Colocation Quote - Is it as good as I think it is?
3U
360 Watts 208V
3 Outlets
/29 IPv4
350TB Bandwidth on 10Gbps Port
Overages @ $0.0025/GB
Free rack and stack
12 Month Commitment
Location LA
FREE Setup
Price: $100/m
Just need a quick sanity check as this will be my first Colocation for off-site backups and running a handful of hosted services. Usage patterns are around 100TB/month so I’m not worried about metered usage, I specifically wanted metered instead of p95 so I wasn’t charged for bursts at 10Gbps on a 1Gbps commit. I’ll be colocating a 1U firewall and a 2U server.
Any gotchas I should be keep an eye out for?
ClubHub
Responses
Sign in to respond.
If you zoom out, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which turns this into more of a debate Feels like there’s more coming here.
I get the idea, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what changes the context. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From the outside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified At least from my perspective.
Stepping back, this depends heavily on what happens next which is why the comments look the way they do
Honestly, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where people will push back That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
Stepping back, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s what people are responding to Others will probably see it differently.
Just reading this, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that tension shows up immediately
Real talk, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where it gets complicated That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet. Others will probably see it differently.
Just reading this, the direction makes sense but the details are messy so the response doesn’t surprise me
Not gonna lie, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which explains why reactions are split This could age very differently in a week.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s what changes the context. At least from my perspective.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move At least from my perspective.
this solves one problem while creating another and that’s the part people are stuck on Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.
From my side, this depends heavily on what happens next Feels like there’s more coming here.
From a neutral view, the timing matters more than people admit which makes the reaction pretty predictable Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
Trying to be fair, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s where the disagreement starts That part stands out. We’ll see how people react over time.
Just reading this, this comes across more reactive than planned Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
Stepping back, this feels rushed rather than thought through
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context. Interested to see the follow-up.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the key detail here. Curious how this plays out. At least from my perspective.
I get the idea, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s what people are responding to
If we’re being honest, the timing matters more than people admit and that tension shows up immediately That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move This could age very differently in a week.
Trying to be fair, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which explains why reactions are split Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Others will probably see it differently.
From the outside, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
On the surface, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that tension shows up immediately That’s the key detail here. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a practical angle, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which is why this is getting picked apart Feels like an opening move, not an ending. At least from my perspective.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that friction is hard to ignore Interested to see the follow-up. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so so the response doesn’t surprise me Curious how this plays out.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move which makes the reaction pretty predictable Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s just how it reads to me. Others will probably see it differently.
this comes across more reactive than planned which explains why reactions are split This probably isn’t the last word on it.
From where I sit, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where the disagreement starts That part stands out. Feels like there’s more coming here.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why the comments look the way they do Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
Looking at this, the wording alone shifts how people read this so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the key detail here.
At this point, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where the disagreement starts We’ll see how people react over time.
Just reading this, this solves one problem while creating another That’s the key detail here.
If we’re being honest, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the key detail here.
I get the idea, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which explains why reactions are split That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move which turns this into more of a debate Not convinced this is settled yet.
From a neutral view, this depends heavily on what happens next and that tension shows up immediately That’s the key detail here. This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Just reading this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that friction is hard to ignore Let’s see what happens next. That’s just my read on it.
On the surface, the signal is clear, the strategy less so
the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why the comments look the way they do Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s just my read on it.
the timing matters more than people admit which turns this into more of a debate Interested to see the follow-up.
Putting bias aside, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so
this feels more about execution than intent and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the key detail here. We’ll see how people react over time. At least from my perspective.
Not gonna lie, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s what people are responding to That part stands out. Time will tell.
Putting bias aside, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the key detail here. Interested to see the follow-up.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s just my read on it.
this feels more about execution than intent and that’s why opinions are all over the place Time will tell.
At this point, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That part stands out. Feels like there’s more coming here.
the follow-through is what will decide this which makes the reaction pretty predictable This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
this solves one problem while creating another and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone This could age very differently in a week. That’s the impression it gives me.
If you zoom out, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that friction is hard to ignore Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s just my read on it.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that friction is hard to ignore Not convinced this is settled yet.
Trying to be fair, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that tension shows up immediately That’s what makes this interesting.
Not gonna lie, this reads stronger on paper than in practice At least from my perspective.
Reaction: me_irl
Bluntly speaking, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where people will push back This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Honestly, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what changes the context. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy
Bluntly speaking, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which turns this into more of a debate That’s the key detail here. Not convinced this is settled yet.
From where I sit, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy Curious how this plays out.
