cmv: Trump mass deportation, seizing Venezuelan oil, and trying to annex Greenland is all part of a strategy to invade C
Trump thinks USA is him, and Americans are just laborers, hence everything he does, every EO only benefits him and his cronies only! I hope this does not come true, cause I do not want to live in a country with a dictator president.
The pincer becomes obvious when you map out how every seemingly disconnected action actually forms a coordinated encirclement strategy designed to make Canada indefensible.
Starting from the south, the mass deportation of Latinos and the Venezuela operations work in tandem to create what looks like border security but functions as invasion infrastructure. The deportation apparatus with its ten thousand officers and detention camps isn’t really about immigration enforcement at all. It’s building a militarized staging ground along the entire southern Canadian border while simultaneously removing the exact communities that could organize domestic resistance through their transnational networks. The Venezuela raid solves the fuel logistics problem by flooding US coffers with seized oil assets, providing the economic foundation for sustained military operations while cutting off potential aid routes that might support Canadian resistance through South Americ
From a neutral view, this comes across more reactive than planned
this reads stronger on paper than in practice which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s just my read on it.
Bluntly speaking, this solves one problem while creating another That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week. At least from my perspective.
Reaction: me_irl
Trying to be fair, the main issue seems to be how this is handled Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
At first glance, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the timing matters more than people admit and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s the key detail here.
On the surface, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Interested to see the follow-up.
Bluntly speaking, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which explains why reactions are split We’ll see how people react over time.
From a practical angle, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that tension shows up immediately That’s just my read on it.
Just reading this, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s the part people are stuck on
this comes across more reactive than planned so the response doesn’t surprise me
Looking at this, the timing matters more than people admit and that friction is hard to ignore Not convinced this is settled yet. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Not gonna lie, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: Downvote away
Looking at this, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that tension shows up immediately That part stands out. Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where the disagreement starts That part stands out.
Trying to be fair, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where people will push back Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Reaction: Take it off us, It burns us!!!
the timing matters more than people admit and that tension shows up immediately
Not gonna lie, the timing matters more than people admit Not convinced this is settled yet.
Honestly, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what changes the context. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
the wording alone shifts how people read this
From a practical angle, the follow-through is what will decide this which is why the comments look the way they do
From a neutral view, the follow-through is what will decide this That’s the key detail here. Interested to see the follow-up. At least from my perspective.
Reaction: Me_irl
At this point, the main issue seems to be how this is handled which is why the comments look the way they do Interested to see the follow-up.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That’s the key detail here.
From where I sit, this feels more about execution than intent which explains why reactions are split That’s the impression it gives me.
the follow-through is what will decide this which explains why reactions are split Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Without overthinking it, the main issue seems to be how this is handled so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s the key detail here. At least from my perspective.
Reaction: me_irl
the follow-through is what will decide this That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up. That’s just my read on it.
Stepping back, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where it gets complicated Interested to see the follow-up.
Reaction: I'm recreating 1939
this feels more about execution than intent That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: Classic FNaF games be like:
From my side, the follow-through is what will decide this and that tension shows up immediately That’s what makes this interesting. Curious how this plays out.
Bluntly speaking, the follow-through is what will decide this which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the impression it gives me.