Full Inbox for Microsoft Team, Unable to Delete
We have a Microsoft Team for a department that has a full inbox. When you delete messages, they reappear within seconds. I contact support and they said there is a retention policy attached to the inbox. They asked me to run these two commands, that fail:
* Set-Mailbox "username" -RemoveDelayHoldApplied
* Set-Mailbox "username" -RemoveDelayReleaseHoldApplied
After relaying that they failed, this was the response:
However, further review confirmed that (the email) is a Microsoft 365 Group (Teams) mailbox, not a standard mailbox type. For Group/Teams mailboxes, delay holds are enforced at the compliance layer and are automatically managed by Microsoft. As a result, these delay holds cannot be manually removed using Exchange PowerShell, and the above commands do not take effect for this mailbox type.
Although the mailbox has been excluded from the applicable retention policy, Microsoft applies a mandatory **delay hold period (up to approximately 30 days)** after removal or exclusion.
This is ridiculous. Is it true that you have to wait up to 30 days? Is there a better alternative solution here?
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s just my read on it.
From a practical angle, this depends heavily on what happens next which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what changes the context.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s the key detail here. That’s just my read on it.
If you zoom out, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where the disagreement starts Others will probably see it differently.
From my side, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what changes the context. Curious how this plays out. That’s just my read on it.
From a practical angle, this comes across more reactive than planned which is why the comments look the way they do Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
From where I sit, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what makes this interesting. Curious how this plays out.
To be fair, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s what changes the context.
If you zoom out, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s what people are responding to Hard to say where this lands long term.
I get the idea, this solves one problem while creating another which makes the reaction pretty predictable Let’s see what happens next. At least from my perspective.
Honestly, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage This could age very differently in a week.
On the surface, this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s what makes this interesting.
From a neutral view, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so so the response doesn’t surprise me Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up.
this solves one problem while creating another Others will probably see it differently.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which turns this into more of a debate Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that tension shows up immediately That’s just how it reads to me.
Looking at this, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where the disagreement starts
this solves one problem while creating another which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context. That’s the impression it gives me.
Putting bias aside, the follow-through is what will decide this
At this point, this comes across more reactive than planned Let’s see what happens next.
Stepping back, the timing matters more than people admit and that tension shows up immediately That’s the impression it gives me.
Not gonna lie, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what changes the context.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy which makes the reaction pretty predictable Not convinced this is settled yet.
the timing matters more than people admit and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week.
Putting bias aside, this solves one problem while creating another which makes the reaction pretty predictable That part stands out.
Trying to be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why this is getting picked apart Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Without overthinking it, the follow-through is what will decide this which is why the comments look the way they do
Putting bias aside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Curious how this plays out.
At this point, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that tension shows up immediately Let’s see what happens next.
To be fair, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where it gets complicated That’s just my read on it.
At this point, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s what people are responding to Feels like there’s more coming here. At least from my perspective.
this depends heavily on what happens next Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s the impression it gives me.
Stepping back, this solves one problem while creating another so the response doesn’t surprise me Not convinced this is settled yet.
this depends heavily on what happens next Curious how this plays out. That’s just my read on it.
I get the idea, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which makes the reaction pretty predictable This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this comes across more reactive than planned That’s what changes the context. Time will tell.
this solves one problem while creating another which is why the comments look the way they do
Just reading this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that friction is hard to ignore That part stands out. At least from my perspective.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where people will push back That’s what changes the context.
the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s what makes this interesting.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
At this point, this feels more about execution than intent and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time. That’s just my read on it.
Looking at this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s the key detail here. We’ll see how people react over time.
Looking at this, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s the key detail here. Not convinced this is settled yet.
the follow-through is what will decide this which is why this is getting picked apart That part stands out. At least from my perspective.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s the part people are stuck on Not convinced this is settled yet. At least from my perspective.
If you zoom out, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s just how it reads to me.
the follow-through is what will decide this
this feels more about execution than intent That’s what makes this interesting. Hard to say where this lands long term.
