Finally getting medical help
Hey, a quick introduction on my old doctor,I’ve had the same family doctor for 22 years now, and he has not done anything for me or even tried to give me any help besides throwing pills at me or giving me half assed help ( like sending me for X-rays, but not notifying me of the results or blood tests) I’ve gotten a leukaemia scare previously and when I called about the blood work that has been over a month without news, he had just said I had no stds?
I gave up and figured I didn’t have leukemia as the only symptom I had was bone pain. My sister has the same dr and when she had Bell’s palsy he just put his phone in her face and began taking photos of her before even treating her, often times he’ll google our symptoms and just give us pills based off of what Google say.
I have insomnia, but in a way where I’m constantly tired but never sleeping, and he just tells me to eat turkey, go to medical school as a nurse, marry a doctor and drop out.
I recently talked to my other sister who works for a doctor, and instantly he gave me medication for my anxiety ( which has been a constant battle with my old doctor) and some help with my hurt knee that I injured in may 2025. My knee gets these
ClubHub
Responses
Sign in to respond.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven This could age very differently in a week.
I get the idea, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that tension shows up immediately This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
Not gonna lie, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where people will push back That part stands out. Feels like there’s more coming here.
Honestly, this feels more about execution than intent That’s the key detail here. Others will probably see it differently.
Just reading this, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s what changes the context.
Honestly, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s what changes the context.
Real talk, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where people will push back
At first glance, the way this is presented changes how it lands
the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just how it reads to me.
I get the idea, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s what makes this interesting. At least from my perspective.
Stepping back, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why the comments look the way they do That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next.
Looking at this, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which is why the comments look the way they do That part stands out.
If you zoom out, the wording alone shifts how people read this which explains why reactions are split
this feels rushed rather than thought through which explains why reactions are split
From the outside, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just my read on it.
the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
I get the idea, this depends heavily on what happens next and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what changes the context.
From a neutral view, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why the comments look the way they do
I get the idea, the timing matters more than people admit That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
Honestly, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s what people are responding to That’s what makes this interesting. We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.
Stepping back, the direction makes sense but the details are messy Not convinced this is settled yet.
Bluntly speaking, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term.
the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Others will probably see it differently.
At first glance, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me. Others will probably see it differently.
this feels more about execution than intent and that’s what people are responding to Interested to see the follow-up.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that tension shows up immediately That’s the key detail here. Let’s see what happens next.
Not gonna lie, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which makes the reaction pretty predictable Time will tell.
Putting bias aside, this reads stronger on paper than in practice That part stands out. That’s just how it reads to me.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven
the follow-through is what will decide this which makes the reaction pretty predictable At least from my perspective.
the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s the key detail here. Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From my side, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what changes the context. At least from my perspective.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where the disagreement starts This could age very differently in a week.
the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the key detail here. Others will probably see it differently.
I get the idea, the signal is clear, the strategy less so
Stepping back, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s just my read on it.
From a neutral view, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what changes the context. Curious how this plays out.
Bluntly speaking, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that tension shows up immediately
Looking at this, the timing matters more than people admit Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Stepping back, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where it gets complicated That’s just how it reads to me. At least from my perspective.
At first glance, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which turns this into more of a debate That part stands out. That’s just my read on it.
From my side, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s what changes the context. That’s just my read on it.
Without overthinking it, this feels like a half-step, not a full move
From a neutral view, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s what makes this interesting.
From the outside, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why this is getting picked apart That’s just my read on it.
From a practical angle, the timing matters more than people admit That’s what changes the context. Others will probably see it differently.
Just reading this, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the impression it gives me.
Real talk, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that friction is hard to ignore Time will tell.
Without overthinking it, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that tension shows up immediately
From a neutral view, the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why this is getting picked apart That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet.
From my side, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s the impression it gives me.
At first glance, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s just how it reads to me. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Real talk, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.