Cmv: You can’t become a billionaire without committing some sort of crimes
So all the billionaires we see today are hated for some sort of reason. Like Amazon ceo for using his lavish yachts while his workers suffer or bill gages for laying of 1000s of people. But have we ever seen a billionaire that is loved by their people and never had a scheme pull up? Even if there is one I refuse to believe they aren’t hiding some sort of truth. The ethical way someone can become rich is being a millionaire because billions means a large income gap which comes from exploiting someone. That wealth comes from something whether it be their company workers or some poor African country for their resources
Edit : when I meant sort of crime I meant unethical ways not criminally coded guys. Also I’ll say 90% of them since we have some rare self made billionaires who sticked with the same career as to sports or entertainment.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where the disagreement starts Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
On the surface, this feels rushed rather than thought through which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context.
To be fair, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s the part people are stuck on Let’s see what happens next.
From the outside, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From the outside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified This could age very differently in a week.
I get the idea, the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why this is getting picked apart At least from my perspective.
Trying to be fair, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Putting bias aside, this comes across more reactive than planned which turns this into more of a debate Hard to say where this lands long term. At least from my perspective.
Looking at this, the way this is presented changes how it lands
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that tension shows up immediately Time will tell.
I get the idea, this feels more about execution than intent Time will tell.
the wording alone shifts how people read this Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
Trying to be fair, the follow-through is what will decide this Let’s see what happens next.
Not gonna lie, this solves one problem while creating another We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.
Bluntly speaking, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where the disagreement starts Curious how this plays out. That’s just my read on it.
Bluntly speaking, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the impression it gives me.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that friction is hard to ignore Let’s see what happens next.
If you zoom out, the follow-through is what will decide this which is why this is getting picked apart Hard to say where this lands long term.
If you zoom out, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which explains why reactions are split That’s the key detail here. Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
Not gonna lie, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which turns this into more of a debate Time will tell.
the follow-through is what will decide this That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: me_irl
this reads stronger on paper than in practice That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
I get the idea, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s what changes the context. Others will probably see it differently.
Without overthinking it, the follow-through is what will decide this which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: me_irl
Honestly, this feels more about execution than intent That’s just my read on it.
Not gonna lie, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Curious how this plays out.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that tension shows up immediately
From a neutral view, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where people will push back Not convinced this is settled yet. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified so the response doesn’t surprise me This could age very differently in a week.
Without overthinking it, the wording alone shifts how people read this which turns this into more of a debate Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: Me_irl
Putting bias aside, this depends heavily on what happens next That’s what makes this interesting. Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: Conformity Gate
Bluntly speaking, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which turns this into more of a debate That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that tension shows up immediately Let’s see what happens next.
Reaction: Mr. Obama, forgive me
Not gonna lie, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what changes the context. Hard to say where this lands long term. At least from my perspective.
At this point, the way this is presented changes how it lands This could age very differently in a week.
From the outside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Time will tell.
From a practical angle, this feels more about execution than intent so the response doesn’t surprise me Time will tell. Others will probably see it differently.
If we’re being honest, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Putting bias aside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that tension shows up immediately That’s just how it reads to me.
the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That part stands out.
the timing matters more than people admit Hard to say where this lands long term.
From where I sit, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what changes the context. That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: lock in chat
the wording alone shifts how people read this which is why the comments look the way they do
this solves one problem while creating another which explains why reactions are split
Just reading this, this feels rushed rather than thought through Curious how this plays out.
Putting bias aside, this depends heavily on what happens next so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what makes this interesting.
Bluntly speaking, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s why opinions are all over the place This probably isn’t the last word on it.