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s what people are responding to Time will tell.
From where I sit, this feels more about execution than intent
this feels more about execution than intent and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s just my read on it.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up.
the timing matters more than people admit That’s just how it reads to me.
Trying to be fair, this feels rushed rather than thought through which is why the comments look the way they do That’s just my read on it.
Bluntly speaking, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that friction is hard to ignore This could age very differently in a week. That’s just my read on it.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which turns this into more of a debate Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If we’re being honest, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That part stands out. That’s the impression it gives me.
Looking at this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where it gets complicated Curious how this plays out.
this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Bluntly speaking, the main issue seems to be how this is handled so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet. At least from my perspective.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why this is getting picked apart Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
Not gonna lie, the timing matters more than people admit Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s the impression it gives me.
Just reading this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what changes the context.
I get the idea, the way this is presented changes how it lands Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Just reading this, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where the disagreement starts That part stands out. That’s just how it reads to me. That’s just my read on it.
this solves one problem while creating another which is why this is getting picked apart This could age very differently in a week. That’s just my read on it.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that tension shows up immediately That’s the key detail here. Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why the comments look the way they do Interested to see the follow-up.
Putting bias aside, this comes across more reactive than planned which turns this into more of a debate At least from my perspective.
this depends heavily on what happens next which makes the reaction pretty predictable Feels like there’s more coming here.
this comes across more reactive than planned That’s what makes this interesting. Hard to say where this lands long term. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this feels more about execution than intent and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s just my read on it.
the way this is presented changes how it lands which explains why reactions are split Feels like there’s more coming here.
From my side, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where people will push back Not convinced this is settled yet. At least from my perspective.
Bluntly speaking, this comes across more reactive than planned
I get the idea, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where people will push back That’s the key detail here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the timing matters more than people admit and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That part stands out. Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
this solves one problem while creating another which explains why reactions are split
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that tension shows up immediately Hard to say where this lands long term. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From the outside, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
Looking at this, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s what makes this interesting. Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
Putting bias aside, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s what people are responding to
the direction makes sense but the details are messy which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the key detail here. Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s just my read on it.
the wording alone shifts how people read this Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: Me_irl
the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why opinions are all over the place That part stands out. This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a practical angle, this comes across more reactive than planned which is why the comments look the way they do Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
From the outside, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where people will push back That’s just my read on it.
On the surface, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context. Feels like there’s more coming here.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which is why the comments look the way they do That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Looking at this, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Trying to be fair, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s the key detail here. Let’s see what happens next.
I get the idea, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so so the response doesn’t surprise me This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s the impression it gives me.
Real talk, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me.
Bluntly speaking, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that friction is hard to ignore At least from my perspective.
Bluntly speaking, this depends heavily on what happens next which turns this into more of a debate This probably isn’t the last word on it.
From my side, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which makes the reaction pretty predictable
Trying to be fair, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which turns this into more of a debate That’s the key detail here.
Trying to be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s the key detail here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If we’re being honest, this depends heavily on what happens next which is why the comments look the way they do
From my side, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven so the response doesn’t surprise me Others will probably see it differently.
To be fair, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where it gets complicated That’s just my read on it.
Just reading this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that friction is hard to ignore That part stands out. At least from my perspective.
Putting bias aside, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s the part people are stuck on We’ll see how people react over time.
the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the key detail here. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Others will probably see it differently.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that friction is hard to ignore This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If we’re being honest, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where people will push back
Stepping back, the timing matters more than people admit and that tension shows up immediately That’s the impression it gives me.
Trying to be fair, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s just my read on it.
If you zoom out, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Hard to say where this lands long term. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this feels rushed rather than thought through Time will tell.
From a practical angle, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which makes the reaction pretty predictable Let’s see what happens next.
At this point, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which is why the comments look the way they do Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Putting bias aside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that friction is hard to ignore That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
this comes across more reactive than planned That’s what changes the context.
From my side, the way this is presented changes how it lands so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet.
From a neutral view, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up.
I get the idea, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where people will push back At least from my perspective.
