CMV: Trump administration wants to tank the dollar and the US economy to profit from it before the ship sinks
Nearly 40T in debt. Trump administration keeps touting that the tariffs are paying off debts (which is not true) and even said that they plan to increase military spending from 1T to 1.5T in 2027.
Because they are insiders, they see the sinking ship and that there is no way around it. So they are profiteering from it while they still can. This aligns with what the Trump administration is doing, threatening with military actions everywhere (including Greenland) to increase weapon sales and set up opportunities for shorting the entire stock market in the US.
What other explanation can you have for Greenland? Minerals are one, but let's be fair, no administration is that forward-looking. The real reason is that by alienating the EU, they allow the process of US companies to tank faster and given all the insider information they have, make insane profit from the average joe.
On the surface, the timing matters more than people admit That’s what changes the context.
From a practical angle, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
From a neutral view, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Hard to say where this lands long term.
Putting bias aside, this feels like a half-step, not a full move This could age very differently in a week. That’s the impression it gives me.
the wording alone shifts how people read this Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why this is getting picked apart Curious how this plays out. That’s just my read on it.
At first glance, the main issue seems to be how this is handled Interested to see the follow-up.
If we’re being honest, this depends heavily on what happens next That part stands out.
Reaction: I cannot elaborate on this meme
From the outside, this comes across more reactive than planned Interested to see the follow-up.
On the surface, the wording alone shifts how people read this
From my side, the follow-through is what will decide this which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what changes the context. Let’s see what happens next. At least from my perspective.
At first glance, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven At least from my perspective.
Reaction: Mr. Obama, forgive me
this comes across more reactive than planned which turns this into more of a debate This could age very differently in a week.
Real talk, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which turns this into more of a debate Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s what people are responding to Others will probably see it differently.
Bluntly speaking, the signal is clear, the strategy less so This could age very differently in a week.
Reaction: Me_irl
I get the idea, this depends heavily on what happens next That’s what changes the context.
Reaction: It's been 7 years , yes 7 whole years
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage which is why the comments look the way they do This probably isn’t the last word on it. At least from my perspective.
If we’re being honest, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s just how it reads to me.
Honestly, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here That part stands out.
Trying to be fair, the follow-through is what will decide this That’s the key detail here.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so That part stands out. This could age very differently in a week. That’s the impression it gives me.
Without overthinking it, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where it gets complicated Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: Why am I scared? Probably because one time my grandma got pulled over when I was a kid and she told the cop that her bad driving was because of me and he came to my window. I didnt do anythi
the main issue seems to be how this is handled Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this feels more about execution than intent which is why the comments look the way they do
From a neutral view, this depends heavily on what happens next which explains why reactions are split Feels like there’s more coming here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where people will push back That part stands out.
From where I sit, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s why opinions are all over the place That part stands out.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which turns this into more of a debate That’s the key detail here. At least from my perspective.
Bluntly speaking, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Hard to say where this lands long term.
Reaction: One does not simply resist clicking the tongs. Embrace carcinization.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where the disagreement starts Curious how this plays out. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If we’re being honest, the way this is presented changes how it lands which makes the reaction pretty predictable Let’s see what happens next.
Reaction: One does not simply resist clicking the tongs. Embrace carcinization.
Without overthinking it, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why the comments look the way they do Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
I get the idea, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That part stands out. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Honestly, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
To be fair, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that friction is hard to ignore
Reaction: The great meme reset
Reaction: me_irl
From a neutral view, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that friction is hard to ignore
Honestly, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where the disagreement starts Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: FFS ... Meh
Reaction: FFS ... Meh
On the surface, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s where people will push back That’s what changes the context.
At this point, the way this is presented changes how it lands which is why this is getting picked apart
From a practical angle, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s what people are responding to Let’s see what happens next.
From a neutral view, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where the disagreement starts Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: me_irl
Trying to be fair, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where it gets complicated Feels like there’s more coming here.
