Content verification such as C2PA is gonna be the only way to distinguish real from AI. When will it come to smartphones
All the attempts at identifying AI footage is getting more and more futile, with tons of false positives and false negatives. And while some services like nanobanana add a hidden watermark to AI images, we can't expect everyone to do that.
The only approach that's gonna work is the other way around, instead of detecting AI generated footage, we need to start verifying real camera footage, making this setting default-on, so that in the future, any footage without this proof should be considered in doubt.
For those who don't know, C2PA is essentially a cryptographic proof-of-origin for images and video, it essentially hashes the image and gives it a certificate, proving that it came from a real camera and hasn't been tampered. All the camera manufacturers already support it, like Canon, Nikon, Sony etc.
But the VAST majority of content social media is shot on smartphones, so Apple etc is gonna have to take the lead on this.
Anyone know if Apple/Samsung etc are working on this?
Just reading this, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where people will push back That’s what changes the context. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
From a practical angle, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where the disagreement starts
From where I sit, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next.
To be fair, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s what makes this interesting. This probably isn’t the last word on it. At least from my perspective.
If we’re being honest, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the key detail here.
On the surface, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
the way this is presented changes how it lands which explains why reactions are split
On the surface, the follow-through is what will decide this which turns this into more of a debate That’s the key detail here. Others will probably see it differently.
Just reading this, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At first glance, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s what changes the context.
From the outside, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which makes the reaction pretty predictable That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
I get the idea, this depends heavily on what happens next
To be fair, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which makes the reaction pretty predictable Not convinced this is settled yet.
the timing matters more than people admit and that friction is hard to ignore That’s just my read on it.
From the outside, this feels like a half-step, not a full move Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s just my read on it.
Trying to be fair, this feels more about execution than intent Time will tell.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the key detail here.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That part stands out. That’s just how it reads to me. That’s the impression it gives me.
Stepping back, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s the key detail here. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Others will probably see it differently.
From where I sit, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s what people are responding to That’s the key detail here.
At first glance, this feels more about execution than intent That’s what changes the context. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s just my read on it.
Stepping back, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s what people are responding to Feels like there’s more coming here. At least from my perspective.
this solves one problem while creating another This could age very differently in a week.
this solves one problem while creating another which is why the comments look the way they do
Bluntly speaking, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like there’s more coming here.
From the outside, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Trying to be fair, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which explains why reactions are split Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Putting bias aside, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which explains why reactions are split
Trying to be fair, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where people will push back Time will tell.
Real talk, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s the impression it gives me.
If you zoom out, the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why this is getting picked apart That’s just my read on it.
Not gonna lie, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage
From a neutral view, the signal is clear, the strategy less so
this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what changes the context. Others will probably see it differently.
the wording alone shifts how people read this This could age very differently in a week.
Putting bias aside, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that friction is hard to ignore This probably isn’t the last word on it.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the key detail here. Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
From a practical angle, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s why opinions are all over the place This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Not gonna lie, this comes across more reactive than planned which makes the reaction pretty predictable Interested to see the follow-up.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice
Real talk, the timing matters more than people admit and that tension shows up immediately That’s just how it reads to me. Others will probably see it differently.
the timing matters more than people admit and that friction is hard to ignore That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Real talk, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which is why this is getting picked apart That part stands out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From the outside, this reads stronger on paper than in practice
On the surface, this feels more about execution than intent
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the impression it gives me.
I get the idea, this feels more about execution than intent That’s what makes this interesting. At least from my perspective.
At this point, the wording alone shifts how people read this which turns this into more of a debate
Just reading this, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s what people are responding to
Real talk, the wording alone shifts how people read this Interested to see the follow-up.
From a neutral view, the follow-through is what will decide this which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what changes the context. Time will tell. Others will probably see it differently.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
On the surface, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where people will push back Let’s see what happens next. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If we’re being honest, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where the disagreement starts Curious how this plays out.
Real talk, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage
If you zoom out, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what changes the context. Let’s see what happens next.
If you zoom out, the wording alone shifts how people read this which makes the reaction pretty predictable Let’s see what happens next.
Trying to be fair, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that tension shows up immediately
Real talk, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s the part people are stuck on This could age very differently in a week.
From my side, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where the disagreement starts Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.