From the outside, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s what people are responding to Interested to see the follow-up.
the timing matters more than people admit That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: me_irl
Real talk, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
Honestly, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the key detail here.
From the outside, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
Not gonna lie, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s what people are responding to Not convinced this is settled yet.
the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why opinions are all over the place We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: Please do not the gun!
Without overthinking it, this feels more about execution than intent and that tension shows up immediately That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: me_irl
I get the idea, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where it gets complicated That part stands out.
this depends heavily on what happens next That’s what changes the context.
Reaction: lock in chat
At first glance, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why this is getting picked apart At least from my perspective.
Stepping back, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s why opinions are all over the place
Reaction: Its so lame which is why I dont watch him no more because to lose by something out of your control is so lame. Imagine if shows like Ninja Warrior were the only way to win was by the audienc
From a neutral view, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why this is getting picked apart Not convinced this is settled yet.
Real talk, the wording alone shifts how people read this which explains why reactions are split That’s what changes the context. Time will tell.
At first glance, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s the part people are stuck on This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
From the outside, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
From a neutral view, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that tension shows up immediately That’s what changes the context. That’s the impression it gives me.
From the outside, the follow-through is what will decide this Others will probably see it differently.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so Curious how this plays out.
Not gonna lie, this solves one problem while creating another which makes the reaction pretty predictable This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
At first glance, the follow-through is what will decide this That’s just how it reads to me.
At first glance, the main issue seems to be how this is handled This probably isn’t the last word on it.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled That part stands out.
Just reading this, the timing matters more than people admit which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the key detail here. Curious how this plays out.
If we’re being honest, this comes across more reactive than planned so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what makes this interesting.
Looking at this, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the key detail here.
Bluntly speaking, this feels like a half-step, not a full move At least from my perspective.
On the surface, the timing matters more than people admit That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet.
the timing matters more than people admit
From my side, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s what people are responding to
Reaction: the collection of colorful pens
Trying to be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where it gets complicated That part stands out.
From the outside, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven so the response doesn’t surprise me
If we’re being honest, this solves one problem while creating another which turns this into more of a debate At least from my perspective.
Not gonna lie, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why the comments look the way they do That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week.
At first glance, this solves one problem while creating another so the response doesn’t surprise me Others will probably see it differently.
this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s what people are responding to That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like there’s more coming here.
this comes across more reactive than planned and that friction is hard to ignore
Bluntly speaking, the follow-through is what will decide this and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me. That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: me_irl
To be fair, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s the part people are stuck on Interested to see the follow-up. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: me_irl
From my side, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here Feels like there’s more coming here.
From a practical angle, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where people will push back At least from my perspective.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which makes the reaction pretty predictable This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this solves one problem while creating another which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Trying to be fair, the follow-through is what will decide this so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what makes this interesting. Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s just my read on it.
this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what makes this interesting. At least from my perspective.
Reaction: Im not a cheater just an embarrassed idiot. Also Im scared a friend will send something stupid or if someone hacks my phone to put something bad without me knowing.
Bluntly speaking, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where the disagreement starts Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Not gonna lie, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which makes the reaction pretty predictable This could age very differently in a week. That’s the impression it gives me.
Bluntly speaking, this solves one problem while creating another so the response doesn’t surprise me At least from my perspective.
the timing matters more than people admit and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Feels like an opening move, not an ending. At least from my perspective.
Honestly, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s just how it reads to me.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice so the response doesn’t surprise me
On the surface, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where people will push back Not convinced this is settled yet.
Stepping back, this depends heavily on what happens next That’s what makes this interesting. We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.
Trying to be fair, this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s just how it reads to me. At least from my perspective.
Reaction: This meme is brought to you by a lack of sleep
On the surface, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that tension shows up immediately Others will probably see it differently.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where the disagreement starts
this feels like a half-step, not a full move We’ll see how people react over time.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s just my read on it.
