Cmv: You can’t become a billionaire without committing some sort of crimes
So all the billionaires we see today are hated for some sort of reason. Like Amazon ceo for using his lavish yachts while his workers suffer or bill gages for laying of 1000s of people. But have we ever seen a billionaire that is loved by their people and never had a scheme pull up? Even if there is one I refuse to believe they aren’t hiding some sort of truth. The ethical way someone can become rich is being a millionaire because billions means a large income gap which comes from exploiting someone. That wealth comes from something whether it be their company workers or some poor African country for their resources
Edit : when I meant sort of crime I meant unethical ways not criminally coded guys. Also I’ll say 90% of them since we have some rare self made billionaires who sticked with the same career as to sports or entertainment.
ClubHub
Responses
Sign in to respond.
Bluntly speaking, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s what people are responding to This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Reaction: me_irl
Not gonna lie, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where the disagreement starts Let’s see what happens next.
Stepping back, this comes across more reactive than planned which makes the reaction pretty predictable This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Trying to be fair, this comes across more reactive than planned which is why the comments look the way they do
On the surface, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s just how it reads to me.
From where I sit, this depends heavily on what happens next which is why the comments look the way they do
this comes across more reactive than planned which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
To be fair, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where people will push back Not convinced this is settled yet.
Reaction: me_irl
Bluntly speaking, this solves one problem while creating another At least from my perspective.
Reaction: Me_irl
Without overthinking it, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where the disagreement starts We’ll see how people react over time.
To be fair, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next.
Reaction: me_irl
From a neutral view, the way this is presented changes how it lands This probably isn’t the last word on it.
From my side, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Let’s see what happens next.
Honestly, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where it gets complicated Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where the disagreement starts We’ll see how people react over time.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If you zoom out, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: Just always
At first glance, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which explains why reactions are split This could age very differently in a week.
From my side, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which turns this into more of a debate That’s the key detail here. Not convinced this is settled yet. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Not gonna lie, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that friction is hard to ignore
Not gonna lie, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that tension shows up immediately At least from my perspective.
From where I sit, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which makes the reaction pretty predictable
Honestly, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome so the response doesn’t surprise me That part stands out. That’s just how it reads to me. Others will probably see it differently.
At this point, this feels more about execution than intent That’s what changes the context.
From a neutral view, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s the part people are stuck on This could age very differently in a week. Others will probably see it differently.
the wording alone shifts how people read this and that friction is hard to ignore Let’s see what happens next.
Not gonna lie, this feels rushed rather than thought through which explains why reactions are split Feels like there’s more coming here.
At first glance, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s what changes the context. Not convinced this is settled yet. At least from my perspective.
Reaction: Me irl
Trying to be fair, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That part stands out. Curious how this plays out.
this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the key detail here.
From a neutral view, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where people will push back That’s just how it reads to me. That’s just my read on it.
From a practical angle, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that tension shows up immediately Time will tell.