FSSO Implementation Advice Needed – Large Environment, No DC Agents
I’m trying to set up Fortinet FSSO / User-ID in a really big AD environment, and I’m kinda stuck.
Some context:
• Can’t install DC Agents on the domain controllers 😬
• I don’t really know what the best approach is – Polling? Something else?
I could really use some help with:
• Port matrix / firewall setup tips
• How long a project like this usually takes
• Which part usually drags the most (prep, config, testing, rollout)?
Any advice, tricks, would be awesome 🙏
Thanks!
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why the comments look the way they do That’s the key detail here. We’ll see how people react over time.
From a neutral view, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
At this point, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s what changes the context. At least from my perspective.
From a neutral view, this comes across more reactive than planned which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting. Curious how this plays out. At least from my perspective.
Trying to be fair, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where people will push back Not convinced this is settled yet. Others will probably see it differently.
If we’re being honest, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s the part people are stuck on Curious how this plays out.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy Feels like there’s more coming here.
From the outside, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That part stands out. Time will tell.
Stepping back, this feels more about execution than intent Time will tell. That’s the impression it gives me.
If you zoom out, the way this is presented changes how it lands which turns this into more of a debate That’s just how it reads to me. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Without overthinking it, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s the part people are stuck on Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where the disagreement starts Others will probably see it differently.
From a practical angle, this feels rushed rather than thought through which is why the comments look the way they do
Bluntly speaking, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why opinions are all over the place Let’s see what happens next.
From my side, the timing matters more than people admit At least from my perspective.
Putting bias aside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s what people are responding to That’s what makes this interesting. Time will tell.
I get the idea, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s just my read on it.
From my side, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the key detail here. Hard to say where this lands long term.
From a practical angle, the way this is presented changes how it lands so the response doesn’t surprise me Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Looking at this, the timing matters more than people admit This probably isn’t the last word on it. Others will probably see it differently.
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting. Others will probably see it differently.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the key detail here. Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
Trying to be fair, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Just reading this, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where people will push back That’s just how it reads to me.
Without overthinking it, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why opinions are all over the place At least from my perspective.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled Let’s see what happens next.
Trying to be fair, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like there’s more coming here.
To be fair, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why this is getting picked apart Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Others will probably see it differently.
the way this is presented changes how it lands which makes the reaction pretty predictable Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Without overthinking it, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the impression it gives me.
Without overthinking it, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here Not convinced this is settled yet.
On the surface, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week.
To be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which makes the reaction pretty predictable Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
Putting bias aside, this comes across more reactive than planned and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what makes this interesting. Time will tell. That’s the impression it gives me.
Putting bias aside, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up.
From where I sit, the main issue seems to be how this is handled so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the key detail here. Hard to say where this lands long term.
Not gonna lie, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that tension shows up immediately That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet.
this solves one problem while creating another Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At first glance, this comes across more reactive than planned Feels like there’s more coming here.
the timing matters more than people admit which is why this is getting picked apart
the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where it gets complicated At least from my perspective.
If we’re being honest, the follow-through is what will decide this
If we’re being honest, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where it gets complicated Others will probably see it differently.
Honestly, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
Trying to be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next which is why this is getting picked apart
Real talk, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Curious how this plays out.
From the outside, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting.
this depends heavily on what happens next and that friction is hard to ignore Let’s see what happens next.
Stepping back, the wording alone shifts how people read this That part stands out. That’s just my read on it.
From a neutral view, the timing matters more than people admit At least from my perspective.
From a practical angle, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where it gets complicated Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
From my side, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the key detail here.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
Trying to be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s the part people are stuck on That part stands out.
Bluntly speaking, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting.
Honestly, this feels more about execution than intent which is why this is getting picked apart That’s just how it reads to me. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Not gonna lie, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where people will push back That’s the impression it gives me.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled which turns this into more of a debate That’s just how it reads to me.
From a practical angle, this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s what makes this interesting. Others will probably see it differently.
At first glance, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s the key detail here.
Not gonna lie, the follow-through is what will decide this That’s the key detail here. Curious how this plays out.
Looking at this, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why this is getting picked apart That part stands out.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where it gets complicated That part stands out. At least from my perspective.
From a neutral view, the follow-through is what will decide this Curious how this plays out.
From a neutral view, this comes across more reactive than planned which explains why reactions are split
To be fair, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s the part people are stuck on This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Putting bias aside, this feels more about execution than intent which is why this is getting picked apart Not convinced this is settled yet.
At this point, the wording alone shifts how people read this That part stands out. That’s the impression it gives me.
this feels rushed rather than thought through Curious how this plays out.
this feels more about execution than intent and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
the follow-through is what will decide this Time will tell. Others will probably see it differently.
At this point, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s why opinions are all over the place That part stands out. This could age very differently in a week.
Stepping back, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Time will tell.
From my side, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why this is getting picked apart Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this feels more about execution than intent and that friction is hard to ignore This could age very differently in a week. That’s the impression it gives me.
