know what to do. But I do realize not standing up for them- was in fact racist in a way.
Next one is my response to specif
At this point, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s why opinions are all over the place
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where people will push back
At this point, this reads stronger on paper than in practice so the response doesn’t surprise me
Putting bias aside, this depends heavily on what happens next so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what makes this interesting.
From my side, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
Real talk, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s what changes the context. Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
the follow-through is what will decide this which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s just my read on it.
From my side, this feels rushed rather than thought through which makes the reaction pretty predictable Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Not gonna lie, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s what people are responding to
From where I sit, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what makes this interesting.
To be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
To be fair, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where it gets complicated That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where it gets complicated At least from my perspective.
Stepping back, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
Trying to be fair, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why the comments look the way they do Curious how this plays out.
Real talk, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what changes the context. That’s the impression it gives me.
Looking at this, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like there’s more coming here.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s what people are responding to Feels like there’s more coming here.
Honestly, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s what changes the context. That’s just my read on it.
Stepping back, the way this is presented changes how it lands
From where I sit, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where people will push back That’s what changes the context.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so Interested to see the follow-up.
Real talk, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which explains why reactions are split
At first glance, this depends heavily on what happens next which turns this into more of a debate Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Others will probably see it differently.
If you zoom out, the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why the comments look the way they do This probably isn’t the last word on it.
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that tension shows up immediately This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Just reading this, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s what people are responding to Let’s see what happens next. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From where I sit, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s just how it reads to me. At least from my perspective.
From a neutral view, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage This probably isn’t the last word on it.
If we’re being honest, this solves one problem while creating another and that tension shows up immediately Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
Without overthinking it, the wording alone shifts how people read this Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Others will probably see it differently.
From the outside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why the comments look the way they do That’s the impression it gives me.
From the outside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which turns this into more of a debate Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
Putting bias aside, the direction makes sense but the details are messy so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week. Others will probably see it differently.
Just reading this, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s the key detail here.
On the surface, this feels rushed rather than thought through which is why this is getting picked apart Not convinced this is settled yet. Others will probably see it differently.
From where I sit, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up. That’s the impression it gives me.
Not gonna lie, this feels rushed rather than thought through Interested to see the follow-up. That’s the impression it gives me.
this comes across more reactive than planned
Putting bias aside, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s just my read on it.
the follow-through is what will decide this which is why the comments look the way they do
Without overthinking it, the way this is presented changes how it lands That part stands out. We’ll see how people react over time.
Looking at this, this depends heavily on what happens next Not convinced this is settled yet.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s just my read on it.
Real talk, the wording alone shifts how people read this so the response doesn’t surprise me
this depends heavily on what happens next which turns this into more of a debate That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Putting bias aside, this depends heavily on what happens next which explains why reactions are split Hard to say where this lands long term. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which turns this into more of a debate Feels like there’s more coming here.
Without overthinking it, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what changes the context. Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
Bluntly speaking, this solves one problem while creating another and that friction is hard to ignore Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
At first glance, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s what people are responding to That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me.
Trying to be fair, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why the comments look the way they do Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
From the outside, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s why opinions are all over the place
the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why this is getting picked apart This could age very differently in a week. That’s the impression it gives me.
the follow-through is what will decide this so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time.
On the surface, the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why this is getting picked apart That’s just my read on it.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where people will push back
From a practical angle, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven
Looking at this, this solves one problem while creating another Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
Looking at this, this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s what changes the context.
Putting bias aside, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s why opinions are all over the place That part stands out.
From the outside, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that friction is hard to ignore That’s just my read on it.
Just reading this, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here
the timing matters more than people admit That’s what makes this interesting. Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Honestly, the direction makes sense but the details are messy We’ll see how people react over time. At least from my perspective.
Not gonna lie, this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s what changes the context.
Stepping back, this depends heavily on what happens next which explains why reactions are split That’s the impression it gives me.
At this point, this feels more about execution than intent Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where the disagreement starts Time will tell. Others will probably see it differently.
Putting bias aside, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That part stands out. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move which explains why reactions are split At least from my perspective.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move This probably isn’t the last word on it.
At first glance, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s just how it reads to me.
Trying to be fair, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what changes the context. That’s the impression it gives me.
To be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which turns this into more of a debate Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy which turns this into more of a debate That’s the impression it gives me.
