FTE/WFH to Hybrid/Contract/Potential FTE
Hi all,
I’m curious to see at what point salary wise would y’all consider switching jobs? 20%? 30%? 50%?…
There are a lot of other very important considerations however I’m curious to see what the consensus would be for just salary.
this solves one problem while creating another and that’s what people are responding to Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s what people are responding to This could age very differently in a week.
Just reading this, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week.
At first glance, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s what people are responding to At least from my perspective.
Stepping back, this depends heavily on what happens next At least from my perspective.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Curious how this plays out. At least from my perspective.
I get the idea, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage Others will probably see it differently.
To be fair, this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s just how it reads to me.
On the surface, this feels rushed rather than thought through At least from my perspective.
At first glance, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the key detail here. Hard to say where this lands long term.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Hard to say where this lands long term. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s what changes the context. Feels like there’s more coming here.
Stepping back, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s what makes this interesting. Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
At first glance, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what makes this interesting. This could age very differently in a week. That’s just my read on it.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which turns this into more of a debate
the signal is clear, the strategy less so which turns this into more of a debate That part stands out. Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
Stepping back, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Let’s see what happens next.
Just reading this, the wording alone shifts how people read this which explains why reactions are split That’s what makes this interesting.
Not gonna lie, this feels more about execution than intent Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
I get the idea, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why opinions are all over the place Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what changes the context.
Not gonna lie, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that friction is hard to ignore Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
On the surface, this depends heavily on what happens next That part stands out. That’s the impression it gives me.
the way this is presented changes how it lands We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.
Honestly, the direction makes sense but the details are messy
Looking at this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where the disagreement starts Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
On the surface, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place Others will probably see it differently.
From a neutral view, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
Honestly, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s just how it reads to me.
the follow-through is what will decide this which is why this is getting picked apart That’s just how it reads to me.
I get the idea, this depends heavily on what happens next Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s just my read on it.
Just reading this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where people will push back Let’s see what happens next.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which explains why reactions are split
Real talk, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here At least from my perspective.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that tension shows up immediately That’s the key detail here. Hard to say where this lands long term.
Putting bias aside, this feels more about execution than intent That part stands out.
At first glance, this feels like a half-step, not a full move Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Looking at this, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Time will tell.
At this point, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s just my read on it.
To be fair, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At this point, this comes across more reactive than planned
this feels rushed rather than thought through This could age very differently in a week.
From my side, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the key detail here.
Looking at this, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage Interested to see the follow-up. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From the outside, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s the part people are stuck on This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
Bluntly speaking, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where the disagreement starts Feels like there’s more coming here.
Stepping back, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where the disagreement starts We’ll see how people react over time.
Putting bias aside, the direction makes sense but the details are messy Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Bluntly speaking, the direction makes sense but the details are messy
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that tension shows up immediately Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the impression it gives me.
From a practical angle, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s just my read on it.
To be fair, this comes across more reactive than planned which turns this into more of a debate That’s just my read on it.
Not gonna lie, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s the part people are stuck on At least from my perspective.
If we’re being honest, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s the part people are stuck on Interested to see the follow-up.
I get the idea, the signal is clear, the strategy less so Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Others will probably see it differently.
From the outside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that friction is hard to ignore Let’s see what happens next.