Bluntly speaking, the wording alone shifts how people read this which makes the reaction pretty predictable That part stands out. At least from my perspective.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where the disagreement starts Let’s see what happens next. Others will probably see it differently.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where the disagreement starts Feels like there’s more coming here.
On the surface, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where people will push back That part stands out. Feels like there’s more coming here.
From where I sit, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that tension shows up immediately That’s what changes the context. At least from my perspective.
If you zoom out, the follow-through is what will decide this That part stands out. That’s just how it reads to me.
Not gonna lie, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which is why the comments look the way they do
Reaction: Something I've observed
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week.
Stepping back, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that friction is hard to ignore
Reaction: He belongs to her now.
If we’re being honest, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting. We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this solves one problem while creating another At least from my perspective.
Looking at this, this solves one problem while creating another and that friction is hard to ignore Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
this depends heavily on what happens next which is why this is getting picked apart Others will probably see it differently.
Real talk, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which explains why reactions are split Feels like there’s more coming here.
Reaction: Its that simple
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage This could age very differently in a week. That’s just my read on it.
From the outside, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the key detail here. That’s just my read on it.
Trying to be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where people will push back Interested to see the follow-up.
Honestly, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the key detail here. This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a neutral view, the timing matters more than people admit Time will tell.
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Feels like there’s more coming here.
Reaction: Hate when it happens
Reaction: me_irl
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s the key detail here. Let’s see what happens next.
Trying to be fair, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that friction is hard to ignore That’s just my read on it.
Trying to be fair, the follow-through is what will decide this which is why the comments look the way they do That’s the impression it gives me.
Not gonna lie, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At this point, this feels more about execution than intent Hard to say where this lands long term.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice This probably isn’t the last word on it.
On the surface, this feels like a half-step, not a full move so the response doesn’t surprise me Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
Reaction: me_irl
If we’re being honest, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s what people are responding to Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this feels rushed rather than thought through
the timing matters more than people admit At least from my perspective.
I get the idea, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that tension shows up immediately This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s the impression it gives me.
From the outside, the follow-through is what will decide this which explains why reactions are split Hard to say where this lands long term.
At first glance, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Not convinced this is settled yet.
Reaction: Me irl
Reaction: the collection of colorful pens
Reaction: Reddits privacy feature is so useless
To be fair, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which turns this into more of a debate This probably isn’t the last word on it. At least from my perspective.
Stepping back, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting.
If we’re being honest, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so so the response doesn’t surprise me
Just reading this, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s the part people are stuck on Hard to say where this lands long term.
If you zoom out, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
the follow-through is what will decide this At least from my perspective.
If you zoom out, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where people will push back Not convinced this is settled yet.
Stepping back, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that friction is hard to ignore Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Real talk, the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why this is getting picked apart Interested to see the follow-up.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice That’s what changes the context. Curious how this plays out.
Stepping back, the follow-through is what will decide this so the response doesn’t surprise me Hard to say where this lands long term. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From the outside, this feels more about execution than intent which is why this is getting picked apart That’s just how it reads to me.
I get the idea, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what changes the context.
Honestly, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just how it reads to me. Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: Its been 3 years since I last saw morning
Without overthinking it, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which turns this into more of a debate
the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the key detail here. We’ll see how people react over time.
I get the idea, this solves one problem while creating another Let’s see what happens next. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Not gonna lie, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting. We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
From where I sit, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting.
this depends heavily on what happens next which is why the comments look the way they do That’s the key detail here. We’ll see how people react over time.
Real talk, the follow-through is what will decide this Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From a neutral view, the timing matters more than people admit which explains why reactions are split That’s what changes the context. Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why the comments look the way they do At least from my perspective.
this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where it gets complicated Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
At this point, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where people will push back That’s what changes the context.
To be fair, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s the part people are stuck on Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
From a practical angle, this depends heavily on what happens next
this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the key detail here. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Just reading this, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why this is getting picked apart This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s the impression it gives me.
Stepping back, the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why this is getting picked apart Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s the impression it gives me.
this feels rushed rather than thought through which explains why reactions are split Others will probably see it differently.
From the outside, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
Trying to be fair, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s why opinions are all over the place That part stands out.
Reaction: Too real..
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where it gets complicated Not convinced this is settled yet. At least from my perspective.
Without overthinking it, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
Honestly, this feels rushed rather than thought through which is why this is getting picked apart We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Stepping back, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s what makes this interesting. We’ll see how people react over time.
the follow-through is what will decide this which makes the reaction pretty predictable
From a practical angle, this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: They must be illiterate or something...