Real talk, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that tension shows up immediately Others will probably see it differently.
From my side, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
Looking at this, the wording alone shifts how people read this
From where I sit, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone We’ll see how people react over time.
this solves one problem while creating another That part stands out. We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.
I get the idea, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that tension shows up immediately That’s the key detail here. Feels like there’s more coming here.
Stepping back, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s the part people are stuck on
Stepping back, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why the comments look the way they do Time will tell.
Putting bias aside, the follow-through is what will decide this so the response doesn’t surprise me Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context. Others will probably see it differently.
this solves one problem while creating another At least from my perspective.
Putting bias aside, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that friction is hard to ignore This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Bluntly speaking, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which turns this into more of a debate
this feels more about execution than intent and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s just how it reads to me. That’s the impression it gives me.
the way this is presented changes how it lands which makes the reaction pretty predictable Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy Others will probably see it differently.
From a practical angle, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where people will push back Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Looking at this, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where it gets complicated We’ll see how people react over time.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s what people are responding to Not convinced this is settled yet.
From my side, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where the disagreement starts Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s just my read on it.
From where I sit, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified so the response doesn’t surprise me
From the outside, the timing matters more than people admit and that tension shows up immediately That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next.
From where I sit, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Not gonna lie, the direction makes sense but the details are messy so the response doesn’t surprise me Feels like there’s more coming here.
At this point, this depends heavily on what happens next which turns this into more of a debate Others will probably see it differently.
Trying to be fair, the wording alone shifts how people read this Feels like there’s more coming here.
Honestly, this solves one problem while creating another
From a neutral view, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which turns this into more of a debate Time will tell. Others will probably see it differently.
Without overthinking it, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
At first glance, this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Bluntly speaking, the timing matters more than people admit which is why the comments look the way they do
From my side, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a neutral view, the signal is clear, the strategy less so Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
From a neutral view, this depends heavily on what happens next Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If we’re being honest, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s the part people are stuck on Let’s see what happens next. At least from my perspective.
Honestly, the signal is clear, the strategy less so We’ll see how people react over time.
Putting bias aside, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why the comments look the way they do That’s the key detail here. That’s just my read on it.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled This could age very differently in a week. Others will probably see it differently.
From a practical angle, this reads stronger on paper than in practice so the response doesn’t surprise me Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Others will probably see it differently.
At first glance, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where people will push back
Honestly, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven We’ll see how people react over time.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s the key detail here. Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Putting bias aside, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where it gets complicated Interested to see the follow-up.
Not gonna lie, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s what makes this interesting.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why the comments look the way they do That’s the key detail here. We’ll see how people react over time.
At this point, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where people will push back Hard to say where this lands long term.
Real talk, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time. At least from my perspective.
From my side, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where it gets complicated
At first glance, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s why opinions are all over the place Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.
the follow-through is what will decide this which makes the reaction pretty predictable
To be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which makes the reaction pretty predictable Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
Trying to be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next
At this point, this comes across more reactive than planned
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that tension shows up immediately That’s the key detail here.
Honestly, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
Putting bias aside, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s the key detail here. Hard to say where this lands long term. At least from my perspective.
From a practical angle, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place Others will probably see it differently.
I get the idea, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why the comments look the way they do
Bluntly speaking, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what changes the context. That’s the impression it gives me.
this comes across more reactive than planned which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the key detail here. Not convinced this is settled yet.
If we’re being honest, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s the part people are stuck on Time will tell. Others will probably see it differently.
From a practical angle, this solves one problem while creating another
To be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next
On the surface, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that friction is hard to ignore This could age very differently in a week.
Putting bias aside, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s what people are responding to Not convinced this is settled yet.
Putting bias aside, this depends heavily on what happens next Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a neutral view, this reads stronger on paper than in practice That’s what changes the context. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Without overthinking it, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where it gets complicated Not convinced this is settled yet.
Stepping back, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven
the way this is presented changes how it lands and that tension shows up immediately That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Just reading this, this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week. That’s just my read on it.
Stepping back, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified
If we’re being honest, this feels rushed rather than thought through which makes the reaction pretty predictable
Trying to be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s what people are responding to That’s what makes this interesting. We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.
Just reading this, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me. Others will probably see it differently.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s the key detail here. Hard to say where this lands long term.
Stepping back, this feels more about execution than intent That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet.
the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s just how it reads to me.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where the disagreement starts
If we’re being honest, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why this is getting picked apart Not convinced this is settled yet.
From a neutral view, this reads stronger on paper than in practice That’s the impression it gives me.
Bluntly speaking, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s the key detail here. Let’s see what happens next.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That part stands out. Curious how this plays out.
On the surface, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where the disagreement starts Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At this point, the signal is clear, the strategy less so so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the key detail here. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Real talk, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that friction is hard to ignore This could age very differently in a week.
