Has TeamViewer actually successfully sued anyone?
We forgot to cancel a sub and they tried to renew it on a cancelled credit card.
we got random collection emails from an agency but after not responding they gave up and another one started messaging us.
they said they’re intending on suing us in Germany and asked us to fly out and attend (lmfao) we said we would pay the time between the renewal and when it was cancelled and to pound sand if they want anything else.
Putting bias aside, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place
Putting bias aside, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That part stands out. Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Putting bias aside, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why opinions are all over the place Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: me_irl
At this point, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s the key detail here.
the timing matters more than people admit We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
To be fair, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which explains why reactions are split That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where it gets complicated We’ll see how people react over time. At least from my perspective.
this solves one problem while creating another and that friction is hard to ignore Interested to see the follow-up.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s what makes this interesting.
From my side, this solves one problem while creating another Curious how this plays out.
Without overthinking it, this depends heavily on what happens next Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
If we’re being honest, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage Curious how this plays out. At least from my perspective.
Bluntly speaking, the way this is presented changes how it lands Hard to say where this lands long term. At least from my perspective.
Just reading this, the wording alone shifts how people read this which turns this into more of a debate That’s what makes this interesting.
From where I sit, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the impression it gives me.
Real talk, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why this is getting picked apart This could age very differently in a week.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where it gets complicated Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At first glance, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which explains why reactions are split That’s what changes the context. Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
From my side, the follow-through is what will decide this
From a neutral view, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that friction is hard to ignore
From where I sit, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s the part people are stuck on Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From the outside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That part stands out. Curious how this plays out.
Stepping back, the timing matters more than people admit Time will tell.
Trying to be fair, the direction makes sense but the details are messy Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If we’re being honest, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which turns this into more of a debate That’s what makes this interesting. Curious how this plays out.
the wording alone shifts how people read this
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that tension shows up immediately That’s what makes this interesting.
At first glance, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s what makes this interesting. At least from my perspective.
Trying to be fair, the way this is presented changes how it lands which explains why reactions are split That’s the impression it gives me.
this comes across more reactive than planned which makes the reaction pretty predictable This could age very differently in a week.
On the surface, this solves one problem while creating another which explains why reactions are split That part stands out. Curious how this plays out.
Putting bias aside, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that tension shows up immediately We’ll see how people react over time.
From where I sit, this depends heavily on what happens next which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s just how it reads to me. That’s just my read on it.
Bluntly speaking, this feels more about execution than intent which explains why reactions are split This could age very differently in a week.
Not gonna lie, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
the timing matters more than people admit Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Trying to be fair, this comes across more reactive than planned
Honestly, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where it gets complicated
At first glance, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That part stands out. Curious how this plays out.
this feels rushed rather than thought through That part stands out. We’ll see how people react over time. That’s just my read on it.
On the surface, the way this is presented changes how it lands That part stands out. That’s just how it reads to me.
If you zoom out, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Honestly, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which explains why reactions are split
Honestly, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where people will push back
Stepping back, the way this is presented changes how it lands Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
At this point, this feels rushed rather than thought through Feels like there’s more coming here.
From a practical angle, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that friction is hard to ignore Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
the way this is presented changes how it lands so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s just my read on it.
Not gonna lie, the main issue seems to be how this is handled We’ll see how people react over time.
Honestly, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where the disagreement starts At least from my perspective.
From a practical angle, the main issue seems to be how this is handled Interested to see the follow-up. That’s the impression it gives me.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the key detail here.