Without overthinking it, the follow-through is what will decide this and that friction is hard to ignore We’ll see how people react over time.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move which explains why reactions are split That’s just how it reads to me.
Just reading this, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s what people are responding to That’s just my read on it.
At first glance, this feels like a half-step, not a full move Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Honestly, the wording alone shifts how people read this
this comes across more reactive than planned Time will tell.
To be fair, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That part stands out. That’s just how it reads to me. Others will probably see it differently.
I get the idea, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s just how it reads to me.
Bluntly speaking, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s what people are responding to
this comes across more reactive than planned Not convinced this is settled yet.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why this is getting picked apart Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a practical angle, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s the key detail here. That’s just my read on it.
If we’re being honest, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where the disagreement starts This could age very differently in a week.
From a neutral view, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Let’s see what happens next. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Without overthinking it, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which explains why reactions are split
From a practical angle, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where people will push back That part stands out. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
From the outside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s just my read on it.
I get the idea, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here Interested to see the follow-up.
From where I sit, this feels rushed rather than thought through which turns this into more of a debate Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Without overthinking it, the direction makes sense but the details are messy
Without overthinking it, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why this is getting picked apart That part stands out.
I get the idea, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which explains why reactions are split That’s what changes the context. Curious how this plays out.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage We’ll see how people react over time. That’s just my read on it.
From where I sit, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where people will push back That’s what changes the context.
From where I sit, this feels like a half-step, not a full move This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At this point, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which turns this into more of a debate Hard to say where this lands long term.
Putting bias aside, the way this is presented changes how it lands Not convinced this is settled yet. At least from my perspective.
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that tension shows up immediately This probably isn’t the last word on it.
From a neutral view, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which makes the reaction pretty predictable Feels like there’s more coming here.
Honestly, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven This probably isn’t the last word on it.
the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s what people are responding to Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Looking at this, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which makes the reaction pretty predictable Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
this solves one problem while creating another and that’s the part people are stuck on At least from my perspective.
Without overthinking it, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s the key detail here. At least from my perspective.
From where I sit, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where the disagreement starts
Stepping back, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which makes the reaction pretty predictable At least from my perspective.
At first glance, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where the disagreement starts We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.
Bluntly speaking, this feels more about execution than intent Interested to see the follow-up.
this comes across more reactive than planned
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which explains why reactions are split That part stands out. That’s the impression it gives me.
At first glance, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where it gets complicated That’s just how it reads to me.
Stepping back, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s what changes the context.
Trying to be fair, this feels more about execution than intent which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the key detail here. That’s the impression it gives me.
Real talk, this solves one problem while creating another so the response doesn’t surprise me Not convinced this is settled yet.
Honestly, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term. At least from my perspective.
the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what makes this interesting. This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From where I sit, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up. That’s the impression it gives me.
From where I sit, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that friction is hard to ignore That part stands out.
Bluntly speaking, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s what people are responding to We’ll see how people react over time.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why the comments look the way they do
Without overthinking it, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what changes the context. Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that tension shows up immediately That’s the key detail here. Hard to say where this lands long term. At least from my perspective.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which is why this is getting picked apart This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
To be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which turns this into more of a debate Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
Looking at this, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s just how it reads to me. At least from my perspective.
this feels more about execution than intent and that tension shows up immediately That’s just my read on it.
If you zoom out, this solves one problem while creating another which is why the comments look the way they do That’s just how it reads to me. That’s the impression it gives me.
Without overthinking it, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why the comments look the way they do Let’s see what happens next.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s the key detail here. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Putting bias aside, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s what changes the context. Not convinced this is settled yet.
From a practical angle, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
At this point, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that tension shows up immediately That’s the key detail here.
Trying to be fair, this feels rushed rather than thought through Time will tell. Others will probably see it differently.
Without overthinking it, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why this is getting picked apart That part stands out.
At first glance, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Time will tell.
Real talk, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what makes this interesting. Time will tell.
Without overthinking it, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which makes the reaction pretty predictable Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
Bluntly speaking, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where it gets complicated That’s just my read on it.
From a practical angle, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where it gets complicated This could age very differently in a week. That’s the impression it gives me.
Stepping back, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone At least from my perspective.