Without overthinking it, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why opinions are all over the place At least from my perspective.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Stepping back, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where people will push back That part stands out. We’ll see how people react over time.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just my read on it.
Honestly, the wording alone shifts how people read this which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the key detail here. We’ll see how people react over time. At least from my perspective.
From a practical angle, the wording alone shifts how people read this Interested to see the follow-up. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Stepping back, the timing matters more than people admit which explains why reactions are split That part stands out. This probably isn’t the last word on it. Others will probably see it differently.
From the outside, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
Bluntly speaking, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which turns this into more of a debate That part stands out. That’s just how it reads to me.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why opinions are all over the place We’ll see how people react over time.
To be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that tension shows up immediately This probably isn’t the last word on it.
From my side, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s the key detail here. This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week. Others will probably see it differently.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the impression it gives me.
From where I sit, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which explains why reactions are split Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this feels more about execution than intent which turns this into more of a debate This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Just reading this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven
From a neutral view, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At this point, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where people will push back Curious how this plays out.
this feels rushed rather than thought through which explains why reactions are split That part stands out. Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
If you zoom out, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why the comments look the way they do That’s just my read on it.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That part stands out. At least from my perspective.
At first glance, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That part stands out.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where the disagreement starts
From a practical angle, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome At least from my perspective.
At first glance, the timing matters more than people admit That’s what changes the context. That’s the impression it gives me.
Stepping back, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the impression it gives me.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here Let’s see what happens next. At least from my perspective.
From a practical angle, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s what changes the context. Feels like there’s more coming here.
Just reading this, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where people will push back At least from my perspective.
Without overthinking it, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s what people are responding to That’s the impression it gives me.
the way this is presented changes how it lands which turns this into more of a debate That’s just how it reads to me.
At first glance, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why the comments look the way they do
From my side, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the impression it gives me.
If we’re being honest, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which explains why reactions are split That’s the key detail here. Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
Bluntly speaking, this reads stronger on paper than in practice That’s the key detail here.
Looking at this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which makes the reaction pretty predictable Curious how this plays out. That’s just my read on it.
At first glance, the signal is clear, the strategy less so This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From my side, the timing matters more than people admit which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s just how it reads to me.
the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s what makes this interesting. At least from my perspective.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage Interested to see the follow-up. That’s the impression it gives me.
Putting bias aside, this feels more about execution than intent That’s the impression it gives me.
If we’re being honest, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s the part people are stuck on That part stands out. Feels like there’s more coming here.
On the surface, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s what changes the context. Time will tell.
Honestly, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone At least from my perspective.
At first glance, this solves one problem while creating another and that tension shows up immediately That’s just how it reads to me.
Looking at this, this reads stronger on paper than in practice so the response doesn’t surprise me
At this point, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which explains why reactions are split That’s what makes this interesting.
At this point, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s the key detail here.
From a neutral view, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why this is getting picked apart Time will tell.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that tension shows up immediately Feels like there’s more coming here.
Bluntly speaking, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the key detail here.
Without overthinking it, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s the part people are stuck on Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
this depends heavily on what happens next which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it. At least from my perspective.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage so the response doesn’t surprise me Feels like an opening move, not an ending. At least from my perspective.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
From the outside, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
Not gonna lie, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the key detail here. We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.
To be fair, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Without overthinking it, the timing matters more than people admit which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the impression it gives me.
Trying to be fair, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why opinions are all over the place At least from my perspective.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy Not convinced this is settled yet.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where the disagreement starts That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up.
If you zoom out, the wording alone shifts how people read this Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From the outside, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which makes the reaction pretty predictable Feels like there’s more coming here.
Bluntly speaking, the direction makes sense but the details are messy Interested to see the follow-up.
From a practical angle, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s the part people are stuck on That part stands out. At least from my perspective.
From where I sit, this comes across more reactive than planned
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome
At first glance, this feels rushed rather than thought through which makes the reaction pretty predictable That part stands out.
this feels more about execution than intent That part stands out. That’s just how it reads to me. That’s the impression it gives me.
At this point, this solves one problem while creating another That’s the key detail here. Not convinced this is settled yet.
At this point, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s the part people are stuck on We’ll see how people react over time.
Honestly, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven so the response doesn’t surprise me Others will probably see it differently.
this comes across more reactive than planned and that tension shows up immediately That part stands out. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Others will probably see it differently.
If you zoom out, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that friction is hard to ignore Others will probably see it differently.
If we’re being honest, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s what makes this interesting. Others will probably see it differently.
this solves one problem while creating another and that’s the part people are stuck on Time will tell.
this feels rushed rather than thought through which turns this into more of a debate At least from my perspective.
Stepping back, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which explains why reactions are split
Real talk, the follow-through is what will decide this
If you zoom out, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven
Trying to be fair, the signal is clear, the strategy less so so the response doesn’t surprise me Curious how this plays out. That’s just my read on it.
Not gonna lie, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why opinions are all over the place That part stands out. At least from my perspective.