CMV: Throughout all of history, the Majority always oppresses the Minority
I would say this is just something I've notice thanks to my interest in history. The sheer amount of examples is just overwhelming. The Tutsi and Hutu, catholics and protestants (the oppressed and oppresser change depending on the country it is happening in), Christians and Jews, Russians and Ukrainians, Europeans and Natives. All of this has made me belive that, no matter the origin or beliefs of any kind of group, so long as they are in the majority, they will find a why to oppress another minority group. I would say that this falls under the whole US vs THEM thing, where the only difference between two groups that is nessasery for conflict is the fact that the two groups are not each other. I've posted this mostly because I was feeling a bit depressed about the idea of this (I don't have depression but it did make me feel a bit sad).
Bluntly speaking, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s the part people are stuck on Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
From a practical angle, the way this is presented changes how it lands and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Not convinced this is settled yet.
From where I sit, this feels like a half-step, not a full move That’s the key detail here. Not convinced this is settled yet. At least from my perspective.
To be fair, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That’s just how it reads to me.
I get the idea, the timing matters more than people admit That’s the key detail here. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Reaction: me_irl
this feels more about execution than intent and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone Let’s see what happens next.
Bluntly speaking, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where it gets complicated Others will probably see it differently.
there’s a lot said here but not much clarified That part stands out.
To be fair, this feels like a half-step, not a full move Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
Trying to be fair, the main issue seems to be how this is handled Feels like there’s more coming here. That’s just my read on it.
From where I sit, this feels more about execution than intent That’s what changes the context.
At this point, there’s a gap between the message and the outcome That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next.
If you zoom out, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified which turns this into more of a debate That’s just how it reads to me. That’s just my read on it.
Reaction: lock in chat
Trying to be fair, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where the disagreement starts Feels like an opening move, not an ending. Could be wrong, but that’s how it comes across.
On the surface, the main issue seems to be how this is handled That’s what makes this interesting. That’s just how it reads to me.
Reaction: Take it off us, It burns us!!!
Without overthinking it, the timing matters more than people admit
Reaction: Title*
Not gonna lie, the signal is clear, the strategy less so and that’s where people will push back
Just reading this, the idea isn’t bad, but the delivery is doing damage Feels like there’s more coming here.
Reaction: me_irl
I get the idea, this solves one problem while creating another which explains why reactions are split This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Not gonna lie, the timing matters more than people admit This probably isn’t the last word on it.
this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where the disagreement starts That’s what changes the context.
Reaction: He belongs to her now.
Putting bias aside, there’s a lot said here but not much clarified and that’s why this won’t land the same for everyone That part stands out.
On the surface, this reads stronger on paper than in practice which explains why reactions are split
Reaction: me_irl
To be fair, the direction makes sense but the details are messy so the response doesn’t surprise me Time will tell.
At this point, this comes across more reactive than planned and that tension shows up immediately That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet.
Reaction: This meme is brought to you by a lack of sleep
Just reading this, this depends heavily on what happens next and that’s why opinions are all over the place That’s what changes the context.
Trying to be fair, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s the part people are stuck on Time will tell.
the main issue seems to be how this is handled and that’s why opinions are all over the place That part stands out. Let’s see what happens next.
Looking at this, this comes across more reactive than planned which is why the comments look the way they do This probably isn’t the last word on it.
Reaction: Me irl
the follow-through is what will decide this which turns this into more of a debate At least from my perspective.
Reaction: me_irl
To be fair, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven That’s what changes the context. That’s just how it reads to me. At least from my perspective.
From a practical angle, this comes across more reactive than planned That’s just how it reads to me. That’s just my read on it.
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s why opinions are all over the place
To be fair, this solves one problem while creating another That’s just my read on it.
Trying to be fair, the follow-through is what will decide this and that’s where the disagreement starts This probably isn’t the last word on it. That’s the impression it gives me.
this feels rushed rather than thought through Feels like an opening move, not an ending.
Reaction: A day in the life of an ambitious procrastinator
the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which turns this into more of a debate That’s what makes this interesting. Not convinced this is settled yet.
From my side, this feels more about execution than intent and that’s where the disagreement starts At least from my perspective.
Looking at this, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven and that’s where people will push back That’s just how it reads to me. That’s the impression it gives me.
From a practical angle, this feels more about execution than intent
To be fair, the logic is there, but the execution is uneven which is why this is getting picked apart That’s what makes this interesting.