CMV: Trump administration wants to tank the dollar and the US economy to profit from it before the ship sinks
Nearly 40T in debt. Trump administration keeps touting that the tariffs are paying off debts (which is not true) and even said that they plan to increase military spending from 1T to 1.5T in 2027.
Because they are insiders, they see the sinking ship and that there is no way around it. So they are profiteering from it while they still can. This aligns with what the Trump administration is doing, threatening with military actions everywhere (including Greenland) to increase weapon sales and set up opportunities for shorting the entire stock market in the US.
What other explanation can you have for Greenland? Minerals are one, but let's be fair, no administration is that forward-looking. The real reason is that by alienating the EU, they allow the process of US companies to tank faster and given all the insider information they have, make insane profit from the average joe.
the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here which turns this into more of a debate That’s what changes the context. Others will probably see it differently.
From a neutral view, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s where people will push back Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
Bluntly speaking, this depends heavily on what happens next and that friction is hard to ignore Others will probably see it differently.
Trying to be fair, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where it gets complicated Hard to say where this lands long term. That’s just my read on it.
Putting bias aside, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where it gets complicated Not convinced this is settled yet.
If you zoom out, this comes across more reactive than planned and that’s what people are responding to This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Not gonna lie, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that’s where people will push back Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
To be fair, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that tension shows up immediately That’s what changes the context. Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
Reaction: Me_irl
this feels more about execution than intent and that’s why opinions are all over the place That part stands out. At least from my perspective.
From where I sit, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Feels like an opening move, not an ending. That’s the impression it gives me.
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone
If you zoom out, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Let’s see what happens next.
From where I sit, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s the impression it gives me.
I get the idea, this depends heavily on what happens next Interested to see the follow-up.
Stepping back, the wording alone shifts how people read this and that tension shows up immediately
Bluntly speaking, this comes across more reactive than planned At least from my perspective.
At first glance, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that tension shows up immediately That’s the key detail here. That’s the impression it gives me.
the direction makes sense but the details are messy We’ll see how people react over time. Others will probably see it differently.