DNS not working on Windows 10 domain computers
We have Windows 10 computers with ESU’s applied weeks ago but something started happening yesterday around 5pm where computers would not use DNS anymore. Able to ping ip addresses fine, tried static IP but same result. Users are unable to login to zscaler as well and getting dns resolution error. Has anyone else experienced this?
this feels more about execution than intent and that’s what people are responding to That’s the impression it gives me.
Without overthinking it, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where people will push back That’s the impression it gives me.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
At this point, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Curious how this plays out.
this comes across more reactive than planned so the response doesn’t surprise me That part stands out. We’ll see how people react over time.
If you zoom out, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s where the disagreement starts Interested to see the follow-up. That’s the impression it gives me.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where it gets complicated That’s just how it reads to me.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where people will push back
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the key detail here. Curious how this plays out.
At first glance, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s the part people are stuck on Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone At least from my perspective.
I get the idea, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From the outside, this feels more about execution than intent Interested to see the follow-up.
To be fair, the timing matters more than people admit which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the key detail here. Feels like there’s more coming here.
Just reading this, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up.
I get the idea, this solves one problem while creating another Feels like there’s more coming here.
To be fair, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
If you zoom out, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which makes the reaction pretty predictable Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Putting bias aside, the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why the comments look the way they do We’ll see how people react over time.
I get the idea, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s what people are responding to
If you zoom out, the main issue seems to be how this is handled so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week.
this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s what changes the context. Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.
Without overthinking it, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where the disagreement starts Not convinced this is settled yet.
this feels more about execution than intent and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what makes this interesting. Interested to see the follow-up. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Real talk, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s just how it reads to me. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Just reading this, this feels rushed rather than thought through which turns this into more of a debate
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome This could age very differently in a week.
this solves one problem while creating another which is why this is getting picked apart This could age very differently in a week.
Real talk, this feels rushed rather than thought through which explains why reactions are split Not convinced this is settled yet. At least from my perspective.
At this point, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Not convinced this is settled yet. At least from my perspective.
Looking at this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where people will push back This probably isn’t the last word on it.
the follow-through is what will decide this That’s just my read on it.
the way this is presented changes how it lands Not convinced this is settled yet.
To be fair, this feels rushed rather than thought through
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone At least from my perspective.
Trying to be fair, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context.
Looking at this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where the disagreement starts Interested to see the follow-up.
Real talk, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where it gets complicated That’s just how it reads to me. That’s just my read on it.
From a neutral view, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the key detail here. Curious how this plays out.
If we’re being honest, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Interested to see the follow-up. That’s the impression it gives me.
From where I sit, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context. That’s just my read on it.
If you zoom out, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that tension shows up immediately Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
Bluntly speaking, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where people will push back That part stands out.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where people will push back That’s the impression it gives me.
Putting bias aside, this comes across more reactive than planned and that friction is hard to ignore That’s just how it reads to me. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move
this comes across more reactive than planned and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
Putting bias aside, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which turns this into more of a debate Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
At first glance, this feels rushed rather than thought through which is why the comments look the way they do Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
From the outside, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why opinions are all over the place That part stands out. This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.