Do you think putting yourself first is selfish?
Lately I've been thinking about what motivates me in life and contrary to what I've believed the entire time, it's not living in the service of others. Nothing motivates me more than doing things for myself (obviously not at the cost of others). But I don't want to live for other people, I want to live for myself. Sure, I'll help out people when I can but helping them is not my main motivation in life. However, I can't help but feel like a selfish asshole for being motivated by selfish desires.
P.S.: I'm not really considering kids in the equation, but I am considering other family.
Not gonna lie, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place
If you zoom out, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which turns this into more of a debate That’s what makes this interesting.
Just reading this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled We’ll see how people react over time.
Without overthinking it, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the impression it gives me.
Without overthinking it, this feels more about execution than intent so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the key detail here.
Bluntly speaking, the follow-through is what will decide this and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the impression it gives me.
Without overthinking it, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the impression it gives me.
If we’re being honest, this solves one problem while creating another which is why this is getting picked apart Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Putting bias aside, the follow-through is what will decide this Others will probably see it differently.
this comes across more reactive than planned which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context.
If we’re being honest, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s what people are responding to That part stands out. We’ll see how people react over time.
Stepping back, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where people will push back This could age very differently in a week.
To be fair, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that tension shows up immediately That’s the key detail here. We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At first glance, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That part stands out. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
On the surface, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the key detail here. Hard to say where this lands long term.
From a neutral view, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s just my read on it.
Real talk, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where it gets complicated Curious how this plays out.
Not gonna lie, this depends heavily on what happens next which explains why reactions are split This could age very differently in a week.
From the outside, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which turns this into more of a debate That’s the key detail here. That’s just how it reads to me.
the way this is presented changes how it lands which makes the reaction pretty predictable Feels like there’s more coming here.
Looking at this, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s the impression it gives me.
Stepping back, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where it gets complicated
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s what people are responding to
I get the idea, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s just my read on it.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s what people are responding to This could age very differently in a week. Others will probably see it differently.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s the key detail here. That’s just my read on it.
I get the idea, this feels more about execution than intent We’ll see how people react over time.
this feels rushed rather than thought through so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what makes this interesting.
From a practical angle, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why the comments look the way they do
Looking at this, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which explains why reactions are split That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Looking at this, this solves one problem while creating another which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the key detail here. We’ll see how people react over time.
From where I sit, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where the disagreement starts This probably isn’t the last word on it. Others will probably see it differently.
Just reading this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s what makes this interesting. This could age very differently in a week.
From where I sit, this comes across more reactive than planned which explains why reactions are split At least from my perspective.
From a practical angle, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where people will push back This probably isn’t the last word on it.
this comes across more reactive than planned
To be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which is why this is getting picked apart
Without overthinking it, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven
Without overthinking it, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Feels like there’s more coming here.
Bluntly speaking, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s what people are responding to Not convinced this is settled yet. At least from my perspective.
From where I sit, the wording alone shifts how people read this That part stands out.
the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why the comments look the way they do That’s the impression it gives me.
Bluntly speaking, this feels more about execution than intent which is why this is getting picked apart
Not gonna lie, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s just my read on it.
Putting bias aside, this feels like a half-step, not a full move Interested to see the follow-up.
the timing matters more than people admit which is why the comments look the way they do That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet.
To be fair, the direction makes sense but the details are messy Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s just my read on it.
Putting bias aside, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s what people are responding to Let’s see what happens next.
Not gonna lie, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next.
If you zoom out, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what makes this interesting.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that friction is hard to ignore That’s the key detail here. Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
Trying to be fair, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
Putting bias aside, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s the part people are stuck on
At first glance, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the key detail here. Others will probably see it differently.
From a neutral view, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the key detail here. Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s just my read on it.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Hard to say where this lands long term. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At this point, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where the disagreement starts Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the follow-through is what will decide this which is why this is getting picked apart Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice That’s what makes this interesting.
If we’re being honest, the direction makes sense but the details are messy so the response doesn’t surprise me Not convinced this is settled yet. Others will probably see it differently.
this feels more about execution than intent This could age very differently in a week. Others will probably see it differently.
Without overthinking it, this reads stronger on paper than in practice That’s the key detail here. Time will tell. At least from my perspective.
From a practical angle, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where people will push back Not convinced this is settled yet. At least from my perspective.
To be fair, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which makes the reaction pretty predictable
If you zoom out, this solves one problem while creating another and that tension shows up immediately That’s just my read on it.
Bluntly speaking, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that tension shows up immediately Interested to see the follow-up. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a neutral view, this feels rushed rather than thought through At least from my perspective.
Honestly, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where people will push back That’s just how it reads to me. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a neutral view, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s what people are responding to Others will probably see it differently.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the key detail here. We’ll see how people react over time.
If we’re being honest, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that friction is hard to ignore Feels like there’s more coming here.
At this point, this solves one problem while creating another At least from my perspective.
Real talk, this feels rushed rather than thought through which turns this into more of a debate We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From my side, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s just how it reads to me. That’s just my read on it.
Bluntly speaking, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what changes the context. Let’s see what happens next.
Not gonna lie, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which turns this into more of a debate Interested to see the follow-up.
To be fair, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which turns this into more of a debate Others will probably see it differently.
this solves one problem while creating another
Stepping back, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s the part people are stuck on Not convinced this is settled yet.
Putting bias aside, this solves one problem while creating another and that friction is hard to ignore Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s just my read on it.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
Real talk, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that friction is hard to ignore Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
From a neutral view, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage so the response doesn’t surprise me
Not gonna lie, this solves one problem while creating another which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. Hard to say where this lands long term.
Honestly, this solves one problem while creating another Hard to say where this lands long term. At least from my perspective.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that tension shows up immediately At least from my perspective.
Without overthinking it, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this solves one problem while creating another We’ll see how people react over time.
Real talk, this comes across more reactive than planned so the response doesn’t surprise me
If you zoom out, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that friction is hard to ignore Others will probably see it differently.
I get the idea, this solves one problem while creating another
At this point, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that friction is hard to ignore That part stands out.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
From where I sit, this solves one problem while creating another That’s what changes the context. Let’s see what happens next.
Without overthinking it, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That part stands out. This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If we’re being honest, the main issue seems to be how this is handled Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s just my read on it.
the way this is presented changes how it lands which turns this into more of a debate That’s the key detail here. That’s just my read on it.
Stepping back, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where people will push back That’s just my read on it.
Putting bias aside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Others will probably see it differently.
If you zoom out, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where people will push back This could age very differently in a week.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so so the response doesn’t surprise me Hard to say where this lands long term.
From a practical angle, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Interested to see the follow-up. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a neutral view, the signal is clear, the strategy less so
this feels more about execution than intent and that’s what people are responding to Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy At least from my perspective.
Putting bias aside, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where the disagreement starts Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Just reading this, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s what people are responding to
At first glance, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where it gets complicated This probably isn’t the last word on it.
At this point, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That part stands out.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage
Looking at this, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that friction is hard to ignore Feels like there’s more coming here.
Stepping back, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s what people are responding to This could age very differently in a week.
To be fair, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why opinions are all over the place That part stands out.
this depends heavily on what happens next and that friction is hard to ignore
From where I sit, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified so the response doesn’t surprise me That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up.