CMV: Trump administration wants to tank the dollar and the US economy to profit from it before the ship sinks
Nearly 40T in debt. Trump administration keeps touting that the tariffs are paying off debts (which is not true) and even said that they plan to increase military spending from 1T to 1.5T in 2027.
Because they are insiders, they see the sinking ship and that there is no way around it. So they are profiteering from it while they still can. This aligns with what the Trump administration is doing, threatening with military actions everywhere (including Greenland) to increase weapon sales and set up opportunities for shorting the entire stock market in the US.
What other explanation can you have for Greenland? Minerals are one, but let's be fair, no administration is that forward-looking. The real reason is that by alienating the EU, they allow the process of US companies to tank faster and given all the insider information they have, make insane profit from the average joe.
this depends heavily on what happens next which explains why reactions are split That’s what changes the context. Let’s see what happens next. At least from my perspective.
Stepping back, this solves one problem while creating another which is why the comments look the way they do Curious how this plays out.
Putting bias aside, this feels rushed rather than thought through That’s what makes this interesting. Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
this depends heavily on what happens next That part stands out. That’s just my read on it.
At this point, this comes across more reactive than planned which is why the comments look the way they do That part stands out. At least from my perspective.
From the outside, this solves one problem while creating another which turns this into more of a debate
If you zoom out, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that friction is hard to ignore That part stands out. Curious how this plays out.
this comes across more reactive than planned which explains why reactions are split Not convinced this is settled yet. Others will probably see it differently.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s just my read on it.
From a neutral view, the wording alone shifts how people read this so the response doesn’t surprise me Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that’s what people are responding to Feels like there’s more coming here.
Stepping back, the follow-through is what will decide this
Putting bias aside, this feels like a half-step, not a full move This could age very differently in a week. That’s the impression it gives me.
Bluntly speaking, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that friction is hard to ignore Time will tell.
Looking at this, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what changes the context. Others will probably see it differently.
Just reading this, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s just my read on it.
On the surface, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what changes the context.
this feels more about execution than intent and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the impression it gives me.
At this point, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here
If we’re being honest, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which explains why reactions are split That part stands out. This probably isn’t the last word on it. Others will probably see it differently.
the follow-through is what will decide this which explains why reactions are split That part stands out. That’s the impression it gives me.
At first glance, the timing matters more than people admit which explains why reactions are split
From a practical angle, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where people will push back That’s what makes this interesting.
Real talk, the timing matters more than people admit That part stands out. Hard to say where this lands long term.
Looking at this, this feels more about execution than intent so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what changes the context. That’s just my read on it.
From the outside, the follow-through is what will decide this so the response doesn’t surprise me That’s what changes the context. At least from my perspective.
this comes across more reactive than planned and that tension shows up immediately
From a practical angle, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what makes this interesting.
the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which is why this is getting picked apart Not convinced this is settled yet. Others will probably see it differently.
From my side, this solves one problem while creating another and that’s what people are responding to That’s just how it reads to me. At least from my perspective.
At first glance, the way this is presented changes how it lands so the response doesn’t surprise me That part stands out. This could age very differently in a week.
Trying to be fair, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s what makes this interesting.
Without overthinking it, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the key detail here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Honestly, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Curious how this plays out. Others will probably see it differently.
Putting bias aside, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that tension shows up immediately That’s what changes the context. At least from my perspective.
Stepping back, the main issue seems to be how this is handled Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
this feels rushed rather than thought through Not convinced this is settled yet.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s the impression it gives me.
From a neutral view, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven At least from my perspective.
the wording alone shifts how people read this
the direction makes sense but the details are messy Interested to see the follow-up.
At this point, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here so the response doesn’t surprise me This could age very differently in a week. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Feels like there’s more coming here.
Honestly, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s the key detail here. Curious how this plays out.
Putting bias aside, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s the impression it gives me.
To be fair, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that friction is hard to ignore
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which is why the comments look the way they do
If you zoom out, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s what people are responding to That’s the key detail here. Hard to say where this lands long term. Others will probably see it differently.
At first glance, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where it gets complicated That’s the key detail here.
Real talk, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which turns this into more of a debate Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
From the outside, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Let’s see what happens next. At least from my perspective.
Stepping back, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Feels like there’s more coming here.
From the outside, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage That’s what makes this interesting. Let’s see what happens next. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Without overthinking it, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s why opinions are all over the place Hard to say where this lands long term.
I get the idea, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s the impression it gives me.