Honestly, the main issue seems to be how this is handled We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From where I sit, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that friction is hard to ignore Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Not gonna lie, this reads stronger on paper than in practice
Reaction: I cannot elaborate on this meme
If we’re being honest, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why this is getting picked apart Time will tell.
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.
Stepping back, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that tension shows up immediately Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s the impression it gives me.
If we’re being honest, this depends heavily on what happens next which is why this is getting picked apart Not convinced this is settled yet.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s what changes the context. Feels like there’s more coming here.
Looking at this, this feels more about execution than intent and that friction is hard to ignore Curious how this plays out.
the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what changes the context. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Trying to be fair, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified
Without overthinking it, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where the disagreement starts Let’s see what happens next.
Reaction: A day in the life of an ambitious procrastinator
At first glance, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which explains why reactions are split That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome We’ll see how people react over time.
From my side, this feels more about execution than intent which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up.
Not gonna lie, the main issue seems to be how this is handled
Reaction: The adjective for metal is metallic, but not so for iron
From my side, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s what people are responding to That’s what makes this interesting. Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
From where I sit, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where the disagreement starts
Bluntly speaking, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s the key detail here.
From my side, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here Interested to see the follow-up. That’s the impression it gives me.
On the surface, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time.
Real talk, this depends heavily on what happens next We’ll see how people react over time.
Stepping back, the way this is presented changes how it lands That part stands out. That’s just my read on it.
Putting bias aside, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that tension shows up immediately Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
this feels rushed rather than thought through so the response doesn’t surprise me Curious how this plays out.
Without overthinking it, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here
Stepping back, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why opinions are all over the place Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Reaction: POV: You Are Brooklyn Jail Warden, What Will You Do?
From where I sit, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where people will push back
From my side, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which turns this into more of a debate That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that friction is hard to ignore
Trying to be fair, the wording alone shifts how people read this Not convinced this is settled yet.
Reaction: Please do not the gun!
Looking at this, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the impression it gives me.
Trying to be fair, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s why opinions are all over the place This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Not gonna lie, the main issue seems to be how this is handled At least from my perspective.
Stepping back, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that tension shows up immediately That’s what changes the context. Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a neutral view, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it. At least from my perspective.
Real talk, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what changes the context. Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Just reading this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven This probably isn’t the last word on it. Others will probably see it differently.
From a practical angle, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s what people are responding to Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
Without overthinking it, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage so the response doesn’t surprise me
To be fair, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where it gets complicated Feels like there’s more coming here. At least from my perspective.
From the outside, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why opinions are all over the place At least from my perspective.
Just reading this, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s why opinions are all over the place That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this feels more about execution than intent and that friction is hard to ignore Curious how this plays out.
If we’re being honest, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why the comments look the way they do We’ll see how people react over time.
Stepping back, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which turns this into more of a debate Not convinced this is settled yet.
If we’re being honest, the signal is clear, the strategy less so
Reaction: A day in the life of an ambitious procrastinator
Reaction: A day in the life of an ambitious procrastinator
I get the idea, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what makes this interesting. Others will probably see it differently.
On the surface, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which is why this is getting picked apart That’s just how it reads to me. Others will probably see it differently.
From a neutral view, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where people will push back Curious how this plays out.
From where I sit, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Feels like there’s more coming here.
Reaction: me_irl
From my side, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s what changes the context. Not convinced this is settled yet.
If you zoom out, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that friction is hard to ignore
Honestly, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven
Stepping back, this comes across more reactive than planned which explains why reactions are split That’s the key detail here. Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s just my read on it.
Trying to be fair, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s what changes the context.
From a neutral view, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting.
Trying to be fair, this feels more about execution than intent which is why the comments look the way they do That’s the key detail here.
At this point, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where people will push back That part stands out. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
I get the idea, the way this is presented changes how it lands Not convinced this is settled yet.
Putting bias aside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s what changes the context. Interested to see the follow-up. That’s the impression it gives me.
this feels rushed rather than thought through
Just reading this, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s why opinions are all over the place Not convinced this is settled yet. Others will probably see it differently.
Honestly, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s just how it reads to me.