Putting bias aside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why opinions are all over the place
Bluntly speaking, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which turns this into more of a debate That’s the key detail here. Interested to see the follow-up. That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: Its been 3 years since I last saw morning
From a practical angle, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage
Looking at this, this solves one problem while creating another which explains why reactions are split Hard to say where this lands long term.
the way this is presented changes how it lands That part stands out.
Without overthinking it, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That part stands out. Interested to see the follow-up. That’s the impression it gives me.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s why opinions are all over the place Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
From a neutral view, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s where it gets complicated At least from my perspective.
Putting bias aside, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where people will push back That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where it gets complicated That’s what makes this interesting. That’s the impression it gives me.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled This probably isn’t the last word on it. At least from my perspective.
Reaction: me_irl
From a neutral view, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that friction is hard to ignore
Putting bias aside, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what changes the context.
Honestly, this reads stronger on paper than in practice This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That part stands out. Feels like there’s more coming here.
Without overthinking it, this comes across more reactive than planned which makes the reaction pretty predictable Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Stepping back, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s the key detail here. Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
Reaction: What game is this?
Reaction: What game is this?
From a practical angle, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context. Time will tell. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a neutral view, this solves one problem while creating another
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified
On the surface, the timing matters more than people admit
Putting bias aside, this solves one problem while creating another That’s the key detail here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From where I sit, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which is why the comments look the way they do That’s the key detail here. Let’s see what happens next.
Reaction: Me_irl
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s what people are responding to Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Putting bias aside, the timing matters more than people admit We’ll see how people react over time. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Bluntly speaking, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s what makes this interesting. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this comes across more reactive than planned Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From my side, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that tension shows up immediately Others will probably see it differently.
Bluntly speaking, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why the comments look the way they do
Trying to be fair, the follow-through is what will decide this This could age very differently in a week.
From where I sit, this reads stronger on paper than in practice
the wording alone shifts how people read this Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice Feels like there’s more coming here. At least from my perspective.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s what changes the context. This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
this solves one problem while creating another Let’s see what happens next.
Stepping back, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s why opinions are all over the place That part stands out. That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: Much has changed in the past 20 years...
this comes across more reactive than planned which turns this into more of a debate Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Bluntly speaking, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified At least from my perspective.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice Time will tell. That’s just my read on it.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why this is getting picked apart Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Not gonna lie, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which is why this is getting picked apart
From a neutral view, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s just my read on it.
If we’re being honest, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which makes the reaction pretty predictable That’s what makes this interesting. We’ll see how people react over time. At least from my perspective.
From a neutral view, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified
At first glance, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that friction is hard to ignore That’s just my read on it.
Bluntly speaking, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which is why this is getting picked apart That’s the key detail here.
To be fair, this depends heavily on what happens next and that friction is hard to ignore That’s just how it reads to me. That’s just my read on it.
At first glance, this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s what people are responding to That part stands out.
From a neutral view, the main issue seems to be how this is handled
To be fair, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that tension shows up immediately Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s the impression it gives me.
Honestly, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome and that’s where it gets complicated This could age very differently in a week. That’s the impression it gives me.
the wording alone shifts how people read this
From my side, the direction makes sense but the details are messy and that’s where it gets complicated This could age very differently in a week.
To be fair, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why this is getting picked apart That part stands out. This could age very differently in a week. That’s the impression it gives me.
From where I sit, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s where the disagreement starts
Bluntly speaking, this feels more about execution than intent That part stands out. That’s just how it reads to me. Others will probably see it differently.
Stepping back, the direction makes sense but the details are messy This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Reaction: Why am I scared? Probably because one time my grandma got pulled over when I was a kid and she told the cop that her bad driving was because of me and he came to my window. I didnt do anythi
Trying to be fair, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what changes the context. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
From the outside, the signal is clear, the strategy less so That’s just how it reads to me.
From a practical angle, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s the impression it gives me.