At this point, this depends heavily on what happens next Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this comes across more reactive than planned Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
On the surface, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where it gets complicated
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s what makes this interesting. Others will probably see it differently.
If we’re being honest, the direction makes sense but the details are messy
Real talk, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where it gets complicated This could age very differently in a week. That’s the impression it gives me.
I get the idea, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s what changes the context.
Real talk, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which explains why reactions are split
I get the idea, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s what makes this interesting. Hard to say where this lands long term.
Just reading this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where the disagreement starts
Real talk, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which makes the reaction pretty predictable Feels like there’s more coming here.
I get the idea, the way this is presented changes how it lands which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context. Feels like there’s more coming here.
From my side, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why opinions are all over the place Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s what people are responding to We’ll see how people react over time.
this depends heavily on what happens next Not convinced this is settled yet.
Bluntly speaking, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Honestly, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where the disagreement starts Not convinced this is settled yet.
At this point, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where people will push back Not convinced this is settled yet.
the timing matters more than people admit and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
To be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s just how it reads to me.
I get the idea, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which turns this into more of a debate That’s the key detail here.
From a neutral view, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s the impression it gives me.
If you zoom out, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which turns this into more of a debate Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
From a practical angle, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet. Others will probably see it differently.
From a practical angle, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where people will push back That’s what changes the context. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From the outside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where people will push back This probably isn’t the last word on it. At least from my perspective.
From a neutral view, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s what people are responding to
Looking at this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the impression it gives me.
the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what makes this interesting. This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this solves one problem while creating another and that’s what people are responding to That’s just my read on it.
Without overthinking it, the timing matters more than people admit which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what changes the context. That’s the impression it gives me.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why this is getting picked apart That part stands out. Time will tell.
Bluntly speaking, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That part stands out. Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
If you zoom out, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the key detail here. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
To be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s just how it reads to me.
Trying to be fair, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where people will push back Curious how this plays out.
the follow-through is what will decide this Curious how this plays out.
If we’re being honest, this comes across more reactive than planned Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
Stepping back, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s what makes this interesting.
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that friction is hard to ignore Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
Without overthinking it, the timing matters more than people admit At least from my perspective.
From a neutral view, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s what changes the context.
Looking at this, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that tension shows up immediately This could age very differently in a week.
the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why this is getting picked apart
Without overthinking it, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s the impression it gives me.
From the outside, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where people will push back
this feels like a half-step, not a full move Feels like there’s more coming here.
Bluntly speaking, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s the impression it gives me.
From a neutral view, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s just how it reads to me.
From a practical angle, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term.
At this point, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s the part people are stuck on
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Others will probably see it differently.
At this point, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here so the response doesn’t surprise me
I get the idea, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage
Not gonna lie, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s the part people are stuck on
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what changes the context. Interested to see the follow-up.
Putting bias aside, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s what people are responding to That’s the key detail here. Curious how this plays out.
Real talk, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the key detail here.
Putting bias aside, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
Real talk, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
From where I sit, the direction makes sense but the details are messy Curious how this plays out.
Not gonna lie, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where the disagreement starts
Honestly, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why opinions are all over the place We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
To be fair, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet. At least from my perspective.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what changes the context. Let’s see what happens next.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s the key detail here. Let’s see what happens next. At least from my perspective.
Stepping back, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which turns this into more of a debate Time will tell.
the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s what people are responding to
From a neutral view, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so
From a neutral view, the timing matters more than people admit so the response doesn’t surprise me Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
At first glance, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why the comments look the way they do
Putting bias aside, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where people will push back We’ll see how people react over time. At least from my perspective.
To be fair, this solves one problem while creating another That’s what makes this interesting.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s what people are responding to That part stands out. Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
If you zoom out, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why opinions are all over the place Time will tell.
Not gonna lie, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that friction is hard to ignore At least from my perspective.
At first glance, this feels rushed rather than thought through Feels like there’s more coming here.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context. That’s the impression it gives me.
On the surface, the timing matters more than people admit and that tension shows up immediately That’s what makes this interesting. Others will probably see it differently.
On the surface, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that friction is hard to ignore Curious how this plays out.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so
To be fair, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context.
From where I sit, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s what people are responding to Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
At this point, the follow-through is what will decide this so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the key detail here. That’s just my read on it.