From a neutral view, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s what people are responding to That’s what makes this interesting. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
If we’re being honest, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so which explains why reactions are split That’s what makes this interesting. We’ll see how people react over time. At least from my perspective.
I get the idea, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That part stands out. That’s the impression it gives me.
Putting bias aside, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that tension shows up immediately That’s the key detail here. This could age very differently in a week.
From a neutral view, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s what changes the context. We’ll see how people react over time. That’s the impression it gives me.
Looking at this, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That’s what changes the context.
From the outside, the main issue seems to be how this is handled Interested to see the follow-up.
At this point, the wording alone shifts how people read this That’s what makes this interesting. We’ll see how people react over time.
Trying to be fair, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome which is why the comments look the way they do That’s what changes the context. Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s just how it reads to me. That’s the impression it gives me.
Honestly, this depends heavily on what happens next Curious how this plays out.
Without overthinking it, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s the part people are stuck on
Putting bias aside, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s the part people are stuck on That’s what makes this interesting. Time will tell.
Honestly, this feels like a half-step, not a full move which explains why reactions are split That part stands out. We’ll see how people react over time.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled Interested to see the follow-up. Others will probably see it differently.
At this point, the direction makes sense but the details are messy That’s what changes the context. This could age very differently in a week.
From a practical angle, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome Not convinced this is settled yet.
this solves one problem while creating another and that’s where the disagreement starts Time will tell.
Without overthinking it, this reads stronger on paper than in practice Not convinced this is settled yet.
this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that’s where the disagreement starts
Not gonna lie, the follow-through is what will decide this That part stands out.
Honestly, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
If we’re being honest, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which explains why reactions are split That’s what changes the context. That’s just my read on it.
the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage and that’s what people are responding to That’s the impression it gives me.
Just reading this, this reads stronger on paper than in practice That part stands out. This could age very differently in a week.
Putting bias aside, the timing matters more than people admit which explains why reactions are split That’s what changes the context. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Putting bias aside, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven Curious how this plays out. That’s the impression it gives me.
If you zoom out, the timing matters more than people admit and that’s the part people are stuck on Let’s see what happens next. That’s the impression it gives me.
this reads stronger on paper than in practice and that’s where people will push back
this feels like a half-step, not a full move Hard to say where this lands long term.
Real talk, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where the disagreement starts Not convinced this is settled yet. That’s just my read on it.
If we’re being honest, the wording alone shifts how people read this Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s why opinions are all over the place That part stands out. Hard to say where this lands long term.
On the surface, this comes across more reactive than planned That part stands out.
From the outside, this feels like a half-step, not a full move and that friction is hard to ignore We’ll see how people react over time.
At this point, this feels rushed rather than thought through and that friction is hard to ignore Interested to see the follow-up.
From a practical angle, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so That’s just how it reads to me. That’s just my read on it.
From where I sit, the signal is clear, the strategy less so which is why this is getting picked apart Others will probably see it differently.
Real talk, the main issue seems to be how this is handled This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s the impression it gives me.
At first glance, this feels like a half-step, not a full move so the response doesn’t surprise me We’ll see how people react over time.
Stepping back, the framing does a lot of heavy lifting here and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what changes the context. At least from my perspective.
Looking at this, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where the disagreement starts Hard to say where this lands long term. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
From my side, the direction makes sense but the details are messy which is why the comments look the way they do Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
the follow-through is what will decide this Curious how this plays out. That’s just my read on it.
Honestly, the main issue seems to be how this is handled
From where I sit, the intention might be solid, the rollout less so and that tension shows up immediately That’s what makes this interesting.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that friction is hard to ignore That’s what changes the context. Interested to see the follow-up.
Putting bias aside, the way this is presented changes how it lands That’s what makes this interesting. This could age very differently in a week.
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s just my read on it.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s where people will push back Time will tell.
this feels rushed rather than thought through and that’s what people are responding to Time will tell. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Not gonna lie, this depends heavily on what happens next This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s just my read on it.
To be fair, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why opinions are all over the place At least from my perspective.
Trying to be fair, the timing matters more than people admit which explains why reactions are split That’s the key detail here. Feels like there’s more coming here. Others will probably see it differently.
Bluntly speaking, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that tension shows up immediately Let’s see what happens next.
there’s a gap between the message and the outcome This could age very differently in a week.
From the outside, the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s what people are responding to That’s what changes the context. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Without overthinking it, the way this is presented changes how it lands which turns this into more of a debate That’s the key detail here.